₦airaland Forum

Android17:
"You can pay for school but you can't buy class".

MOU pushed your Fraudiola in the mud, you are here quoting what an albino saw in your 007.

Raumdeuter, you have a fax message from Istanbul.

timbros:
Sterling GA last season.... 12

Sancho/Neto GA so far...

This is the same nonsense stance hailing Sterling, that trumps mine billions times, according to Egbon Lateef.

They wanted that useless Sterling to still remain and they didn't want us to get Neto and Sancho. Thank God we have a Maresca, that understands football.

Replace Jackson with a reliable finisher and replace Badiashile and Desasi next summer, then we go for the league title.

Godblessme1:
Oga rest why is the Christian God so weak when it concerns the defending of his church?


I'm a Christian I think of this everyday. A time will come the whole world will be destroyed by Islam and it's coming near.
world

You are obviously not a Christian. Taqqiya must kill you one day.

swiz123:
How exactly is 7 point difference after just 14 games competing? Are we competing with Liverpool? No we are not because we couldn't beat Arsenal and Man U, we lost to Liverpool and Man city.

These are games we couldn't dominate and our defence let us down. Liverpool on the other hand won all these games except drawing to Arsenal.

So how exactly is 7 point deference after 14 games a competition?

You guys can be irritating. Are Arsenal competing?

Anyways, Maresca should do the needful by bringing quality into the box by summer to complete our improved attack, so we can win the league next season.

swiz123:
It's obvious you have no analytical mind and would rather go on and about in endless back and forth over useless arguments that tend to dull one's IQ.

What I said is clear to those whose IQ isn't at par with a child's.

What you said has been confirmed to be foolish with our position on the log. If we got Gyokeres, we would have become the favourite by now.

swiz123:
Jokes on you if you think we can compete for anything with those defenders.

Shameless thing.

MorataFC:
I hope Chelsea wins the league soon, so we can finally put the 'attack vs defense' debate to rest. If not, these guys will continue to debate this discussions for years to come.

It has already been settled. We can see even Nateevs distancing himself from Timbros stance that attack wasn't our major problem.

After the window closed i posted it and now we are here.

airmark:
We had same number of big chances as Arsenal and they coverted 15 more than us last season.

There's a reason we have spent over 150m on our attack and we didn't spend more than 40m on defence. We conceded less against City at home this season as against 4 last season, and we scored 6 against Wolves as against 1 we scored last season at molineaux.

The only painful thing is that we didn't upgrade from that wasteful Jackson. Every other thing I asked for in the attack was done.

Felix - 60m
Neto - 52m
Dewsbury - 35m
Guiu - 6m
= 153m

Veiga - 14m
Jorgensen - 24.5m
Tosin - 0
= 38.5m

nateevs:
Again, you are a fraud. This is the entirety of the quote you keep going to.





You constantly exclude the larger point of the quote, by fraud; instead continue to concentrate on the single lines that have nothing to do with the larger point i am making. Meanwhile there are multiple indicators telling you how not to argue. But your cannot resist the urge.


First got said I didn't mention anything about support casts. Then you said I didn't say anything about signing LWF. Now you are saying I didn't make any arguments at all, because I cared to mention that Timbros was making more sense than you were.

Just motherfu**king bold-faced lies in the face of overwhelming evidence.

What sort of human being are you?

What you are doing can be likened to a kid caught munching a stolen meat and asked why he stole it. Instead of answering he started talking about how other parents give their kids meat to eat and take them out to Pizza hut. Na slap such nonsense deserve.

Obviously you are the fraud here, as your post is a complete paragraph and you should answer the simple question instead of keeping malice with your own post.

nateevs:
Alhaji, you have confused me with someone else. I never joined your attack v defence debate, even though I did acknowledge that Timbros' stance trumps yours by a billion light years.

I ask again, what's Timbros' stance in the attack vs defence debate that trumps mine a billion light years?

