Welcome, Guest: Join Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 2,481,453 members, 5,617,724 topics. Date: Monday, 25 May 2020 at 07:38 PM

Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? - Religion - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? (2794 Views)

Intelligent Design - A Rational Conclusion / Arguments Against Intelligent Design / Intelligent Design Or No Intelligent Design? Can We Analyze This? (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)

Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Blogthug(m): 4:41pm On Feb 23, 2017
p 1. All codes of known origin is a product of intelligence (empirical observation)
p 2. The DNA is a code
p3 .therefore the DNA is a product of intelligence

Deductive logical inference

for those that would think all codes of known origin are produced by only humans :
http://www.livescience.com/3812-dancing-bees-speak-code.html

please avoid Strawmaning my Argument as u attempt to refute p1 and 2 , if u can't u should concede to the argument and prolly become and Atheist that believes in ID if that's even possible lol, good luck Atheist smiley

2 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by ExAngel007(f): 4:48pm On Feb 23, 2017
baseless... many new viruses pop up frm everywhere around the world, that doesnt mean it was created

2 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 4:55pm On Feb 23, 2017
I agree DNA has a creator-evolution

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by felixomor: 4:56pm On Feb 23, 2017
ExAngel007:
baseless... many new viruses pop up frm everywhere around the world, that doesnt mean it was created

Is virus a code?
Please mention one example of a place u "popped out" a virus from?

Besides, there is much ample evidence to the genetical engineering of viruses in research labs.
cool

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by jonbellion(m): 5:07pm On Feb 23, 2017
LightandDarkness:
I agree DNA has a creator-evolution
actually I'd prefer to use the word nature wink

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 5:09pm On Feb 23, 2017
felixomor:


Is virus a code?
Please mention one example of a place u "popped out" a virus from?

Besides, there is much ample evidence to the genetical engineering of viruses in research labs.
cool

Viruses contain RNA/DNA which they use to infect host cells.
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by jonbellion(m): 5:09pm On Feb 23, 2017
Blogthug:
p 1. All codes of known origin is a product of intelligence (empirical observation)
p 2. The DNA is a code
p3 .therefore the DNA is a product of intelligence

Deductive logical inference

for those that would think all codes of known origin are produced by only humans :
http://www.livescience.com/3812-dancing-bees-speak-code.html

please avoid Strawmaning my Argument as u attempt to refute p1 and 2 , if u can't u should concede to the argument and prolly become and Atheist that believes in ID if that's even possible lol, good luck Atheist smiley
Mr man first off
Do you believe all things were created according to thier "kind"
Lol

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by forray(m): 5:13pm On Feb 23, 2017
Why cant we just respect the believe of one another and try to live right? Una no dey tire for this arguments? Live the best possible moral justified life in what ever ur belief is and let the end judge Abeg.

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by felixomor: 6:07pm On Feb 23, 2017
LightandDarkness:


Viruses contain RNA/DNA which they use to infect host cells.

Of course I know.

If i didnt know, i wouldnt make the claim that viruses were genetically engineered in research labs.

But the virus itself, is it a code?
No.
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Blogthug(m): 6:10pm On Feb 23, 2017
jonbellion:
Mr man first off Do you believe all things were created according to thier "kind" Lol
Red herring fallacy, try again

5 Likes 1 Share

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Blogthug(m): 6:11pm On Feb 23, 2017
ExAngel007:
baseless... many new viruses pop up frm everywhere around the world, that doesnt mean it was created

non sequitor fallacy, try again

4 Likes

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by jonbellion(m): 6:58pm On Feb 23, 2017
Blogthug:


Red herring fallacy, try again
I just asked na
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 7:04pm On Feb 23, 2017
felixomor:


Of course I know.

If i didnt know, i wouldnt make the claim that viruses were genetically engineered in research labs.

But the virus itself, is it a code?
No.

I believe his point is about the DNA/RN in viruses themselves...
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by felixomor: 7:14pm On Feb 23, 2017
LightandDarkness:


I believe his point is about the DNA/RN in viruses themselves...

Read my reply to him.
U should have also excercised ur "belief" while reading my reply to him.
Rather than take the first line literally.
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Ranchhoddas: 7:29pm On Feb 23, 2017
Blogthug:
p 1. All codes of known origin is a product of intelligence (empirical observation)
p 2. The DNA is a code
p3 .therefore the DNA is a product of intelligence

Deductive logical inference

for those that would think all codes of known origin are produced by only humans :
http://www.livescience.com/3812-dancing-bees-speak-code.html

please avoid Strawmaning my Argument as u attempt to refute p1 and 2 , if u can't u should concede to the argument and prolly become and Atheist that believes in ID if that's even possible lol, good luck Atheist smiley
All living entities have progenitors. God is a living entity. Ergo, God has a progenitor
Do you agree? Why?

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Blogthug(m): 9:54pm On Feb 23, 2017
Ranchhoddas:
All living entities have progenitors. God is a living entity. Ergo, God has a progenitor
Do you agree? Why?

non sequitor

but God should not be classified as a living entity, that's why the question is always Does God exists? not is god living?

