₦airaland Forum

Death toll in Mina stampede rises to 717; over 850 injured
MINA: The death toll in the Thursday morning stampede in Mina has risen to 717 and officials expressed fears that the number could still increase. The Directorate for Civil Defense said 863 more pilgrims have been injured.

The stampede happened as pilgrims, numbering about two million, were on their way to the Jamrat to perform the "stoning of the Devil" ritual of Haj. The exact cause of the accident could not be determined immediately.

Most of the victims were Arabs and Africans, officials said. Many of the injured were in semiconscious state. The harsh summer weather has only added to the problem. The injured were not in a position to speak.

Sirens were wailing as the ambulances brought in the injured. Hundreds of Saudi security forces and Haj volunteers are at hand helping the injured.
Most of the injured were taken to Mina Emergency Hospital. Other were also rushed to the hospitals in Makkah.
Amateur video shared on social media showed a horrific scene, with scores of bodies — the men dressed in the simple terry cloth garments worn during Haj — lying amid crushed wheelchairs and water bottles along a sunbaked street.

Pictures taken later by Arab News photographers showed bodies piled on top of each other near a gate leading to the Jamrat.

Survivors assessed the scene from the top of roadside stalls near white tents as rescue workers in orange and yellow vests combed the area.

Because of the tragedy, security officials closed the Jamrat area, where the pilgrims have to perform the symbolic stoning of the devil ritual. The Jamrat has seen stampedes in the past. But the Saudi authorities have expanded the area by constructing a multilayered complex to ease the flow of pilgrims.

The pilgrims had spent the night in Muzdalifa and had come to Mina to throw seven pea-sized stoned at one of the three wall-like structures.
Some 2 million people are taking part in this year’s Haj pilgrimage, which began Tuesday.
The stampede was the deadliest disaster at the Haj since 2006, when more than 360 pilgrims were killed in a stampede in the same area. Another stampede at Mina in 2004 left 244 pilgrims dead and hundreds injured.
Thursday’s stampede happened less than two weeks after a giant construction crane came crashing down on the Grand Mosque in Makkah, the focal point of the Haj.
That accident, on Sept. 11, killed at least 111 people and injured more than 390. Authorities blamed the crane collapse on high winds during an unusually powerful storm

http://www.arabnews.com/saudi-arabia/news/810806

Refugees, Bogus Financial System, Nuclear War -Morris AND Sheikh Imran Hosein


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez0X5KEBTWg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ7ZIvgPopw

Refugees, Bogus Financial System, Nuclear War - Sheikh Imran Hosein


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez0X5KEBTWg

David Milliband ex British Foreign Minister during bombing of Iraq now oversees resettlement of refugees (from bombing): https://twitter.com/DMiliband


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ7ZIvgPopw

Refugees, Bogus Financial System, Nuclear War - Sheikh Imran Hosein

Now Refugees Are A Trickle Due To An Unjust System


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez0X5KEBTWg

David Milliband ex British Foreign Minister during bombing of Iraq now oversees resettlement of refugees (from bombing): https://twitter.com/DMiliband

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ7ZIvgPopw

The Zionist Plan for the Middle East Translated and edited by Israel Shahak

The Israel of Theodore Herzl (1904) and of Rabbi Fischmann (1947)

In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.”

Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”
from Oded Yinon’s

“A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties”

Published by the Association of Arab-American University Graduates, Inc. Belmont, Massachusetts, 1982

Special Document No. 1 (ISBN 0-937694-56-

Table of Contents
Publisher’s Note1

The Association of Arab-American University Graduates finds it compelling to inaugurate its new publication series, Special Documents, with Oded Yinon’s article which appeared in Kivunim (Directions), the journal of the Department of Information of the World Zionist Organization. Oded Yinon is an Israeli journalist and was formerly attached to the Foreign Ministry of Israel. To our knowledge, this document is the most explicit, detailed and unambiguous statement to date of the Zionist strategy in the Middle East. Furthermore, it stands as an accurate representation of the “vision” for the entire Middle East of the presently ruling Zionist regime of Begin, Sharon and Eitan. Its importance, hence, lies not in its historical value but in the nightmare which it presents.

2 The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation.

3 This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme. This theme has been documented on a very modest scale in the AAUG publication, Israel’s Sacred Terrorism (1980), by Livia Rokach. Based on the memoirs of Moshe Sharett, former Prime Minister of Israel, Rokach’s study documents, in convincing detail, the Zionist plan as it applies to Lebanon and as it was prepared in the mid-fifties.

4 The first massive Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1978 bore this plan out to the minutest detail. The second and more barbaric and encompassing Israeli invasion of Lebanon on June 6, 1982, aims to effect certain parts of this plan which hopes to see not only Lebanon, but Syria and Jordan as well, in fragments. This ought to make mockery of Israeli public claims regarding their desire for a strong and independent Lebanese central government. More accurately, they want a Lebanese central government that sanctions their regional imperialist designs by signing a peace treaty with them. They also seek acquiescence in their designs by the Syrian, Iraqi, Jordanian and other Arab governments as well as by the Palestinian people. What they want and what they are planning for is not an Arab world, but a world of Arab fragments that is ready to succumb to Israeli hegemony. Hence, Oded Yinon in his essay, “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980′s,” talks about “far-reaching opportunities for the first time since 1967″ that are created by the “very stormy situation [that] surrounds Israel.”

5 The Zionist policy of displacing the Palestinians from Palestine is very much an active policy, but is pursued more forcefully in times of conflict, such as in the 1947-1948 war and in the 1967 war. An appendix entitled ”Israel Talks of a New Exodus” is included in this publication to demonstrate past Zionist dispersals of Palestinians from their homeland and to show, besides the main Zionist document we present, other Zionist planning for the de-Palestinization of Palestine.

6 It is clear from the Kivunim document, published in February, 1982, that the “far-reaching opportunities” of which Zionist strategists have been thinking are the same “opportunities” of which they are trying to convince the world and which they claim were generated by their June, 1982 invasion. It is also clear that the Palestinians were never the sole target of Zionist plans, but the priority target since their viable and independent presence as a people negates the essence of the Zionist state. Every Arab state, however, especially those with cohesive and clear nationalist directions, is a real target sooner or later.

7 Contrasted with the detailed and unambiguous Zionist strategy elucidated in this document, Arab and Palestinian strategy, unfortunately, suffers from ambiguity and incoherence. There is no indication that Arab strategists have internalized the Zionist plan in its full ramifications. Instead, they react with incredulity and shock whenever a new stage of it unfolds. This is apparent in Arab reaction, albeit muted, to the Israeli siege of Beirut. The sad fact is that as long as the Zionist strategy for the Middle East is not taken seriously Arab reaction to any future siege of other Arab capitals will be the same.

Khalil Nakhleh July 23, 1982
http://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReOSGFyGWJI

“Greater Israel”: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East

The Infamous "Oded Yinon Plan". Introduction by Michel Chossudovsky
This article was first published on Global Research April 29, 2013.

Global Research Editor’s Note
The following document pertaining to the formation of “Greater Israel” constitutes the cornerstone of powerful Zionist factions within the current Netanyahu government (which has recently been re-elected), the Likud party, as well as within the Israeli military and intelligence establishment. The election was fought by Netanyahu on a political platform which denies Palestinian statehood.

According to the founding father of Zionism Theodore Herzl, “the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” According to Rabbi Fischmann, “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”

When viewed in the current context, the war on Iraq, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing war on Syria and Iraq, the war in Yemen, the process of regime change in Egypt, must be understood in relation to the Zionist Plan for the Middle East. The latter consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of an Israeli expansionist project.

“Greater Israel” consists in an area extending from the Nile Valley to the Euphrates.

The Zionist project supports the Jewish settlement movement. More broadly it involves a policy of excluding Palestinians from Palestine leading to the eventual annexation of both the West Bank and Gaza to the State of Israel.

Greater Israel would create a number of proxy States. It would include parts of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, the Sinai, as well as parts of Iraq and Saudi Arabia. (See map).

