afrodoc2:


So it is until he clenches his pari like Samanja and starts insulting every body before you will know he is serious.

Seems some of you guys crave being stressed and unhappy. What is the next thing? Criticize his hair cut?

I read other questions directed at other managers and they are quite different from the ones directed at Ole cuz they know he likes to talk and will definitely reply them. Sometimes you ask Ole just a simple question about what he expects in a game and he goes to talk about the Old times and SAF, tactics and everything. So I understand what the guy criticizing him is saying.

I'm not criticizing Ole for being loquacious. But I feel he needs to tune down some of these things he talks about on what to expect next season( style of play and everything).

Leyqute:


Nope. Smalling is only fitter and gets injured less often.

that makes him better na
Abi no b Jones wey de always injure himself 4 training how can u b a good player wen u can't stay fit and save ur career

ChristoBam:


I read other questions directed at other managers and they are quite different from the ones directed at Ole cuz they know he likes to talk and will definitely reply them. Sometimes you ask Ole just a simple question about what he expects in a game and he goes to talk about the Old times and SAF, tactics and everything. So I understand what the guy criticizing him is saying.

I'm not criticizing Ole for being loquacious. But I feel he needs to tune down some of these things he talks about on what to expect next season( style of play and everything).

Fair point.

I agree with you.

ChristoBam:


I read other questions directed at other managers and they are quite different from the ones directed at Ole cuz they know he likes to talk and will definitely reply them. Sometimes you ask Ole just a simple question about what he expects in a game and he goes to talk about the Old times and SAF, tactics and everything. So I understand what the guy criticizing him is saying.

I'm not criticizing Ole for being loquacious. But I feel he needs to tune down some of these things he talks about on what to expect next season( style of play and everything).

Real baller. underrate at your own peril. Greenwood scores like someone deranged BTW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb3KI5pJAmY

Oasis007:




Everyone knows, but how does his comment relate to the Post he quoted?! How many Betting Firms are on the List?! Combine all their Deals together, it's not close to Chevrolet Deal alone.

So how are they possibly influencing the Game?

let me just chip in some things here.
The same way it is difficult to prove the existence of heaven so it is to prove the existence of fixing matches. Stakeholders in football have diverse benefits they look forward to.
Spectators want to enjoy the game. They pay

Footballers want to make money. They are paid

Club owners want to make money. They are paid

Refereees want to make money. They are paid

Bettin companies want to make money. So they pursuade spectators to go the extra mile to gamble.

If you are yet to see the picture, then let me go a bit further...

All other stakeholders are banking on the spectators' money to keep on going. They want to get more money from spectators through gambling.

A match between mancity (1.20) vs wolves (7.30)
The bookmaker expects 95% of gamblers to go for mancity. However, the bookmakers by virtue of their stake in the game have been given just one game in 380 games to influence. They communicate with the FA that this is the game they want to use to wreck the stakers. The FA calls in a trusted executioner (professional referee) who is aware of the job at hand.

All the executioner needs to do is to discourage mancity players and encourage wolves players with the manner he goes about with the officiating. The slim chance of wolves winning in suddenly increased by his actions. At the end of the day, the spectators and stakera will yell any or a mixture of the lines below:

The referee killed the match
The referee is madt
The officiating was poor
The penalty awarded to wolves was not worth it
Mancity should have gotten two penalties
Wolves defender should have seen red
That mancity defender's tackle was not a red card offence
The wolves striker dived but referee signal led a penalty
The mancity striker was wrongly accused and booked for diving.

At the end of the day, wolves wins, the bookmakers have taken their pound of flesh for the season and mancity will be given the three points back either by:
Favoring them in a future match or
Making their rivals go through such nightmare too at a point in time within the 38 game days.

This is just to let you have a brief idea of how technically easy it is for those who are paid to swindle those who are paying by conspiring together.

lekkie073:
let me just chip in some things here.
The same way it is difficult to prove the existence of heaven so it is to prove the existence of fixing matches. Stakeholders in football have diverse benefits they look forward to.
Spectators want to enjoy the game. They pay

Footballers want to make money. They are paid

Club owners want to make money. They are paid

Refereees want to make money. They are paid

Bettin companies want to make money. So they pursuade spectators to go the extra mile to gamble.

If you are yet to see the picture, then let me go a bit further...

All other stakeholders are banking on the spectators' money to keep on going. They want to get more money from spectators through gambling.

