₦airaland Forum

Leemzyy:
I know it means that,just that i dont know the right word to use at that moment,no way u could get my language than i do

Lol. U just shot urself on the foot. U don't know "the right word" to describe it, so u opted for "the wrong one". Just admit it, Hausarki tayi kadan.

Oshin56:
comrade have been consulting the god's of the land since, but then never reply be like say then need Hennessy...

That's true, they need to consult the gods of their land, because water don pass garri Ooo.

Leemzyy:
We saying something similar,u can't understand my language better than i do

Compare and contrast. How does "Yaudara" meaning to abandon or forget someone totally. Become similar with "Yaudara" as a verb (fi'ili) means to deceive, cheat, or delude. And as a noun (Suna), it means deception and treachery? If u accept the truth say I sabi Hausa (Ur supposed language) pass u, u no go die. Trust me.

Na wah Ooo. Once some people chop belle full, na to dey go find trouble upandan.

Oshin56:
that's why the director there's looking for the rich people from that state, especially those that are into oil and gas business.

Which sin dem commit to warrant this kind punishment?

If to say na "treat" life dey treat us (like patients), we for don well tey tey. But life go do collabo with Tinubu just to "deal" with us.

Oshin56:
no it's not branch office, it's zonal office from the report that was sent to us by the comrade...

Chai! A whole Zonal office? That's huge!

Leemzyy:
lol "Yaudara" it means to abandon or forget someone totally

Lol. You’re wrong! I understand Hausa better than you do. The word "Yaudara" as a verb (fi'ili) means to deceive, cheat, or delude. And as a noun (Suna), it means deception and treachery.

Leemzyy:
Biko i did not dump you oo,well my name is Halima so you see right?

Lol. Did I say that u dumped me? Kin ma isa kiyi dumping dina? It's like u don't understand Hausa in the afternoon Ooo.

Leemzyy:
Muslimah oo

Give me one reason why I should believe u. Kin taba yaudarata fa, kin manta?

Na wah Ooo. E be like say death don open branches for Anambra Ooo. E just dey take their big big men away any how.

Leemzyy:
Leave that otondo,biko i'm a real muslimah jare my ex friend

Muslimah abi Chrislimah?

BABANGBALI:
person wey dey lead praise and warship for their church

She deny am Ooo. For which church? I wan make I go the church go catch her dey lead praise and worship.

Odingo1:
They should build a third toilet for transgenders.

Male, Female, Trans

It's not feasible for all transgender individuals to use the same toilet because some identify as trans males while others identify as trans females. Separating transgender restrooms into male and female categories might not fully address the issue, as non-binary individuals may not find either restroom to be a suitable option. Dem go need:
1. male toilet
2. female toilet
3. Trans males toilet
4. Trans females toilet
5. Unisex and non-binary/gender-neutral toilet.
This one na real confusion be this Ooo.

Na wah Ooo. Dangote group go fit borrow Nigeria money and then seize our refineries and Ajaokuta steel company be that Ooo.

Chinese firm (not even Chinese gov't) dey seize our Aircraft? It is finished.

Elidrisy20:
Make them sell to the Russians

Yes, they should sell it and share the Money to Nigerians. If not, na dem go still chop the money.

Akaegwu:
National disgrace. Billions of dollars investment in ruin. Nigeria government officials present and past are very wicked. Killing them all is the best thing.

Lol. For Nigeria to work, you'll have to kill the whole Nigerians Ooo because we're all the same. The youth we've been counting on to take Nigeria to the promised land, are they any better? What about women, are they better than men? Like leaders, like followers.

...Three suspects, identified as Mr Ikenna Daniel Ndeka, Mr Innocent Chike, and Mr Chukwu John, were arrested in connection with the illegal operation."
Ndi develōpers Amaka!

Peter Obi's "neighbors" are responsible, yet he doesn't consider them criminals.

SpaceX:
If I tell you that there is no need for marriage nowadays some folks will be offended. Another clear reason to live a free agent lifestyle. I pity men who still get married, you're leading yourself to the slaughter house. Sim.ps will never listen they still want a mummy.

