₦airaland Forum

Ibime:
Wahala for who say dem go show Airmark pepper. Na your body go tell you.

Airmark is indestructible. Ask Raumdeuter and A40 who have been trying for 10 years

In school I beat one stronghead JSS1 boy from an interior village. The guy kept coming back crying and shouting YOU GO KILL ME TODAY. So I continued beating him, and he kept coming back shouting YOU GO KILL ME TODAY till he started hyperventilating and breathing loudly sounding like someone about to die of thirst. So I beat him to the nearest tap and forced him to drink water, make he no die for my hand. And still he kept coming and coming till my niggas had to save me by holding him down. Na me wey dey beat am still had to leave the dorm quickly while my niggas held him in dorm. Na me still find am the next day to apologise and make peace because he was clearly a mad man.

Airmark is the Nairaland version of that nigga. He will not lose the war, even if you win the first 10 battles. I trust am die!

I am actually not that guy as none of them beat me with facts but attempted with lies.

I stated it multiple times here that nothing concerned me with aiming at top 4, but contesting for the league title. You can't spend over 1bn recently on players and not be aiming at clinching the title and i made my suggestion known - Spend more funds on attack than the defence, throw away Sterling and get only Silva's replacement as CB. That's what brewed the initial argument.

After the transfer window closed i served those against my stance, their L as Chelsea spent more on attack than the defence and threw away Timbros and Nateevs Sterling. However, i was happy with the fortification in our attack but still made it known that my goal (winning the league) wouldn't be achieved since we refused to get a better finisher. Receipts are available and i am tired of posting them again.

The reason for the recent attacks against me, is the heat the improvement we've had on the table is giving both the Aba-made fans and Nateevs as my stance has been validated. Nobody likes losing and the smell of stupidity that oozes out of a flawed view. Whatever Nateevs asked for, was embedded in my request, but they must manipulate the true argument (focus more on the attack than the defence) to evade the obvious L.

In a nutshell, i am not the same as that your school nigga. I won the argument hands down based on Chelsea acceding to almost all my recommendations and with position on the log so far. I will only lose if Chelsea win the Epl without getting a better striker and i may even do a giveaway if it happens to show my happiness. Why won't I want Chelsea to shame Fraudiola and Raumdeuter, more than anything?.

My post on August 7 before we got Neto and Sancho, but they said i only wanted a striker.

I have been consistent with my goal - to compete for the Epl title, that's why i wanted more than Nateevs support cast.

airmark:
Lavia, Enzo, Palmer and even Jorgensen can give long pass to set a dashing striker up when our wingers are shut down.

We have Palmer who can start ahead of Madueke. I have been asking for a new LWF that can dribble in tight space since God knows when. Sterling should have been sent away even before Preseason but like some here, Chelsea are still looking for water from his stone.

The nonsense policy of not signing over 24/25 years old player, shouldn't have been extended to strikers. By now, one of Guirassy and Dovbyk should have been signed at a decent price,if we don't want to deplete our vault.

I want us to compete with Arsenal and city for Epl and not struggling to make first 6 like Timbros and co only want. We will face more low blocks and we don't have a great dribbler and potent striker. Saddening.

@kingbolton, since May i have been facing the same thing and i have been correcting them, but they are desperate.

We got Tosin for free and spent more money on attack as suggested, while the injured Colwil and Fofana had done better than Badiashile and Disasi.

Airmark was spot on, they had to hide under a Jackson that Maresca confirmed he missed 1v1 chances and need to improve.

kingBolton:
Leave nairaland for few days and you will be confused when you come back. Was expecting this fight to be between Air.mark and tim.bros , its surprising seeing it between airmark and nateevs as nateevs was attributing the issues to pochettino and not either department.

Airmark made so many rookie mistakes in this debate.
1. Why allow the debate to be boxed into a striker vs defenders something when it was always a attack vs defense issues. The genesis of the attack vs defense issues was how useless we were without cold boy on the pitch last season. How this degenerated to a defense vs Jackson debate is amusing
.

Maybe you missed some of my replies when Nateevs and Lordfalcao wanted to make it a striker vs defence issue, but in their pursuit of a non-existing win, they kept on hammering on the lie.

I replied Lordfalcao again today with this below but trust me, the goat will still come back tomorrow and ask the same foolish question and post the same thing.

airmark:
You lack understanding and only God can help you out.

When i asked chelsea to sign LWF, was that not asking for a support cast? Did i ask Chelsea to only sign a striker and no other player?

