Gandrova:
Not only paradigm shift, you will See Jupiter shift!

Paradigm means usual pattern, not the name of a random planet. Paradigm shift means a deviation from the norm, which is what Obi's emergence represents in our intrinsically corrupt society down the years.

You're welcome.

ArcSEMPECJ:


Lols, go and check what made the Doctors to go on strike Bro....it was not the fault of Peter Obi pls
He.........let me not go into details anyway

Well, we have Bola Ahmed now as President, let's see what he can achieve within his time frame as the court case goes on....

We all pray for a better Nigeria, but we must come out excellent from the elections if we must answer his Excellency.....

The court proceedings is nice

senatordave1:


Why can't lp prove the so called illegality

What is being done now is collection of evidences , data , etc before each will be examined by the judges and judgement pronounced....

But where I found INEC and APC especially INEC funny , is where evidences sheets that INEC duly signed and stamped were brought to court and INEC and APC, vehemently jumped against the evidence........like is it not from INEC again??

Omoboricash:

IPOB african political man of the year.
His legacy in Anambra is there to show, reason Anambraian are trooping to Lagos. Reason Awka still searching for beffiting state capital.
Indeed African political man of the year

I swear to gawd dawg

ArcSEMPECJ:


What is being done now is collection of evidences , data , etc before each will be examined by the judges and judgement pronounced....

But where I found INEC and APC especially INEC funny , is where evidences sheets that INEC duly signed and stamped were brought to court and INEC and APC, vehemently jumped against the evidence........like is it not from INEC again??

What's funny there?

IamV:


Q: You said you are the publicity secretary ?

A: No I’m the chief spokesperson of the campaign and the Director of Media

Q: Okay. So as the chief spokesperson I will expect that you were receiving information from INEC from time to time

A: Can you rephrase your question

Q: You were receiving information from INEC from time to time

A: No. I get information from the Chairman who speaks with INEC

Q: I thought you know everyone and I’m surprised INEC did not speak with you directly.
On February, INEC came out to say we are sorry that we cannot upload results electronically .

A: No, I’m only aware of the Festus Okoye statement that it would be uploaded.

Q. Look at Exhibit PCQ, those are receipts obtained For certified true copies of INEC documents which were tendered here

A. Yes

Q. Please confirm some of the documents were obtained 6 April, 25 April, 31 March variously like that

A. I can see 15, 16, 31 March, 4 April, 2120 March,... They are receipts of payment for documents.
Q. In Para 102, you rely on the documents mentioned there to make your depositions

A. Yes

Q. Documents mentioned in Para 102L,M, N,O,V,Y,Z,AA,CC,JJ,MM,OO,RR were not tendered in this proceedings

A. We are in process of tendering them

Q. You were not able to tender all

A. Yes

DeTribalisedCit:


Paradigm means usual pattern, not the name of a random planet. Paradigm shift means a deviation from the norm, which is what Obi's emergence represents in our intrinsically corrupt society down the years.

You're welcome.

Am aware of it bro! It also means changing of status quo ! Mr Grammar. Obi has nothing to Offer!

Dubetex96:


Someone just confirmed how his father look like

Ewu Gambia

Talk true, if dem use dis one do sacrifice, sango no go reject am? Just talk true

Respondents Asking lots of questions to buy out the limited amount of time.

ArcSEMPECJ:


What is being done now is collection of evidences , data , etc before each will be examined by the judges and judgement pronounced....

But where I found INEC and APC especially INEC funny , is where evidences sheets that INEC duly signed and stamped were brought to court and INEC and APC, vehemently jumped against the evidence........like is it not from INEC again??

This is where you guys are missing it.all the data and evidences being collected and kept in court will not be examined by the judges except you make reference to it and show how it affects your case one by one.
Most of the evidences brought by lp are wrongly pleaded or not pleaded in the main petition or are either secondary evidence.therefore,it has to be objected to

sportskid:


My God!!! So inec is now trying to say the changed there mind on etransmission of results? This is shocking . All the hype about inecs integrity, so tnis was there plan b. INEC HAS SHAMED US.

They only said they wouldn't transmit raw figures like 1, 2, 3, 4 however the results will be uploaded electronically via BVAS after scanning EC8A result sheet.

skyZine:
Respondents Asking lots of questions to buy out the limited amount of time.

