Somehow in Canada, feminists have been able to pass into law a bill that ensures an ex-girlfriend will be paid alimony by her ex-boyfriend despite both of them never been married and divorced or separated.

Alimony by the way is a COURT-MANDATED ALLOWANCE PAID TO A FORMER SPOUSE BY A DIVORCED OR LEGALLY SEPARATED PERSON.

Feminism is said to be for equal rights for Males and females, how is this equal rights for males? How does this law benefit or protect men's rights? Is feminism not only and truly about promoting female privilege?

Fati2001
Magnoliaa

TORONTO — A wealthy businessman will have to pay more than $50,000 a month in spousal support for 10 years to a woman with whom he had a long-term romantic relationship even though they kept separate homes and had no children together, Ontario’s top court has ruled.

Under Ontario law, an unmarried couple are considered common-law spouses if they have cohabited — lived together in a conjugal relationship — continuously for at least three years. But that doesn’t necessarily mean living in the same home, the court found.

“Lack of a shared residence is not determinative of the issue of cohabitation,” the Appeal Court said. “There are many cases in which courts have found cohabitation where the parties stayed together only intermittently.”

The decision comes in the case of Lisa Climans and Michael Latner, both of Toronto, who began a romantic relationship after meeting in October 2001. At the time, she was 38 and separated with two children, court records show. He was 46 and divorced with three children.

Although they maintained their separate homes, Latner and Climans behaved as a couple both privately and publicly. They vacationed together. He gave her a 7.5-carat diamond ring and other jewelry that she wore. She quit her job and would regularly sleep at his house. They travelled together and talked about living together.

Latner proposed several times and Climans accepted. He often referred to her by his last name. However, he insisted she sign a marriage contract and came up with several drafts. She refused.

Throughout their relationship, the two kept separate bank accounts and never owned property in common. Nevertheless, Latner gave Climans thousands of dollars every month, a credit card, paid off her mortgage and showered her with expensive gifts. He provided her and her children with a “lavish lifestyle,” the court found.
“Theirs was a committed relationship,” the Appeal Court said.

When their 14-year relationship finally broke down in May 2015, Climans asked the courts to recognize her as Latner’s spouse and order him to pay her support. He argued she had been a travel companion and girlfriend, nothing more. As such, he said, they were never legally spouses and he owed no support. An eight-day trial ensued.

In her decision in February 2019, Superior Court Justice Sharon Shore sided with Climans. She ruled they were in fact long-time spouses, finding that despite their separate home, they lived under one roof at Latner’s cottage for part of the summer, and during winter vacations in Florida. Shore ordered him to pay her $53,077 monthly indefinitely. Latner appealed.

The higher court leaned heavily on Shore’s analysis, finding she was right to conclude cohabitation can occur even when the parties stay together intermittently.

The Appeal Court did find Shore had made an error in deciding how long Latner would have to pay Climans support based on when they first began cohabiting. While Shore had found that to be almost from the get-go, the higher court said it wasn’t earlier than their first stay together at his cottage, meaning they didn’t reach the threshold for indefinite payments.

Instead, it ordered him to pay her support for 10 years.

Climans and her lawyers declined comment. Lawyers for Latner did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

What did I just see

tales by moonlight
thunder fire all my ex

When feminist is your president mtcheeew?
If the man salary is $500 monthly or wages $250 how him go cope there

Dreadlock69:
When feminist is your president mtcheeew?
If the man salary is $500 monthly or wages $250 how him go cope there

Nigerian men should beware. Canada sef get craze. funny enough greater percentage of feminist in Canada and around the world are silent on this matter, yet the want MEN to believe FEMINISM is for all of us?

Of the 400,000 people in the United States receiving post-divorce spousal maintenance, just 3 percent were men, according to Census figures. Yet 40 percent of households are headed by female breadwinners — suggesting that hundreds of thousands of men are eligible for alimony, yet don’t receive it.

The reason? Die-hard gender roles, a bitter fight from breadwinning wives and macho pride, say family attorneys. And in some parts of the country, judges are flat-out sexist.

Since them legalize weed for Canada. The whole country has been acting weird

I wish I had a clearer image

Same here

These is unbelievable

needanswer:
Somehow in Canada, feminists have been able to pass into law a bill that ensures an ex-girlfriend will be paid alimony by her ex-boyfriend despite both of them never been married and divorced or separated.

Alimony by the way is a COURT-MANDATED ALLOWANCE PAID TO A FORMER SPOUSE BY A DIVORCED OR LEGALLY SEPARATED PERSON.

Feminism is said to be for equal rights for Males and females, how is this equal rights for males? How does this law benefit or protect men's rights? Is feminism not only and truly about promoting female privilege?

Fati2001
Magnoliaa

It's DAMN WRONG

JESHAL:



It's DAMN WRONG

Damn it is. Wonder why only men see it?

needanswer:


Damn it is. Wonder why only men see it?

Women are empowered over there in there education and career compared to men
These privileges will spoil them

This alimony law is total madness, if it is adopted will result to multipul murders. Women will start disappearing.

Thunder fire ex girlfriend and alimony
List of countries not to travel to as a chronic womanizer
Switzerland ✅

JESHAL:



Women are empowered over there in there education and career compared to men
These privileges will spoil them

It has spoilt many already. The root cause though is feminism.

Dreadlock69:
Thunder fire ex girlfriend and alimony
List of countries not to travel to as a chronic womanizer
Switzerland ✅

indeed. Not everything overseas make sense. Shine your eyes.

dammyz101:
This alimony law is total madness, if it is adopted will result to multipul murders. Women will start disappearing.

Why I dont support murder but I get your stance. Men really should hold women to a certain standard in the legislative.

Reading this is very annoying.

Bodyodour:
Reading this is very annoying.

Very very

Alimony for an ex girlfriend?

BareFacedLies:
Alimony for an ex girlfriend?

E shock you abi