WhoDeyHause:

That's why we need to get another striker until whenever he develops and decides to start cooking. A club as big as ours cannot be parading the young shall grow everytime.

Evidently the direction the club hierarchy is heading to believes in "young shall grow" too much. If not, this total clear out and 24 years and below signings won't happen like this.

Make we siddon dey look as things pan out. The team go cook, but when? That's the problem...

timbros:


Did he play a role in our win that season that warrant you to name him among Chelsea CFs? Was he registered for UCL that season if he is that important? How did Chelsea prepare him for the season? By playing him for 4 minutes and shipping him out?

You have pride issues.

So, if they ask you if Man united prepared Sancho for 2023/2024 Epl season, you would say NO, because he didn't play many games for them this season.

You must be on colos.

WhoDeyHause:

Colwill has mistakes in him but not up to badiashile and Disasi.
We both know James is one of the best defensive full backs in the world if not the best and he's also part of a back 4 not a front 4.

Colwill is just there. Nothing spectacular. Colwill cannot have the Palmer effect in our defence.

The good thing about James is his attacking output. So while he is superb defensively, we still miss him in attack too. It took him less than 5 minutes to assist the much maligned Jackson. Who knows what would have happened if he had played more this season.... Could Jackson have been on 25 goals by now? Think about it...

airmark:


So, if they ask you if Man united prepared Sancho for 2023/2024 Epl season, you would say NO, because he didn't play many games for them this season.

You must be on colos.

You can do better than this, airmark.

How did Chelsea prepare Shevchenko for 2009/10 season? A season he played just 4 minutes and left for Ukraine.

forgiveness:


17 goals out of 40 chances. He try well no bi small.

You no get emi idarijin and your name na forgiveness .

airmark:


So, if they ask you if Man united prepared Sancho for 2023/2024 Epl season, you would say NO, because he didn't play many games for them this season.

You must be on colos.

You no go ever accept your goof. Na to embarrass yourself dey sweet you well well.

Sheva that Don Carlo let go is who airmark wants us to believe he is part of 4 CFs Chelsea was preparing for the season.

Dey get small shame nah..

Andrey Santos scores his first Strasbourg goal and it's a 90+1 match-winner against Metz…

He also received his April POTM Award before the game 🤯

GEM 💎🌟

WhoDeyHause:

This boy is giving me generational talent vibes.

Kendry Paez will be best talent to be signed by Chelsea football club.

He needs to be protected at all cost.

timbros:


I'm sure you know what "late bloomer" means..

Not everyone start cooking at the same age.

Zidane is a typical example of late bloomer.

Zidane was not a late bloomer. He was already a star at Bordeaux.


You can continue with the rest of your other misinformation.

Andrey Santos was named man of the match against Metz..After scoring the winning goal in the 90+ ...🔥💙

He also received the following awards before the match,,:

• Ligue 1 Young Player of the Month
• Strasbourg Player of the Month

He has settled in Europe - and is going to be a huge player for Chelsea in the future. The talent is insane 🔥

#CFC #OnlyChelsea

timbros:


You can do better than this, airmark.

How did Chelsea prepare Shevchenko for 2009/10 season? A season he played just 4 minutes and left for Ukraine.

Comprehension is your problem. I give up.

BlueAngel444:
it's actually £30m and his salary is £65k per week can't compare to the great hojlund 😁

Let's stop comparing our team with a United team that haven't smelt Epl trophy since Ferguson left, while City keep on winning the league.

Chelsea should be looking at Man city's standard abeg, not Palmgrove, Antony, Amodu and Kabiru they are parading.

When you have your striker missing this type of goal,leave him and start changing your goalkeeper.

@airmark

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/LDPxudBi9dz5Q5WL/?mibextid=vNHAvl

forgiveness:


17 goals out of 40 chances. He try well no bi small.

That's why I like Madrid. If you don't meet up to their standard they sell or loan you out as a youngster to develop. I won't be surprised if in few years time they come back for Odegaard.

popizaino:
When you have your striker missing this type of goal,leave him and start changing your goalkeeper.

@airmark

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/LDPxudBi9dz5Q5WL/?mibextid=vNHAvl

He should be loaned out, if we want to challenge for Epl next season.

That's how they were against me on Morata and we stupidly wasted years, waiting for a fruitless tree to produce. Who will help us straighten Jackson's legs now?