You must not leave Timbros to bear the brunt alone.

swiz123:
What is happening is that Airmark is and has always been mischievous and very dishonest as he only cares about winning an argument.

Instead of you to bury your face in shame, you are mentioning me in your stupid post, when we are on 2nd on the table, with the same defenders you claimed we wouldn't use to compete. With a better striker we would have become the team to beat.

Shameless thing.

swiz123:
Jokes on you if you think we can compete for anything with those defenders.

Spy360:
Your children are my flesh and blood 😂

So Igbo girl dey control your gear box 😂

You want to claim children that are not yours? Go adopt na.

drisham:
Maresca said this when?

6 days ago. E shock you abi?

The way you casuals see football is different from how professional analysts see it. That's why most of you attack my positions here, which most times tally with the professionals'.

dostr4:
Airmark I have a quick one for you,.. LiVarpool who is 1st on the log, how many goals does their striker have? Newcastle & villa who have lethal ST where are they on the table. MJ that you're quick to discredit, who is improving before our eyes, what's your target for Jackson this season.
One with a proper football knowledge knows that without a proper supporting cast your team is just a 'Tottenham with Kane' in Nateevs words.

A league season is a long hike so it's too early to pick the winner and besides, when I was asking for reinforcement in the attack, I didn't ask for only striker so I don't see any reason for this question.

I want to win the league this season that's why I wanted more than a support cast.

Maybe I will put this as my default footer, so that my position will be known and all these unnecessary questions will stop.

airmark:
Just like Mikel, I want us to compete for the Epl title and not just aiming at top 4. We have spent over 1bn and shouldn't be thinking like Aston Villa.

swiz123:
What is happening is that Airmark is and has always been mischievous and very dishonest as he only cares about winning an argument.

Below is what I care for and I stated it before our first kick this season. I have been supporting Chelsea since 90s, and you can't ask me to lower my standard or expectation after sinking a lot of funds.

airmark:
Just like Mikel, I want us to compete for the Epl title and not just aiming at top 4. We have spent over 1bn and shouldn't be thinking like Aston Villa.

nateevs:
You sound like you never held down a professional job. I expect more intellectual contribution from a suya merchant.

So because I weighed in on a debate between yourselves, means I cannot hold any outside opinions on other topics? Are you this close-minded in the face of evidence?

I just gave you a screenshot from August showing you where I stated affirmative, even before this point, upgrades on Sterling's and Madueke's positions being more of a priority than a CF position but you are still denying it's existence, but binding it to yet a completely different debate.

Do you lack the capacity to understand that one point of view in not contigent upon the other? What is wrong with you man?

Why are you so desperate?

Stop doing shakushaku around the important question with scribbles that can't conceal your shameful support for Timbros in the Attack vs defence debate.

There's a reason i emboldened and reddened the important part of your post, which clearly shows your position on the attack vs defence debate and not another topic as you untruthfully claimed. Maybe you don't understand the implication of the subordinating conjunction, though, you used in your post below. That's your problem not mine.

nateevs:
Alhaji, you have confused me with someone else. I never joined your attack v defence debate, even though I did acknowledge that Timbros' stance trumps yours by a billion light years.

I ask again, what's Timbros' stance in the attack vs defence debate that trumps mine a billion light years?

You must not leave Timbros to bear the brunt alone.

Kimbeast:
What is the purpose of creating your own chances only to waste it. At his current rate of 9 in 14matches we are looking at over 20 big chances missed during the course of the season if he doesn't improve. He should take extra training sessions from Jackson on how to be a deadly finisher.

Jackson, deadly finisher?

It seems one Chelsea hater is behind this Kimbeast account and i suspect Dayo.

Maresca is just waiting for next summer to get a reliable striker and not the one still learning, that missed 1 v1 chances.

Maresca - 'For sure, this season he’s had one-v-one chances he has missed - that can happen - but he can improve that area. He can be a bit more brave on the ball when we need to link with him but overall there are many areas he’s already improved a lot.’

