Golan007:


Oh you mean like when the church claimed the Earth was the centre of the universe?

Perfect like when we found that a rainbow is simply a spectrum of white light broken into its constituents and not a promise about anything to Noah?

Surely, you believe science.

You are using a scientific device to respond on this forum.

kingxsamz:


Jesus' resurrection is the most celebrated and most talked about event in the bible.
Show me hardcore evidence or little "footprints" which can be traced to his resurrection. I'm waiting.

Ayilara1:


To your question, to be frank I wouldn't believe because it has no or negligible consequence whether I did or not but I will be reasonable enough not to rule out its possibility.

Not believing in science has a negligible consequence on me but not believing in God has a very regrettable consequence for you ... Please, who's smarter?

finnacle2020:

I love you sir and I respect you alot. You might not know why.

I love your wisdom and that of your father

jaxxy:


Take a pilgrimage tour to Isreal u will see everything and more.

Xbee007:

It is true that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. However, without evidence, a lot of ridiculous and unproven can be made, like talking snake, walking on water, virgin birth, Noah's ark where 8 people feed millions possibly billions of animals for several days. This is why scientists seek evidence.

And your claim that scientist didn't accept the existence of microorganisms because they claim they can't see it is false. Scientists will simply ask you to prove it.

Macsjebs:

Thanks, anything for the advancement of knowledge.

NobleSeed:
Hmm 80 million What!!!
Op Abeg allow God use you for once na

kingxsamz:


Here you go again.
You're using Eistein's belief (without proof
) to validate your claim that a god exists simply because he's a scientist.
That's dumb.
And just like what @danyero said, what you're doing is called "Appeal to authority". It's a logical fallacy.

Pelecius:


The differences are not as easy as you put it.
1. There is what is called a ruling paradigm which the scientific consensus work with. Anything which challenge this paradigm is attacked with all might. An example was the ptolemic geocentricity, abiogenesis, and now materialism
2. Not all theories have repeatable experiments for them. Example include dark matter in cosmology, principle of uniformitarianism, chemical evolution and so many other auxiliary theories in the General theory of evolution. Historical science is what they call it, just-so-stories. No repeatable experiment.
3. Yes but most time, it is the auxiliary theories that are being revised while the core theory is protected. Example, cosmic evolution is being revised time to time while General Theory of evolution is protected
4. Yes but physical proofs don’t speak for themselves. They are being interpreted according to the ruling paradigm. Example, detecting Carbon – 14 in millions of years old fossils MUST NEVER be interpreted as the fossil being ‘recent’, rather, contaminations must be invoked to explain why the proof goes against the trumpeted long age.
5. This is not entirely factual and not purely scientific. For example, the origin of the universe is unexplainable, yet the scientific consensus says it was formed from NOTHING. Yes, nothing. Again, the origin of life is a nightmare, but in order to exclude a NON-MATERIAL cause, the scientific consensus resorted to the ‘magical’ abiogenesis.
Sir, it is not as simple as the media would want us to have it. Agreeing to some of those facts takes a huge leap of FAITH.

Passionatebabe:


But as a believer in "science" one of your most trusted subjects is "evolution". The big bang happened, rocks and other inanimate pieces suddenly became single and multi celled organisms. Fish, frogs and other amphibians quickly transformed to lions and monkeys. These ones in turn became YOUR ancestors. When reminded that goats continue to be goats and fish continue to be fish, you claim there were "missing links".

You refuse to believe in God and his son Jesus even archeological and other evidences confirm so many things written in the Bible. True Christians believe in the "right science" not just any science. So stop condemning what you don't know or what you refuse to know, only to believe in "unproven science"

Moreover, in your understanding, it is only "black man" that believes in God! What more can I say!?

Pelecius:

[b]I think you post stuff like this to enjoy the discussion (between folks) and not really for knowledge sake. [/b]I know there are a lot of discoveries and invention that makes life better which you can post but I am yet to find from you.

It's cool anyway. You hardly even bring your input

mployer:


Appeal to authority is not a fallacy in totality, especially where the said authority is recognized by both sides in the argument. You and danyero need better education.

We both recognize Eistein as an authority in science, it's idiotic to discard his opinion in argument that has to do with science.

DavidEsq:

See para ! The lie don too much ba?

Golan007:


How can you say I believe science without asking when I am a scientist myself?

We use the existence of fossils to date geological strata with the proof of it being oil and gas deposits.

You guys are laughable.