Safe to say obi ti lule

senatordave1:

So lp dey follow object

Lol

IamV:


[ The first respondent cross examiner continues with the witness ]

Q. Look at Pg2 of Exhibit X1, read the declarations your party sought.

A. Declaration not to opt for manual upload but electronic method
An Order of the court to compel INEC to comply with the provisions of the law.

Q. Read the last 2 Paragraphs of the Judgment

A. The court ruled that INEC will chose its method as provided by law.

Q. Did your party appeal that judgment ?

A. I'm not aware of this one and not aware of an appeal.

[ Here's a link to the publication,
https://www.thecable.ng/rewind-in-january-court-ruled-that-inec-can-use-any-method-for-results-transmission/amp ]

Lol

IamV:


Q. Look at Exhibit PCQ, those are receipts obtained For certified true copies of INEC documents which were tendered here

A. Yes

Q. Please confirm some of the documents were obtained 6 April, 25 April, 31 March variously like that

A. I can see 15, 16, 31 March, 4 April, 2120 March,... They are receipts of payment for documents.
Q. In Para 102, you rely on the documents mentioned there to make your depositions

A. Yes

Q. Documents mentioned in Para 102L,M, N,O,V,Y,Z,AA,CC,JJ,MM,OO,RR were not tendered in this proceedings

A. We are in process of tendering them

Q. You were not able to tender all

A. Yes

Q. You mentioned that you relied on evidence of forensic experts

A. Yes

Q. Your deposition was made on March 20th

A. Yes

Q. Are you aware that the final reports of your expert was in May 2023

[ The witness was quiet ]

Q. You'll agree with me that the issue you brought to court were transmission of irev not snatching of ballot box

A. Our case was on 2 grounds, double nominations and forfeiture.

femisplash:

Lol

They are do hypocritical

senatordave1:


You are living up to your name

That's what I am

IamV:


Q. You mentioned that you relied on evidence of forensic experts

A. Yes

Q. Your deposition was made on March 20th

A. Yes

Q. Are you aware that the final reports of your expert was in May 2023

[ The witness was quiet ]

Q. You'll agree with me that the issue you brought to court were transmission of irev not snatching of ballot box

A. Our case was on 2 grounds, double nominations and forfeiture.

[ They show him the court judgment in PDP v INEC & ORS on double nominations which he identifies.
They now seek to tender the documents before the court ]

PETITIONERS object to the tendering and admissibility of the documents and shall advance reasons.

[ All other respondents do not object to the document.]

IamV:


Q. You mentioned that you relied on evidence of forensic experts

A. Yes

Q. Your deposition was made on March 20th

A. Yes

Q. Are you aware that the final reports of your expert was in May 2023

[ The witness was quiet ]

Q. You'll agree with me that the issue you brought to court were transmission of irev not snatching of ballot box

A. Our case was on 2 grounds, double nominations and forfeiture.

Chai,what a killing blow

IamV:


[ They show him the court judgment in PDP v INEC & ORS on double nominations which he identifies.
They now seek to tender the documents before the court ]

PETITIONERS object to the tendering and admissibility of the documents and shall advance reasons.

[ All other respondents do not object to the document.]

The Court:
The Court Judgment hereby admitted into evidence and marked as Exhibits X2 accordingly.

^{As the court pleases}.

IamV:
Without an iota of doubt , here's African
political man of the year !

Just an appreciation post,it have become necessary .

I am genuinely interested in what he has done to give him that title and maybe why just Africa, why not the world.

I actually am grateful for him and his "third way" politics as I am fed up of PDP and APC taking the populace for granted.

I am concerned at his lack of control on his Obidients and their perpetual attack mode. I can see why he needs that fervour behind him although in the long run, that is what would stop his political career reaching the heights I feel it deserves.

A shame.

IamV:


[ They show him the court judgment in PDP v INEC & ORS on double nominations which he identifies.
They now seek to tender the documents before the court ]

PETITIONERS object to the tendering and admissibility of the documents and shall advance reasons.

[ All other respondents do not object to the document.]

Op,you are editing the updates,drop it word for word.the witness fumbled and the whole court laughed.reduce the bias na

IamV:


The Court:
The Court Judgment hereby admitted into evidence and marked as Exhibits X2 accordingly.

^{As the court pleases}.

[ The 4th respondent continues with the witness]

Q. By that judgment, the issue of double nominations have be solved.

A. No, it is not settled

[And that is all for the Cross-examination.
The Petitioners note that they do not have any re-examinations.]

IamV:


[ They show him the court judgment in PDP v INEC & ORS on double nominations which he identifies.
They now seek to tender the documents before the court ]

PETITIONERS object to the tendering and admissibility of the documents and shall advance reasons.