When Bayern saw that Boathand was useless and nobody to cover him up, the club president publicly disgraced him to force him out. Football is a serious business, not a charity.

popizaino:
When you have your striker missing this type of goal,leave him and start changing your goalkeeper.

@airmark

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/LDPxudBi9dz5Q5WL/?mibextid=vNHAvl

Was he about to laugh at the end of the clip?

OSIMHEN
Goals: 15 in 22 starts
Assist: 3
Non-penalty goals: 12
Goals per game: 0.6
Goal frequency: 131 minutes
xG: 15.3
xG on target: 18.2
Goal conversion rate: 17%
Chances created: 23

JACKSON
Goals: 14 in 29 starts
Assist: 5
Non-penalty goals: 14
Goals per game: 0.4
Goal frequency: 188 minutes
xG: 17.89
xG on target: 16.1
Goal conversion rate: 19%
Chances created: 36

* League stats👀

Vischy:
OSIMHEN
Goals: 15 in 22 starts
Assist: 3
Non-penalty goals: 12
Goals per game: 0.6
Goal frequency: 131 minutes
xG: 15.3
xG on target: 18.2
Goal conversion rate: 17%
Chances created: 23

JACKSON
Goals: 14 in 29 starts
Assist: 5
Non-penalty goals: 14
Goals per game: 0.4
Goal frequency: 188 minutes
xG: 17.89
xG on target: 16.1
Goal conversion rate: 19%
Chances created: 36

* League stats👀

Jackson has a better goal conversion than osimhen,goes to say osimhen might flop in Chelsea.

Afcon really exposed osimhen

€130m for osimhen is simply fraud......

Vischy:


Jackson has a better goal conversion than osimhen,goes to say osimhen might flop in Chelsea.

Afcon really exposed osimhen

€130m for osimhen is simply fraud......

You know the grass is always greener on the other side. If you told someone without showing stats that Jackson has a higher conversion rate, in a tougher league, than Osimhen, without showing the stats, people will laugh you off.

forgiveness:


I nobi Alhaji, oga. He should be higher there but point remains Chelsea must get a striker. Shikena.

He should be higher there. Why? Did you spend £100m on him? Why do you think he should be?

Chelsea must no get anything.

Since Abramhovic took over Chelsea and we started the era of splashing on strikers, Nic Jackson has been the most productive Chelsea striker per pound, at £30m. And Jackson has done this in about the poorest team, the youngest team, the most inexperienced team, in the same era. One more thing, Jackson also went away for the Nations Cup in the same season.

You guys need perspective. I don't care, unless you want to buy Haaland or Mbappe for £300m, I can guarantee you there's is no striker out there in the world right now that gives you that value.

You want to go and spend £100m on a guy who will come and score 25 goals. You might as well give the chance to Jackson and spread that money on productive supporting ninjas like Trossard. That's what wins championships - 3 or more players scoring 15 or more goals. Not just one guy scoring 25.

E be like Airmark who insists we should have bought Vlahovic for £85m. This ninjah in more appearance, has scored less goals and made less assists than Jackson. Dude is even 2 years older than Jackson.

But we must another striker.... why?

Thank goodness you guys are not running the club.

timbros:


Did he play a role in our win that season that warrant you to name him among Chelsea CFs? Was he registered for UCL that season if he is that important? How did Chelsea prepare him for the season? By playing him for 4 minutes and shipping him out?

You have pride issues.

Vischy:


Jackson has a better goal conversion than osimhen,goes to say osimhen might flop in Chelsea.

Afcon really exposed osimhen

€130m for osimhen is simply fraud......

we don't need osimhen.

Chelsea should look for strikers in profile of Jackson that can easily play across all lines, but with better finishing

And the player i can point to now is gyokores.

nateevs:


He should be higher there. Why? Did you spend £100m on him? Why do you think he should be?

Chelsea must no get anything.

Since Abramhovic took over Chelsea and we started the era of splashing on strikers, Nic Jackson has been the most productive Chelsea striker per pound, at £30m. And Jackson has done this in about the poorest team, the youngest team, the most inexperienced team, in the same era. One more thing, Jackson also went away for the Nations Cup in the same season.

You guys need perspective. I don't care, unless you want to buy Haaland or Mbappe for £300m, I can guarantee you there's is no striker out there in the world right now that gives you that value.

