A001's Posts
Nairaland Forum › A001's Profile › A001's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 (of 184 pages)
popizaino:Don't focus on your life. Continue hating on one of the best coaches in the world that doesn't even know a nonentity like you exist. Tuchel will succeed in Bayern like he did in Dortmund and Mainz. Even if he doesn't, all you'll do is to make noises all about. Noisemaker. Mr "Potter is better than Tuchel". Where's Potter now? |
Two clowns. I guess it was Tuchel that made your Potter a failure as a coach. |
Ibime:We've Tuchel to thank for that. We're lucky our fate to play in EPL next season isn't in Lampard's hands. If it was, na relegation straight. |
OasisX:Why? |
Lampard don finish Everton this season. Relegation sure for them die. If he had his way, Chelsea would be fighting relegation now.
|
🚨 Sam Allardyce on Chelsea and the new ownership: “Talk about wasting money! They’ve delved into a business they know little about. The club’s in a terrible state.” |
Melvyn11:I have work to do. You can keep crying in my mentions. Men and women are different on the anatomical level, and that's why they're not equal. Having a different anatomy doesn't mean a woman doesn't have equal rights as a man. If you've nothing sensible to say, stop mentioning me unnecessarily and find something useful to do with your time. You've been quoting me for over an hour and can't cite just one reason to back your points. |
Donjazet2:There are no female prophets of Yahweh in the Bible. Those ones you mentioned are not Yahweh prophets. |
Melvyn11:You're just confused. You're a religious person, and that's why I quoted your Bible. Do you have examples in your Bible to show a man is equal to a woman? Examples like female prophets? You've not given a single reason why a man is equal to a woman. You've been repeating the same line since, which is stale. A simple look at the anatomy of a man compared with a woman's shows a man is different from a woman. They're not the same at the biological level, meaning they're not equal. If they were equal, they'll have the same features anatomically. |
Melvyn11:You're just confused. You believe a man is equal to a woman yet you believe in the same book, the Bible (your god's book), that says "the man is the head of the house". Where's the equality there? |
Donjazet2:My original post is clear enough and answers the question. |
Melvyn11:The original post you quoted is clear enough. Read it again to get your answers. Men and women are different and not equal, but both should have equal rights in society. But you can believe man = woman sha. I wonder why one is called a man and the other a woman in the first place or why one bears a child naturally and the other doesn't. |
Donjazet2:You didn't see mostly there? I said "today's women are mostly toxic women", you changed it to "today's women are toxic". |
Donjazet2:If A = B, A is the same B. A man is different from a woman at the biological level. So they're not equal. |
Melvyn11:Repeating the same line all over again. You've no evidence to back your claim? Even the imported god you dey worship didn't make any female a prophet in your Bible. |
Donjazet2:Point to where I said "today's feminists are toxic" in the post you quoted. |
Melvyn11:You're merely repeating the same line over and over again? What makes men and women equal? The biology doesn't agree with your statement. |
No female prophets in Islam, Judaism, Christianity (Catholicism). Yet, you say men and women are equal. Men and women are different at the basic (biological) level. But both should have equal rights. |
Melvyn11:No, they're not. A simple look at the anatomy of a man compared with a woman's shows they're different. |
Melvyn11:One of the key reasons they're not equal. |
Melvyn11:Men and women are fundamentally different at the biological level and other levels. |
Melvyn11:What does it look like? |
In modern times, I don't take most feminists seriously. However, the history of feminism is rich and interesting, especially in the US and the UK. Even as a man, I shared the beliefs of prominent feminists in the US such as Jane Addams, who was a strong advocate for women's rights and played a leading role in the women's suffrage movement in the 20th century. In the past, women were not allowed to go to school, vote, run for public office, and do certain jobs in many parts of the West. Women like Jane Addams and Susan Anthony fought hard to promote women's rights, and they achieved laudable feats. Over the years, feminism had gone through various phases: first wave, second wave, third wave, and fourth wave. Today, I feel the movement has practically lost its relevance. Unlike those brave feminists of the past, today's feminists are more or less opportunists. It's pertinent to point out that men and women are not equal -- and can never be equal. But both should have equal rights. I support gender equality: Women should have the same access to education, job opportunities, and political representation as men. Also, I support gender equity: The idea of fairness and justice in the way that men and women are treated, taking into account their different needs and experiences. These are the good principles upon which the original feminist movement was established. But today's feminists are mostly toxic women. People should not be discriminated against based on gender, as proponents of the LGBTQ+ movement aver. |
Emaprince:Disgraced out of a UCL at the quarter-finals by just a loan goal to the biggest team in the tournament? Disgraced out a CL he won in the previous season? Is a lone goal a disgrace to you? Was it TT that made your silly Lampard lose all the games he has managed for us after making Everton a relegation-threatened club? Kloop with much fewer achievements than TT is still with Liverpool. His career at Liverpool has been marred with some bad results and poor form. Liverpool has gone through some crises under Kloop. But Liverpool's management stuck with him and supported him. That team is in a better shape than us. Clueless Boli wrecked this season for us by sacking Tuchel at the beginning of the season. Chelsea is still paying for that silly decision. Only a mumu sacks a top coach and appoints a complete rookie. Then sack the rookie some months after numerous poor results and appoint another rookie, one who most likely will lose all the games he'll manage for the team. And you're mentioning a Tuchel that left Chelsea at the beginning of the season at the 5th position for Potter and your stupid coach Lampard who both have wrecked the club. |
BlueMann:Thanks to Boli and Russia. If to say Boli get sense, things for no worse like this. |
wman:You know no say that boy na salaro before. He no dey all right in the head. Ibime hyping useless coach Lampard is still understandable being the club legend as a player. But who be poto poto? |
But this EPL na funny league sha. How come just one league has two of the worst coaches in Europe in Lampard and Potter? How come just one club appoint these two of the worst coaches in Europe all in a single season? |
airmark:That one na senseless goat. |
MorataFC:Are you sure? Lampard go overshock you o lose everything |
Sterling na the 12th man for Brentford. Very useless player. 2-0, lols |
Lampard go lose all the remaining games this season. The worse coach in EPL. |
raumdeuter:Lols, weak point again. I'm neither a politician nor public official. On that thread you made the comment, the OP was talking about the anti-corruption mantra of Buhari's campaigns where he promised several times to fight corruption among public office holders. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 (of 184 pages)