According to Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya in a 2011 Global Research article, The Yinon Plan was a continuation of Britain’s colonial design in the Middle East:

“[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.

Israeli strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest strategic challenge from an Arab state. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the balkanization of the Middle East and the Arab World. In Iraq, on the basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one for Shiite Muslims and the other for Sunni Muslims. The first step towards establishing this was a war between Iraq and Iran, which the Yinon Plan discusses.

The Atlantic, in 2008, and the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal, in 2006, both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the outline of the Yinon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, which the Biden Plan also calls for, the Yinon Plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt, and Syria. The partitioning of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan also all fall into line with these views. The Yinon Plan also calls for dissolution in North Africa and forecasts it as starting from Egypt and then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region.
Greater Israel” requires the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states.

“The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must 1) become an imperial regional power, and 2) must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states. Small here will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation… This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme.” (Yinon Plan, see below)

Viewed in this context, the war on Syria and Iraq is part of the process of Israeli territorial expansion. Israeli intelligence working hand in glove with the US, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and NATO is directly supportive of the crusade directed against the so-called Islamic State (ISIS), which ultimately seeks to destroy both Syria and Iraq as nation states.
Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, September 06, 2015


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZH0VB4g68E&list=PL2VQBdA8x58Fks7Cfxb1qhafArXpo3qJr&index=3

BISHOPMAGIC IS THIS THE KIND OF COMPASSION YOU TALK ABOUT? I NEVER KNOW YOUR SISTERS DEY SERVICE ARABO TOO .



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUv8Tr9K1SM

Russian President Vladimir Putin is due to inaugurate Moscow’s biggest mosque on Wednesday, September 23. President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbaev and President of the State of Palestine Mahmoud Abbas are due to attend the ceremony. Muslims make up roughly 14 percent of Russia’s population and about 300,000 of them live in Moscow. The new mosque, which will be the seventh in Moscow, is expected to help decongest other mosques in the city, which are inundated by the capital’s growing Muslim population.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqQcZwf-i4A

Russian President Vladimir Putin is due to inaugurate Moscow’s biggest mosque on Wednesday, September 23. President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbaev and President of the State of Palestine Mahmoud Abbas are due to attend the ceremony. Muslims make up roughly 14 percent of Russia’s population and about 300,000 of them live in Moscow. The new mosque, which will be the seventh in Moscow, is expected to help decongest other mosques in the city, which are inundated by the capital’s growing Muslim population.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqQcZwf-i4A

How I Found Islam - Anthony Abdurraheem Green

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn60YMJRYjk

Abdur Raheem Green (born Anthony Vatswaf Galvin Green; 1962) is a British Muslim convert who is known in some Muslim communities for his work in Dawah, both in televised formal settings and informal contexts such as Hyde Park's Speakers Corner. He is a presenter on Peace TV.[1][2] He is engaged in education and media work on Peace TV and is the chairman of iERA, the Islamic Education & Research Academy. Green has given talks overseas, including a peace conference held in Mumbai.
Early life

Green was born in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. His father was a colonial administrator in the British Empire[4] and his mother is Polish. His father was agnostic and his mother a devout Roman Catholic. Green was raised in the Roman Catholic faith from a young age.[4]

Green attended a Monastic Roman Catholic boarding school, St Martin's Ampleforth at Gilling Castle, and then Ampleforth College. When he was 11, his father took a job in Cairo, and so Abdur Raheem would travel to stay there during his school holidays. He studied history at the University of London, but did not complete his degree because of a growing disillusionment with what he regarded as the Eurocentric teaching of the British educational system. [5]

Conversion to Islam

At a young age, Green began to question his Roman Catholic upbringing. However, at the age of 19, he stated that he would "vigorously defend" the faith, even though he did not actually believe in it. He also practiced Buddhism for nearly three years, though never formally embraced it. In 1987, Green first became interested in Islam, picking up his first copy of the Qur'an.[4] Green embraced Islam in 1988, and has been a Dawah practitioner ever since.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOG0EN4yYUo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg4Hyr3Br4s


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtMlMA8-7Bo

BishopMagic:
Op has ran away from his useless thread.

Why are muslims mentally handicapped?

GOOD I CAN RESPOND NOW
I AM NOT MENTALLY HANDICAPPED BECAUSE A MENTALLY HANDICAPPED PERSON CAN NEVER BE GRANTED A FULL SCHOLARSHIP TO STUDY AT A UN INSTITUTION ,WHICH YOU BISHOPMAGIC CAN NEVER GET IN YOUR WILDEST DREAMS.I WONDER WHAT YOU WILL DO WHEN YOU MET BUDDHIST,HINDUS AND ALL THOSE ASIANS WHO WORSHIP GODDESS.IM SURE YOU WILL CUT OFF THEIR HEADS.IDOL WORSHIPPERS ARE MORE THAN MUSLIMS AND XTAIN COMBINED.

BISHOPMAGIC IF YOU HATE MUSLIMS SO MUCH PLEASE STOP EATING TOMATOES,ONION,BEANS,YAM,AND ALL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MADE BY THE HAUSA ,BUY ONLY PRODUCE MADE FROM YOUR XTAIN BRETHREN. ANOUFIA


MARK MY WORDS EUROPE IS A MULTICULTURAL MODE WHETHER YOU WANT IT OR NOT, THANKS TO THE JEWS.EUROPE WILL BECOME MUSLIM NATION BECAUSE THATS THE ONLY RELIGION OF YOUR CREATOR AND OUR FOREFATHERS FROM ADAM(ASW) TILL MOHAMMED (SAW).THE JEWS AND THE POLITICIAN KNOW IT BECAUSE THEY CANT SURVIVE THE FUTURE WITHOUT ISLAM.
DO YOU EVEN KNOW SCHOOL CHILDREN(PRIMARY-SECONDARY) ARE BROUGHT TO THE MOSQUE IN MY CITY TO LEARN ABOUT ISLAM?ONLY ISLAM CAN REVERSE THE EVIL IN EUROPEAN SOCIETY ALCOHOLISM,PROSTITUTION,HOMOSEXUALITY,AETHISM,PERVERSION OF ALL KINDS.

EVEN OUR EUROPEAN CONVERTS WHO GOES TO JAIL ALL THE TIME ARE NOW LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AFTER CONVERSION.DO NOT BELIEVE ALL THE PROPAGANDA,I WATCHED A VIDEO ABOUT AN IMMIGRANT ENCLAVE I LIVE AND I WAS SUPRISED ABOUT THE REPORT IN THE MEDIA BECAUSE SUCH THINGS DONT HAPPEN LIKE IT WAS PRESENTED.

THE SYRIAN WAR WAS MADE TO BROADEN THE FRONTIERS OF A GREATER ISRAEL AND WARS WILL CONTINUE IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND WILL NOT END ANYTIME SOON.MORE COUNTRIES WILL DECEND INTO CHAOS BECAUSE THE ANTICHRIST IS ABOUT TO EMERGE.EUROPE WILL CONTINUE TO ACCEPT REFUGEES.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juTPGdYX9y0

Hutu Muslims saved Tutsis during Rwandan genocide
BISHOPMAGIC AND WOMBRAIDERS MUST LISTEN TO THIS VIDEO
Rwanda has been marking the 15th anniversary of the country's genocide IN 2009 when according to the government 1.2 million people were killed, the UN says 800,000 died, most of those murdered were ethnic Tutsis.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0U5AZFsBrc

By Mike Pflanz in Nairobi

6:41PM BST 05 Aug 2008

The two-year investigation said France helped the extremists who carried out the genocide and even took part in some of the killings.

It named François Mitterand, France's late former president, and former prime minister Dominique de Villepin among 33 military and political leaders.

In 100 days 14 years ago, more than 800,000 of Rwanda's minority Tutsi tribe and moderates from the majority Hutus were killed.

A French force sent to establish a "humanitarian safe zone" once the genocide had started directly took part in killing and raping Tutsis, the report alleged.

"French soldiers themselves directly were involved in assassinations of Tutsis and Hutus accused of hiding Tutsis," it said.

