dalaman:


Its a disbelief in God and God happens to be the central point of most religions.

4everGod:


If Atheism is a disbelief in God shouldnt you have moved on from the "God" matter by now unto something else?

You disbelieve yet still hang around those who believe as if you are indeed finding it very hard to fully let go of the God concept.

A true atheist does not spend his days battling God with Gods people. He assumes God never was so has no need discussing Him.

Where do you fit in?

4everGod:


If Atheism is a disbelief in God shouldnt you have moved on from the "God" matter by now unto something else?

You disbelieve yet still hang around those who believe as if you are indeed finding it very hard to fully let go of the God concept.

A true atheist does not spend his days battling God with Gods people. He assumes God never was so has no need discussing Him.

Where do you fit in?

dalaman:


I debate and challenge thode that subscribe to the God idea because I find it facinatating that people strongly hold onto that man made idea and concept.



The straw man atheist you created inside your head will not do what you just outlined. A real atheist will do what ever he wants. I spend some time discussing the God idea with those that subscribe to it, I chose to do that, if you don't like it you can go and call the police on me.

felixomor:



Great question.
Or better still ask him:
between chicken and egg, which one evolved first?

SirWere:

It has been resolved. It was the chicken.

felixomor:


Male or female?

SirWere:



Really

felixomor:


U r hooked
Maybe transgender....

SirWere:




Sometimes I wonder who made you like this.

felixomor:


Quiet abeg.
If u cant answer.
Stop deceiving urself

4everGod:



hahahaha hydra headed answer. The chicken was a female like male chicken which did not really have both sex organs but evolved the female organs after the sperm cell evolved an egg and fertilized it by itself and then very quickly the chicken evolved female reproductive organs which trapped the egg and incubated it for the period needed and then the chick hatched and came out a rooster.

lmao

scientific stories can amaze one.

felixomor:


LoLz
I am telling u.....
They dont even put into consideration that for any animal to even have any attribute, that attribute must be coded in either the male or female Chromosomes.....

So many lies...

4everGod:


The question is ...does Sirwere know this? He hurriedly said the Chicken came first but his "logical" mind did not stop for a second to ask a simple question like....What was the sex of the Alleged chicken that he claimed came first?.....

Jesters!

SirWere:


You should understand : I am not intrested in the inane back and forth that characterizes NL religious section.

He asked a question. I told him the answer. It is up to him to research more on why that answer is correct.

Don't quote me again. I have no intrest in conversing with you.


Good day

4everGod:



Yet you responded to me. lol

Anything worth doing at all is worth doing well. If you know the sex of the chicken that came first you should have said it from the get go as that would quench further gist.

So let me ask you straight.

What was the sex of your chicken that came first?

Answer or forever remain silent.

SirWere:

Why should I answer you

I repeat :

his question was : "who came first : the chicken or the egg".

To which I responded.


If he truly wants to know, he can do a google search and find out why that is thought to be the correct answer. You can do the same.

Answering this will only further prolong this..... Convo


Once more, goodday.

4everGod:



lmao at "google search"...

Simply say you did not think this one through. Bunch of Jesters.

bennyann:



Lol




























I Can't remember the last time SirWere ran out of a thread. And he ran over chicken and egg?

SirWere

All these episodes were just a comic relief to me...

bennyann:





I Can't remember the last time SirWere ran out of a thread. And he ran over chicken and egg?

SirWere

All these episodes were just a comic relief to me...

bennyann:






























I Can't remember the last time SirWere ran out of a thread. And he ran over chicken and egg?

SirWere

All these episodes were just a comic relief to me...

bennyann:






























I Can't remember the last time SirWere ran out of a thread. And he ran over chicken and egg?

SirWere

All these episodes were just a comic relief to me...

SirWere:


Until una force me to answer this shaa.....

---

It is assumed the chicken came first because the proteins needed to make egg shells is pretty much specialized.

It's actually intresting because it is somewhat analogous to the DNA/ribosomes schism.

As for the sex; I suspect female but I can't be sure.


And bennyann, I didn't run.
Honestly.
I just am not intrested in meaningless back and forth chatter.

Possibly felixomor of 4everGod will find fault with my claim and file a query which I'll be forced to respond to.
Then they respond and it goes on and on...

