The person u quoted is saying the truth...it is more economical to run a pipeline from the gas plant in the south underground to the north ....
There is no way u will tell me moving trucks from the gas facilities through our bad roads in numbers down to the rail lines and reloading them into the train ..think about how many trucks u need and also note the amount of fuel u will consume...it even more dangerous and requires Labour.. or do you think the gas facilities will be next to the railline..it better a pipeline is layed underground and gas is allowed to flow without human interference to the north...
Lol..it funny how I think..why do u think all the fuel depot have pipelins layed underground to their facilities...do you think if they were transported by truck from papa down to the depot.. remember those filling stations who want to buy will still carry their trucks to the depot...and with all this u will believe our roads won't be worse..
U have absolutely no idea of what ur saying...it is 100percent better to have pipelines that are layed underground through areas of low human activities than to have trucks conveying them through densely populated areas to the rail station

persius555:


You will make a better engineer than an economist. How many times have LNG transported by rail involved in accidents? This project is just another egocentric mission laced with emotions and no financial objectivity.

idealogical:



There are more industries inn the North than the SS and SE.

I doubt that.

Give me one made in Kano finished product in the market that you know.


And that is the most industrialised northern state.

CSTRR:

I doubt that.

Give me one made in Kano finished product in the market that you know.


And that is the most industrialised northern state.

But all this leather products nko?

adenigga:


But all this leather products nko?

ABA also makes leather products.

CSTRR:

ABA also makes leather products.

But the raw materials come from Kano, ''Hides & Skins''

Am I right?