"French soldiers committed many rapes, forced sexual intercourse specifically with surviving Tutsi women. They clearly requested Interahamwe [Hutu militia] ... to kill Tutsis," the special commission report said.

"They also clearly requested to have Tutsi who had infiltrated in displaced population camps brought to them and have Interahamwe kill at least some of them. They let Interahamwe kill Tutsis under their eyes."

A spokesman for the French foreign ministry refused to comment, but the release of the report follows years of souring relations between Paris and Kigali, Rwanda's capital.

"We have not yet read the report which has not been sent to us by the Rwandan government. We are therefore not in a position to react," a spokesman said.

In 2006, a French judge accused President Kagame and nine of his closest officials of being responsible for starting the genocide.

In return, Rwanda expelled the French ambassador, closed French schools and intensified its efforts to join the Commonwealth.

The report states that France knew that the genocide was likely to take place but failed to act. French military advisers worked closely with the Rwandan government in the years leading up to 1994.

Those advisors helped draw up battle plans and military strategy for the Rwandan armed forces, including elite units which are accused of being among the first to start the killings, the report said.

The French suggested a program to arm civilians to protect against opposition rebels, and then went on to train volunteers. These militia formed the core of the later genocidal infrastructure.

Training and funding was also given to a department of Rwanda's national intelligence services on how to establish a computerised database of people's tribes, which was later used to draw up a "kill list" of Tutsis.

Once the genocide had started, on April 6, 1994, France sent arms to support the genocidal government, according to the report, which heard from 120 witnesses since it was set up by President Kagame in 2006.

On five occasions during May 1994, an unmarked Boeing 707 landed at the airport in the then Zairean town of Goma, which lies on the border with Rwanda.

Each time, up to 18 tonnes of weapons believed to be from Eastern Europe were unloaded and driven into Rwanda, witnesses told investigators.

One senior Rwandan official spent 27 days in Paris as the genocide was taking place, to "accelerate" six arms deliveries worth more than £2.5 million.

"Considering the gravity of the alleged facts, the Rwandan government enjoins competent authorities to undertake all necessary actions in order to bring the French political and military accused leaders to answer for their acts before Rwandan justice," the report concludes
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/2506150/France-accused-of-complicity-in-Rwanda-genocide.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXE1HfzPEJw

A person's sexual orientation is a characteristic that is so fundamental to identity that he or she should not be forced to renounce it (p. 46). The fact that there exists such a criminal law which the national targets, with provisions targeted specifically to gay people, means that these people can be considered as a separate group that is perceived as being different by the surroundings (p. 48). Article 10.1 di Qualification Directive should therefore be interpreted as meaning that the fact that there exists such a penalty legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, with provisions targeted specifically to gay people, allow these individuals to be considered a particular social group ( p. 49).

A law criminalizing homosexual acts can not in itself be considered to have such a significant impact on the asylum seeker to the seriousness required for the criminalization shall constitute persecution under Article 9.1 of the Directive has been reached (p. 55). However, the very term of imprisonment provided in connection with a particular legal provision criminalizing homosexual acts constitute persecution under this Article, provided that it is actually applied in the country of origin which has adopted penal bid (p. 56). It is for the national authorities in the assessment of facts and circumstances, in particular examine whether the custodial sentence under the legislation of the applicant's country of origin applied in practice. These aspects should be taken into account when the national authorities assess whether the applicant actually harboring well-founded fear of persecution on return to the country of origin (p. 58-60). A prison sentence provided for homosexual acts, and that is actually applied in the country of origin that have adopted such legislation as a punishment which is disproportionate or discriminatory and therefore constitute persecution (p. 61).

A requirement that members of a social group that has the same sexual orientation shall keep secret their sexual orientation is contrary to the recognition of the existence of a characteristic that is so fundamental to identity that the persons concerned must not be forced to renounce it. Thus, it is not permissible to expect that an asylum seeker conceal his homosexuality in the country of origin to avoid persecution (p. 70-71).

Asylum seekers should be granted refugee status once it is established that he or she will run a real risk of persecution because of their homosexuality if they returned to their country of origin. In that respect, account should be taken of the applicant could avoid the risk by observing greater restraint than a heterosexual person do when he or she expresses her sexual orientation (p. 75). It is only those homosexual acts that are criminal in accordance with national laws that are excluded from its scope. The competent authorities can not, when considering an application for refugee status, reasonably expect that an asylum seeker to avoid persecution conceal his homosexuality in the country of origin or observe restraint when he or she expresses her sexual orientation (p. 76).

2.3. The Migration Court

It is common ground that A's protection needs to be examined against the conditions in Nigeria. It is the applicant who will do their needs for international protection is likely (see the ME 2006: 1). That means in this case that A will make it probable that he belongs to a group at risk of persecution because of their sexual orientation.
Migration Court considers that there is no reason to make any other assessment of previously filed documents other than the immigration court has done. As regards tidningsartiklarnas validity notes Migration Court that the A at the hearing that in 2004, he got a job with a man who today is ambassador to Uganda and that he in 2007 started a job with a governor. The articles A by his own admission has written or dealing with him and his sexual orientation, according to his own statement published inter alia, 2004, 2006 and 2007. It stands under the Migration Court opinion, not likely that he was a relatively short time after the publication of such articles would be relatively high positions in society, but he because of his sexual orientation should have been expelled from the PDP in 2010 .

The Migration Court has A, inter alia, submitted two newspaper articles, a certificate of exclusion from the PDP, a certificate of military service and a certificate from their university studies. The submitted newspaper articles from The Network June 6, 2013 and Saturday Mirror of 8 June 2013 cited a person with identical names A as an example of a gay man who has been harassed and attacked in Nigeria. The information was reported to have come from activists working for the rights of homosexuals. How and where these in turn had received the data, and the latter was founded is not clear from the articles. In its view, they can now filed Articles only be accorded limited probative value in terms of A's cited security grounds. It is also unclear which spread these newspapers have in Nigeria. The certificate of expulsion from the PDP are simple in nature and thus has a limited probative value. As for the certificate of military service and the certificate from the university studies extraneous to the invoked security reasons. Migration Court finds at an overall assessment of the alleged documentary evidence that A not only through this has been able to make it probable that he is gay, and thus risk protection foundation treatment at home.

An assessment must be made of the A's story. The asylum seeker's story should be accepted if it appears credible and plausible. In assessing the credibility of the applicant's affidavit should be attached weight including when the story is coherent and not marked by conflicting information and that the story of its main features remain unchanged during the examination of asylum requests once in different instances. (See MIG 2007: 12 and MIG 2011: 29th)

At the Migration Court of Appeal hearing before A has not to any significant extent been able to answer general questions about their sexual orientation and how this has affected his life. He has also otherwise during the process left remarkably vague information about their personal perception and feelings related to sexual orientation, which seems strange since the sexual orientation must be considered a fundamental characteristic of an individual (cf. UNHCR guidelines reproduced above and Prop. 2005/06: 6 p. 26). In this case, it is particularly noteworthy in light of what he observes about the attitude to homosexuals in Nigeria.

A has instead mainly described the abuse he says he has been subjected to because he is gay. In this respect he has for the process in some parts contradictory statements. During the Migration Board asylum investigation he stated example, that the attack after he participated in a TV program in 2009 were carried out by local people, while at the Migration Court's oral hearing stated that the attack was carried out by members of the PDP.

Migration Court also notes that A has provided conflicting information about why he left his homeland and traveled to Sweden. According to the information he left the Migration Court of Appeal hearing before he traveled to Italy on a Schengen visa to attend a conference on human rights, after which he traveled to Sweden. In court, he said that he traveled to Sweden to seek care. During the Migration Board asylum investigation, he stated that he left Nigeria because of his health and that he needed protection and asylum. The residence permit application for the extended visit to Sweden shows that his intention to stay in the country was to buy used cars and then sell them on to Nigeria. At the hearing, the Migration Court maintains the A that was the case and that this was done in order to finance the flight to the conference in Italy.

Above all, it is of course very remarkable that A has waited to apply for asylum to the day that the Svea Court of Appeal upheld the deportation order against him. At this time he had been in Sweden for more than six months.