I have a profound weakness :
I can't hold long convos

4everGod:



How I wish you knew that DNA cannot be messed with. You needed not to have answered. Keeping mute already gave you an escape route. Here you are suspecting female and yet talking about the genetic composition of the egg shell. lmao

Was the first chicken a suspected female with flakes of eggshells?

A mutant Chicken?

4everGod:



How I wish you knew that DNA cannot be messed with. You needed not to have answered. Keeping mute already gave you an escape route. Here you are suspecting female and yet talking about the genetic composition of the egg shell. lmao

Was the first chicken a suspected female with flakes of eggshells?

A mutant Chicken?

SirWere:
Dna cannot be altered Really

Go tell the victims of Hiroshima Nagaski and Chernobyl that

SirWere:


Until una force me to answer this shaa.....

---

And bennyann, I didn't run.
Honestly.
I just am not intrested in meaningless back and forth chatter.

I have a profound weakness :
I can't hold long convos

4everGod:


Dictionaries do not form English Grammar for you do they? They only offer definition. Education should be applied before such a definition would make sense when you apply it in Language.

If you say you have a disbelief or a rejection of belief that means you have reasons why you hold such rejection of beliefs. THOSE REASONS HAVE BECOME YOUR BELIEF. Do you get it now?

niyihawking:

this is a show of shame

4everGod:


And how did they end up?

niyihawking:

this is a show of shame

rhektor:


Before you argue with this man please check his moniker.
God bless you sir

frank317:

What's this? Sometimes I think u guys are just mad. Soon luvmijeje will call this a great quote. And that's how u guys breed fools

blueAgent:



Who is more mad, the one that claims he is a product of chance and one who knows he was carefully made?

Among the two of them who has the probability of having a miswiring in the Head?

felixomor:

Obviously they dont know That the issue of existence and non existence are mutually exclusive. They dont know that You must hold a belief of one or the other.
Their logic is deficient

4everGod:


Rejection of a belief automatically gives you a belief in your rejection. Do i need to break it down to you any further?

If you reject the belief that Seun Owns Nairaland that means you accept the belief that HE DOES NOT OWN nairaland.

This is elementary English. I am surprised you are debating this. Lmao

hopefulLandlord:


nope simple definition of atheism those days are too narrow and tunnel shaped

the Bible for instance says "there is no God"

you and I both know that "God" is actually referring to a specific god otherwise it would have been "There ARE no gods";

Diagoras of Melos was regarded to be at atheist because he rejected the only god people worshipped; this muddle of confusion and failure to define what atheism really is has been a source of philosophical arguments and debates; even Richard Dawkins never claimed there is no god; he said "There's probably no god" because a definitive position on the existence of every single god both past and present without testing each and every one of the said gods is a position of arrogance

you're atheistic to some gods and agnostic to many too

felixomor:

You dont even understand that the definition of atheism ends with God/gods.....
Hian

hopefulLandlord:


but this doesn't hold for Christianity Amirite?

and this doesn't hold for other definitions of atheism in other dictionaries Amirite?

what about other definitions in other dictionaries that support our stand? it isn't valid Amirite?

tell me more about your confirmation biasl

oh! adiós

blueAgent:




Stop decieving yourself .Define Atheisms?

hopefulLandlord:


I already showed you that atheism's definition have changed over the years

already showed you that the word "God" is referring to a specific god

already showed you that even by the definition in the Bible one can say that a Hindu is an atheist because we know that "There is no God" is definitely referring to Yahweh and would've been "There are no gods"
if it were referring to all gods

this is why one simply need to go for the latest definition which takes it all into consideration by using the word "Deities"

its simple really

we can argue this schematics forever bring a dictionary definition that supports each of us while ignoring those that supports our opponent

in this day and age one has to simply assume atheism is lack of belief in deities; this cuts across all atheists with no exception

attempt to force atheism into something other than that and attacking it from there is simply pulling strawman except your atheist opponent tells you his specific stand

felixomor:


Very wrong.
People come and see o
That a hindu is an atheist to a Christian....
What is all this?
You see the twist u have put urself in

By the way there is no God according to bible means "no theos"
Which is also "a-theos"
k
Even if u say "deities" u can not be atheist and be indifferent to any deity.
Its simple english.

Either way you twist it....
Its goofy

blueAgent:




You are a perfect proof of the Title of this post. HYPOCRITE.

blueAgent:





You are a perfect proof of the Title of this post.
HYPOCRITE.

felixomor:

U r hooked Maybe transgender....