TenQ:
Spatial dimensions are axes of space that we can move through like the x, y, and z axis that we can move through.

Let's go on a journey of dimensions by imagining a 3D space (as we are familiar with it).

Existence in Zero Dimension:
Zero Dimension is just an infinitesimally small point within a 3D space. A person within a zero Dimensional space is static and he would believe he's alone in the whole universe. Words like velocity, distance, Area, Volume or Space would be nonsensical to him.

Existence in One Dimension:
One Dimension is an assembly of infinitely large numbers of zero dimensions in a straight line. A person within a one dimensional space within a 3D space is unaware of the fact that he's in a 3D space. It is impossible for him to know if he's in the X or y or z directions as these are meaningless to him. Measurements of distance, speed make sense to him, however, he cannot comprehend the meaning of area or volume or space. You will find it difficult to convince him that it is possible to have a higher dimension than 1D.
A paradox:
even when he is seen from the 3D space as alined in x or y or xz directions, it is oblivious to him.

Existence in Two Dimensions:
A Two Dimensional space is an assembly of infinitely large numbers of one dimensions in a straight line stacked on upon the other. A person within a Two dimensional space within a 3D space is unaware of the fact that he's in a 3D space. It is impossible for him to know if he's in the xy or yz or xz planes as these are meaningless to him.
Measurements of area, displacement, velocity, volume, area density make sense to him, however, he cannot comprehend the meaning of area or volume or height. You will find it difficult to convince him that it is possible to have a higher dimension than 2D.
Paradox:
When an object is placed in a closed loop, he believes that it is scientifically impossible to bring out the object from within the loop without breaking the loop.
Of course, those of us who live within the 3D space will laugh at his folly. When such a feat is done before him by someone in the 3rd dimension, he concludes that it must be a miracle

Existence in Three Dimensions:
A Three Dimensional space is an assembly of infinitely large numbers of Two dimensions stacked on upon the other. A person within a Three dimensional space within a 4D space is unaware of the fact that he's in a 4D space. It is impossible for him to know if he's in the xyza or xyzb or xyzd volumes as these are meaningless to him.
Measurements of area or volume or height, displacement, velocity, volume, area density make sense to him, however, he cannot comprehend the meaning of anything outside the 3D.

Just as the person in the 1D or 2D space, You will find it difficult to convince him that it is possible to have a higher dimension than 3D.

Paradox:
When an object is placed in a closed volume, he believes that it is scientifically impossible to bring out the object from within the volume without breaking the volume.
Of course, those who live within the 4D space will laugh at his folly. When such a feat is done before him by someone in the 4th dimension, he concludes that it must be a miracle

Christians have always spoken about God, Angels, Demons and the Spiritual Realm which in this case is at dimensions higher than 3 dimensions. We cannot tell if their dimensions is the 4th or 5th or 6th....1000th.
Atheists understandably think that any dimension higher than 3D is a figment of imagination.

Note:
Time is NOT a dimension: time is a measure of intervals between events in 1D, 2D, 3D , 4D space


Question:
1. Is it reasonable to conclude unequivocally that higher dimensions than 3D do NOT exist in the Universe?
2. What kind of experiments would you advise scientists in the 2D world conduct to prove the existence of the 3D space?
3. Let's assume that by some Stroke of massive intelligence, scientists in the 2D space have perfect scientific knowledge of their space, would this knowledge be adequate in the 3D space?
4. We know that a person in a higher dimension can interact with those in the lower dimensions: is the converse possible?

Bishopkingsley:


Not a computer simulation rather it should be probably God's simulation

Bishopkingsley:
❤️❤️
Energy
The first law of thermodynamics, also known as Law of Conservation of Energy, states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed; energy can only be transferred or changed from one form to another. ... In other words, energy cannot be created or destroyed.


You said you wanted scientific evidence about God

And I am now showing you how science discovered an area of God


Now am saying and
Stating that God is many things and that God is power and since power is energy

Therefore since science says
. Energy can not be created or destroyed

There for God exists

Because science shows that there is a force that can not be created and that force can not be destroyed

They called that force energy


While Bible calls that force God


My brother the linkage is very clear for all to see the evidence from scientists research


If science never found this force then Bible theories maybe said to be lying but here science found it and science explain it exactly the way Bible explains it


God can not be created and God cannot be destroyed same as energy definition

Is this not marvelous in our eyes


Glory to God

JustMe77:
Hi to all my fellow marvel fans, crazily-in-love with marvel fans. I have read most of this thread from 2015 and it's bcs of you guys I decided to join nairaland. I am not a fan of marvel comics though since I haven't read any marvel comic book b4. The only one I've read is x-men. After watching end game(the best movie ever!) many will think that marvel is finished. Heck no!, they are coming wit full force now and am happy to have joined this thread at this point in time. who else is excited abt the mcu?!!!
Plss give me a warm welcome

pu7pl3:


Can never forget their queen Sabr1na and Duke Vic2ree

mJbolt is not civil ..there is also cottonmouth, 1000waystodie or something like that and africagalactic

None of them are as hardcore as Hulk tho

F0REVERB0SS:

Hasn't been said , but probably Bushman .

Oladimeji247:

They just casted Ethan Hawke to play the villain. this series is really turning out to be something special

webhead:
3 days left!

Kaycee7:
I miss the good old days when we had decent trolls. These kids today don't even bother to try.

webhead:
yeah.

I was schocked as hell, when I saw last night that it had deteriorated.

I guess it's a bad movie after all. but I'll need to see it for myself.

hope wanda-vison won't disappoint.