This is the foolish person Nateevs is relying on as his plug.

kingBolton:
2. The money spent and the new players in various department of the field should be what you should be banking on.

3. The league table, how many goals have conceded and how many have we scored , compared it to last season..

I posted the post below after the window closed and as replies to Nateevs in the past. But he kept on coming with support cast nonsense. That's why i asked him if a LWF is not part of support casts since i asked for one. I made it clear that i want us to challenge for the league that's why i also wanted us to upgrade from Jackson as it would be a miracle winning the league, with a wasteful striker. But you know he is hustling for an 'i told you' medal.

airmark:
We had same number of big chances as Arsenal and they coverted 15 more than us last season.

There's a reason we have spent over 150m on our attack and we didn't spend more than 40m on defence. We conceded less against City at home this season as against 4 last season, and we scored 6 against Wolves as against 1 we scored last season at molineaux.

The only painful thing is that we didn't upgrade from that wasteful Jackson. Every other thing I asked for in the attack was done.

Felix - 60m
Neto - 52m
Dewsbury - 35m
Guiu - 6m
= 153m

Veiga - 14m
Jorgensen - 24.5m
Tosin - 0
= 38.5m

kingBolton:
4. Trying to debate many opponents at once will be difficult for anyone , even John Cena no dey fight Big show and Mark Henry and the same time.

I have started ignoring foolish posts and questions.

GloriousGbola:
That's why I asked if airmark was pretending to be gay. . I remember Tatu.

Wonder where they are today in putins far right Russia.

Only few people here can back what they post up. Many will type and post before thinking.

The same guy believes being tall is a talent.

OasisX, we no go invest on drones to get pictures of impending wailings at Old Trafford like this?

nateevs:
You still don't understand. It comes back to real life. In real life, Lords like myself don't go and battle with minions like you. How do you intend to pay me for my time?


I'd rather spend the day with a mentally-deranged destitute than give you the pleasure of exchanging words meaninglessly.

Let's create a thread for a battle? Are you a child?

All those I will destroy you with words, bla bla bla, will always end in ducking. You should try to be a man of your words.

You did the same with the 'Timbros stance' post and many more that point to the same cape of deception you wear.

Skimpledawg:
To what end egbon?

If you really dip this argument, it holds no water. We are second on the log and hopefully we win more matches to make top 4 and challenge for the title.

Make e slide.


Egbon, you allowed this argument to provoke you

It's not worth it.

He is always throwing subtle jabs because he is not sound in football matters, but he went mad after I exposed his teaming up with a stance that was against signing Sancho.

Like Timbros and Lordfalcao, he is obviously not a true Chelsea fan that wants the best for the team. He strongly supported a wasteful Morata and since last season he has been against getting a striker better than Jackson, in order to compete for the league title.

Such people should be scolded in the best possible way.

nateevs:
Hehehehe. You want to refer to me as a fool and foolish and not expect me to put you in your phucking place in real life. Son, you had it coming.

It was a simple question about Halaand and City, and Liverpool and no striker. It was a strictly football debate.....Then you pivoted, after being caught in a corner and you started to refer to me as foolish and had the temerity to call me a fool.

If you think it's cool for you to do that, then I am coming for you and your ancestors off the bat. No playing.

You had a chance to answer the question without insults. You chose insults.

You want me to call a foolish question what it's not? I won't do that, I say it as it is no matter whose ox is gored.

I have asked you to agree to a battle and if you like go and hire a ghostwriter I will change your Nateevs to L ateef.

drisham:
Make una end this debate already abeg

We are 2nd on the table ffs

Fraudiola and scummies are chopping L's after L's

Wetin be the issue again sef
Insults don dey enter already

He jumped foolishly on my post where i highlighted how spending more on our attack than the defence helped us to improve on the log and it got us here.

When you see someone saying you can't mingle with me in real life during football argument, such person is the loser.

Skimpledawg:
So, this issue don reach this level?


egbon nateevs and airmark, please let it slide.

He is a wordsmith according to him, let's see if he won't 'change mouth' as usual, after receiving punches.

Today, he supports ''Attack is not our major problem''.

Tomorrow he denies taking side.

Hypocrite.

That's how he tackled me on Morata, asking us not to replace him, only to bury his face in shame after throwing him away.

lordfalcao:
you see why you dy run around.

So support cast is your reason why city is not topping. But you are looking for a prolific striker before you win the league?

You lack understanding and only God can help you out.

When i asked chelsea to sign LWF, was that not asking for a support cast? Did i ask Chelsea to only sign a striker and no other player?