He began studies in physics and electronics at the University in 1993/94. Teaching is conducted in English. He finished his education in 1999 and then did a year of military service. After that he started his own company and then he was involved in a lot. In the years 2004-2005 he worked as an assistant for a man who today is ambassador in Uganda, and in 2007 he was hired by the governor.

In addition to the evidence on which A relies in previous instances, he lodged in the Migration Court, inter alia, A newspaper article from June 6, 2013 from the newspaper The Network, a newspaper of Saturday Mirror June 8, 2013, both in its original form and printed from the Internet, a certificate of exclusion from the Peoples' Democratic Party (PDP), dated 13 October 2010, a certificate from the University and a certificate from the military service.

The Migration Board denied approval of the appeal, arguing, inter alia, following. Migration Court has made a correct assessment. The explanations A has given to many of the circumstances that the Migration Court has made the cornerstone of its judgment bears unlikely sake of touch and appears after the event. That a newspaper would dare publish content with anti-government articles and give them spread, but do not dare to keep copies of the newspaper which has already been published in the newspaper's own name does not appear credible because the risk of the newspaper is reasonably publishing articles in their own name. That a newspaper would use a different kind of font for a particular article rather gives the impression that the article never published in the magazine.

Appeal in Stockholm, the Swedish Migration Court of Appeal (2013-12-19, Linder, Landelius, peer and Axelsson), said:

1. Residence permits for those sentenced to deportation

A has the public court expelled because of crime. Migration Court in the contested decision applied to Chapter 8. § 14 third paragraph of the Aliens Act as in force, under which the Court could annul such an expulsion order and granting a residence permit under Chapter 5. § 1 of the Aliens Act if the alien was considered a refugee under Chapter 4. 1 § or in need of protection under Chapter 4. 2 or 2 a § same team.

The provision in Chapter 8. § 14 third paragraph of the Aliens Act has had its main counterpart in the current Chapter 12. 16 b § third paragraph of the Aliens Act, which entered into force on 1 September 2013. The provision follows that what is stated in Chapter 5. § 1 of the same Act applies if the Migration Court or the Migration Court finds that a foreigner, who by court expelled because of crime, is a refugee under Chapter 4. 1 § or in need of protection under Chapter 4. 2 or 2 a §.

In the preparatory work is recalled that the general courts have been expelled on grounds of crime has, as the regulatory system is built, have been asked for protection proceedings already in the criminal proceedings (prop. 2012/13: 151 p. 52).

Before the amendment, September 1, 2013 missing counterparty in these cases in the migration courts. During the process, the Migration Court, the Court had therefore to a greater extent than in other types of migration cases investigate the A's credibility. Nowadays, the Swedish Migration Board counterparty in these cases (16 Ch. 6 § of the Aliens Act).

2. Residence at the persecution on grounds of sexual orientation

2.1. Applicable provisions, etc.

A claim that he is considered as a refugee, subsidiary protection or otherwise in need of protection because he risks persecution because of their sexual orientation if they returned to their home country Nigeria.

An alien who is outside the country of the person's nationality, because the alien has a well-founded fear of persecution on grounds of sexual orientation, and is unable or, owing to such fear, unwilling to avail himself of his homeland protection refugee, unless certain uteslutandegrunder exists (4 Ch. 1 § of the Aliens Act). Both with subsidiary protection as other protection status means an alien who is outside the country of the alien's nationality and of various specified reasons can not return to that country (§ 2, first paragraph, and 2 a § first paragraph of the same chapter). Refugees, subsidiary protection and other protection status who are in Sweden are entitled to a residence permit (5 Ch. 1 § first paragraph of the Aliens Act).

In the government bill on refugee status and persecution on grounds of gender or sexual orientation pronounced among others following. In situations where the persecution is due to the subject's sexual orientation, it is often stated quite clearly that he or she belongs to a particular social group. For example considered homosexuals in many countries of their environment as a particular social group and it is precisely their sexual orientation who are subject to persecution. The Government wishes to emphasize that sexual orientation should be regarded as a fundamental characteristic of the individual that there can never be considered to require that he or she waives. Sexual orientation is thus such property that can define a social group in flyktingbestämmelsens sentence. This also applies if a person in their home country have concealed their sexual orientation, or have lived in a way that minimized the risk of persecution. [...] If a person in the home country has been living in a way that minimized the risk of persecution, for example, by hiding their sexual orientation, this circumstance can be important in the risk assessment. [...] The risk assessment must be made on the basis of the circumstances of the individual case and the detailed distinctions for consideration in this regard asylum reasons relating to persecution on grounds of gender or sexual orientation shall be left to the right application to do. (Prop. 2005/06: 6, pp. 26-27.)

EU Member States must when assessing the reasons for persecution including take into account that a group shall be considered to form a particular social group where in particular members of the group have a common innate characteristic, or a common background that can not be changed, or consisting of people who share a characteristic or belief that is so fundamental to identity or conscience they should not be forced to renounce it. The group may further have a distinct identity in the relevant country, because it is perceived as being different by the surroundings. Depending on the circumstances in the country of origin, a particular social group might include a group based on a common characteristic sexual orientation. (Article 10.1 di Directive 2004/83 / EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and on the personal status and the content of the granted protection - the Qualification Directive.)

2.2. Method for examination of persecution on grounds of sexual orientation

2.2.1. UNHCR Handbook

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) issued "Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee status" (manual) is an important source of law regarding the procedure to determine whether there is protection (see the ME 2006: 1). As a supplement to the manual is UNHCR has issued guidelines on the assessment of claims of persecution based on sexual orientation (UNHCR, "Guidelines on International Protection No. 9: Claims to Refugee Status Based on Sexual Orientation and / or Gender Identity within the context of Article 1A ( 2) of the 1951 Convention and / or its 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees ", October 23, 2012, HCR / GIP / 12/09). The guidelines (p. 12, 26, 27, 31, 62-64) states, inter alia, following.

Sexual orientation is a fundamental property of an individual who is either innate or immutable and that a person can not be required to waive or hide. Many gay applicants from countries where such relationships are criminalized. It is generally accepted that such criminalization is discriminatory and contrary to international human rights standards. In case a person at risk of persecution or punishment such as the death penalty, imprisonment or severe physical punishment is the character of persecution particularly clear. Although these laws irregularly, rarely or never applied a ban on homosexual relationships lead to an unacceptable situation that reach up to the level of persecution. The fact that an applicant could avoid persecution by hiding or be discreet about their sexual orientation or have acted this is not a valid reason to reject an asylum application.

To assess an applicant's sexual history is essentially a question of credibility. The assessment of credibility must be made on an individual and considerate way, by examining the circumstances surrounding the applicant's personal opinions, feelings and experiences of inequality, stigma and shame more than a focus on sexual activities. The applicant's own story is the main and often only source of evidence. Both general and specific questions that are designed in a non-judgmental way possible for the applicant to explain its duties. That the applicant is married, divorced or have children does not mean that the applicant is not gay. It may be appropriate to ask any questions regarding the reason for the marriage. If the applicant can provide a coherent and reasonable explanation of marriage and / or their children should be part of the story is accepted. It may also be helpful to ask questions about the applicant's knowledge of homosexual contacts, groups, and activities at home, such as meeting places for homosexuals.

2.2.2. Swedish Migration Board the right manager's legal position

Right head of the Migration Board in a legal position on 13 January 2011 presented a method for the investigation of the forward-looking risk for persons seeking protection grounds on the basis of sexual orientation (RCI 03/2011). The statement is based, inter alia, in a ruling by the Supreme Court in the United Kingdom July 7, 2010, HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31. The guidelines provide, inter alia, following.

The applicant must initially make it probable that he or she belongs, or in their home country is deemed to belong to a group at risk of persecution because of their sexual orientation. If the applicant can show that he belongs to that group, he can not be judged to be refugees. The next step is that, based on relevant and current country information, determine whether the group in question in the applicant's home country are abused as its nature and its scope is the protective founding persecution and about the group can get an effective protection of the authorities or other organization. Then it should be assessed whether the applicant's story has made it probable that he / she before departure have suffered persecution or protection foundation treatment and whether the applicant in this case has sought protection from the authorities. It should be noted that it is not necessary that the person has already suffered persecution.

