BassReeves:
If you want my response to your questions, you will learn to address me correctly as BassReeves, otherwise you are interacting with a wall

Muttley is reborn. Okay oh.

BassReeves:
Ephesians 6:5-9
'5Slaves, be obedient to those who are your earthly masters, with respect for authority,
and with a sincere heart [seeking to please them], as [service] to Christ--
6not in the way of eye-service [working only when someone is watching you and only] to please men,
but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart;
7rendering service with goodwill, as to the Lord, and not [only] to men,
8knowing that whatever good thing each one does, he will receive this back from the Lord, whether [he is] slave or free.
9You masters, do the same [showing goodwill] toward them, and give up threatening and abusive words,
knowing that [He who is] both their true Master and yours is in heaven,
and that there is no partiality with Him [regardless of one’s earthly status].

Colossians 4:1
'Masters, provide your slaves with what is right and fair, because you know that you also have a Master in heaven.'

Since you want to use slavery to shift focus away from paedophilia, then may I ask whether you can see from the above, how the bible watched out for slaves and is after their good health, happiness and welfare, even entreated that they be treated with respect and accorded fair treatment.

No matter how hard you want to drag slavery into this, paedophilia, that essentially, is about having sexual fantasies, arousal, sexual attraction urges to prepubescent children, has never being an issue in biblical times for it to be recorded. Every sexual perverseness, from rape, adultery, temple male prostitutes, bestiality, infidelity, fornication, men sleeping with men or women sleeping with for purposes of idolatry activities and as part of ritualistic pagan worship acts and reasons etc however are for posterity sake recorded

Lol... It's okay to keep people as property,don't just be harsh to them...clap for yourself
Wether you're too morally inept to see how wrong it is doesn't invalidate the point I was trying to make there.

BassReeves:

Isnt it interesting that your opinion and way of thinking is now taking another turn.

What else would I have been referring to before Isn't marriage the only means where sexual relations are allowed in the bible(sleeping raping your slaves also)...So when I talk about paedophilia won't it be through child marriage such doors are opened ?

BassReeves:

I did nothing of the sort. It is you who was trying to amoral pedophilia.

Are you trying to front that children in biblical times, were married off during prepubescent years, as in meaning, before they were grown?

I'm amazed you're not aware of this simple historical fact...or perhaps you're just feigning ignorance.

BassReeves:

If you want to go the route of xtian traditions, then what age does xtian traditions place Mary to be?

Wasn't it eleven or so

BassReeves:

If you had done a proper and careful bible study on Mar, you would have found out that, inspire of God already knowing Mary's heart, he still sought her consent first and Mary who had reached the age of giving consent, gave a clear, verbal consent to the conception, pregnancy and birth that was to follow.


In any society, whether biblical or the currently present society, it will be wickedness which is what anything devoid of morality is, to with a prospect of having conception, pregnancy and birth, without consent come unto anyone or come unto them against their will

Please don't go and sleep with a minor and when caught you then say she agreed to the act,since that is what you're essentially saying here.
Go understand what consent really means.

Jashub:
Lovely writeup.

There is nothing lovely about the writeup since it is of ignorance. In Genesis 3 vs 16, the Almighty Himself cursed the woman in childbearing. What this means is every child born into this world of a woman is born imperfect from conception. That is why some can be born gay, some are born hermaphrodites, etc.

Kobojunkie:
There is nothing lovely about the writeup since it is of ignorance. In Genesis 3 vs 16, the Almighty Himself cursed the woman in childbearing. What this means is every child born into this world of a woman is born imperfect from conception. That is why some can be born gay, some are born hermaphrodites, etc.

So if I(a man ) choose to dress like a woman , does it mean that I was born that way ?

Jashub:
So if I(a man ) choose to dress like a woman , does it mean that I was born that way ?

Are you born wearing gender-specific clothing from your mother's womb or what?

Your choice of clothing is a choice same as the color of pen you insist on writing with or the type of apples you prefer to eat. What has that to do with this here?

Kobojunkie:
Are you born wearing gender-specific clothing from your mother's womb or what?

Your choice of clothing is a choice same as the color of pen you insist on writing with or the type of apples you prefer to eat. What has that to do with this here?

There are gender specific clothes . Which is why you don't see men wearing skirts . So back to the question: So if I(a man ) choose to dress like a woman , does it mean that I was born that way ? I await your response with an answer and not a question

Jashub:
■ There are gender specific clothes . Which is why you don't see men wearing skirts .
■ So back to the question: So if I(a man ) choose to dress like a woman , does it mean that I was born that way ? I await your response with an answer and not a question

Gender specific clothing specified/designated by God or by men?

Again, are you born wearing gender-specific clothing from your mother's womb or what?

Your choice of clothing is a choice same as the color of pen you insist on writing with or the type of apples you prefer to eat. What has that to do with this here?