Sabr1na:

Yeah I don't know about this. At this point I've developed a certain level of apathy for this game. I don't like how the levels are basically just these big arenas with enemies that you select. I would've preferred an open world, something like Spider-Man PS4 or the Arkham games.

I also thought the gameplay looked a bit boring. It just didn't seem fun to play to me. You could see Thor doing that same combo over and over.

And I don't know why you would take out Captain America in your first Avengers game . Save something like that for the sequel. People want to play as Cap. I'm sure he'll be back, but the character will probably be missing most of the game.

F0REVERB0SS:
I have no great excitement for any of the future announced Marvel movies at the moment. There a couple I am interested in seeing....but the thrill is gone for me. While I liked INFINITY WAR and ENDGAME.....I saw no reason to kill off characters because some actor's contracts were up. I have watched multiple actors play James Bond, Tarzan, Superman, Batman, etc......I could have watched a new actor play Iron Man or Captain America. ENDGAME was an ending. My set of MCU films from IRON MAN to ENDGAME make a grand set and series that I will continue to re-watch when ever I can. Yes, I know that SPIDER-MAN FAR FROM HOME came after ENDGAME....but it seems (to me) to be the start of the new stuff and doesn't fit in with the other movies. I will watch future MCU films as they are released....but I will not be waiting on the edge of my seat for them like I did all the others.

Sabr1na:

I would be in the same boat if the only things we're getting were sequels to Captain Marvel, Black Panther, Doctor Strange, Thor, Spider-man "Home" films, prequels to Black Widow, new sets of films from Shang-Chi, Eternals and TV shows for Hawkeye, Loki, and Falcon & The Winter Soldier, She-Hulk, Moonknight and Ms. Marvel.

However, what's really got my attention is the X-men. It won't be for a few years yet, so that's got my excitement way, way tempered down. When that time comes and all the casting news is released and the set pictures? Yea you'll see me in cloud 9.

But for now I'm just sitting back and hoping the slate of films that comes out in the next few years doesn't ruin the MCU

MJBOLT:

what did flash do in the JL movie?i'll wait and cyborg will get crushed by spider man,vision or iron man even scarlet witch is enough.wonder woman best feat of strength is lifting a WW1 tank,that's something war machine did,there will be no battle for aquaman when he has been reduced to the size of an ant.

100naira:

"In all my years of conquest, violence and slaughter, it was never personal. But I tell you now, what I'm about to do to your stubborn, annoying little planet, I going to enjoy it, very very much".



... Thanos pre COVID-19





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANuJ4m5m1kc

Darkprime:

Could have been good. But I still think Disney and Marvel should have shown more spine and set all of Phase 4 during the 5 year snap and put Endgame at the end of Phase 4. They could have had a Hawkeye film in the vein of Logan. And a smaller scale Black Widow film with Natasha having to pick up the pieces and operate in a world with mostly failed governments. It would have been an opportunity to do darker and more intimate character oriented films for a few years.

pu7pl3:


Same you that won't agree that your talent speaks for you in Hollywood but will jump and agree to the foolish take on looks...

Go and sit down my friend

Shittaakeem:

Cottonmouth:
I’m so bored, I’m actually starting Inhumans. Who this quarantine even epp?

Barely halfway into the second episode and I feel like tossing my laptop out the window. In God's name, what was the reason for cutting Medusa’s invincible hair or for even doing this without having the fantastic four? Nawa oo

pu7pl3:
I can't even..with you guys anymore... someone that claims to know how Hollywood works is saying that Cavill gets more roles just because he is good looking

There is nothing else to add here...run from it all you want, deny it all you want Cavill is the better actor and he will continue to be more prominent and relevant than Cox..

Cox can stick to his usual music videos and short films..it's what he is really good at...

HbJ2:

If I remember correctly, Cavill and Cox were both up for the role of Tristan in Stardust and Cox beat him out which is how Cavill ended up with the bully role in the first place.

pu7pl3:


[i][color=#770077] Actually, your talent speaks for you..if you are talented enough and show it you would always be called on for these kind of projects..

If Cox is as talented as y'all claim he would have been a bigger deal than he is now..it's simple

All of you here backing Cox as a better actor are just talking about his role in Daredevil..

that's his highest point/level, that's where his range stops..Cavill on the other hand has alot of range Comedy, Action, thrillers andwe have seen him helpless, we have seen him as a spy, we have seen him handle swords etc and he looks to just be getting started

Lala39:
Acting ain't errythang.... Bale as Batman isn't nearly as iconic as Chris Reeve as Supes despite being a better actor ..

Sometimes sheer presence trumps character acting chops.

pu7pl3:


Your shalaye no make sense...try again

pu7pl3:


You have no point me man, it's obvious you just came here to twist logic

dragonflyy:
[/s]
looooooool... I did not know that talent boiled down to a mathematical equation

please try again

pu7pl3:




..instead you resort to canceling my comments, throwing Jabs and making side comments like little kids deprived of thrills

pu7pl3:




This is the type of clownery that will turn this place into a desert again real quick

Cox was decent in just one series and all of a sudden he is a better actor than Cavill, even when the numbers clearly state otherwise..?

Okay, you are refuting numbers but what other parameters have you brought as measuring tools to back up your claim? Nothing..instead you resort to canceling my comments, throwing Jabs and making side comments like little kids deprived of thrills

Y'all are too old for this advice but there is time for everything

HbJ2:
Lol... i can’t picture Matt Murdock as superman. I just don’t see it.

nyarlathotep:

Exactly. Why would the MCU ever need to reboot? They'd just continue to tell new stories with new characters within the pre-established continuity. That's like rebooting Star Wars.