Your opinion is understandable, considering that your father never married your mother either. He was busy engaging in casual sexual encounters with multiple women, resulting in an unplanned pregnancy with a woman he had a brief fling with, who later gave birth to you. I hope this does not offend you, but not everyone wishes to live that kind of lifestyle. We value the institution of marriage and believe it is important to choose the mother of our children wisely. Any woman who is good for your children is also good for you to marry. If you want to factor in life's challenges, you might choose not to marry or have children, but will that truly shield you from all difficulties? Life is an adventure, and it is important to embrace all experiences and live it to the fullest.


Peace!

Chai! I need to marry before "Wife Material" finish Ooo. So, help me God!

Prices Of Garri, Fufu, Others Drop for which State? Oh I can see, it's from The National Bureau brewery of Statistics. Very intoxicating stat.

Prices Of Garri, Fufu, Others Drop for which State?

Botragelad:
Still nonsense if you can't respond to my previous statement. Read it!

I don't anticipate that you will comprehend anything I've said. Only those who possess common sense can decipher the logic. You seem to excel only in finding faults. Show respect for other people's beliefs and refrain from using every opportunity to criticize others' faith under the guise of human rights. It is not your concern if Muslims use the fact that Muhammad married a six-year-old to justify similar actions. Mind your own business. If you had been born into a Muslim family, you might be a Muslim as well. This may be my last response to you, as I find it unenjoyable to engage in discussions with individuals of low intellect.


Peace!

Botragelad:
Speak to me without using words copied from a chat intelligence.

Are you not smart enough to do that?

Lol, you are both right and wrong simultaneously. I won't deny using AI, but the original idea was mine; I only utilized AI to enhance it. I rely on AI to improve texts or rewrite them if they are too lengthy and contain numerous typos and abbreviations. However, I don't use AI to generate ideas for chatting with people. You are not a child; you should be aware that AI's way of reasoning differs from that of humans.

Here is the original text I improved:

You're wrong in all aspects, stop justifying urself. The topic is on "Rape and Murder" of a girl not on marriage. Also, the thread is for "foreign affairs" not "religion". If u want to discuss age of consent in Islam why not open a thread on that under religion and stop detailing the thread.

U speak of human rights as if you were among those who determined the rights human should have. Everyone must not live according to European human rights agenda. Human beings having different beliefs and opinions is among the diversity of life. If u can't accept it, then try to tolerate it at least. Stop emphasising on human rights which not all people give a damn about.

U talk about consent as part of human rights, LGBTQ rights is also part of human rights, do u accept it for Ur children? Would u feel being backwards and uncivilised because of Ur stand on LGBTQ right because they said it's not progressive based on 21st century reforms? Or u choose to accept some rights and reject some?

Like I said earlier, religion is a sensitive issue, avoid dwelling on matters that does not concern u or matters that will provoke others. Muslims or Christians will always find a way to justify their religious teachings wether it aligns with Ur so called human rights or not. Stop attaching religious topics with human rights matters as they may not align with each other. It's like joining morality and human rights.
Respect other people's religious beliefs. Nothing u say or do will Muslims change their faith u can only provoke them and my lead to violence towards u by some impatient religious individuals.


Shalom!

Botragelad:
Spare me the psychoanalysis! My failure to mention King Richard II wasn't due to some bias, but simply because he's irrelevant to the topic of Muhammad's marriage to a 6-year-old.

Mate, I'm more concerned about the harm caused by those Islamic beliefs when they're used to justify child marriage and other human rights abuses.
This discussion is about criticizing harmful practices, not about my personal beliefs.[/b]and, my point is that child marriage is wrong, regardless of cultural context. Stop deviating!

[b]Consent is the word!

Your perspective appears misdirected in several ways; please refrain from attempting to justify it. The primary focus here is on the heinous act of "rape and murder" of a six years old girl, not about "marriage of prophet Muhammad". Additionally, it is essential to note that this discussion falls under "foreign affairs" and not "religion." If your intention is to delve into the age of consent within the Islamic context, I suggest initiating a dedicated thread on the topic of religion to prevent derailing this thread.

When discussing "human rights", it is vital to keep in mind the diverse cultural and ideological underpinnings that influence them. It is not reasonable to assume that everyone must adhere to a specific human rights framework that may be rooted in a particular cultural perspective. Rather, it is important to appreciate the rich diversity of beliefs and opinions that exist in our world. If complete acceptance is not possible, striving for tolerance and understanding should be the minimum goal. It is also important to avoid placing excessive emphasis on human rights that not all individuals prioritize.