Kimbeast:
More reason to practice his shooting so he won't be aiming at the goalkeeper next time. We can't have a wasteful winger stinking up everywhere. For context Sterling missed 11 big chances in 31games last season. Madueke is already on 9 in 14games.

Maybe we should call your Sterling back and send Madueke to Arsenal.

timbros:
Nah... Not when one is blatantly lieing to score cheap points. I don't do such.

I recommended a LWF and we got one. We got linked to another LWF that I said we don't need. Dude is aggressively trying to force it down my throat that I was against the signing of a LWF. All in a bid to win an argument? What kind of rubbish is that?

Once I see a mention of my moniker in his post, that post is gone. Simple.

You never see anything. Next time you will think properly before you jump into my post and waste my time with your ignorance.


Attack vs Defence

Felix - 60m
Neto - 52m
Dewsbury - 35m
Guiu - 6m
Sancho - 0
= 153m

Veiga - 14m
Jorgensen - 24.5m
Tosin - 0
= 38.5m

timbros:
Are you sure you are okay airmark?

February I recommended LWF which we did in Neto. Few days to TW closing we got linked to Sancho, another LWF and I said we don't need another LWF... How does that translate to me NOT wanting a LWF for my club?

What exactly is the colour of your problem Airmark?

Henceforth, I will report and hide any trash you post, mentioning me.

Go and ask Pedro Neto's coach, where he bought him to mainly play from.

You didn't want us to sign Sancho because you knew it meant a straight L for your stance in the Attack vs defence debate. I must use it to strangle you this season.

nateevs:
That's why I told you, that you don't know your left from right. You talk too much, you argue too much, you lost track of who is who, you lose track of even your own talking points.

You are talking about the number one critique of Sterling and Madueke on this forum..Me?

I am resisting so immensely, the urge to call you the names you deserve. Like seriously?

You no. 1 critique of Sterling? Critique with no consistent request for his ouster? Critique isonu.

Egbon, stop muddling things up and address the issue of your position in the attack vs defence debate.

nateevs:
Alhaji, you have confused me with someone else. I never joined your attack v defence debate, even though I did acknowledge that Timbros' stance trumps yours by a billion light years.

Can you try your beautiful skill of twisting and turning on the emboldened? What's Timbros' stance in the attack vs defence debate that trumps mine a billion light years?

Let's start from there.

nihilistjnr:
The guy has split personalities. You might be arguing with one today, but it's a different guy posting tommorow.

Timbros is terrible.

Sportsweb:
🚨Chelsea’s first 14 PL games under Pochettino and Maresca compared
(Sofascore)
So, same number of clean sheets, but 10th vs 2nd

Noted.

Jamiuokolaa:
Airmark though

Lmao

They thought I have forgotten all their posts.

He was aggressively attacking me on that attack vs defence argument wasting my time, now he is politely asking me to stop mentioning him since it's obvious he goofed as usual.

He never see anything, next time he wont dare it. That's exactly how they tackled me on Morata. They always cherish average attackers/performances.

I made myself clear before the season started.

airmark:
Just like Mikel, I want us to compete for the Epl title and not just aiming at top 4. We have spent over 1bn and shouldn't be thinking like Aston Villa.

timbros:
Can you please stop mentioning me with trash? I politely ask please.

Since you have resorted to blatant lie, I'm done with you. Please stop mentioning me.

You are quoting your February post when I quoted the post you made few days to the closure of transfer window in August, that we shouldn't sign a new left winger I.e Sancho.

After you guys argue ignorantly and foolishly, later when you are proved wrong, you will start denying. Sorry, for wasting my time that time, I must rub salt on your injury regarding Sancho.

timbros:
With or without Sancho, Sterling is already gone.

We don't need another LW ...Just get in an experienced CB and a CF.

Trim the squad down and we are good to go.

nateevs:
Wait, are you again saying that I argued against signing a LWF?