Kobojunkie:
Gender specific clothing specified/designated by God or by men?

Again, are you born wearing gender-specific clothing from your mother's womb or what?

Your choice of clothing is a choice same as the color of pen you insist on writing with or the type of apples you prefer to eat. What has that to do with this here?

God has gender specific clothes:


The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.(Deut 22:5)


99.99% of men wear trousers , but less than 0.1% of men wear skirts . Why ? Because trousers by default were established as gender-specific clothing for men , not women .


Now back to the question:


So if I(a man ) choose to dress and behave like a woman , does it mean that I was born that way , did God create me that way ...? I await your response with an answer

Jashub:
■ God has gender specific clothes:
The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.(Deut 22:5)
■ 99.99% of men wear trousers , but less than 0.1% of men wear skirts . Why ? Because trousers by default were established as gender-specific clothing for men , not women .Now back to the question: So if I(a man ) choose to dress and behave like a woman , does it mean that I was born that way , did God create me that way ...? I await your response with an answer

1. God also specified that the law which you quoted there applies only as far as the children of Israel in the Land of Canaan. You and I are not in the Land of Canaan and God put a seal on Prophets and visions --- the Old Law---over 1900 years ago. So, I fail to see why you would wish to sanely throw that Law at anyone in this day and age.

2. By the way, God never actually specified trousers were for men or women. So, I am not entirely certain where you are headed with these ludicrous assertions about who can or cannot wear skirts or pants.

Kobojunkie:
1. God also specified that the law which you quoted there applies only as far as the children of Israel in the Land of Canaan. You and I are not in the Land of Canaan and God put a seal on Prophets and visions --- the Old Law---over 1900 years ago. So, I fail to see why you would wish to sanely throw that Law at anyone in this day and age.

2. By the way, God never actually specified trousers were for men or women. So, I am not entirely certain where you are headed with these ludicrous assertions about who can or cannot wear skirts or pants.

...yet you follow the 10 commandments, and accept offerings that were meant for the those in the land of Caanan abi ? Hypocrisy and double standards at its peak

Look you have absolutely no scriptural backing for your lousy narrative , and that just tells me that you only support what suits your intrest and not the the truth , since it suits you and only you , which is delusional


And as for your second, point , it is completely ridiculous. It is a historically fact that men all over have always worn distinctive clothing from women to serve as identifiers . The trouser and pants are fine examples, and to say that God doesn't recognize gender clothing simply means I can decide to use a sanity pad and pretend I'm seeing a menstrual cycle.

Kobojunkie:
1. God also specified that the law which you quoted there applies only as far as the children of Israel in the Land of Canaan. You and I are not in the Land of Canaan and God put a seal on Prophets and visions --- the Old Law---over 1900 years ago. So, I fail to see why you would wish to sanely throw that Law at anyone in this day and age.

2. By the way, God never actually specified trousers were for men or women. So, I am not entirely certain where you are headed with these ludicrous assertions about who can or cannot wear skirts or pants.

If these that you call old laws don't pertain to us why are they being read to us yet?

The scripture says it is an abomination to God, and God is God everywhere.

Jashub:
■ ...yet you follow the 10 commandments, and accept offerings that were meant for the those in the land of Caanan abi ? Hypocrisy and double standards at its peak
■ Look you have absolutely no scriptural backing for your lousy narrative , and that just tells me that you only support what suits your intrest and not the the truth , since it suits you and only you , which is delusional
■ And as for your second, point , it is completely ridiculous. It is a historically fact that men all over have always worn distinctive clothing from women to serve as identifiers . The trouser and pants are fine examples, and to say that God doesn't recognize gender clothing simply means I can decide to use a sanity pad and pretend I'm seeing a menstrual cycle.

1. How can I follow the 10 commandments alig with the other 603 commandments that make up the Old Law of Moses when I already swore to no longer follow it when I became born-again? Where do you have me stating that I still live by the Old Law?

2. How can I have scriptural backing for what Jesus Christ never made an issue?

3. Historical fact made up by you, right? Stop with the desperate attempts to drag God's name into the mud in your foolishness abeg!

ChukwukaEze:
■ If these that you call old laws don't pertain to us why are they being read to us yet?
■ The scripture says it is an abomination to God, and God is God everywhere.

1. Knowledge of the Old Law is important to understanding Jesus Christ. Afterall, He was spoken of by the Prophets. Also, since Jesus Christ was sent only to the Lost sheep of Israel --- only people who have the blood of Israel in their veins can partake of the Kingdom of God ---- understanding the Old means understanding their ancestry and also the way of what God has done.

2. Scriptures says sin --- disobedience of His direct Law --- is an abomination to God, and it also says you sin against God when you attempt to put Old Wine and New Wine together. So you cannot claim to be of the Old Law when Himself sealed that chapter over 1900 years ago.