Apina:
Did she just file a restraining order all d way from Canada against Suleiman who's in Auchi, Edo, Nigeria? This biatch is plain stupid

You ended it by laughing at your stupidity. Guess you only read the topic.AAA

What a foolish pig! Your mama deny u! Your papa Deny u! Your sis Deny u! Who will defend u!? Or stand as a witness? Another slut of your friends For the jury?

In nigeria, you had no credible evidence, will u now recover the all of a sudden stolen phone in Canada?
Why can't u just have sense?!

Why can't u finish what u started or sth?

5 million dolls for this recession for a wacko like u!? See the crimes then mention!! All of that happened to only u!?

Repect yourself! Musician wannabe! Look for a job and do

Ralphlauren:


Gbam !

she has played the ultimate joker.

the only way out of this mess is for the fake apostle to settle out of court and pay her off quietly.

the canadian court has every jurisdiction over him because he owns a church in canada and i wont be surpsied if he is on the church's payroll and filing yearly canadian tax returns

SMH! And all ds rofo~rofo 'fight' because of 5 minute 'enjoyment'?!

When will men learn!
Men been slayed by slay Queen's since 0000

I SMH d 2nd time

pek:
You ended it by laughing at your stupidity. Guess you only read the topic.AAA

I actually did read it but wasn't making reference to what the op said. Take a look at what the fourth person who commented copied from SR. Asking questions when one doesn't understand is a characteristic of being common sensical, Now who's stupid!

kozmokaz:

I wonder ooo

do u guys read to understand or what?
A letter dated April 19 2017 with case file number CV-17-573595, signed by Registrar of the Ontario Superior Court and addressed to Apostle Suleman’s Ontario residence.
he could be trial in absentia and if found guilty, know he will Never bound a plane to Canada again

Mr Suleiman has to pay for his sins for showing no remorse in the 1st instance. I pray he goes to jail after being disgraced with superior evidences in a superior court since he feels too big to admit his sins and apologise to his victim and his congregation.

Mojibola:
This is like the story of the dog aspiring to catch the monkey, apparently she has some major backup. It seems Apostle has stepped on toes

Yes........God!

Dongreat:
Good one Otobo. Sue that bald man. You think is every fornication that God will punish you? Nah he will leave it for man to do. Otobo I believed you since the day you spoke and brought evidence.

You are happy becos he is pastor. Now, what are your benefits? What are you gaining? You just get excited becos a pastor got into trouble. As you are happy look at ur back more accusations is coming for you. I don't know where you will run to.

mrborntodoit:
Apostle no dey live for Canada, make she come file suit for Nigeria

But the apostle is wearing suit now.

Which one does she (Otobo) need? Surgery of the brain or of the spirit?

How can someone be living in Nigeria and you are taking him to Canada court?

To do what?

Is she OK?

mrborntodoit:
Apostle no dey live for Canada, make she come file suit for Nigeria

But the apostle is already wearing suit now.

Moneyyy:
Is the Apostle living in Canada? Do Canadian courts have jurisdiction in Nigeria? This girl is funny and has a mission.

Na you funny pass. Where he for commit the alleged Nackery? Na for Naija abi Canada? Use yuwa heird.

Keneeby:

You are happy becos he is pastor. Now, what are your benefits? What are you gaining? You just get excited becos a pastor got into trouble. As you are happy look at ur back more accusations is coming for you. I don't know where you will run to.

And you think if I support him I won't still be accused? Sorry I am not a fan of god of men. If they are so powerful then Nigeria would have been the best country to live in. Very religious so ungodly people. And my benefits is that the fraud will be exposed.

Mandynews:
she might win if the whole women in Nigeria support her just like the case of Rick Ross. Rick Ross was never caught raping, he only rapped about it.

In April 4, 2013 Womens rights group ‘Ultraviolet’ hosted a protest for Reebok to fire Rick Ross. for the lyrics he performed in the song “U.O.E.N.O.,” by the rapper Rocko.

UltraViolet began circulating an online petition asking Reebok to end its endorsement deal with Mr. Ross. In the first 24 hours the petition received 50,000 signatures, Ms. Chaudhary said. A week later the group organized a protest at the Reebok flagship store, in Midtown Manhattan, in which about 100 people held signs denouncing rape and began sending Twitter messages to Reebok. That day members of UltraViolet also started a phone campaign, calling Reebok’s headquarters in Canton, Mass., to complain about Mr. Ross.