You strongly supported Timbros stance in the attack vs defence debate.

timbros:
With or without Sancho, Sterling is already gone.

We don't need another LW ...Just get in an experienced CB and a CF.

Trim the squad down and we are good to go.

Spy360:
So you married an Igbo woman...

Ronu in da mud 😂

Nobody in the mud, werey.

All humans are not the same but you need to open your eyes and brain.

MEND001:
Story for the God's. Every Igbo is Ipob

My wife doesn't belong to a proscribed group, she is law-abiding unlike you.

swiz123:
Ask Leicester fans if they rate Fofana ahead of Morgan or Huth. With those defenders, Kante's energy will make them even more solid.

We don't have good defenders. Our coordinated press is shielding them currently. Games we failed to press properly, our defenders disgraced themselves.

You want to talk about our own Robert Huth with me? Babayaro made me a Chelsea fan and I have been following Chelsea religiously since then.

You must be kidding me.

popizaino:
You were not alone,i also said it was tactical blaming Pochettino.

You think with tactical change but with Sterling, we would be where we are now? Dey play.

I am happy that Maresca hammered on not having quality in the box and hopefully we get a reliable striker next season so that we can tick all the boxes in our attack, win the league next season.

MEND001:
Don't u think you should ask yoʻur Ipob wife at home? Since she is igbo too

She is not one of you Ipob jesters/criminals. She is a decent and peaceful being and trust me you will be proud of her.

nateevs:
He is shameless. The problem is that he spends half his time on here trying to justify he's right on every topic, to a point where he cannot remember all the topics he debated.

Can you imagine the guy saying I am trying to sneak in support cast into the debate!!!!

Like for real? Sneak? 😁😁😁😁😁 A topic he debated against profusely? I need to remind him?

I know you know forgetfulness is not from me but you. I just cleared your friend, Timbros, who denied that he asked us not to sign a new LWF. I just served him the proof and he shook his head and buried his face in the mud.

We both have different goals. I wanted us to do the needful and win the league by being better than the best team in the league, that's why I asked for more than support cast in attack. Spend more on attack and get a new CB(Silva's replacement). While all you wanted was just to see improvement and not winning the league as indicated with your support for a wasteful Jackson, same thing you did for a wasteful Morata.

I want to be a serial league and UCL champions unlike you, that's why I want more than support cast. I wasn't against it, I wanted more.

timbros:
SMH.

I shook my head for an unrepentant liar like you.

StarchAndBanga:
Guys like Nateev were emphasizing the importance of a good support cast, but all u were after was a shiny new striker..

Clown

Na starch and Banga full your brain.

I am happy Maresca understands football more than you and Nateevs combined. And his target is the top and not anything less.

If you want to be the best, you must be able to beat the best. Despite their poor run, we know that City have been the best team in Epl in recent times, if my coach could confirm this openly, it shows that he regretted not getting a quality striker as Jackson is not the quality striker we need to become the best.

nateevs:
But you are becoming a fraud sir. You and Dayo were having a conversation about clear cut chances missed and the impact on table standings. How was that a defence v attack debate?
?

Sorry, you are the fraud here as I believe you must have checked the previous conversations before Raumdeuter jumped in, and it was defence vs attack's debate.

Raumdeuter jumped into my post which was on attack vs defence and you followed suit just to counter my view of 'attack missing big chances, wrecking us and was the major problem'.

nateevs:
It had absolutely nothing to do with defence or not. Also it was a one-time interjection from me. No historical debate between you and I on this topic. Also, you had to go all the way back to February to go find something remotely close to your fraud, just to justify a stupid point, when over 90% of our debate occurred only during this summer.

Are you this desperate?

It was to show the adverse effect of our wasteful attack and a good reply to your ignorant question and you went mute as you were cleared.

I wanted Sterling and Jackson to be replaced since and we got Sterling out, the concluding part is expected by summer then we go back to be better than City and win the league next season.