The next question is how the applicant will manifest their affiliation to the group on a return. Thereby, as support for future risk assessment including considered how far the person has lived in the home and how the person has acted in the country where he is seeking asylum, for example, by investigating whether the applicant is living openly as a homosexual in the country of application, or if he even there hide their sexual orientation. If the applicant can show that he / she will choose to publicly display their affiliation to the social group, the question is how others will act on this approach and about the reactions will reach up to protect founding persecution. The assessment must take into account that the applicant can not and must be expected hide parts of their sexual orientation which he / she is not willing to hide. If the applicant states that he / she will select discrete documents the next step is to find out why the person will choose this way of life. If it emerges that the reason is that it is so he / she wants to live or that it is due to social pressure, the person is not in need of protection when the social pressure of this kind does not constitute persecution. If the reason that the applicant will choose a discreet existence, however, is that he faces a real persecution must instead be assessed if the fear is well founded.

If the applicant is deemed to be in need of protection because of their affiliation to the group at risk of persecution on grounds of sexual orientation, should it finally be an assessment of whether there is an official protection under existing law to bring in a return to their home or a internally displaced within their home country.

2.2.3. European Court

The European Court of Human Rights, the European Court, has the case MKN v Sweden, judgment 27 June 2013 (appl. no. 72413/10), examined the question whether the applicant had made likely that he, because of his sexual orientation, risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the European Convention. The Court noted first that the applicant had expressed an intention to stay with his wife and children. More important, however, was that he was in the national process had waited to claim that he was gay until he appealed the Migration Board's negative decision, which was more than a year after his arrival in Sweden. He mentioned neither his homosexual relationship during the execution of the European Court until a year and a half after the process had begun. In the application, he stated that there were threats from Al-Tawahid and Al-Jihad, but he made no threats from Mujahideen. The European Court therefore agreed that the migration court's assessment that the applicant had not provided a reasonable explanation as to why he waited to talk about their sexual orientation in the national process. The Court therefore considered that the applicant's claims about his homosexual relationship was not credible. Because of these shortcomings credibility Court held that it was unnecessary to consider whether the situation in their home country for homosexuals was such that removal there would be in breach of Article 3 of the ECHR.

2.2.4. EU court

European Court November 7, 2013 announced its decision after preliminary ruling on the interpretation of the Qualification Directive, inter alia, in terms of what constitutes persecution because of his homosexual activities (Case C199 / 12, C-200/12 and C-201/12, X, Y and Z). Cases concerned asylum seeker from Sierra Leone, Uganda and Senegal, where the national courts had been established that the persons in question were gay. The judgment stated, inter alia, following.

make it probable that he was considered to be a refugee, alternative or otherwise in need of protection.

A appealed to the Migration Court, claiming that he should be granted permanent residence and refugee status, alternative or otherwise in need of protection and that the general court on expulsion would be suspended. In support of its action, it argued, inter alia, following.

[b]He has provided a coherent and credible story about his background and what he has endured in his homeland. He has made it probable that he because of his sexual orientation has been subject to protection foundation treatment in Nigeria, he has not been able to receive adequate official protection against abuse and to well-founded fear that if they returned again subjected to similar or worse punishment form of persecution, abuse, discrimination, harassment, or in the worst case death. With the new bill that was voted in late 2011, he can expect a harder life in their home country with powers to authorities to punish him in a way they have not previously done.

He was and is versed in the laws of Nigeria and know that homosexuality is forbidden since many years. His view is that Nigerian authorities are very negative towards homosexuals. However, he has experienced law as "quiet" and that is why the voices have been raised in Nigeria for tougher penalties against homosexuality. That is how he has been talking about the teams during the proceedings. Although authorities have not been properly or fully made use of the possibility to award long prison sentences or sentence to death because of homosexuality, they have not had either the will or ability to protect him against abuse.

When he came to Sweden was his intention to wait for the new bill which he thought was a necessity for him to get protection. After some time, however, he jailed and his public defender explained that he was under those circumstances could not seek asylum. During the court hearing, he learned that he could not be deported if he did, probably because he was gay. He therefore immediately into an asylum application.

The asylum investigation and subsequent calls to the Migration Board were held in English, which is not his native language. Therefore, misunderstandings have arisen about his view on whether homosexuality is illegal in Nigeria or not. He was not confronted with information that there has long been laws against homosexuality until the country information was communicated to him. Then he straightened immediately question marks.

The Migration Board considered the Migration Court that he had done its protection unlikely, and that he was considered to be a refugee. He was given the opportunity during the Migration Board's management as soon as possible to submit evidence. He contacted a friend at home who sent the articles to Sweden. It is impossible that the friend would have had time to produce counterfeit articles and unreasonable to believe that he would have made them before he left Nigeria.

Migration Court did not accept his explanation that it is commonplace in Nigeria that articles or magazines that can be uncomfortable for the government to be removed to avoid reprisals from the very gayfientliga government. This is, however, consistent with available country information on Nigeria and the corrupt society there. It is also noteworthy that the migration court without further support in the country information have accepted what that emerged from newspaper vendors that recent newspaper only published sporadically and that court for that reason considered it natural that a newspaper in an ongoing series of in each case four days not to be have published a day due to internal and financial problems. More likely is that these problems meant that the newspapers published in installments with longer intervals than one day's loss newspaper. He has also provided credible explanations on how publications begins and ends.

He is not meant to invoke their political affiliation as a basis for protection, but has wanted to emphasize that he was expelled from the party because of their sexual orientation. At some point, he has entered the mother of his children as his wife. During the investigation, he corrected this, stating that they are not formally married, which he maintains. If a man has a child with a woman he is regarded in Nigeria is no longer being single, even if they are not married. Homosexuality is illegal throughout Nigeria's why an internal flight alternative is not possible. The documents he submitted should have greater probative value than the Migration Court considered that they have.

Appeal in Stockholm, the Migration Court, ordained May 29, 2013 that the execution of the Svea Court of Appeal April 18, 2012 to expel A until further would be set. Migration Court held October 7, 2013 hearing in the case. At the hearing did A particular the following additional information.

It was when he was in high school that he first heard about homosexuality, but then he did not understand what it was. He had his first homosexual partner in 1995. He has had about three to four partners. Then he began to write articles about gay, he has, inter alia, been attacked and lost his job.

When he came to Europe was to attend a conference in Italy on human rights, which was the reason he got the Schengen visa. At that time, the draft law regarding homosexuality in Nigeria and he then traveled to Sweden to await the decision on whether the law would be adopted. He was unsure how the new law would look like and that was why he applied for an extension of the permit to reside in Sweden. If it was decided that people could live as they wanted, he needed not to be afraid to return, but it was a criminal offense to be gay, he would seek asylum. In his application for extension of residence permit he stated that he was working to sell used cars, which is true. To finance the trip to the conference in Italy he took orders in four to five cars. He has been married to the children's mother accordance with custom, but has not legalized marriage. He was introduced to her during 2002-2003. The first child they had in April 2007, since they were a child who is now four years. The first child they had died. The second child, who is alive, was born in 2008. The baby was born in January 2006, died. He has another baby who was born in 2010.
[/b]

THS IS A CASE OF ONE OF YOUR XTAIN BROTHER IN SWEDEN TRYING TO BE GAY INORDER TO LIVE IN EUROPE

Consideration on security grounds after the Migration Board's rendition of file under Chapter 5. § 20 Aliens Act concerning foreigner of general jurisdiction have been expelled because of crime. Ask if the alien has made it probable that he belongs to a group at risk of persecution because of their sexual orientation. Even the method for testing the issue of persecution on grounds of sexual orientation.

[b]A traveled by his own admission in Sweden in September 2011. He was sentenced on 21 February 2012 by Attunda District Court to imprisonment for one year and expulsion with prohibition to return to Sweden by 21 February 2017. The Court of Appeal upheld the District Court April 18, 2012, and the judgment became final when the Supreme Court 20 June 2012 decided not to grant leave to appeal.

