felixomor:
Space booked.

Expect some contributions from this space.

Nice one bro

KingEbukasBlog:
Yes ! Winner01 is back !

winner01:
What is amazing to me is, SETI,
the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Org., is looking for basic radio signals in space. They have made it clear that a radio signal with a simple code, pattern, for argument sake, i.e.like a simple Morse coded message, dot...dot...dash...dash, and then repeat, would be proof positive that there is intelligent life out in space/another planet.

HOWEVER, DNA, an unbelievable complex code, which only recently was discovered, and then a couple of years ago was found to hold a secondary code on top of the original code, making it even more unfathomably complex, to these SAME PEOPLE, is NOT proof of Intelligent Design!

What's even more unbelievable, is many people "SEE" how DNA is not random, not accidental, clearly thought out, complex, created by intelligence CLEARLY, and these people are considered..."backward"...believing in fairy tales.

Sometimes, I like having discussions about this, but I sincerely have to laugh when the other side claims that anyone who believes that DNA is not accidental, is stupid, uneducated, etc.

I grew up believing in evolution, natural history, fossil "proof",
(LUCY, supposed humanoid fossil proof, forget that there should be millions of these bones/fossils,was never accepted by me as proof...can you imagine if dog skulls were fossilized and discovered by modern "scientists"? They would come up with every possible missing link species, cartoons, animations, sketches, etc., of all the different evolved species they are...since they are so different in look, but that they are ALL the same species of DOG) as administered by the American Museum of Natural History, the Smithsonian Institute, National Geographic, Scientific American magazine, NASA, etc. When I hit 15 years old, every new "scientific" announcement/discovery, just separated me further and further from Religion of Evolution...to me, that is what it was...is.

(someone else posted this pic a few weeks ago...reposting it. if somehow, the German shepherd existed today as the only remaining specie of dogs and the rest were extinct. I'm convinced that evolutionists will make attempts at providing these fossils in the picture below as "missing links" or evolutionary links)

KingEbukasBlog:
Yes ! Winner01 is back !

sonofthunder:

you couldn't have said it better..

winner01:
Been a while here bro. I'm guessing we still have most of the common anti-God rebuttals or do we have new arguments?

winner01:
Thanks.

KingEbukasBlog:


No new arguments at all bro , just the usual recycled empty nonsense they spew . Right now , anyone could sleep and refute any atheist arguments .

bennyann:


Analice107, he is back!

onyenze123:


war loading

onyenze123:
Can evolution and intelligent design hypothesis coexist?

KingEbukasBlog:


Of course , special creationism : A concept whereby God created primordial ancestors and enabled diversification/ variation through evolution .

winner01:
Thumbs up bro.

Creator Involved.

4kings:
Winner01 i thought you're now an atheist

So you neva leave this silly matter alone abi.
I have one very simple task for you.

There are many recent peer reviewed papers on Google Scholars still talking on evolution, maybe you can do yourself a favour and educate yourself directly from a scientist rather than a creationist blog.
After you've read even if it's just one (that's recent though within 3 years), you can make it a subject of discussion and try to debunk their "absurd explanations" to prove creationism then scientist and other intelligent minds will be very willing to listen to you.

Talking about that, i hardly think you can find any recent(within 3 years) peer reviewed journal against evolution, so if you manage to debunk one, then you're proudly the scientist of the year, till then "PLEASE KEEP QUIET!!!"

winner01:
lol.
Same old. Same old.

I'm not debunking their explanations. We only want people to see for themselves.

It does not really matter how many years of bullshit or how many "evolutionists" support bullshit.

We are asking obvious questions like every reasonable mind is supposed to ask.

All you could do was to tell me that several persons or journals support evolution?

SMH

If you spend the time and effort you spend here digging into evolution, and not replacing pseudoscience backed by cartoons, you would have changed your views by now.

4kings:

I believe you're smart.
If you know that many scientists still support this, why not look into their reason for this.

If you read those papers like i told you to, you would not come up with silly questions like the one your meme indicated.

winner01:
I've probably looked into more papers on evolution that you have and in fact than most atheists here have.

Just one question.

Give just 1 example of change of kinds.

Science is observable, pseudoscience is not.

CoolUsername:
Seriously, if you deny evolution despite the wealth of evidence, then you must be one of the following:

A. Dishonest

B. Retar.ded

C. Both

4kings:
Winner01 i thought you're now an atheist

So you neva leave this silly matter alone abi.
I have one very simple task for you.

There are many recent peer reviewed papers on Google Scholars still talking on evolution, maybe you can do yourself a favour and educate yourself directly from a scientist rather than a creationist blog.
After you've read even if it's just one (that's recent though within 3 years), you can make it a subject of discussion and try to debunk their "absurd explanations" to prove creationism then scientist and other intelligent minds will be very willing to listen to you.

Talking about that, i hardly think you can find any recent(within 3 years) peer reviewed journal against evolution, so if you manage to debunk one, then you're proudly the scientist of the year, till then "PLEASE KEEP QUIET!!!"

onyenze123:


So your thinking has been outsource to journals written by humans like you?

How did things come into existence? How did it all start?

4kings:

So your thinking has been outsource to books written by humans like you?


Why start unnecessary argument if you are not ready to be open-minded.

onyenze123:


lol, you are running around. Besides, I didn't start the argument, OP did. I think you are the one that's closed minded. Whatever some scientists put down as result from experiment, holds..

onyenze123:


Wealth of evidence?

you are funny. It is the same "wealth of evidence" the universe came to be.

To me, Intelligent design and evolution can co-exist

onyenze123:


war loading