You want to go and spend £100m on a guy who will come and score 25 goals. You might as well give the chance to Jackson and spread that money on productive supporting ninjas like Trossard. That's what wins championships - 3 or more players scoring 15 or more goals. Not just one guy scoring 25.

E be like Airmark who insists we should have bought Vlahovic for £85m. This ninjah in more appearance, has scored less goals and made less assists than Jackson. Dude is even 2 years older than Jackson.

But we must another striker.... why?

Thank goodness you guys are not running the club.

Ike gwuru, if we must buy a striker. Definitely not from Italian leagues abeg

airmark:


Let's stop comparing our team with a United team that haven't smelt Epl trophy since Ferguson left, while City keep on winning the league.

Chelsea should be looking at Man city's standard abeg, not Palmgrove, Antony, Amodu and Kabiru they are parading.

🤣🤣🤣

timbros:


Is it the Colwill we watched earlier in the season or another Colwill? James is not CB by trade.

earlier but he improved just before getting injured

WhoDeyHause:

Colwill has mistakes in him but not up to badiashile and Disasi.
We both know James is one of the best defensive full backs in the world if not the best and he's also part of a back 4 not a front 4.

even the Badiashile needed to pick form after injury

Disasi just joined no preseason and he had some good games, some great ones and some iffy ones.

With all this talented CBs let's look at City's CBs that even Gvardiol no fit displace Ake and is playing lb.

That's how people criticised Rudiger till he is now about to win a Spanish treble and 2nd UCL

Vischy:


Jackson has a better goal conversion than osimhen,goes to say osimhen might flop in Chelsea.

Afcon really exposed osimhen

€130m for osimhen is simply fraud......

but did you notice Jackson should have had 4more goals.

If Jackson was lethal, not only will this talk of not taking PK be crap because he would be taking it but Chelsea's position would be comfortably top four even with our poor defence highest we outscore them, Madrid style 101

If Jackson was Kane at 22, he would have had 20 to 25goals already.

Vischy:
Andrey Santos was named man of the match against Metz..After scoring the winning goal in the 90+ ...🔥💙

He also received the following awards before the match,,:

• Ligue 1 Young Player of the Month
• Strasbourg Player of the Month

He has settled in Europe - and is going to be a huge player for Chelsea in the future. The talent is insane 🔥

#CFC #OnlyChelsea

Very nice one

lordfalcao:
we don't need osimhen.

Chelsea should look for strikers in profile of Jackson that can easily play across all lines, but with better finishing

And the player i can point to now is gyokores.

Good point that's is it, Chelsea needs ball playing strikers and it's only Viktor Gyokeres that fits into that mould for now

nateevs:


He should be higher there. Why? Did you spend £100m on him? Why do you think he should be?

Chelsea must no get anything.

Since Abramhovic took over Chelsea and we started the era of splashing on strikers, Nic Jackson has been the most productive Chelsea striker per pound, at £30m. And Jackson has done this in about the poorest team, the youngest team, the most inexperienced team, in the same era. One more thing, Jackson also went away for the Nations Cup in the same season.

You guys need perspective. I don't care, unless you want to buy Haaland or Mbappe for £300m, I can guarantee you there's is no striker out there in the world right now that gives you that value.

You want to go and spend £100m on a guy who will come and score 25 goals. You might as well give the chance to Jackson and spread that money on productive supporting ninjas like Trossard. That's what wins championships - 3 or more players scoring 15 or more goals. Not just one guy scoring 25.

E be like Airmark who insists we should have bought Vlahovic for £85m. This ninjah in more appearance, has scored less goals and made less assists than Jackson. Dude is even 2 years older than Jackson.

But we must another striker.... why?

Thank goodness you guys are not running the club.

I agree with you but we must buy another striker not one that's overly expensive or puts pressure for Poch to bench Jackson but a 9 that was like Giroud for us an alternative option that can help Jackson as well. The only options we have at the club are Davidie and D.Fofana, one or both may leave on loan.

What Jackson does in games might get him injured or tired in the next game.

Viktor Gyokeres
Stats
Liga Portugal · Sporting · 2023-24
32 Matches
27 Goals
10 Assists

Release clause:€100m

Vhlahovic
31 games
16 goals
3 assist

Available for €100m

Victor Osimhen
22 games
15 goals
3 assists

Release clause: €130m

Make your choice Chelsea fans....