Golan007:
It is [b]easier for a black man to believe [/b]a tribe of people are God's chosen, a woman had a child without intercourse and the product of that birth ended up walking on water, dying and thereafter resurrecting and ascended unto to a place called heaven, than to accept that dinosaurs whose remains we see all the time ever existed.

mployer:


Your science that is still battling with corona virus.

Your science that copies from natural mechanisms. Yes, the camera is a copy of the mechanism of the natural eye. You can only copy from someone higher than you.

Science that has no explanation to origin of life except some big bang nonsense.

I am an engineer. Engineering is simply the application of natural laws to solve human problems. Did you ever ask who put the laws in place? Whomever put it in place is bigger than you.

Xbee007:

It is true that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. However, without evidence, a lot of ridiculous and unproven can be made, like talking snake, walking on water, virgin birth, Noah's ark where 8 people feed millions possibly billions of animals for several days. This is why scientists seek evidence.

And your claim that scientist didn't accept the existence of microorganisms because they claim they can't see it is false. Scientists will simply ask you to prove it.

kingxsamz:


I thought you were better than this.
I'm asking for proof of the resurrection of the most celebrated figure in your religion and you're telling me to go to Israel?
Israel that isn't even a Christian nation?
Nawa!

kingxsamz:

A white bearded man living in the sky is scientific?
That is why I asked you to provide Eistein's proof of a god.
What research did Eistein come up with to prove the existence of a god? I'm waiting.

TimCook:


1. Medicine which is a branch of science would probably provide a vaccine. There are doctors who believe in a supreme being. Vaccines production have little or nothing to do with theory of evolution and the big bang theory.

2. Production of cell phones also have little or nothing to do with theory of evolution and the big bang theory.

3. The big bang was never observed, and can never be observed. It's a wide guess that has lots of weak foundations. That's one of the reasons its a proposed theory.

4. Please stop calling people who disagree with you ILLITERATES. There are scientist who disagree with those theories, and they are very good in their respective fields. You lots are not in anyway better or smarter than the average Nigerian, not cause you agree with scientist or anything.

I'd appreciate if you can show us studies and research you've carried out personally on your own, relating to these theories. If you can't, then you're no different from theist who swallow up everything they read, just different sides of the same coin (theist/atheist).

jaxxy:


Jesus was a Jew not so?

Are u asking about his resurrection or his existence?? His existence is there and the tomb is also there. Scientists have not disputed it. His resurrection is recorded in the scriptures. Even people in his time didn’t all witness or believe his resurrection. Normal of humans to doubt what they didn’t see.

kingxsamz:


So if I told you that that Unicorn with five heads wants you to serve it and if you disobey it, there'll be grave consequences, would you believe?

So you only believe in a god because you're scared of hellfire?

mployer:


He saw the orderliness of the universe. Everything in the universe is in order and functions in order.

Things don't to get in order by accident. Someone has to keep it in order. Your room can't get in order by accident. You have to keep it in order.

So he said the universe is so organised to have come by accident, Someone must have made it so. And whomever that made it so is God.
Therefore God exist.

danyero:
True.

According to the Bible, the Earth is flat and the Sun revolves around the Earth. If you want you can look up evidence that that is not the case. So you should ask yourself if the Bible is a reliable source of facts.

Ayilara1:


Yea, because hellfire Nd paradise are things that worth averting and working for respectively.

No, because 1'm 10000000... Times convinced he exist and how ungrateful would I have being if I don't worship someone that created me out of nothing? What's the importance of your cup if it's refuses to allow you to use it to drink water?

If we do see God it's uniqueness will be questioned ... Who will regard diamond if it's something we all see when we step out of our door?

And again how will your cup prove you exist?

mployer:


He saw the orderliness of the universe. Everything in the universe is in order and functions in order.

Things don't to get in order by accident. Someone has to keep it in order. Your room can't get in order by accident. You have to keep it in order.

So he said the universe is so organised to have come by accident, Someone must have made it so. And whomever that made it so is God. Therefore God exist.

Ayilara1:


Because you're not there doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Even in this century, there are people that still float and levitate on air, how will science prove that? In Europe magic is still been practised.

When people lose the power to do so that in future generation and our children started saying "it's not possible because no one is doing it around us And it is not scientifically proven".. will you say they are on the truth?

If we can still see people levitating or doing different tricks in America idol at this Age, how do we disprove the probability of the miracles written Above?

kingxsamz:



Did this nigga just say people levitate?
Damn! There goes your MCM, embarrassing himself online.
After watching America Idol, you now believe people levitate. abeg.