A match between mancity (1.20) vs wolves (7.30)
The bookmaker expects 95% of gamblers to go for mancity. However, the bookmakers by virtue of their stake in the game have been given just one game in 380 games to influence. They communicate with the FA that this is the game they want to use to wreck the stakers. The FA calls in a trusted executioner (professional referee) who is aware of the job at hand.

All the executioner needs to do is to discourage mancity players and encourage wolves players with the manner he goes about with the officiating. The slim chance of wolves winning in suddenly increased by his actions. At the end of the day, the spectators and stakera will yell any or a mixture of the lines below:

The referee killed the match
The referee is madt
The officiating was poor
The penalty awarded to wolves was not worth it
Mancity should have gotten two penalties
Wolves defender should have seen red
That mancity defender's tackle was not a red card offence
The wolves striker dived but referee signal led a penalty
The mancity striker was wrongly accused and booked for diving.

At the end of the day, wolves wins, the bookmakers have taken their place pound of flesh for the season and mancity will be given the three points back either by:
Favoring them in a future match or
Making their rivals go through such nightmare too at a point in time within the 38 game days.

This is just to let you have a brief idea of how technically easy it is for those who are paid to swindle those who are paying by conspiring together.

Wehdone

melodyogonna:
Real baller. underrate at your own peril.
Greenwood scores like someone deranged BTW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bb3KI5pJAmY

If one of Angel Gomes, Chong, Garner or Greenwood achieve their full potential, then we would be very lucky cos these guys have got real talent. Chong is very explosive and tricky while running, he reminds me more of Giggs than Daniel James.

lekkie073:
let me just chip in some things here.
The same way it is difficult to prove the existence of heaven so it is to prove the existence of fixing matches. Stakeholders in football have diverse benefits they look forward to.
Spectators want to enjoy the game. They pay

Footballers want to make money. They are paid

Club owners want to make money. They are paid

Refereees want to make money. They are paid

Bettin companies want to make money. So they pursuade spectators to go the extra mile to gamble.

If you are yet to see the picture, then let me go a bit further...

All other stakeholders are banking on the spectators' money to keep on going. They want to get more money from spectators through gambling.

A match between mancity (1.20) vs wolves (7.30)
The bookmaker expects 95% of gamblers to go for mancity. However, the bookmakers by virtue of their stake in the game have been given just one game in 380 games to influence. They communicate with the FA that this is the game they want to use to wreck the stakers. The FA calls in a trusted executioner (professional referee) who is aware of the job at hand.

All the executioner needs to do is to discourage mancity players and encourage wolves players with the manner he goes about with the officiating. The slim chance of wolves winning in suddenly increased by his actions. At the end of the day, the spectators and stakera will yell any or a mixture of the lines below:

The referee killed the match
The referee is madt
The officiating was poor
The penalty awarded to wolves was not worth it
Mancity should have gotten two penalties
Wolves defender should have seen red
That mancity defender's tackle was not a red card offence
The wolves striker dived but referee signal led a penalty
The mancity striker was wrongly accused and booked for diving.

At the end of the day, wolves wins, the bookmakers have taken their pound of flesh for the season and mancity will be given the three points back either by:
Favoring them in a future match or
Making their rivals go through such nightmare too at a point in time within the 38 game days.

This is just to let you have a brief idea of how technically easy it is for those who are paid to swindle those who are paying by conspiring together.

Nonsense.
Bookmakers make money regardless of whether your game won or lost. They make money by giving imperfect odds.

Oasis007:
Rob Dawson: "United training at the National Stadium in Singapore ahead of game against Inter tomorrow. Lukaku not part of the group. Darmian and Fred have joined up."

Inter should conclude the deal or Bleep off, their sluggishness is affecting our other deals.

When are we going to get a RIGHT WINGER ffs!!!

Are we going to play Lingard and Mata there this season again?
They aren't pursuing a single right winger. Ole and Woodward are insane for this!

I don't think we are getting another striker to replace Lukaku if he leaves. OGS will want to make do with Martial, Rashy and Greenword

eph12:
I don't think we are getting another striker to replace Lukaku if he leaves. OGS will want to make do with Martial, Rashy and Greenword

You're indeed wise. With the way he's praising Martial new attitude, giving more game time to Greenwood and saying he can play in any position at the final third, I'm suspecting that too.

Martial, Rashford, Greenwood, Dan James and if at all Lingard will lead the front three positions.

You all forgot the pianist. Sanchez is still here.