A filed April 18, 2012 for permanent residence, status, explanation and travel documents in Sweden and stated that because refugees, alternatively or subsidiary protection because of their sexual orientation.

The Swedish Migration Board submitted the questions of residence and status declaration to the Migration Court in accordance with Chapter 4. § 6, and Chapter 5. § 20 Aliens Act (2005: 716). The Migration Board stated the opinion that there were certain circumstances in A's story that gave reason to question the credibility of the same, but held nevertheless that he had made it probable that he had lived as a homosexual, that his sexual orientation was publicly known that he risked abuse and that he could not be expected to avail himself of the protection authorities in the home country of Nigeria. Board judged because he was considered to be a refugee.

A had the Migration Board submitted photographs that he said was taken the same day he was attacked in 2009, certification from an organization for homosexuals at the university where he studied, membership cards in the same compound and five newspaper articles published during the years 2004-2010 which he said has either authored by himself or have been written about him and that was about his sexual orientation.[/b]
The Administrative Court in Stockholm Migration Court (2013-05-07, Chairman Aronsson and three lay judges'), the A's application for residence and work, and admitted no status declaration. Migration Court had allowed carry out a so-called Embassy of investigation into the existence of the current publications and on the articles were consistent with the version that the newspapers had on each occasion. The Court found that none of the submitted articles had been verified by the Embassy of the investigation and considered that there was reason to doubt that the submitted papers had been published in Nigeria on the way A claim, which also affected the assessment of his general credibility of asylum story. The Court considered with this in mind and given the limited probative value of the other documents submitted that A no documentary evidence been able to make its protection unlikely.

Furthermore, the Court considered that the fact that A has waited to apply for asylum until the date on which Svea Court of Appeal adopted the expulsion decision to Nigeria constituted a lack of credibility purposes, and that his explanation - that he wanted to await the criminalization of homosexual acts - further gave reason to question his credibility when the time of criminalization was not compatible with the available country information. Ignorance of the ban on homosexual acts in their home country was further remarkable in light of his stated commitment to gay rights. The Court also noted that he submitted different versions of their family situation. Migration Court found, inter alia, Against this background, the story A left was not credible and that he had therefore not been able

IF YOU WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHY YOUR WORLD IS SO MESSED UP WITH NO SOLUTION IN SIGHT
READ THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION AND YOU WILL UNDERSTAND EUROPE, THE WORLD AN THE ENDGAME

CHRISTIAN COMPASSION ONLY EXIST IN YOUR DREAMS,WHERE WAS THE COMPASSION WHEN YOUR XTIAN BROTHERS KILLED THE RED INDIANS OF AMERICA AND THE ABORIGNES OF AUSTRALIA BY SPREADING DISEASE AND RAPE,ALCOHOLISM AMONG THE POPULATION TO STEAL THEIR LANDS FROM THEM AND PUTTING THEM ON RESERVATION.GOOGLE ABOUT THE CONDITIONS OF LIVING OF THE RED INDIANS
AND ABORIGINEES IN THE PRESENT DAY.WHERE WAS THE XTAIN COMPASSION DURING THE RWANDA WAR WHERE XTIANS WERE
MURDERED IN THEIR OWN CHURCH BECAUSE THEY CHURCH ALLOWED THE MASSACRE.

WHAT IS CURRENTLY HAPPENING IN THE WORLD IS BEYOND YOUR COMPREHENSION BUT YOU ARE ANGRY AND DONT UNDERSTAND HOW THESE THINGS CAME TO BE ,SO YOU CHANNEL YOUR ANGER ON PEOPLE WHO ARE ALSO VICTIMS OF THE EVILS OF THE WORLD.

IF YOU ARE JEALOUS OF MUSLIMS GETTING REFUGEE STATUS TO LIVE IN EUROPE PERMANENTLY,YOU CAN ALSO BRAVE THE JOURNEY TO COME THROUGH THE SAME ROUTE YOUR BLACK BROTHER COME TO EUROPE OR GET A VISA.I MUST ASSURE YOU YOUR XTIAN ROOTS WILL NOT BE USEFUL HERE BECAUSE THE EUROPEANS LOVE GAYS AND LESBIANS MORE THAN XTIANS.XTIANS IN IBOLAND ARE NOT AT RISK OF PERSECUTION AND DEGRADING TREATMENT. I KNOW SOME OF YOUR XTIAN BRETHREN WHO HAVE CLAIMED GAYS AND LESBIANS SO THEY CAN STAY IN EUROPE IMAGINE THAT.XTIANITY IS TERMED MENTAL ILLNESS CODEDLY.

16 April 1994 - Massacres at Ntarama Catholic Church

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXKHBfsZvx4

Hutu Muslims saved Tutsis during Rwandan genocide

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSk6gqwokWw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vUmLGqqAsM

WELCOME REFUGEES SWEDEN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a06xfjTwQA

GERMANY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BWCZmDaPG8

AUSTRIA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGfIXnn7JB0

DENMARK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMZWskyrTM8

BRITAIN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqeBXGCKa-4

CANADA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC1Qd0V8-eA

I AM VERY SURE IM MORE BEAUTIFUL THAN YOUR SISTERS COMBINED MASHALLAH.I AM LIKE A MULLATO.I DONT EVEN LOOK NIGERIAN.SO BUZZ OFF MR

YOUR XTIAN BROTHERS AS VICTIMS OF FAR RIGHT GROUP ,WATCH THESE VIDEO ON THE GREEK FAR RIGHT GROUP,
GOLDEN DAWN


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaSZg_Id_Ao

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrjZB5ZGeqM

Bishop magic Op has ran away from his useless thread.

BISHOPMAGIC I DIDNT RUN AWAY FROM MY THREAD NAIRALAND STOPPED ME FROM COMMENTING.FOR YOUR IGNORANT BRAIN I AM A SHE AND NOT A HE.

ACCORDING TO YOUR GUIDE TO RAPE,I WANT YOU TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION
HAS A MUSLIM EVER RAPED YOUR MOTHER,SISTER,COUSIN,WIFE OR GIRLFRIEND,FEMALE RELATIVES?

I CAN SEE THAT THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IN NIGERIA IS READY AFFECTING YOU THAT YOU HAVE NO OTHER JOB BUT TO COME ONLINE TO BASH MUSLIMS.FOR YOUR INFORMATION I LIVE IN EUROPE AND I CAN TELL YOU NOT EVERYTHING HAPPENING ON GROUND IS REFLECTED IN THE MEDIA.WHAT ABOUT THE WHITE EUROPEAN CONVERTS TO ISLAM?DO YOU EVEN KNOW THEY EXIST

YOUR SO CALLED FAR RIGHT MOVEMENT ARE NO THREAT TO MUSLIMS AT ALL,WE ARE NO COWARDS.EFFEMINATE MEN CANNOT CONFRONT REAL MEN.

300,000 Moroccan Jews in Israel mourned the death of King Hassan of Morocco in 1999.


His father, Mohammed V, is widely credited with having saved Morocco’s Jews from deportation during World War II, and Hassan continued the philo-Semitic policies of his father. Although there was an outbreak of anti-Jewish incidents following the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the Jewish community was generally safe under the protection of both Mohammed and Hassan, who proudly considered the Jews “Moroccans of Jewish origin.

The sons of World War II Jewish communal leaders, related stories of regional governors in Morocco who gave Jewish leaders matches and told them to burn the list of the names, addresses and assets of local Jews. Without lists, it was more difficult to deport the Jews and confiscate their assets.