The group also bought digital ads on Facebook that were aimed at people who “liked” the Reebok Facebook page and ads online that were aimed at people who were using search engines to look up “Reebok.” The final step was a letter sent to the company on behalf of 550 rape survivors.

The company Reebok dropped Rick Ross as ambassador

“While we do not believe that Rick Ross condones sexual assault, we are very disappointed he has yet to display an understanding of the seriousness of this issue or an appropriate level of remorse,” the statement said. “At this time, it is in everyone’s best interest for Reebok to end its partnership with Mr. Ross.”

Rick Ross Apologize

“I dont condone rape.Apologies for the #lyric interpreted as rape. #BOSS,” “Apologies to my many business partners,who would never promote violence against women.

can Nigerian women ever do this? no one want to listen or believe what this girl is saying. i love my mom and i respect all women world

my name is Mandy

You make sense.

What we in Nigeria may not understand is the way the westerners take issues that has to do with a woman being emotional abused, psychological trauma, harassment, or any of such.

Apostle Suleman should pray the judge is not a feminist.

Now dat #bbn is over i can now focus on dis ur matter.make suleman go d court 4 canada abeg,i wan c who win dis case.finally d matter don commot 4 naija court.now the gobbe don land.

linearity:


Canada have jurisdiction, both personal and subject matter jurisdiction; and the court will have jurisdiction to hear the case, if it can assert either, but in this case they have both...Canada have subject matter jurisdiction because, the plaintiff alleged that part of the allegations were committed within Canadian territory...Canada can also assert personal jurisdiction, because the defendant own properties in Canada.

This is a civil case, she does not need iron clad evidence. She does not need to proof beyond a reasonable doubt to sustain her claims...she only need to prove by a preponderance of evidence, which is a lesser proof burden and threshold. In a proof requiring only preponderance of evidence, to sustain their claim on each count, the plaintiff need only proof either through her testimony or evidence that the defendant 'more than likely' committed the allegation.

Also remember, there are 16 allegations against the Pastor, so even if she could not prove 1, there are 15 mor; and base on the evidences out there, it is doubtful if at least one or two of the charges will not stick. And if only one charge sticks, that will negate all of the Pastor's innocence and pronouncements that, he had never met her and was only sending her money out of the kindness of his heart.

As much as it is nice to always have a signed contract...you don't need a dully signed contract for it to be enforceable in a law court. Majority of contracts out there are oral contracts, it is up to the Judge to decide who is more believable...and sometimes duly signed contracts are not enforceable, you have to look at the content and the circumstance surrounding it.

No one, including the Pastor should take any court case with levity, any false move you are gone and I believe the Pastor will address this with the ultimate seriousness that it deserves.

Those are views that we can't comprehend from here.

Most people are looking at this case through the lens of Nigerian judiciary system which may not apply in Canada.

sekem:


Sista, why you dey talk like dis na?

Na confam naigerian guy im be na

You know no our way again?

Na initial gra gra tins na

Besides, the apostle has his customers followers who look up to him

See, Sinator Dino wey sue Sahara Reporters

You neva wonda why we no hear from am again over his claim of cyber bullying by Sowore?

All na initial gra gra

I see. let's see how the drama unfolds

Semper247:


See one of them, senseless people occupying cyber space.

They can't even reason any longer..... Irredeemably senseless

lol.. why are you this angry? is she your sister?

Simply counter his points na... I find credibility very serious in his post. Over there, all defence do is attack integrity of witnesses and if that succedes, game over.

Women can ruin ones career within minutes.Mom always tells me this

The lady was a moronn.

How come a nigerian pastor go marry her as second wife?

grafitti:


Yes........God!

Hmmm, pardon me please but I think its human.

