peacesamuel94:
really!
So these other planets that support human life what are their names?

So you've been to all planets to confirm non supports life ?

taurus25:


Stop embarasing yourself. No offence but you sound unitelligent here, did even read the article?. The galactic redshift was observed by edwin hubble in 1929 and the CMB was discovered by
arno penzias and robert wilson in 1964.



its a fact



The scientific community generally accepts the theory. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Big_Bang_theory



You know this how? , better still i doesnt prove gods existence.

U r the one sounding highly unintelligent if u dont know.

Just look at u using a Wikipedia page explanation of big bang as ur evidence for universal consensus "conclusion' and acceptance.

God's creation has a Wikipedia page too.
Go read it.

felixomor1:


U r the one sounding highly unintelligent if u dont know.

Just look at u using a Wikipedia page explanation of big bang as ur evidence for universal consensus "conclusion' and acceptance.

God's creation has a Wikipedia page too.
Go read it.

Ok, great thing we've moved past evidence for the big bang.

Can you provide any evidence of rejection of the theory from the scientific community?

taurus25:
So you've been to all planets to confirm non supports life ?

I asked a question the least you could do is give an answer, I laid emphasis on HUMAN life, so i would love to know of the planets were humans are currently living normal lives just like we have here on planet earth.

It is not a sin to upgrade one's knowledge level as someone has said earlier. thanks in advance.

felixomor1:


Pieces of evidence, from somborri's project work.
Excuse me. Please

And see u trying to bring in another dubious "religious physicist" again.

If u like twist ur vocabularies and words to suit any shape u want to take.
There is no general scientific concencus or conclusion that confirms or verifies the big bang.

The most intelligent scientists still believe the universe was created by God.
Kill it.

are you for real oooh this guy *facepalm*
People that are really intellegent will not accept irrefutable methodology for the origin of our existence. So the intellegent scientists believe that woman was formed out of a mans rib and they were deceived by a talking snake.
I see
We simply don't know is it really hard to say I don't know is it so hard The existance of a supreme being is unknowable. A supreme being might have started the universe. The big bang is not an explosion the name can be misleading However the attributes of the Abrahamic God are man made and are an insult to the thought of a deity
It is really this simple

peacesamuel94:


I asked a question the least you could do is give an answer, I laid emphasis on HUMAN life, so i would love to know of the planets were humans are currently living normal lives just like we have here on planet earth.

It is not a sin to upgrade one's knowledge level as someone has said earlier. thanks in advance.

ok fair enough. What gives you the idea that there must be HUMANS in an extraterristrial planet?.

As far as we know, species evolve to adapt to their environment. So if there is any life form outside earth, dont expect that much similarity to us.

Recently, scientists have discovered thousands of planet outside our solar system, many of them similar to earth in terms of size and closeness to its host star. This may suggest that life similar to ours can exist some where else in the universe.

There has never been a direct observation of aliens, but all evidence point to the possibility of their existence.

jonbellion:
are you for real oooh this guy *facepalm*
People that are really intellegent will not accept irrefutable methodology for the origin of our existence. So the intellegent scientists believe that woman was formed out of a mans rib and they were deceived by a talking snake.
I see
We simply don't know is it really hard to say I don't know is it so hard The existance of a supreme being is unknowable. A supreme being might have started the universe. The big bang is not an explosion the name can be misleading However the attributes of the Abrahamic God are man made and are an insult to the thought of a deity
It is really this simple

And somewhere in ur mind u think this reply substantiates the claim of the person i was replying?

Shift!

taurus25:


ok fair enough. What gives you the idea that there must be HUMANS in an extraterristrial planet?.

As far as we know, species evolve to adapt to their environment. So if there is any life form outside earth, dont expect that much similarity to us.

Recently, scientists have discovered thousands of planet outside our solar system, many of them similar to earth in terms of size and closeness to its host star. This may suggest that life similar to ours can exist some where else in the universe.

There has never been a direct observation of aliens, but all evidence point to the possibility of their existence.

So all scientists have, concerning the possibility of life supporting planets such as earth, are mere speculations and assumptions. But you sounded as if duplicates of earth have been discovered to be littered all over our gallaxy.

I rest my case here

taurus25:


Ok, great thing we've moved past evidence for the big bang.

Can you provide any evidence of rejection of the theory from the scientific community?

Now that u have seen the hole in what u were doing up there.
U should know that "big bang" in itself was a mockery as a name given by the scientist who named it so.
Moreover, big bang can only exist as a theory because scientists explanation of dark energy requires belief.
Its as good as a religious man trying to explain God.

peacesamuel94:


So all scientists have, concerning the possibility of life supporting planets such as earth, are mere speculations and assumptions. But you sounded as if duplicates of earth have been discovered to be littered all over our gallaxy.

I rest my case here

What are you even saying. Nobody has ever claimed that theres life outside earth for sure. But all observation suggest that there may be life elsewhere in the universe. Do you have a problem with this?

taurus25:

What are you even saying. Nobody has ever claimed that theres life outside earth for sure. But all observation suggest that there may be life elsewhere in the universe. Do you have a problem with this?

ok

taurus25:
So you've been to all planets to confirm non supports life ?

Bro, for now there are no proof, i mean concrete one (not some speculated fact made up by some cheap scientist looking for attention) that life exist in other planet.

Thermodynamics:


Bro, for now there are no proof, i mean concrete one (not some speculated fact made up by some cheap scientist looking for attention) that life exist in other planet.

I know theres no proof. But the possibility cannot just be ruled out.