Kobojunkie:
The children can sue, not as partners in the marriage but as members of a family unit.

chidonweb:

No, I'm not married. You don't have to be married to know.
I'm still single and searching. Thanks for asking

chidonweb:

No, I'm not married. You don't have to be married to know.
I'm still single and searching. Thanks for asking

Munzy14:

Lol...smh you eeh...

Same here..

efficiencie:


Women will be the ones to ultimately suffer for this...men will further deepen their resolve never to marry. As for sex, there are countless girls available for sex outside of marriage and there are married ones willing to taste forbidden fruits. As for house chores you can recruit a house help to do the job and pay him or her a modest fee. And boom some women have been replaced as far as some men are concerned. Who wants to labor for years and lose it on a divorce? Na woman go suffer this law las las.

salem1996:

I never marry her on contract basis, but if she insist on payment for doing wht she is suppose to do, then she is to pay for what she is not suppose to pay

Tycyborg:

HONESTLY YOU DONT HAVE A POINT... SO YOU ARE SAYING A RESPONSIBLITY SHOULD BE SOMETHIMG TO BE PAID FOR? TAKING CARE OF CHILD IS A CRUCIAL RESPOSIBLITIES EVEN ANIMAL DOES IT... THE MALE HUNT AND THE FEMALE STAY... PENGUIN MALES TAKE CARE OF THE EGG AND THE FEMALE SEARCH FOR FOOD FOR MONTHS.... ITS A PITY WOMEN ALWAYS WANT ATTENTION FOR EVERYTHING... WHYSHOULDNT THEY PAY MEN FOR IMPREGNATING A WOMAN? EVEN NATURE MAKES WOMAN LACTATE AND NOT MEN FOR FEEDING A BABY.

Tycyborg:

HOUSE HELP CANT FIGHT ME IF I DO ANYTHING I WANT, LIKE BRINGING A SIDE CHICK HOME, I AM NOT BUYING CLOTHING OR CAR OR ANYTHING FOR HOUSE HELP AND I DIDNT PAY ANY BRIDAL PRICE OR GET ANY NAGGING FROM HOUSE HELP AND I THINK HOUSE HELP ALL THE WAY

Belafonte:
Like I said, slippery slope

BRATISLAVA:


If men don't marry because they are bitter at women, who cares? You're the ones looking for good women, why? You're looking for who to spend your lives with. A man without a woman is nothing. He will always seek to impress women. All the dickmeasuring is for who? Other males?

Who proposes? Who pays the bride price? Who is getting married on Saturday? One word: Men.

You lot act like you're doing women a favor by marrying them. Don't marry. You will still have the same issues with baby Mama's. Want to know how? By the time all of you don't marry yet want someone else to slave after your offspring, a new law will be used to tackle that. And you will then refuse to have children, etc, as the "proactive" gender. SMH. Same issues will spring up again.

If there's way too many issues with women, whichyou frequently moan about and seek to teach women a lesson for, why don't you marry the peaceful, genuine, undemanding and loving gender —men? There's nothing wrong with loving yourselves, man to man. Right?

Too many teenagers on the forum. Come Saturday another man will be "shackled" gladly. Men are truly suffering. From confusion. And hurting themselves pretending to be red pill.

efficiencie:


Dear if you followed by comments you will see that I am basically describing the situation women created for themselves all in a bid to conform to liberal ideals. I am married and I know the value of virtuous women. There are people who have made marriage work and I believe if done right marriage can be one of the most beautiful of things...but given the state of affairs in our world today one can see how liberal ideals are tearing the great institutions apart and one institution that has consistently been a victim is the institution of marriage.

Marriage today is increasingly been seen as a scam by most men and their fears have been well founded by facts from liberal societies. A man works his ass off trying to earn a living and after becoming a success he foolishly gets married just to have a sex partner, a home keeper and offspring. Soon enough he will realize that his so called wife is fair weather person and when the chips are down he will be left high and dry either by abandonment or by divorce. It is considered fair when the man has to have his properties shared equally in a divorce but when this happens to the woman lamentations we currently have an epidemic of single men who are refusing to get married and they are more prevalent in liberal societies where most connubial laws are geared towards protecting women and not protecting relationships.

Data proves this point. This was culled from an editorial:

According to Pew Research Center, the share of women ages eighteen to thirty-four that say having a successful marriage is one of the most important things in their lives rose nine percentage points since 1997– from 28 percent to 37%. For men, the opposite occurred. The share voicing this opinion dropped, from 35 percent to 29 percent. Source here

While more women have profited from marriage, men haven't. This is why I always advice. If as a man you intend to get married, seek your spouse when you have nothing. Find your spouse when you are not yet successful. The woman who is willing to support your growth and success is the woman worthy to be your wife. I don't care how holy your wife is. If she did not play a key role in your rising she will ultimately be the source of your downfall.

