CosmicPhoenix:

there's no historical or archeological evidence to show Rameses II was the biblical Pharaoh, I dare you to show us here.



The figure of Moses is well-known:
Yet, outside of biblical scripture, there is next to no evidence in the archaeological and historical record of Moses's existence. There is no exact time frame for when the events of Exodus may have occurred -- with scholarly conjecture spanning more than half a millennium. Nor do we know the identity of the villainous Pharaoh in the Bible, cast in films repeatedly as Ramesses II. That pharaoh is famed for his conquests and building projects. But in their digs and readings of inscriptions and papyrus, historians have found no trace of Moses under Ramesses's reign

missjo:




Rameses II, specifically.

Proftowin:
Na yeye dey worry dem, u for bring them back to life na. Let dem rest in peace

Explorers:
The chief embalmer was a priest wearing a mask of Anubis.

Anubis was the jackal headed god of the dead.

He was closely associated with mummification and embalming, hence priests wore a mask of Anubis.

https://now.northropgrumman.com/the-mummification-process-in-5-steps/

CosmicPhoenix:

the ancient egyptians were known to keep historical records of all their activities,that's why in the bible the name of the pharaoh that enslaved the israelites was never mentioned because the ancient egyptians had no record of such and the lie would have been too obvious.

CosmicPhoenix:

the ancient egyptians were known to keep historical records of all their activities,that's why in the bible the name of the pharaoh that enslaved the israelites was never mentioned because the ancient egyptians had no record of such and the lie would have been too obvious.

Ofemini:


Hmmmm!
Interesting, myths are no match for truths.
The surest historical book in the world is the Bible. No manipulation of men can obliterate this.
The Bible will always speak for itself.
We can not do anything against the truth!
Shalom!

CAPSLOCKED:


THE JEWS AND ISRAELITES EVEN REJECT THE STORY. THEY'VE LONG APOLOGIZED TO EGYPT ON BEHALF OF THE AUTHORS OF THIS LIE.

THE EGYPTIANS (SO CALLED SLAVE MASTERS) REJECT THIS STORY AS THEY HAVE NO RECORD OF THE EVENTS THAT HAPPENED.
THE ISRAELITES (SO CALLED SLAVES) REJECT THIS STORY AS THEY WERE NEVER ENSLAVED BY ANYONE.

GUESS WHO ARGUE THAT THE EGYPTIANS AND ISRAELITES ARE WRONG?
CHRISTIANS IN NIGERIA, THAT ARE NEITHER ISRAELITES NOR EGYPTIANS.

CAPSLOCKED:


THE JEWS AND ISRAELITES EVEN REJECT THE STORY. THEY'VE LONG APOLOGIZED TO EGYPT ON BEHALF OF THE AUTHORS OF THIS LIE.

THE EGYPTIANS (SO CALLED SLAVE MASTERS) REJECT THIS STORY AS THEY HAVE NO RECORD OF THE EVENTS THAT HAPPENED.
THE ISRAELITES (SO CALLED SLAVES) REJECT THIS STORY AS THEY WERE NEVER ENSLAVED BY ANYONE.

GUESS WHO ARGUE THAT THE EGYPTIANS AND ISRAELITES ARE WRONG?
CHRISTIANS IN NIGERIA, THAT ARE NEITHER ISRAELITES NOR EGYPTIANS.

CosmicPhoenix:

the ancient egyptians were known to keep historical records of all their activities,that's why in the bible the name of the pharaoh that enslaved the israelites was never mentioned because the ancient egyptians had no record of such and the lie would have been too obvious.

lebete3000:


So the Bible is a fallacy?

Image123:


You don't even know what your girlfriend is doing, not to talk of 100% stating what your fore father did 5000years ago. Try to think before talking.

kingxsamz:


Always has been.