[ All other respondents do not object to the document.]

Again,lp lawyers are objecting

IamV:


[ The 4th respondent continues with the witness]

Q. By that judgment, the issue of double nominations have be solved.

A. No, it is not settled

[And that is all for the Cross-examination.
The Petitioners note that they do not have any re-examinations.]

[ Dr Livy tells the court that they have 2, maybe 3 witnesses.]

The court :
The court notes that it is almost 7pm.

LO Fagbemi :
He notes that ordinarily, the LP should have ended their time on Tuesday and that they are here with new people and should not be allowed to continue.

Wole SAN:
He reads the Schedule of the court that today is the last day and that Dr Livy is even guessing as to number of witness. He notes that they are objecting to any extension and any extension whatsoever.

IamV:


Q. Do you see 59 for LP ?

A. It is mutilated

Q. Do you see 6 votes for APC ?

A. They are mutilated

Q. Are they mutilated or blurred ?

A. They are mutilated and blurred

Q. In the entirety of you 105 paragraphs of your witness deposition, confirm to this court that you've not stated any figure as unlawful votes
A. Seemimgly No

Q. Look at Para 9, you talked about Party Agents of your party, confirm to the court that you had agents in all polling units.

A. Yes, 133,000

Q. How many polling units nationwide ?

A. I can't remember the figure

Lol

IamV:


[ Dr Livy tells the court that they have 2, maybe 3 witnesses.]

The court :
The court notes that it is almost 7pm.

LO Fagbemi :
He notes that ordinarily, the LP should have ended their time on Tuesday and that they are here with new people and should not be allowed to continue.

Wole SAN:
He reads the Schedule of the court that today is the last day and that Dr Livy is even guessing as to number of witness. He notes that they are objecting to any extension and any extension whatsoever.

They should give them tomorrow as their last day of grace so that we can laugh at them more

IamV:


Q. You mentioned that you relied on evidence of forensic experts

A. Yes

Q. Your deposition was made on March 20th

A. Yes

Q. Are you aware that the final reports of your expert was in May 2023

[ The witness was quiet ]

Q. You'll agree with me that the issue you brought to court were transmission of irev not snatching of ballot box

A. Our case was on 2 grounds, double nominations and forfeiture.

This is a nuclear bomb on Labour Party and Obi

This means he lied on his disposition
Chia

senatordave1:

They are do hypocritical

Very very

femisplash:

Lol

APC: Look at this evidence PCQ, those are receipts for CTC certification of INEC documents

W: Yes

APC: Please look through, those documents were received on 6th April and 25th of April

W: There is no 6th of April in my statement

APC: You cannot see your own statement again. Is it mutilated or blurred
😒

W: It’s 16th March, 20th March, 15th March and 4th April

APC: 4th April what was it for

W: It’s for payment for PVCs collected in Kogi State

APC: What is the date

W: 04/04/2023

APC: In paragraph 102 of your witness deposition you relied on these documents to make your deposition

W: Yes

APC: On page 31 on paragraph 102
The document mentioned on item LMNOVYZAACC were not tendered in these proceedings
And on page 33 JJMMOORR of your statement
These documents were not rendered

W: As at yesterday, we were about to tender but there was no time

APC lawyers are now laughing

Justice Tsammani: This is not a circus, why are you people laughing . What’s that

APC: Sorry my lord
So did you tender

W: We were about tendering

APC: So you did not

W: No

APC: You used forensic experts right

W: Yes

APC: Your deposition was made on 20th of March

W: Yes

APC: The report of the expert was May 2023 and you deposition was March 2023
Nicodemus how did you get it in your statement

Witness is quiet

APC: Now you will agree with me that the issue you brought to court was on transmission and not on ballot snatching

W: It was on 2 grounds, it’s on double nomination and forfeiture of $145,000

APC: Thank you. Do you know this document on a court order on the double nomination

W: It says PDP

APC: Yes. My lord I want to tender it and it’s a case between PDP Vs INEC delivered on the 26th day of May 2023

SAN Livy has objected to the tendering of the document

Justice Tsammani: Are you objecting to the tendering or the admissibility

SAN Livy with a smile : To the admissibility my lord.
I am just tired

Justice Tsammani: I don’t blame you, you are sandwiched by all these people objecting you

The whole courtroom is laughing



The op is mischievous.he is not doing full posting,na cut and join.hevis too ashame to admit their failure