Hyerin:


Do you help your virtuous wife with chores at home? Do you provide emotional support to your wife? Do you also cook? Or you let her mule because you believe that is a measure of "virtue" for a woman by being a beast of burden.

Liberal ideals aren't tearing anything apart rather they're freeing both women and men from the bondage of being put into a box via societal expectations. Marriage as an institution has always been shit because for long, women were and are still expected to be longsuffering in the hands of men. They're the ones constantly preached to by society, in churches, in family gatherings, by friends to compromise, endure, do this and do that. Men are barely recipients of this message. This imbalance has gone on for so long and now that the tides are changing, men are scared because they're about to lose privileges the imbalance has brought. You lot aren't victims nor martyrs. You're frauds.

Research has literally shown married men live happier and tend to live longer than their single counterparts. Married women on the other hand, tend to be miserable and single, childless women report high rates of happiness. If marriage was such a scam for men, they wouldn't be the ones remarrying at lightning speed after divorce or death of their spouse. Men can't stand being alone that's why inceldom is such a huge thing now (men forming communities to complain about how sexless and loveless their lives are).

Why do you men act like being providers and working is the hardest thing in the world and then take this frustration upon women? Women did not dictate men to undertake this role, the patriarchy did. Your frustrations should be directed towards dismantling the patriarchial structure so that the burden of providing will be lifted off your shoulders but ofc, men love the status quo and strive to maintain/preserve it at all costs. You only use the downsides as a crutch to nag at women for a system they didn't instate.

Women are providers too as well as homemakers. Being a housewife, in this day and age is relatively rare. A stream of income cannot sustain most families except if the man is super wealthy which, most men aren't. Exceptions don't make the rules. The average Joe's families are two-income households.

I read alot of this divorce talks in manosphere circles. You lot keep regurgitating the same shit. Frankly, it's tiring. I don't understand why men love acting obtuse. You really think a wife should leave with nothing after all her contributions being a home maker and mostly raising the children. Doesn't marriage this way sound like a scam to women? And men make more than women on average. Never heard the gender pay gap? Are men going to fight against income inequality so that women become on the same earning level as them? Or do you only just want to complain about perceived divorce advantages towards women while not looking at the bigger picture by fighting against income inequality which automatically makes men earn more? Are you lot going to rally against that?

If more men are choosing not to get married and hopefully, also decide to be childfree then that's not a loss at all. No wife nor children to lord over. There would be no further contribution to domestic violence rates, so that's a good thing

Hyerin:


Do you help your virtuous wife with chores at home? Do you provide emotional support to your wife? Do you also cook? Or you let her mule because you believe that is a measure of "virtue" for a woman by being a beast of burden.

Liberal ideals aren't tearing anything apart rather they're freeing both women and men from the bondage of being put into a box via societal expectations. Marriage as an institution has always been shit because for long, women were and are still expected to be longsuffering in the hands of men. They're the ones constantly preached to by society, in churches, in family gatherings, by friends to compromise, endure, do this and do that. Men are barely recipients of this message. This imbalance has gone on for so long and now that the tides are changing, men are scared because they're about to lose privileges the imbalance has brought. You lot aren't victims nor martyrs. You're frauds.

Research has literally shown married men live happier and tend to live longer than their single counterparts. Married women on the other hand, tend to be miserable and single, childless women report high rates of happiness. If marriage was such a scam for men, they wouldn't be the ones remarrying at lightning speed after divorce or death of their spouse. Men can't stand being alone that's why inceldom is such a huge thing now (men forming communities to complain about how sexless and loveless their lives are).

Why do you men act like being providers and working is the hardest thing in the world and then take this frustration upon women? Women did not dictate men to undertake this role, the patriarchy did. Your frustrations should be directed towards dismantling the patriarchial structure so that the burden of providing will be lifted off your shoulders but ofc, men love the status quo and strive to maintain/preserve it at all costs. You only use the downsides as a crutch to nag at women for a system they didn't instate.

Women are providers too as well as homemakers. Being a housewife, in this day and age is relatively rare. A stream of income cannot sustain most families except if the man is super wealthy which, most men aren't. Exceptions don't make the rules. The average Joe's families are two-income households.

I read alot of this divorce talks in manosphere circles. You lot keep regurgitating the same shit. Frankly, it's tiring. I don't understand why men love acting obtuse. You really think a wife should leave with nothing after all her contributions being a home maker and mostly raising the children. Doesn't marriage this way sound like a scam to women? And men make more than women on average. Never heard the gender pay gap? Are men going to fight against income inequality so that women become on the same earning level as them? Or do you only just want to complain about perceived divorce advantages towards women while not looking at the bigger picture by fighting against income inequality which automatically makes men earn more? Are you lot going to rally against that?