Go to ICC and file a case against him for not divorcing his wife to marry you. Tell your accomplice from Kaduna to extradite him to Canada. Desperate people with desperate quest for quick cash.

kennygee:
All I see in that woman is greed.

some women's folks will defend tboss But blame Stephanie I hiss for una

This 1 weak me die 4 apuzzle sulefo*ck

She is a resident of Canada, and first met the pastor in Canada .She has the right to sue him in Canada.. Reference to James ibori vs uk lawyer..
If pastor fail to respond he would be force to Canada like ex convict James ibori...Gbam

Moneyyy:
Is the Apostle living in Canada? Do Canadian courts have jurisdiction in Nigeria? This girl is funny and has a mission.

Go to another country and commit crime claiming u don't live there...

U hear...?

tintingz:
Ghen ghen!

The battle is on.

For Canada Superior Court to file charges on Apostle Sule, there are evidences on ground, Canada is not corrupt like Nigeria where our police can lick shít for money.



Nigeria is a corrupt country, the best way for Otobo to get justice is through foreign court, the same reason Dino Melaye dare not challenge Sahara reporters in U.S court, na mouth him get.

The problem is that none of the alleged incidence occurred in Canada, except for the fact that Stephanie resides there, it will be difficult to see any basis upon which a Canadian court will exercise jurisdiction...not sure what Canadian law is on this though...but I know that in Wiwa v. Shell B.P A New York Court exercised Jurisdiction purely on the basis of residency...very interesting suit

Codes151:
What a foolish pig! Your mama deny u! Your papa Deny u! Your sis Deny u! Who will defend u!? Or stand as a witness? Another slut of your friends For the jury?

In nigeria, you had no credible evidence, will u now recover the all of a sudden stolen phone in Canada?
Why can't u just have sense?!

Why can't u finish what u started or sth?

5 million dolls for this recession for a wacko like u!? See the crimes then mention!! All of that happened to only u!?

Repect yourself! Musician wannabe! Look for a job and do

Your rant ticks all cliched boxes...you express quintessential negro logic...bravo, your stupidity doth Shake speare well done carry on

linearity:


Canada have jurisdiction, both personal and subject matter jurisdiction; and the court will have jurisdiction to hear the case, if it can assert either, but in this case they have both...Canada have subject matter jurisdiction because, the plaintiff alleged that part of the allegations were committed within Canadian territory...Canada can also assert personal jurisdiction, because the defendant own properties in Canada.

This is a civil case, she does not need iron clad evidence. She does not need to proof beyond a reasonable doubt to sustain her claims...she only need to prove by a preponderance of evidence, which is a lesser proof burden and threshold. In a proof requiring only preponderance of evidence, to sustain their claim on each count, the plaintiff need only proof either through her testimony or evidence that the defendant 'more than likely' committed the allegation.

Also remember, there are 16 allegations against the Pastor, so even if she could not prove 1, there are 15 mor; and base on the evidences out there, it is doubtful if at least one or two of the charges will not stick. And if only one charge sticks, that will negate all of the Pastor's innocence and pronouncements that, he had never met her and was only sending her money out of the kindness of his heart.

As much as it is nice to always have a signed contract...you don't need a dully signed contract for it to be enforceable in a law court. Majority of contracts out there are oral contracts, it is up to the Judge to decide who is more believable...and sometimes duly signed contracts are not enforceable, you have to look at the content and the circumstance surrounding it.

No one, including the Pastor should take any court case with levity, any false move you are gone and I believe the Pastor will address this with the ultimate seriousness that it deserves.

Not sure the facts are as you stated but if they her then the Court may assert subject matter and personam jurisdiction....an easier way would be for them to use a long arm statute bearing in mind that the defendant could always plead forum non convenien...how do you compell appearance?

YelloweWest:
Now see how this girl is rubbishing a respected pastor.
..

The respected has since become SEXpected.

Semper247:
Where are his supporters?

Now he can go to Canada to use their police to harass the poor girl.

The fact is, Suleiman will not escape this time, the gal has given enough evidences to make him pay for his many Crimes.

Awon stupids will still come out that buhari is sponsoring the Canadian authority to hunt Suleiman down.... Awon oloshi gbogbo

I stand completely on the side of reasoning based on evidential substantiation.

I have no moral judgments and or religious ones, she's a woman and he's a man, whatever happened or didn't happen is open to multitudes of interpretation.

Consider the bold highlighted in your post. Can you tell me what act of criminality or criminal breach of law transpired, that Mr Sulieman has to pay for . Please without sentiment educate us, because I do not know.