While discussing "consent" within the context of human rights, remember that LGBTQ+ rights are also included within this framework. Consider whether you accept these rights in relation to your own family. Would you perceive yourself as regressive or uncivilized for opposing LGBTQ+ rights, given that Western society broadly views them as progressive? Or do you adopt a selective approach, accepting certain rights while dismissing others?

As previously mentioned, religion is a deeply sensitive topic, and it is important to exercise caution and sensitivity when discussing matters that could potentially provoke or offend those with differing beliefs. Both Muslims and Christians will undoubtedly seek means to justify their respective religious doctrines, regardless of whether they align with your particular interpretation of human rights. Refrain from merging religious matters with human rights discussions, as the two may not necessarily align. The same can be said for intertwining "morality" and "human rights".

Lastly, it is crucial to demonstrate respect for the religious beliefs of others, recognizing that your words and actions are unlikely to sway the convictions of Muslims, but may inadvertently elicit negative and aggressive reactions from individuals with deeply-held religious beliefs


Shalom!

Botragelad:
Did the person I quoted support getting married to a child in the 21st century or not? 🤷‍♂️

Nice try with the weak attempt to deflect. Just because Muhammad married Aisha thousands years ago(according to the Quran) doesn't mean you should give him a free pass. We're talking about his actions and the harm they cause, also the precedent they set.

Besides, Islamic doctrine holds Muhammad up as the perfect example for all Muslims to follow. So, if he married a 6-year-old, that sets a rather disturbing precedent, don't you think? We can't just dismiss it as a product of its time when it's still being used to justify child marriage today. Exactly what the person I quoted did(justify).

How do they relate to the trash you wrote?

Interestingly, there was no mention of King Richard II of England in your argument. Is it because he was an ancestor of the people you consider your "slave masters" that you failed to acknowledge his disturbing precedent?
A thorough examination of your mindset is necessary to ensure that your reasoning is sound.
Why does it bother you so much what Muslims believe about Muhammad? Have Muslims ever expressed issues with your godlessness or beliefs regarding Jesus, his sonship, and divinity?
What is wrong with people adhering to age-old cultural practices in the 21st century? How is that your problem? Did they ask for your daughter's hand in marriage?
Morality and chastity were once highly valued in the age-old cultural practices, but have been compromised in the 21st century. You're not concerned about that, what concerns you the most is the fact that a religious figure married a six years old girl in the 7th century.

Botragelad:
So this trash you wrote justifies getting married to a 6 yr old child in the 21st century? 🤷‍♂️

Did Muhammad married a six year old girl in 21st century? U get big head but I no sure if Brain dey inside.

Botragelad:
So this trash you wrote justifies getting married to a 6 yr old child in the 21st century? 🤷‍♂️

Did Muhammad married her in 21st century? U get big head but I no sure if Brain dey inside.

Botragelad:
I recall one of your previous comments, in which you stated that you would willingly allow a suitor to marry your six or nine-year-old child, citing that it aligns with your Islamic beliefs.

I find it surprising that you now condemn rape. These women didn't consent to be raped or abused, just like your 6 yr old daughter. You should shush and stop being a hypocrite.

Leemzyy was right. In 1396, King Richard II of England married Isabella of Valois, who was only six years old at the time of their wedding. Due to her young age, Isabella remained in her parents' custody until deemed old enough to consummate the marriage. Although shocking by today's standards, this practice was not uncommon in medieval times, where marriages were often politically or strategically motivated.
The fact that an English King married a six-year-old girl in 1396 (628 years ago) has largely been forgotten by history. Many are unaware of this historical event, yet continue to discuss and judge Prophet Muhammad's marriage to a six-year-old girl 1,400 years ago—a time when the concept of an age of consent did not exist. This represents a clear double standard.
Religion is an extremely sensitive topic, and it's essential to approach it with respect and understanding. Refrain from condemning religious figures solely based on your own beliefs. It's important to remember that our religious affiliations are often determined by the circumstances of our birth. Had you been born into a Muslim family, you may have likely been a Muslim today.


Peace!