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 10:39pm On Feb 23, 2017
ExAngel007:
baseless... many new viruses pop up frm everywhere around the world, that doesnt mean it was created

THE END grin

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by MrMontella(m): 12:31am On Feb 24, 2017
Blogthug:
p 1. All codes of known origin is a product of intelligence (empirical observation)
p 2. The DNA is a code
p3 .therefore the DNA is a product of intelligence

Deductive logical inference

for those that would think all codes of known origin are produced by only humans :
http://www.livescience.com/3812-dancing-bees-speak-code.html

please avoid Strawmaning my Argument as u attempt to refute p1 and 2 , if u can't u should concede to the argument and prolly become and Atheist that believes in ID if that's even possible lol, good luck Atheist smiley
the atomic line spectra is a kind of a Morse code, even the sun's absorption hydrogen spectrum too.

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by lepasharon(f): 2:55am On Feb 24, 2017
DNA is a code, but it's not perfect
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 5:05am On Feb 24, 2017
Rejoinder: Yes, nature built my house for me, also painted it, put a plasma and set everything else in place.
Ain't nature just wonderful?

jonbellion:
actually I'd prefer to use the word nature wink
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Nobody: 5:10am On Feb 24, 2017
undecided
lepasharon:
DNA is a code, but it's not perfect
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:17am On Feb 24, 2017
lepasharon:
DNA is a code, but it's not perfect

So what? Try and show the argument is invalid.
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:20am On Feb 24, 2017
Ranchhoddas:
All living entities have progenitors. God is a living entity. Ergo, God has a progenitor
Do you agree? Why?

Material living entities have progenitors. God is immaterial. Try again. Actually, the argument Blogthug made has some flaws but I won't reveal it. A smart atheist should be able to figure it out. Once the argument is better structured it becomes unassailable.

2 Likes

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:22am On Feb 24, 2017
MrMontella:

the atomic line spectra is a kind of a Morse code, even the sun's absorption hydrogen spectrum too.

Wrong. In Morse code, taps or electric signals represent a letter. In the genetic code codons represent an amino acid. The atomic line spectra reps nothing.

2 Likes

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:24am On Feb 24, 2017
felixomor:


Of course I know.

If i didnt know, i wouldnt make the claim that viruses were genetically engineered in research labs.

But the virus itself, is it a code?
No.

The virus is not a code but the RNA or DNA material in it has a code.
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:28am On Feb 24, 2017
jonbellion:
actually I'd prefer to use the word nature wink

Nature cannot effect DNA. There is no evidence for such. In fact many artificial chemicals like nylon do not and cannot be naturally synthesized and so can never be found naturally occuring anywhere on Earth or the universe. The conditions for their synthesis are very specific and is outside the abilities of nature to effect.

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:30am On Feb 24, 2017
LightandDarkness:
I agree DNA has a creator-evolution

No. Evolution starts when there is a living thing with DNA. Abiogenesis is the thesis that seeks to explain how life and its DNA originated. The thesis is a failed one only upheld because of the materialistic paradigm ruling science.

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by UyiIredia(m): 5:33am On Feb 24, 2017
ExAngel007:
baseless... many new viruses pop up frm everywhere around the world, that doesnt mean it was created

You are suggesting a false spontaneous generation of viruses. That theory has been thoroughly discredited and no scientist will talk such nonsense as you have. New viruses don't pop up. They have always existed in some inert state in nature or in other species before humans get in contact with them and become aware of them.

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by jonbellion(m): 6:24am On Feb 24, 2017
Omudia:
Rejoinder: Yes, nature built my house for me, also painted it, put a plasma and set everything else in place.
Ain't nature just wonderful?

yes yes
Misinterpret away smiley
BTW you do realise DNA in no way proves the Abrahamic God

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by DeSepiero(m): 6:46am On Feb 24, 2017
Blogthug:
p 1. All codes of known origin is a product of intelligence (empirical observation)
p 2. The DNA is a code
p3 .therefore the DNA is a product of intelligence

Deductive logical inference

for those that would think all codes of known origin are produced by only humans :
http://www.livescience.com/3812-dancing-bees-speak-code.html

please avoid Strawmaning my Argument as u attempt to refute p1 and 2 , if u can't u should concede to the argument and prolly become and Atheist that believes in ID if that's even possible lol, good luck Atheist smiley

Kindly highlight what your p1 describes as 'codes of known origin'.
Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by Ranchhoddas: 7:21am On Feb 24, 2017
UyiIredia:


Material living entities have progenitors. God is immaterial. Try again. Actually, the argument Blogthug made has some flaws but I won't reveal it. A smart atheist should be able to figure it out. Once the argument is better structured it becomes unassailable.
Special Pleading. Or can you give me another example of an immaterial living entity?

1 Like

Re: Can NL Atheists Dare To Refute This Logical Evidence For Intelligent Design? by MrMontella(m): 8:38am On Feb 24, 2017
UyiIredia:


Wrong. In Morse code, taps or electric signals represent a letter. In the genetic code codons represent an amino acid. The atomic line spectra reps nothing.
what nonsense are you spitting bro?

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply)

Tb Joshua: "relax And Enjoy Your Wine." / Warning Graphic, Raw Photos -- Isis On Christians: 'there Is Nothing To Give The / Practical Ways For A Christian And Others To Get In Shape.

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2020 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 105
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.