Novarisammy2:




Clause 48 of the INEC Regulation
reveals the status of the electronically
transmitted election results, where
incorrectness is identified by the
collation officer, with a similar purpose
identified under Clause 51, which states
that discrepancies in a result submitted
by the presiding officer to the Ward
Collation Officer will be resolved using
the electronic result to identify the
source of the discrepancy. The clause
states that the result that is
electronically transmitted will be
employed for the purpose of collation
and announcement of result. Therefore,
in a situation of incorrectness or
suspicion of manipulation, the
electronically transmitted result
supersedes other forms of result
appearing before the collation officer.
Electronic Transmission and Other

culled from premium times
march 23rd, 2023

go and read it up

Clause 93 states that manual forms is the primary form

Result sheets from the IREV were blurry. Means there was no way to tally the contents of the hard copy with that on the IREV. And when such a discrepancy is yet to be straightened out, collated results shouldn't be announced. Yet, folks are littered everywhere on nairaland twisting and misrepresenting the laws just to suit interests and narratives.

Nigeria is just another sad country.

garfield1:


Clause 93 states that manual forms is the primary form

You're here talking Marco Polo, SWAGA has started using their attack police to fight deserters. Don't worry, a month from now, your eye go begin clear. Obi and co are in US getting briefings on when he becomes president. Una go see chimchom.

garfield1:

Clause 93 states that manual forms is the primary form

read what I posted and this time around do that with the intention of learning

Novarisammy2:




Clause 48 of the INEC Regulation
reveals the status of the electronically
transmitted election results, where
incorrectness is identified by the
collation officer, with a similar purpose
identified under Clause 51, which states
that discrepancies in a result submitted
by the presiding officer to the Ward
Collation Officer will be resolved using
the electronic result to identify the
source of the discrepancy. The clause
states that the result that is
electronically transmitted will be
employed for the purpose of collation
and announcement of result. Therefore,
in a situation of incorrectness or
suspicion of manipulation, the
electronically transmitted result
supersedes other forms of result
appearing before the collation officer.
Electronic Transmission and Other

culled from premium times
march 23rd, 2023

go and read it up

Lol. You guys are really ignorant. You read to argue and not to understand. Go and read the part in bold clearly.

The discrepancies you’re talking about are discrepancies that have already been resolved at the ward collation centers and the electronic results are those already uploaded to the BVAS from the polling units. It is not IREV. All the discrepancies were resolved at the ward collation centers and party agents including those of Labour Party signed the collated results at the ward level.

IamAtikulate:

That 18k results totalled about 2.5 million votes. Tinubu won with 1.8 million votes.

Use your sense

They are blurry only on IREV. The real form EC8A results for the 18k units are not blurry. They are very clear and they were used in collating the results. Results were not collated on IREV.

IamAtikulate:

There were discrepancies, that is why they blurred the results.

Evidence of the discrepancies?

Novarisammy2:


read what I posted and this time around do that with the intention of learning

Obidients even need the tutoring.yiu guys are new to electoral matters.ny virtue of supreme court judgments in osun,all inec data from server are unreliable and thirdhand

Penguin2:
At the resumed hearing of the Petition of the Labour Party and Peter Obi against INEC, Tinubu, Shettima and APC, INEC was finally able to open their defence as their witness did not have “domestic issues” today.

INEC witness today was the same Deputy Director of ICT at INEC, Lawrence Bayode, who testified for INEC in PDP’s case.

After adopting his witness statement, it was time for cross examinations by parties.

When it the turn of the Labour Party, cross examination was handled by PIN Ikwueto SAN.

First, under cross examination, PIN Ikwueto asked the witness why INEC went ahead to deploy the IREV for the elections if it had “vulnerabilities” (recall the many claims of threats of hackers and all by INEC and government agencies).

To this the witness replied that the IREV “had no vulnerability.”

Furthermore into the cross examination, Mr Ikwueto handed an INEC certified IREV result sheet and asked, “what is the score of APC in this result sheet?”

INEC Witness: ”I don’t know, the results are blurry.”

And that was how INEC admitted in court that its document is blurry.

Now, the question is where did it get the numbers to announce the winner it announced?

Remember: ”The aim is not to trust the judiciary, the aim is to overwhelm them with evidence”.

people get brain but dem no dey use am

[quote author=Penguin2 post=124209070]At the resumed hearing of the Petition of the Labour Party and Peter Obi against INEC, Tinubu, Shettima and APC, INEC was finally able to open their defence as their witness did not have “domestic issues” today.

INEC witness today was the same Deputy Director of ICT at INEC, Lawrence Bayode, who testified for INEC in PDP’s case.