Rossikki:
STOP POSTING FAKE, DRAWN IMAGES OF WHITENED FOLKS AND CLAIMING THEY WERE THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/12382700_images8_jpeg8695947f10cd08316772c98228ac1601
'
'
'
'
The people of the land of KEMET, the real African name for ancient ''Egypt'' looked like THIS:

(original tomb artefacts)








I mean, we have ancient artefacts and art showing them POUNDING FUFU.

WhIch other race on earth pounds fufu?

No one else. Just BLACK AFRICANS.

So stop posting those fake, white/Arab images, OP, ok?

Thank you.

lebete3000:


Meshonu, who ask you?

CAPSLOCKED:


THE JEWS AND ISRAELITES EVEN REJECT THE STORY. THEY'VE LONG APOLOGIZED TO EGYPT ON BEHALF OF THE AUTHORS OF THIS LIE.

THE EGYPTIANS (SO CALLED SLAVE MASTERS) REJECT THIS STORY AS THEY HAVE NO RECORD OF THE EVENTS THAT HAPPENED.
THE ISRAELITES (SO CALLED SLAVES) REJECT THIS STORY AS THEY WERE NEVER ENSLAVED BY ANYONE.

GUESS WHO ARGUE THAT THE EGYPTIANS AND ISRAELITES ARE WRONG?
CHRISTIANS IN NIGERIA, THAT ARE NEITHER ISRAELITES NOR EGYPTIANS.

Explorers:
Prepare the Body

The BBC reports that modern researchers used forensic techniques to identify the ingredients in the resin that ancient Egyptians used.

The recipe included a plant-derived oil, such as sesame oil, a balsam-type of plant or root extract, a plant-based gum and a conifer tree resin, likely pine resin.

These ingredients have chemical properties that give them antibacterial effects that prevent the body from decaying.

A standout among the ancient Egyptian tools used for mummification is the brain hook which is just as gory as it sounds.

Embalmers used this tool, which resembled a crochet needle, insert to nostril to pull the corpse’s brain out through the nose.

They would also make an abdominal incision and remove the lungs, stomach, liver and intestines.

The body’s organs were placed in special containers called canopic jars.

They intentionally left the heart in the body because they believed it was the source of a person’s thoughts and overall being.

Next, the body was rinsed with wine, which helped to kill bacteria.

https://now.northropgrumman.com/the-mummification-process-in-5-steps/

ednut1:
why was the Pharoah not mention na

CosmicPhoenix:

nobody asked you for a story,simply show us historical or archeological evidence that the pharaoh in the bible is Ramssess II,we are all waiting.The reason christians attach Ramesses II to their fairy tale is because of how popular and rich his history is and it all started with Hollywood.

Ofemini:


You should understand that the Bible was not written to gain the approval of men nor to establish the ideas and philosophy of mortals.
It's focus is to draw mortals to her maker, source and sustainer, God almighty and His loving relationship towards them.
Therefore, any name or object left out is very inconsequential to the objective stated above.

Enjoy your evening!

ednut1:
keep consoling your self

gentleibraheem:
Why are Americans and Englishmen telling the stories of the pharaohs when Egyptians document their histories even before the Englishman knows how to bath

Explorers:

https://now.northropgrumman.com/the-mummification-process-in-5-steps/

Ofemini:


You should understand that the Bible was not written to gain the approval of men nor to establish the ideas and philosophy of mortals.
It's focus is to draw mortals to her maker, source and sustainer, God almighty and His loving relationship towards them.
Therefore, any name or object left out is very inconsequential to the objective stated above.

Enjoy your evening!

chariisGRACE:
That was some African Magic then. Africa...where the world began.

AmazonTopaz:

I don't like religious arguments but have you asked yourself who wrote the Bible?did you know that the Bible was originally written in Greek,Hebrew and Aramaic and it has overtime been edited and revised.Did you also know that many orthodox churches have more than 66 books do you know about the council of Nicea and how the Bible was revised and edited.It is a fallacy to actually believe that what you are reading now is everything that was originally in the manuscripts what about the dead sea scrolls and the likes who wrote the Bible?