truthsayer009:


Ouuuuuuuh! How did I miss this? Mama the Mama.
Bukatyne & Crackhaus would not be a bad idea at all, For real yo!

Guys, I'm already booking a Luxurious space @ Radisson Blu Victoria Island, Lagos. Crackhaus please hit me up for the keys!

Jokes apart though, I like both of you.

bukatyne:


Is crackhaus interested in becoming a second husband?

I prefer virgins though

truthsayer009:


Hmm good explanation. My eyes just opened to the time factor involved in having kids. I used to think women might fancy polyandry as a pay back for polygamy but now i see it wouldn't even work them too.

It's a Fail Fail for both.

truthsayer009:


What is your take on polyandry though, do you think Nigeria women can cope in reality? It would also involve giving birth for 2 different Men living in same house.

I know Men cannot cope.

bukatyne:


Maybe they wanted to live the life through you. Which makes them technically same as you

And the fact a lady doesn't drink, smoke, party, club, change sex partners like underwear etc. does not mean she is boring or not exciting.

Let's just say I pursue pleasure with a conscience.

Anything pleasurable without being morally wrong or a sin, count me in.

sassysure:

Believe me, I wanted to spit fire on this thread until I saw brother
My mind did somersault
Of all the people here on nairaland, u better call me sister sassy too.

I know u have been on both sides of the coin with him for long but u really don't know crackhaus at all

Brother, i hail o

bukatyne:


Very funny at the bold.

I still do not know what you mean by pseudofeminism nor have I been a SJW.

All my threads have actually been controversial however, I wasn't very open about my stance on certain issues.

While I have never supported some things e.g. homosexuality, I was more on the 'as you please' side of the divide.

I stumbled on this article by Matt Walsh and it resonated with me: I did not want to be seen as close-minded so I was not too vocal about them.

I even created a thread out of it and resolved to be more vocal. It was also the year I would be 30 so it was part of my self-actualization goals.

Someone asked me if I changed church on a thread. Sad if people couldn't pinpoint my stance on certain issues earlier.

I have also stumbled on some posts of posters I never agreed with and realized that most posters (myself inclusive) read people's posts with previous fracas and conclusions without absorbing the specific post in front of us.

Some others even leave the issues at hand and tackle previous issues. Most read to respond and not understand the poster's particular point.

So I learnt to focus on what the poster is saying at that point whether I think he/she is anti/pro a particular stance.

I remember advicing a poster to follow doitforyou's opinion on a thread because it was brilliant. Doesn't change my opinion of her/him though.

I also engage to better understand and change my stance on housewifery for instance.

It has been all good.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/22991/christians-america-arent-close-minded-or-matt-walsh

bukatyne:


Sister Sassy

I like the sound of that

How will I know Crackhaus kwanu? No bi Nairaland all of us dey?

My dear, whatever people claim to be here, I relate with them based on that here and log off to my life outside.

crackhaus:

Oh but you were a feminist before, staunch feminist advocate for that matter, and I quite remember hounding you all over the forum for a while back then

You may still be one now but I don't remember the last time you referred to yourself as one, neither do the other so-called feminists consider you a part of their pack anymore given how they always congregate like fleas in your threads to deal with a sell-out.

Pseudo feminism and SJW (Social Justice Warrior), imply the same thing in context - the context being that the title bearer is as fake as a 50,000naira Rolex...shiny surface but completely bronze underneath.

The contrast however is that while pseudo feminism describes a fake feminist who still lives under the financial disposition of a man/men, is still very servile and submissive to the man in her life, still considers hard work a man's forte, seeks to be respected just because she's a woman, prefers being treated softly and gently, etc, an SJW on the other hand, might be a true feminist in personal lifestyle, but she does not belong to any feminist group or organization, does not support/campaign for women causes outside the internet, has never attended a women rights workshop or campaign, the social media is her battleground for women activism - nothing happens outside this space in that respect.

Try guessing where your former NL comrades fall under

crackhaus:

Don't worry, we're all brothers and sisters.
Aren't we, sassysure?

bukatyne:


@bold:

Still a feminist

I can't remember when I defined myself as a Christian/Yoruba/Woman or anything else. Who really cares? If someone doesn't ask, why should I divulge?

The posters hounding my threads now are actually new except they are old posters with alternate monikers.

Strangely, all my topics have been somewhat similar on women, ladies and family life.

See definitions:

Eku se oluwa!

crackhaus:

Don't worry, we're all brothers and sisters.
Aren't we, sassysure?

bukatyne:


Brother Crackhaus (BCS) and Sister Sassysure (SSE), you guys should hold your service outside my thread abeg

crackhaus:

And you do?


Abeg where we for know each other?

sassysure:



We are indeed!

sassysure:


Here of course

crackhaus:

Internet knowing.
How will you truly know someone you never met

sassysure:

Oh, I stopped taking you guys serious after the ass of lots of you were busted here

crackhaus:

Crackhaus' ass can NEVER be busted here, NEVuuuuR...
Instead na me go spoil show for some females here, but I'm not into that sort of thing.

sassysure:


Hmm, ok.

So u know?

Lots of the female especially married ones too.

A shocker to me.
This place is evil

CHoccolaTE:

Men are the ones sleeping with the so called girls with questionable past, na them dey carry ashawo up and down but they always want to marry a clean fresh untainted virgin.
Very ironic abi hypocritical, I dont know which one is the right word to use

bukatyne:


First, once someone is below 18, anything you do is called statuory rape irrespective of why they look or what they can do.
Secondly, it is not your place to discredit someone's rape story if you do not have a contrary evidence.

CHoccolaTE:


Hmmm

Having sex with a drunk person is wrong naaa, haba mama, no wa o.
I dont get your analogy of absolving drunk people of murder, if a woman drinks and passes out or is unaware o:her surroundings and a man has enough consciousness and self awareness to have sex with her without her approval it's rape.
Nothing else but rape.

CHoccolaTE:


It's still rape naaa

If the woman was too drunk to give consent and the man had enough self awareness to force a woman who can't consent then it's rape. The man is the one performing the sex acts in this situation so he is the rapist.

bukatyne:


Your attempt at lightening the suitation is funny.

If a lady is crushing on a guy and the guy is not interested in her (sex, real relationship, marriage) etc, that guy will avoid the lady till eternity.

He will not go to her house, not entertain her calls, not give her green light, not collect anything from her.

Depending on his finesse, he will tell the babe he is not interested.

Maybe ladies should actually learn that from men.

In retrospect, thank you for the example.

Cc: CHoccolaTE

kaycee125:

Severepain:
PedophileKaycee