After adopting his witness statement, it was time for cross examinations by parties.

When it the turn of the Labour Party, cross examination was handled by PIN Ikwueto SAN.

First, under cross examination, PIN Ikwueto asked the witness why INEC went ahead to deploy the IREV for the elections if it had “vulnerabilities” (recall the many claims of threats of hackers and all by INEC and government agencies).

To this the witness replied that the IREV “had no vulnerability.”

Furthermore into the cross examination, Mr Ikwueto handed an INEC certified IREV result sheet and asked, “what is the score of APC in this result sheet?”

INEC Witness: ”I don’t know, the results are blurry.”

And that was how INEC admitted in court that its document is blurry.

Now, the question is where did it get the numbers to announce the winner it announced?

Remember: ”The aim is not to trust the judiciary, the aim is to overwhelm them with evidence”.

[/quote
You can only deceive your gullible obiidiots…… kontinue

seunmsg:


IREV results are downloaded from IREV. IREV results were not used for collation so it’s of no effect even if it is blurry. Below is the relevant testimony of the witness that the OP will not post here.



And this



Final

What them is the purpose ilof IREV in the elections?

garfield1:


Clause 93 states that manual forms is the primary form

What then is the purpose of IREV?

Spy360:

What them is the purpose ilof IREV in the elections?

For people like you to view from home.

Spy360:

What then is the purpose of IREV?

It is for the public to view the results online wgict stands for inec result viewing portal

Spy360:

What them is the purpose ilof IREV in the elections?

For public view

seunmsg:


For people like you to view from home.

Ok. Kindly interpret the statement on the pix below.

Cc Garfield1
Seunowa

seunmsg:


They are blurry only on IREV. The real form EC8A results for the 18k units are not blurry. They are very clear and they were used in collating the results. Results were not collated on IREV.

Why should IREV be blurry and the source clear?

Novarisammy2:




Clause 48 of the INEC Regulation
reveals the status of the electronically
transmitted election results, where
incorrectness is identified by the
collation officer, with a similar purpose
identified under Clause 51, which states
that discrepancies in a result submitted
by the presiding officer to the Ward
Collation Officer will be resolved using
the electronic result to identify the
source of the discrepancy. The clause
states that the result that is
electronically transmitted will be
employed for the purpose of collation
and announcement of result. Therefore,
in a situation of incorrectness or
suspicion of manipulation, the
electronically transmitted result
supersedes other forms of result
appearing before the collation officer.
Electronic Transmission and Other

culled from premium times
march 23rd, 2023

go and read it up

Oga !! what that clause is addressing is a situation where there is discrepancies between the polling unit and at the ward centre collation unit,
the presiding officier from the polling unit and collation officier will review the discrepancies with electronic result, i.e check what was snapped by the Bvas and rectify AT WARD LEVEL. as primary source what is on the BVAS is what will definitely be seen on IREV

We have four coalition stage, polling units 2 ward 2 local govt 2 state then 2 National




Section 64 subservient to section 47 (2) are the only Guide of the collation of results

Penguin2:
At the resumed hearing of the Petition of the Labour Party and Peter Obi against INEC, Tinubu, Shettima and APC, INEC was finally able to open their defence as their witness did not have “domestic issues” today.

INEC witness today was the same Deputy Director of ICT at INEC, Lawrence Bayode, who testified for INEC in PDP’s case.

After adopting his witness statement, it was time for cross examinations by parties.

When it the turn of the Labour Party, cross examination was handled by PIN Ikwueto SAN.

First, under cross examination, PIN Ikwueto asked the witness why INEC went ahead to deploy the IREV for the elections if it had “vulnerabilities” (recall the many claims of threats of hackers and all by INEC and government agencies).

To this the witness replied that the IREV “had no vulnerability.”

Furthermore into the cross examination, Mr Ikwueto handed an INEC certified IREV result sheet and asked, “what is the score of APC in this result sheet?”

INEC Witness: ”I don’t know, the results are blurry.”

And that was how INEC admitted in court that its document is blurry.

Now, the question is where did it get the numbers to announce the winner it announced?

Remember: ”The aim is not to trust the judiciary, the aim is to overwhelm them with evidence”.

. The INEC declared results based on the collation of EC8 forms signed at the collation centers not IREV results.
The SC held that IREV results may be affected by transmission, manipulation and electronic faulty transmission.
Any case based on IREV resukts are academic wiithiut any probative value.
We will continue to remind the Obedients the SC judgement on IREV till the day their case will be struck out .

Spy360:

Ok. Kindly interpret the statement on the pix below.

Cc Garfield1
Seunowa

The supreme court interpreted it in osun

Spy360:

Why should IREV be blurry and the source clear?