This is the foolish person Nateevs is relying on as his plug.

nateevs:
Ogbeni sublime before I destroy you with words.

Mr Megedefegede don start with long epistle when dem corner am.

Let them create a battle thread for us, if you come out alive and retain your Lateef name after dropping 16 bars on your foolish head, i will deactivate.

If you don't change your plug from Lordfalcao to BIS sha.

lordfalcao:
bia, comedian.

Is support cast the reason why city has conceded 21 goals in 9 games in all competitions?

Nateevs, see who you are relying on as plug? He is against our importance of support cast

lordfalcao:
but no one copy’s you.

It’s because you’re the most ignorant poster of this thread

My ignorance is like Solomon's wisdom to you. Talk true.

nateevs:
My foolishness is several light years beyond your wildest ambitions. It will be a privilege to you and your lineage if you get the chance to mingle with my toenails.

Self-proclamed arbiter of striking position gone mute upon simple question. Alakori Airhead.

Foolish people also have connections, and rich people can also still drop stupid opinions on a niche they have no good knowledge about.

You exposed your foolishness by copying foolish questions from foolish posters. I have been suspecting your poor IQ, when you chose Kimbeast and Lordfalcao, as your opinion plugs.

How could anybody be asking foolish question why Man City are not topping when it has been Haaland carrying the team since the beginning of the season when others downed tools.

Only a dolt would be asking such foolish question when support cast like Foden has been underperforming and injuries took away others like Kova and Rodri.

Face your profession, leave analysing football to those with football brain.

nateevs:
This might be a shock to you, but we will always copy people who have multiple times the size of your intellectual capacity.

Answer the question Airhead.

Why is City not leading the league, despite having the most reliable striker in the division?

Conversely, Liverpool don't have a reliable 9 but they lead the table. Why?

Explain away.

They said silence is the best answer for a fool. I refuse to answer a foolish question from a fool, that is you.

It's conversations like this that expose emptiness in people, asking foolish questions.

Amigoss:
This is how your endless arguements look like especially that Attack Vs Defence...

2 mentally challenged people having a conversation in Lagos pic.twitter.com/7QnYaHxsPt

— Oyindamola🙄 (@dammiedammie35) December 6, 2024

Did i take L in Cucurella's argument? If you cant answer that, fvck off.

nateevs:
Leave the nonsense. Answer the question.

Why is City not leading the league, despite having the most reliable striker in the division?

Conversely, Liverpool don't have a reliable 9 but they lead the table. Why?

Explain away?

It's desperation making you to be incoherent and copying foolish question from Lordfalcao.

Android17 will come and answer your question, it's his club and after answering, you can ask me to come and corroborate or disagree.

Jamiuokolaa:
Guardiola spent 3 seasons in the useless Bundesliga and won 3 useless Titles on the bounce and had to quit that useless league...

If he had stayed 5 seasons, he would have won 6 titles

Plus he didn't spend fraudulent funds to get quality players before winning them.

nateevs:
City have the most reliable in the league, why are they not typing the table?

You are too desperate to tackle me, make your post comprehensive.

raumdeuter:
He has won 4 in a row like no manager has ever done in the league

Like he has never done in his career

Answer the question, don't be evasive like Nateevs.

Why is the bench thin?

nateevs:
Answer the question you were asked. City have the most reliable 9 in the league. Why are they not above Liverpool on the table?

You will need to ask Android17, he will answer the foolish question.

Amigoss:
I never see arguments wey Airmark no dey take L's but baba go still dey do agidi

Even on Cucurella that i asked us not to waste money on any new LB, i took L?

You need your eyes or brain fixed. One or both are bad.

lordfalcao:
haaland is the top scorer, why are they not topping Liverpool?

Keep on moving from coast to coast, in pursuit of happiness.

raumdeuter:
The bench is so thin anyone fit can get in

Why is it thin? No fraudulent funds to make it thick?

lordfalcao:
so how will you be topping the league if you had gyokeres this season, when Liverpool doesn’t have a 9 as highest scorer nor have conceded more than any other team?

They don't have reliable 9, one of the reasons we would have topped them, with a striker that can score hat trick against Epl defending champions, that we couldn't score against.

nateevs:
You are laughable. You think you caught me? Dude, when I own a position, I own it. If the facts change and I need to adjust my viewpoint accordingly, I do unashamedly. I am not fueled by the insatiable need to win like you. Therefore, I don't need to keep turning Amala because I have to win.

