Airmark, Popizaino and even Nihilistjnr think that my saying our bigger issue is at the back means that I don't want a better striker for us than Jackson.
When my point has always been that even if you sign Haaland today, as long as you keep making comical errors at the back, you will keep throwing points away.
Our bigger issue is not at the back, we can all see that even with badiashile we still collected 3pts and without spending more than 38m on the defence as against 150m spent on attack, we have improved tremendously on the table.
My brother, rest when your point received a knock out.
timbros: Below is one of my very first comment on this matter. January 18th to be precise...
Later that same day, I said this...
The very next month (February), I made this recommendation which covers both ends of the pitch.
I even recommended a tactically sound coach who can change things with the personnel on ground because improvement is not only about buy this player or buy that player....
They make it look like you MUST be either on the attack OR defence side of the divide. Once you think defence is the MAJOR problem, it automatically means you are very okay with he attack. You don't want anything to be touched in the attack.
Look at him mocking my "balance" comment.
Who in his right senses doesn't want his team to be balanced?
This is Sancho spanking your head today, while your Sterling is melting on the bench at Arsenal.
Kimbeast: Bro you are typing foolishly. How exactly is this statement the same with the previous one? Should I bring you Pep talking about City creating chances and not scoring.
Pep after winning southampton:
"We created chances that we couldn't convert but the result is good. People had said to me about Russell and his team"
Pep after losing against Madrid:
"What we have done in many years is creating more chances than the opponent, who create few. That’s what happened today. Unfortunately, we couldn’t [win] like in previous game"
You have Apollo?
"Probably the big difference was inside the box.
Maresca kept on hammering on the same thing, until he mentions Jackson's name? I won't reply you again, you too dull.
Kimbeast: You are typing nonsense. Nkunku would have been starting if Jackson was not quality in the box. It simply shows enzo was only talking about a single game when Jackson was having an off day.
What about against Man city?
Maresca : "Probably the big difference was inside the box. I'm quite happy in terms of performance. For me, the important thing is to create chances. We didn't score but we created chances."
That's been diplomatic and he shouldn't be thrown under the bus as he is still needed until the season ends. I wouldn't have even mentioned his wastefulness in public, like Maresca did.
The crucial point that made Maresca/Chelsea to be linked with strikers now, has been chipped in. You've decided to see what you wanted to see to make yourself happy.
Kimbeast: You are wasting your time. Even Pep has mentioned how Haaland misses chances and needs to improve in some of his press conferences. Normal Managers talk to keep their players on their toe Is what that nigga is running agenda with.
Maresca also said it more than once that we lack quality in the box. To be specific, he removed Jackson against Bournemout and Nkunku scored. After the match he said he introduced Nkunku because we lacked quality in the box.
They must use fingers to demonstrate before you know 2+2=4.
StarchAndBanga: How ur brain read the full quote from Maresca below and tagged it as a criticism truly shows ur level of reasoning
Another one whose brain is full of Starch and Banga, and with no discerning spirit.
A Coach telling the public that his finisher missed 1 v1 chances and that he needs to be more brave, indicates strong concerns that if he doesn't improve he will find a solution. But since your brain can't process that, it's not criticism but hailing.
Sportsweb: Your problem is you always wants to be right 24/7, this makes you argue like a mad man. Ask everybody here on this board, they all see you as a mad lunatic.
Nobody criticize or troll Jackson more than me, both here, Facebook and Twitter. But his performance this season made me to change my stance a little bit but you, aka mad man of this thread refuse to even accept that Jackson has improved or done well despite scoring 8 goals and 3 assists this season.
Even Ibime that use to say Jackson leg is not straight, now uses Jackson to troll you whenever he scores.
Is Maresca a mad man too, for criticizing Jackson few days ago as seen below? You and others that couldn't see his wastefulness this season are the mad men. Not me and not Maresca.
Maresca - 'For sure, this season he’s had one-v-one chances he has missed - that can happen - but he can improve that area. He can be a bit more brave on the ball when we need to link with him .’
If a coach said this about his main striker, there's a problem, but you are blind, deaf and have no discerning spirit.
Airmark's doggedness is similar to that of the fearless Honey Badger - his resilence and tenacity when confronted by lions and other higher predators, gives him the edge
I am always armed with proofs.
Take for instance, some of these people were shocked that despite scoring 8 goals Jackson was still criticised and asked to improve for missing 1 v 1s this season. One asked me when he said it and I replied and it's a fact. None of Timbros, Nateevs, Lordfalcao, sportsweb and other casuals hyping Jackson could query Maresca but they understand the fact that like Maresca I am yet to be impressed as there's a standard expected of a Chelsea striker and Jackson is not there.
It seems one Chelsea hater is behind this Kimbeast account and i suspect Dayo.
Maresca is just waiting for next summer to get a reliable striker and not the one still learning, that missed 1 v1 chances.
Maresca - 'For sure, this season he’s had one-v-one chances he has missed - that can happen - but he can improve that area. He can be a bit more brave on the ball when we need to link with him but overall there are many areas he’s already improved a lot.’
This your post have literally confirmed that he has been beaten repeatedly. I don't care how many time he comes back with "YOU GO KILL ME TODAY".. Everyone has clearly seen that he is beaten time without number. That's the important thing and that's what I care about
He will still quote this comment shamelessly. He doesn't miss any single post
Ibime confirmed that he has been skipping convos on the attack vs defence for months, so he didn't have the clear picture of how you have collected more Ls than Southampton with your porous defence.
Chelsea spent over 150m on attack and less than 40m on defence, and we are doing much better than we did last season (my position justified).
You asked Chelsea not to sign Sancho, man has given us 7 G+A in like 10 matches.
If not that you are shameless, you are supposed to offer yourself to all Chelsea fans, to be sent on errand throughout this season as punishment before you are allowed to be posting again.
Sportsweb: The problem Airmark argues for arguing sake. The many years of arguing with a legendary goal shifter ramuduteur has corrupted his brains..he is just like Ramu the godfather himself.
You deserve no reply, you are like that ballsproblem whatever, I think the type of ogogoro you take at a particular time determines the way your opinion goes.
No be you post this to mock Jackson and tag me? Now I argue for argument sake.
Because I don't put the cart before the horse bro. I think well before posting and some of these guys have no retentive memory. They usually forget their positions on issues and when I bring proofs, they become dumb and foolish and I saunter.
For example, Timbros was strongly against signing Sancho but he has forgotten, when I told him he asked me to bring proof. When I showed him his post against Sancho or any other LWF, he wagged his tail.
The multiple attacks on me is a function of many Ls these guys have collected. They got it off Morata's dismissal. More recently they are unhappy that Sterling was chased away and we are scoring more. All their 'If you like buy Haaland, we can't do well with the same poor Fofana, Colwill, Cukuruku", has been shamed and they are uncomfortable.
So I expect them to have stomach ache and palpitations and throw all sorts, to reduce the shame.