[b]Robert Satloff reported in a NYT article that ”Arabs welcomed Jews into their homes, guarded Jews’ valuables so Germans could not confiscate them, shared with Jews their meager rations and warned Jewish leaders of coming SS raids. The sultan of Morocco and the bey of Tunis provided moral support and, at times, practical help to Jewish subjects. In Vichy-controlled Algiers, mosque preachers gave Friday sermons forbidding believers from serving as conservators of confiscated Jewish property. In the words of Yaacov Zrivy, from a small town near Sfax, Tunisia, “The Arabs watched over the Jews.” I found remarkable stories of rescue, too. In the rolling hills west of Tunis, 60 Jewish internees escaped from an Axis labor camp and banged on the farm door of a man named Si Ali Sakkat, who courageously hid them until liberation by the Allies. In the Tunisian coastal town of Mahdia, a dashing local notable named Khaled Abdelwahhab scooped up several families in the middle of the night and whisked them to his countryside estate to protect one of the women from the predations of a German officer bent on rape.” He also tells the story of Yehuda Chachmon, a Libyan Jew interned in an Italian camp in Giado. “The Arab camp guards opted out of the sadistic torture inflicted on Jews and other prisoners by the Italians. Of the 2,600 Jews in the Giado camp 562 died in less than a year. The Italian guards treated the Jews with brutality; the attitude of the Arab guards under the Italians was excellent. They even found secret ways to ease our discomfort.”[/b]
The Tunisian Khaled Abdul-Wahab was nominated as the first Arab to be declared a Righteous among the Nations at the Jewish Holocaust Memorial Yad Vashem. But his efforts were rejected two years later on the grounds that Abdul-Wahab did not risk his life, as he did not act against Tunisian law while caring for two Jewish families when their house was confiscated during the German occupation. Whether or not he should be included is still in dispute. Also in Tunisia, in Tunisia, the wartime rulers Ahmed Pasha Bey and his cousin Moncef Bey offered vital public support for Jews facing Vichy persecution. “They regularly warned Jewish leaders of German plans, helped Jews avoid arrest orders, intervened to prevent deportations, and even hid Jews so they could evade the Germans. Moncef Bey is remembered fondly by Tunisian Jews. “He gave the Jews equal treatment,” declared Shlomo Barad. “He did not allow them to be discriminated
The Bosnians - Not only did Dervis and Servet Korkut hide many Jews from the local pro-Nazi regime, including a young Jewish woman resistance fighter named Mira Bakovic, but Dervis Korkut saved the precious Sarajevo Haggadah, concealing it in his home and thus keeping the 14th-century volume, the best known illuminated Hebrew manuscript, intact.

All too often the Muslim and Arab soldiers who fought with the Allies are the forgotten heroes. In the U.S. alone, over 15,000 Arab Americans served in WWII. You can see some photographs of Muslim soldiers buried in military cemeteries in Europe here. And, there are crescents among the crosses at Arlington military cemetery. In the French Military Cemetery in Rome, Italy, there are 1,888 burials. It is a modest cemetery for 1,700 French Expeditotionary Corps soldiers, mainly Moroccans and Algerians. The cemetery is at the end of a small road, Via dei Casali di S. Spirito. Most of the grave markers bear a Muslim crescent while some have crosses. All, however, bear the inscription “Mort pour la France”.

Arabs and Jews once fought together under the British Flag against the Nazis in the Palestine Regiment. Robert Fisk wrote about the Arabs in the Palestine regiment in an article that opens with this statement: No one remembers the Palestine Regiment. Even this morning, on the actual day of remembrance, few will recall that Arab and Jew once fought together under the British flag against Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Even fewer will know the extraordinary story of an Arab and a Jew who fought side by side against Hitler, and then twice fought each other as enemy combatants - in 1948 and 1967 - and of how, in their declining years, they became friends. But in a Middle East in which “hawks” and “doves” and “terrorists” and “security forces” battle to the death, their story provides an extraordinary - and shaming - indictment of both Ariel Sharon and Yasser Arafat. He also writes about other Arab and Muslim soldiers who fought for Britain in battles like El Alamein. There was also an Arab Legion from what was then called Trans-Jordan. In May 1941, the Arab Legion Mechanized Regiment participated against pro-Nazi Rashid Ali who had seized power in Iraq and was attacking British forces located there.

There were many Muslim Merchant Seamen in WWII. In fact, War History reports “If we look at just the ships sunk by U-boats in WW2, we see that over 3,300 Indian crewmembers died in these attacks, of which the overwhelming majority were Muslim.”

Inayat Bunglawala reports in Honor our Muslim soldiers “Inscribed in marble at the Menin Gate Memorial to the Missing in Ypres, Belgium, are the names of 54,896 soldiers of Britain and the Commonwealth who died in the Ypres Salient in the first world war and whose graves are unknown. The German army had surrounded Ypres on three sides and subjected it to bombardment throughout much of the war as it stood in the path of its plans to occupy the rest of Belgium. Among the dead recorded at the Menin Gate Memorial are Muhammad Aslam, Abdullah Khan, Ahmad Khan, Muhammad Usman and many others with recognisably Muslim names.”

The majority of Allied troops that landed on the beaches of Provence in August, 1944 were “Free French” Muslims from North and West Africa. Thousands of Moroccan and Indian Muslim troops voluntarily served in the liberation of Italy. They risked and gave their lives along with Polish freedom fighters and American GIs at Monte Cassino. Tens of thousands more Soviet Muslim troops bravely served at hellish Stalingrad and Leningrad. All of us should honor and be thankful for their sacrifice in helping end the scourge of Nazism.

[b] Noor Inayat Khan fought against the Nazis and was killed at Dachau concentration camp. See Noor-un-Nisa Inayat Khan, d. Dachow, Poland, 1944 In 2012 she was honored by Britain with a bronze bust memorializing her heroism. Her photo is at the top of this page. The photo below is from Chez Chiara


The stories of Muslim rescuers of Jews are largely unknown and unpublished. Only in the past fifteen years have Holocaust researchers brought a few to the public’s attention. Yad Vashem and other Holocaust memorial groups have honored several Muslims (whose courageous stories we have been able to confirm) as Righteous Gentiles. 70 Muslims are named by Yad Vashem as “Righteous Among the Nations” for aiding Jews in North Africa, Turkey and Albania during the Nazi era.

Bulgarian Christians and Muslims protected Jews from the Nazis.

Albania was the only Muslim majority country in Europe. Albania not only saved Albanian Jews from the Nazis, but, in fact, Albania was the only country in Europe that had a larger Jewish population at the end of the war than before the war. Not one Albanian Jew or any other Jew who came to Albania for protection was turned over to the Nazis. There was a film called “The Optimists” which tells the virtually unknown story of how 50,000 Jews living in Bulgaria survived the Holocaust despite intensive Nazi efforts to deport them to death camps. Fifty thousand Jews didn’t die because Bulgarian Christians and Muslims found ways to protect Jews from their would-be murderers. - - The Albanian Refik Vesili who — as a 16-year-old — saved eight Jews by hiding them in his family’s mountain home. - The English-Albanian plaque in the Jewish Corner of Tirana’s National Museum lists the names of 33 Muslim Albanians who have been honored by Yad Vashem, and leaves space for other people “whose names remain unrecorded.” [/b]

The New Jew site notes “What made the Albanians refuse to comply with the Nazis when almost everyone else did? Their strong Muslim beliefs. Here is one man’s explanation: “Why did my father save a stranger at the risk of his life and the entire village?” asked Enver Alia Sheqer, son of Righteous Among the Nations Ali Sheqer Pashkaj, who is featured in the exhibition. “My father was a devout Muslim. He believed that to save one life is to enter paradise.”

Muslims Who Fought Against the ‘Real’ Fascists & Nazis

Muslims Who Fought Against the ‘Real’ Fascists & Nazis

by Sheila Musaji


With the recent increase in the use of the misleading term Islamic Fascists it is important to point out a few facts. There may have been a few Muslims who cooperated with the Nazis/Fascists during the Second World War, but they were a small minority. Most Muslims followed the Qur’anic injunction:

“Oh you who believe, stand up firmly for justice, as witnesses to God, even if it be against yourselves, or your parents, or your kin, and whether it be against rich or poor; for God can best protect both. Do not follow any passion, lest you not be just. And if you distort or decline to do justice, verily God is well-acquainted with all that you do” (Quran 4:135).