If more men are choosing not to get married and hopefully, also decide to be childfree then that's not a loss at all. No wife nor children to lord over. There would be no further contribution to domestic violence rates, so that's a good thing

efficiencie:


Dear if you followed by comments you will see that I am basically describing the situation women created for themselves all in a bid to conform to liberal ideals. I am married and I know the value of virtuous women. There are people who have made marriage work and I believe if done right marriage can be one of the most beautiful of things...but given the state of affairs in our world today one can see how liberal ideals are tearing the great institutions apart and one institution that has consistently been a victim is the institution of marriage.

Marriage today is increasingly been seen as a scam by most men and their fears have been well founded by facts from liberal societies. A man works his ass off trying to earn a living and after becoming a success he foolishly gets married just to have a sex partner, a home keeper and offspring. Soon enough he will realize that his so called wife is fair weather person and when the chips are down he will be left high and dry either by abandonment or by divorce. It is considered fair when the man has to have his properties shared equally in a divorce but when this happens to the woman lamentations begin...we currently have an epidemic of single men who are refusing to get married and they are more prevalent in liberal societies where most connubial laws are geared towards protecting women and not protecting relationships.

Data proves this point. This was culled from an editorial:

According to Pew Research Center, the share of women ages eighteen to thirty-four that say having a successful marriage is one of the most important things in their lives rose nine percentage points since 1997– from 28 percent to 37%. For men, the opposite occurred. The share voicing this opinion dropped, from 35 percent to 29 percent. Source here

While more women have profited from marriage, men haven't. This is why I always advice. If as a man you intend to get married, seek your spouse when you have nothing. Find your spouse when you are not yet successful. The woman who is willing to support your growth and success is the woman worthy to be your wife. I don't care how holy your wife is. If she did not play a key role in your rising she will ultimately be the source of your downfall.

BRATISLAVA:


You are married, yet there are some infantile one-sided remarks you make. Or you are cohabiting? Your links on why young men are scared of marriage is nothing, because most are confused and brain washed. What is the Nigerian man scared of in a marriage? His shadow? The patriarchy? Spare us all the drivel.

From your comments, the only role you feel your wife plays is having sex with you, having children and cleaning? And, boom, you can easily replace her.

Yet you want a woman who will play a role in your life, when you have pushed her into 3 roles that are primarily to your benefit: sex, cleaning and birthing automaton.

The matter is clear.

If you like, seek your spouse when your are poor, it will not change anything. All you have done is give a test to a woman, because you want her to bend to your conditions. But what have you been tested with, as the perfect being you are? What conditions of hers have you met? Oh, but she's just for sex, birthing and cleaning. Why bother with that?

Half of you say what you can't do offline, and yet you say it like it's the law about women. Because if your girlfriend was to truly live with your online persona, she would've done something terrible by now.

JESHAL:



Women are sexual objects
Men are success objects


Period

BRATISLAVA:


The bloodysperm red pill bot.

What's your other moniker again?

JESHAL:





Gender pay gap as a result of sexism is a myth, it occurs by the female choice, women don't take longer hours, don't work risky jobs, take maternity leave hence their careers are affected,there are very strong laws that punish employers who discriminate against women

Domestic violence is a myth as 70% of domestic violence are initiated by women where records are kept in liberal societies


Women being providers is also another myth as majority of women marry their equals or superiors and a significant amount don't settle except they get the hign valued man, even average women want high valued men, no wonder Marital and birth rates are plummeting, the common saying a woman's money is her money and a man's money is families money, 90% of alimony and child support is paid from men to women

BRATISLAVA:


The bloodysperm red pill bot.

What's your other moniker again?

mariahAngel:


Gini?

Hyerin:


He says dumb shit like that and expects anyone at all to take him serious. What a joker.

Kobojunkie:
Nothing slippery about this at all. Soon long as the children are wards of those in the marriage, they can't claim to be equal members of the marriage.

Belafonte:
children are full humans, their human rights should not be trampled

Munzy14:

I kwunyere m mmiri na onu with the happy weekend na...

Kedu

mariahAngel:

A ma’m na owu ihe I ga e kwu.



Fine, thank you.

Kobojunkie:
They are humans yes and have rights yes, but they are not partners in a marriage contract by law.

Belafonte:

Doesn't matter. They're humans and deserve their human dignity protected

Kobojunkie:
It matters! There is a contract involved here.
Stop feigning ignorance!

Kobojunkie:
Go back and rws the OP so you better understand the application of this ruling.

Kobojunkie:
These rules and ideas all exists in your heads as the female can also work to gather while the male fends for the child.

Anyway, the judge's ruling is in in case of divorce divorce martial property dispute where she expects that all property in the marriage be equitably shared by both parties, and not simply given over to the one who claimed to be breadwinner in the home.