dayokanu:

So theres a chance Bayern might play Man Utd in the Second round? father Lord make this happen and I can guarantee you all nothing less than a 3 goal margin of defeat

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/id/998961/man-utd-play-down-possible-champs-lge-reprieve?cc=5901

dayokanu:

The same ppl who cant make it out of a group with Benfica, Basel and Otelu Goliath would make the final?

Maybe the Obalende Sand football final

dayokanu:

^^ Example of a game where United didnt play with 8 players of the caliber of

De gea, Jones, Evra, Carrick, Anderson, Nani, Rooney, Rio, Hernandez

dayokanu:

^^ How many of your stars played that game?

A man Utd stong team would be like

De gea, Jones, Rio, Vidic Evra, Carrick, Anderson, Nani, Young Rooney, Hernandez

With some minor adjustment . Regulars are De Gea, Vidic, Jones, Evra, Rooney, Nani, Hernandez, Anderson

Vs man City Only Badstuber and Boateng are our regulars who started

Throughout the groups there was no game Bayern played our strongest possible every game had either Robben or Schweinsteiger out

dayokanu:

So theres a chance Bayern might play Man Utd in the Second round? father Lord make this happen and I can guarantee you all nothing less than a 3 goal margin of defeat

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story/_/id/998961/man-utd-play-down-possible-champs-lge-reprieve?cc=5901

Mr_TA:

This is brilliant!

http://aggbot.com/Manchester-United-News/article/15690912

Emperoh:

Okay then, devil don catch am.
he escaped with Ghana but not with Evra

Suara slammed with an 8 match ban plus E40k

FA harsh oo

coogar:

he should have gotten more. i was hoping he would get 24 league games.
racism at any level should not be condoned!

StarBoard:

Waiting to see how the Terry case pans out.
If Terry gets any less,then Suarez is being made a scapegoat and there's a lot of hyypocrisy in the FA.

Effiko:

ok . . . so its going down against fulham 2day . . . . .

Mr_TA:

RE: Suarez, I think it was deserved. However, I am intrigued to know what evidence the FA used to come to this conclusion. If it was Evra's word against Suarez' then this could open up a whole new can of worms.
Hopefully the evidence and punishment against John Terry is solid.

Mr_TA:

RE: Suarez, I think it was deserved. However, I am intrigued to know what evidence the FA used to come to this conclusion. If it was Evra's word against Suarez' then this could open up a whole new can of worms.
Hopefully the evidence and punishment against John Terry is solid.

montelik:

Liverpool are just perambulating looking for any excuse to save their best player and I can understand their predicament. But didn't Suarez himself suggest he used d "n" with Evra, wasn't Gus Poyet screaming from d rooftops explaining that Suarez's supposed insults, were not an insult in South American culture. D media reported that "suara" defense would consist of character statements and highlighting d cultural differences of any supposed racist statement. All this points to d fact that d club and d player willingly acknowledged d guy said something that most likely could be controversial. Now all of a sudden they want to go back to arguing its Evra word against Suarez.

montelik:

Liverpool are just perambulating looking for any excuse to save their best player and I can understand their predicament. But didn't Suarez himself suggest he used d "n" with Evra, wasn't Gus Poyet screaming from d rooftops explaining that Suarez's supposed insults, were not an insult in South American culture. D media reported that "suara" defense would consist of character statements and highlighting d cultural differences of any supposed racist statement. All this points to d fact that d club and d player willingly acknowledged d guy said something that most likely could be controversial. Now all of a sudden they want to go back to arguing its Evra word against Suarez.

StarBoard:

From where I see it,it's apparent that word of mouth evidence was used.If that's the precedent that the FA want to set,it's not going to help the system,in my view. . .
We know Suarez agreed that he used the derogatory term.Why he did that,I wouldn't know,but I'm guessing he did so to appear kind of macho (a typical latin american male trait),but for whatever reason he did that,it was plain dumb to me.
If he had denied it,the onus of proof would have been with Evra and the case would have died on arrival.

StarBoard:

^^^
Not holding brief for Suarez.
Only trying to highlight some inconsistencies in the FA's approach to cases like these.
What I'm asking is had Suarez not admitted to saying those things,would they have thrown the book at him the way they did?
It's hard to prove such allegations when it's obvious nobody aside those two heard those statements from Suarez.Hence my statement that admitting it for whatever reason/motive was dumb.