As Mas’ood Cajee points out


A growing chorus of voices which exploits the Holocaust for political gain has been trying to smear Muslims — and Arabs in particular — with grand accusations of complicity in the Holocaust and support for the Nazis. These voices serve hawkish interests in Israel and the United States who wish to justify and legitimize continued war, violence, and yes — even genocide — against Muslims and Arabs. Identifying Muslims with and as Nazis eases the task of selling continued bloodshed to war-weary publics. Reading the books and op-eds of the smearers, one could almost conclude absurdly that the Nazi holocaust was an Arab Muslim and not a European Christian project. As evidence, the smearers usually trot out the pro-German Mufti of Jerusalem Amin Al-Husayni and the Bosnian Muslim SS “Handschar” division.

What these smearing Islamophobes don’t like to tell you: the “Mufti” was actually an appointee of the Jewish administrator of British Palestine who completed one measly year at Al-Azhar and betrayed the Ottoman Sultan to join the British. The much-vaunted “Hanschar” SS division — disbanded after a few months due to mass desertions — was the only SS division ever to mutiny.

There is a photo below of Bosnian Muslim anti-Fascist fighters.

Here is a photo of Hitler conversing with the Papal Nuncio, Archbishop Cesare Orsenigo. What does such a photo “prove” about Christianity? Source. There are hundreds of photos of Christian clergy with Hitler, Mussolini, and other Nazis and Fascists.

https://0.tqn.com/d/history1900s/1/0/d/P/hitler25.jpg


As I said in an article about the current common usage of the term “Islamic Fascists” - Islamic Fascists? Deceptive Labels & Propaganda are Counterproductive


In just the past few months there has been a rash of articles and blog entries that bring up and expand upon the sad fact that Amin el-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem collaborated with Hitler during WWII. This comes at the same time as President Bush’s use of the term Islamic Fascists appearing to validate a term used over the last few years among those determined to provoke a clash of civilizations. Whether the sudden proliferation in the use of this term (or its’ variants - Islamo-Nazi, Islamo-Fascist, etc.) and the articles attempting to find some connection with Islam and the Nazis and Fascists is simply a case of extremists feeding off of each other in our world of almost instantaneous communication, or is due to a calculated campaign is debatable, but the end result is an increase in Islamophobia and mutual distrust. Such stereotyping all too often leads to a dehumanization of the “other” and has historically been the precursor to isolation, discrimination, and violence. Such descriptions also blur distinctions and create an atmosphere in which the “enemy” becomes most or all Muslims.

Robert Duncan’s article “Islamic terrorism linked to Nazi fascists” on Renew America uses the Mufti/Hitler photo as justification for President Bush’s use of the term Islamic Fascists. Others who have jumped on this bandwagon are Jonah Goldberg in “The Swastica and the Scimitar”, Gene Pinkam, Alan Dershowitz, Timothy Furnish (who is opposed to the use of the term, but whose ‘reasons’ for that opposition still play into the same mindset, Daniel Johnson, etc. Little Green Footballs showed archival footage of Hitler and the Mufti, a number of blogs are referring to a photo of Hitler together with the Grand Mufti, and Daveed Gartenstein-Ross even stretches the Mufti’s aberrational behavior to include a generalized “Muslim World’s sympathy with the axis alliance”. And, the propoganda film “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West” is being shown across the U.S. and Canada and attempts to make this same connection.

Robert Spencer said “The misbegotten term “Islamo-fascism” is wholly redundant: Islam itself is a kind of fascism that achieves its full and proper form only when it assumes the powers of the state.” Spencer also said “The term “Islamo-Fascists” no more blames the religion of Islam than the term “Italian Fascism” blames Italy for fascism. It merely refers to those Muslims—who obviously really exist—who invoke Islam to justify violence and supremacism, whether they are invoking Islamic doctrines correctly or not.”

In fact, Spencer, and his partner Pamela Geller use the term “fascists” and “brownshirts” and “nazis” so often in relation to Muslims that it is for them commonplace. Another associate of Spencer and Geller in the Islamophobia industry, David Horowitz, even holds an annual “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week” on college campuses.

This is a pointless attempt at justifying stereotyping and Islamophobia. Certainly there were some Muslims who were Nazis or Fascists, but they were a small minority compared to all of those who fought against the Nazis and the Fascists.


... The actual Nazi party originated in Germany, a predominantly Christian country. The actual Facists came out of Italy, another predominantly Christian country. The Nazis and Fascists were predominantly Christians. Christianity had a role in the rise and fall of the Nazi’s. The Vatican signed a concordat with Hitler’s Reich. The Catholic responses to Hitler were ambiguous at least. There are numerous photographs of Hitler with various Christian clergy including Archbishop Cesare Orsenigo, the papal nuncio in Berlin, and with a Catholic Cardinal, Spanish and German Bishops giving Nazi and Fascist salutes, Cardinal Michael Faulhaber marching in a Nazi parade, the Reich Bishop Ludwig Muller, and many more that are still available. There are also numerous photographs of Christian symbols in Nazi artifacts. And, photographs of Nazi soldiers praying in churches. (One such photo at bottom of this page)

Hitler himself referred to Christianity as a foundation for his beliefs: “The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and cooperation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life.” Source: My New World Order, Proclamation to the German Nation at Berlin, February 1, 1933

The Christian connection with the Nazis and Fascists was widespread and well-documented. The Muslim connection was minimal. And, just as there were Christians who resisted and fought against the Nazi and Fascist regimes there were also many Muslims who fought against this evil worldview.

The holocaust was a terrible stain on humanity, and there were villains and heroes everywhere. The Mufti of Jerusalem was one of the villains and will have to answer to God for his crimes.

The bottom line is that all of those who participate in, cooperate with, or do not speak out against evil (no matter what their religion) bring shame on the human race, and all of those who stand for justice and compassion give us all hope.
https://nimg.sulekha.com/others/thumbnailfull/france-muslim-graves-2009-10-22-13-17-11.jpg

Empty Churches Go On Sale in Europe as Christian Faith Declines

In what the Orthodox Christian Network calls an "alarming trend," The Wall Street Journal featured a page one article this weekend– Europe’s Empty Churches Go on Sale as the number of attendees has diminished over many years.

. . . “the closing of Europe’s churches reflects the rapid weakening of the (Christian) faith in Europe, a phenomenon that is painful to both worshipers and others who see religion as a unifying factor in a disparate society.” By example, the Netherlands is projected to close 2/3 of its Roman Catholic churches in the next decade.
Pew Research Center data, presented by the Wall Street Journal, highlights the degree to which the European population reports no religious affiliation: France (28%), Germany (24.7%), Italy (12.4%), Netherlands (42.1%), and the United Kingdom (21.3%). By contrast, 16.4% of the United States population is unaffiliated with any religion.
The Netherlands at 42%! The former Roman Catholic church of St. Joseph in Arnhem, Netherlands, has been converted into, of all things, a skate board park. Skaters are inspired to execute backside flips under the watchful eye of a mosaic image of God's only Son. "Whoa, Dude!--who needs religion when you can see Jesus after a couple of tokes and a boardslide?"

The closing of Europe’s churches is a result of flagging faith and empty pews, but it is mostly Christians who are losing their faith. Several other religions have not experienced the same decline. Orthodox Judaism has remained relatively steady and primarily because of immigration, Islam has actually grown.

Database of Publicly Accused Bishop/Priests in the United States


http://bishop-accountability.org/priestdb/PriestDBbylastName-A.html

One in 50 priests is a paedophile: Pope Francis says child abuse is 'leprosy' infecting the Catholic Church[/b]Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2690575/Pope-Francis-admits-two-cent-Roman-Catholic-priests-paedophiles-interview-Italian-newspaper.html#ixzz3mDCLFEw7

[b]Catholic sexual abuse cases in Australia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_sexual_abuse_cases_in_Australia
More +


GENEVA -- The Vatican revealed Tuesday that over the past decade, it has defrocked 848 priests who raped or molested children and sanctioned another 2,572 with lesser penalties, providing the first ever breakdown of how it handled the more than 3,400 cases of abuse reported to the Holy See since 2004.