The camera of the bvas could be faulty,bad handling by inec staff,bad weather,bad flashlight.when photocopying documents,don't some copies come out blurry? Does that mean forgery? Forgery is when something is mutilated or erased.why has obi not displayed mutilated documents

What the fukk are they talking about Blurry?!!!

That's my favourite rock song,mehn!!!

This dirty people should keep their bullshhhht away from Blurry

Penguin2:
By that singular admittance, INEC fell into a bottomless pit of trap set by the Labour Party’s Lawyer.

The man below is a senior lawyer and he shares his view about that.

So because one result from a polling unit is blurry or proven to be "rigged", you think Obi has achieved the high level of proof required to overturn an election?

This is not a science or statistic type situation where you extrapolate stuff, all that will happen is calculated votes from that particular polling unit is nullified, not even an opportunity for elections to be held again at that Polling unit.

By the way why are LP's lawyers still indulging in bush league behaviour? They were given 3 weeks to tender documents, instead they wasted time indulging themselves by wheeling TV's into court as well as presenting BS experts.

Now that it is the turn of Respondents to file their own evidence, LP's lawyers are trying to bring in even more documents.

Obidients will always keep clutching at straws sha.

Yakubu has been hiding his face in shame. That guy is Anini's reincarnation, a glorified highway bandit.

garfield1:


The supreme court interpreted it in osun

Give me an interpretation whether Osun or what you are seeing.

Penguin2:
At the resumed hearing of the Petition of the Labour Party and Peter Obi against INEC, Tinubu, Shettima and APC, INEC was finally able to open their defence as their witness did not have “domestic issues” today.

INEC witness today was the same Deputy Director of ICT at INEC, Lawrence Bayode, who testified for INEC in PDP’s case.

After adopting his witness statement, it was time for cross examinations by parties.

When it the turn of the Labour Party, cross examination was handled by PIN Ikwueto SAN.

First, under cross examination, PIN Ikwueto asked the witness why INEC went ahead to deploy the IREV for the elections if it had “vulnerabilities” (recall the many claims of threats of hackers and all by INEC and government agencies).

To this the witness replied that the IREV “had no vulnerability.”

Furthermore into the cross examination, Mr Ikwueto handed an INEC certified IREV result sheet and asked, “what is the score of APC in this result sheet?”

INEC Witness: ”I don’t know, the results are blurry.”

And that was how INEC admitted in court that its document is blurry.

Now, the question is where did it get the numbers to announce the winner it announced?

Remember: ”The aim is not to trust the judiciary, the aim is to overwhelm them with evidence”.

. ELUPEE ZOMBIE, the result printed out on IREV Portal were blurred what happened to the major evidence and primary source of document which was form EC8B original result sheets from each poling Unit. Was that one blurry?

garfield1:


The camera of the bvas could be faulty,bad handling by inec staff,bad weather,bad flashlight.when photocopying documents,don't some copies come out blurry? Does that mean forgery? Forgery is when something is mutilated or erased.why has obi not displayed mutilated documents

Then we can say that IREV is useless and meaningless and a waste of resources and energy. And all the brouhaha by INEC about uploading realtime was a farce? Yes? No?

seunmsg:


For people like you to view from home.

Keep deceiving yourself.

So, you will spend billions of naira on a technology just for people to be viewing your business. This is ridiculous.

Tell us what you that made the huge investment stand to benefit.

Technology is not for jamboree.

seunmsg:

..If 18k snapped results are blurry out of 176k, then that’s an insignificant number. It’s a passmark for INEC and IREV.

Is it insignificant really?

According to INEC, the number of voters per PU is 500 (700 actually on average). 500 by 18000 gives a potential 9,000,000 voters. The smallest margin of winning between the top 3 in the flawed elections was 800,000, the largest margin of win was less than 2,000,000 and over four times less than the potential voters unaccounted for on iRev. Then, there is the issue of whose stronghold was blurred out?

You'd agree with me that your passmark did not come from a place of common sense.

seunmsg:


INEC officials. And yes, there are lots of reasons for blurry images. If 18k snapped results are blurry out of 176k, then that’s an insignificant number. It’s a passmark for INEC and IREV.

18K is insignificant when it can have a change in the results? 18k insignificant, nothing one won't read on this forum.

Spy360:

Then we can say that IREV is useless and meaningless and a waste of resources and energy. And all the brouhaha by INEC about uploading realtime was a farce? Yes? No?

Yes to an extent.it is useful in the absence of manual results

Spy360:

Give me an interpretation whether Osun or what you are seeing.

Read osun judgment again by justice agim.it is oyetola vs adeleke supra 2023 per jsc agim.