Plenty talk no dey full basket, answer the simple question bro.

nateevs:
The reason I didn't need to answer your question is because I didn't want to indulge you in your nonsense. You lied about my position multiple times; to a point where others had to correct you with evidence. You ignored, continuing to parrot your nonsense. And now, you are trying to engineer an escape route using the attack v defence debate.

This is a senseless excuse and you know it's not tenable.

If you say someone's stance trumps mine billion times, you have already pitched your tent to the stance. Now, saying you don't want to indulge me that's why you didn't answer it, is sheer irresponsibility from you. You know you goofed like Timbros, that's why it is hard like Zuma rock answering the question as you will be exposed as having Timbros and Lordfalcao-level of football knowledge and it will burst the nonsense support cast kite you subsequently flew.

Just like Timbros, you didn't agree that attack was our major problem and we should spend more on attack. Period. Your non-answering the question is a reconfirmation.

nateevs:
Sir, I was never a part of that debate and I don't want to be part of it, no matter how hard you try. My stance was the same then as it is now - it was more of tactical issue than any particular overwhelming personnel issue.

The keyword here being "overwhelming". Which means that despite my viewpoint, I can agree that simultaneously, some facts on either side of the attack v defence debate can be equally correct. What is not correct is a completely outlandish position on either side of that debate.

Stop playing tricks with semantics. You were not part of the debate but you agreed with his stance that attack wasn't our major problem and we shouldn't spend more money on attack last summer. Yes or No? If Timbros stance trumps mine billion times, then your support cast request was already a victim, as he asked us not to get Sancho. He still rates Sterling above both Neto and Sancho and mocked them few days ago. That's Timbros stance.

nateevs:
For instance, on the no-good stupid "outscore" nonsense arguments, a simple set of incontrovertible facts follow, like: 'no matter how many goals you score, if your defence is weak enough to concede more goals than you can score, then you will lose games'. These are just basic facts. And you will literally need to be screw-loose in the head to argue against this, even if you are on the attack side of the debate.

That was the point I tried to make when I interjected. This was the point Timbros was making at the time, and yes, it trumps yours by a billion simply because you took an outlandish position against this, saying its not true. And yes, anyone can have this point of view without necessarily joining in on the debate. How can you not understand this?

The fact that I have to explain this with this long epistle is absolutely embarrassing.

I hope you remember that post was in August and it was a reply to my post of Chelsea reasoning along with me, by spending more on attack.

You are desperate to coverup your goof with lies and evasiveness, but its not working. I will advice you next time don't interject into something ignorantly and drop opinion that will later bite you in the a.ss.

My argument with Timbros was that we should focus more on attack, since our injured defenders would return and get Silva's replacement. I don't know how you saw my view as only addressing our attack and neglecting the defence.

When you say a stance trumps mine billion times, it means i scored zero in your evaluation of the debate. You didn't consider that my stance included your own opinion of getting support cast - Sancho, which Timbros was against. Obviously, your agenda was to nail Airmark and not to be objective.

You are on Timbros side fully, show that loyalty billion times through the thick and thin and stop dancing shakiti bobo, to evade the impending shame.

Ballzproblem2:
you guys are reading here? Damn ,I only come to post Chelsea news ,the only time I read is during live match ,na person wey don chop belleful dey engage airhead.

And na that hunger go kill you.

Android17:
The irony.

1. Porto FC got suspended in 2003/4 for bribing refs. Guess who was the coach?
2. Mou has been fired 6 times. Pep 0.
3. Pep has beaten him more times in their head to head. Which of the losses was controversial?
4. PSR rules were basically created because of CFC. Why do you think your club together with Everton and City are now being called the 'Blue Cartel'? Your club is one of the clubs backing City because we copied what we saw Roman doing ...remember Roman hired Mourinho?
5. I already told you what the outcome of the 115 charges will be. The 115 charges that did not matter when we were winless in 6 games, remember? You'll bring it up again at the end of the season.

E no dey hard you.

You also told me the outcome that later led to the cremation of your Eruditor account.

Since the 115 charges hitting up, Fraudiola and his fraudulent club have been treating the transfer window like a church altar. No more manipulation of financial books to sign quality players, as old man Gundongan was recalled and pusxy brought to the field to get sodomised by Gyokeres and unknown attackers.

raumdeuter:
The same way it removes from all achievements Mourinho and Chelsea has

Chelsea never had 150 charges slammed on them.

Mou just echoed what we've been stating here. Fraudiola for a reason.

raumdeuter:
It has to be an ignorant Chelsea fan who will be pushing this narrative

How does this remove the 150 charges from Fraudiola and his fraudulent achievements?.