Amujale's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Amujale's Profile › Amujale's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 (of 151 pages)
OLAADEGBU:They represent a false and unrealistic view of history. The authors of these books, have a complete disregard of chronology, the Ages, and how they are meant to line up in some kind of perfect harmony. They manipulate and take advantage of real life historical names, places and events so as to seem genuine. These kind of books are nothing more than a good read. Something book enthusiast can sink their teeth into, looking at it in any other way becomes devisive and counterintuitive. Definately not a reference to, nor a correct version of world history. |
Ayodejioak:. Idolatry isnt even a real word. Its a sensless slang that has no real meaning outside of Abrahamic religions. The term "Idol" in this context, holds within it, the history of an immure and derogatory way the Early Crusaders used in an attempt to discriminate against philosophies and concepts all around the world. Africans have never be known to practise so-called Idolatry, hence it doesnt translate properly, although it fits perfectly into an Asian and European context. The people that history tells us practised Idolatry are the Arabs, Greeks, Persians and Romans. |
NCANSecretary:Yoruba is recognised as a very special language and ethnicity to the great peoples of Brazil. |
Sundaygeorge:Yoruba is an ethnic group not a tribe, Africa has ethnicity not tribes. Brazilian Yorubas can be found all across their country. 1(a) Nationality: Brazil Ethnicity: Hispanic 1(b) Nationality: Brazil Ethnicity: Portuguese 1(c) Nationality: Brazil Ethnicity: Yoruba |
[flash=250,250] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOIm5Wd29-A][/flash] 1hour and 5 minutes [flash=250, 250] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1ZeK4ecHKU&t=1s[/flash] 47 minutes. They came Before Columbus: Lectures by various African historians includes guest appearance by Dr Ivan Van Sertima, the topic: extracts of his book with the same title. |
[flash=250,250] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOIm5Wd29-A][/flash] [flasj=250, 250] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1ZeK4ecHKU&t=1s[/flash] They came Before Columbus: Lectures by various African historians includes guest appearance by Dr Ivan Van Sertima, the topic: extracts of his book with the same title. |
Because of the great carpet destruction of evidence in major African cities & libraries, we have been forced to put up with the Eurocentric version of historical events especially the assumption that Africans are always stagnant. Its time to accept Africas role in the development of human existence and civilisation as a whole. The first pyramid to appear at Leventa is in the Americas. Black Africans, West Africans are said to be associated with the "Olmec" an ancient civilization that existed during the Egyptian dynastic times. There are massive statues found in South America known as the "Collossal Heads" that depict black African warriors in military gear. Ancient Egyptians are Africans, Nubianssic (Nubians are powerful, wealthy and intelligient people who controlled large territories along the Nile) that called the land KM.T; the first pharoahs had pure African blood, furthermore, Piankhi, Shabaka I, Shakatak, Taharka and Tanutamun are all black Africans. For more information read: They Came Before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America by Ivan Van Sertima. |
..... |
Afro-Mexicans are also called Black Mexicans and are both the indegenous Mexicans and the total amount of the population that both identify themselves as having, and history identifies them as having African heritage. |
Generically, all black people are African and all indegenous Africans are black, brown or bronze. Currently, Africans cut across the global divide. As in, Africans are blacksic brown, bronze, orentialsic and whitesic. The history of the Americas is riddled with misinformation, false assertions and false concepts. Everyone that studies African history knows that Africans are the original founders of The Americas, North, South and Central. History doesnt lie. People lie and make up false versions of history. Why does Mexico speak the Spanish language? Who are the indegenous Mexicans? The indegenous Mexicans are known to us as these distinct groups; Afro-Mexicans and the Asian-Mexicans. Europeans colonised The Americas on various sepearate occasions. Central was largely colonised by Spain and other Europeans. They are the "model" Central American and are in the same group as the European-Mexican. North America was largely colonised by Britain and other Europeans. On both occasions of different periods in history, according to their own records, African communities are always said to be present. |
Amujale: |
If the premise of an hypothesis is deemed to be wrong, then the conclusion is said also to be wrong. The difference between African historians, scholars and academics and their Eurocentric counterparts with regards African history is as follows; Africans base their studies on genuine research and analytical processes whilst Eurocentric’s base theirs on false premise and disingenuous speculation. Dr Cheikh Anta Diop’s and Dr Ivan Sertima ‘s conclusion are used everywhere in the world today. Proving beyond reasonable doubt that “They Came. Before Columbus”. Their combined effort contains within them various scientific, analytical and visual proof: Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) from the Americas found in the stomach of mummified African royalty. Tested and proven to be accurate. Cotton from the Americas present in the green houses of African royal families. Tested and proven to be accurate. According to Dr. David Imhotep, the author behind the book “The First Americans Were Africans: Documented Evidence,” “Egyptian artifacts found across North America from the Algonquin writings on the East Coast to the artifacts and Egyptian place names in the Grand Canyon” are all signs of an early arrival in the Americas by Africans. This is also paired with a much earlier account of Black people with incredible skills at sea. Back in 445 B.C.E, the Greek historian Herodotus wrote of King Ramses III leading a team of Africans at sea with astounding seafaring and navigational skills. A Polish professor called Andrzej Wiercinski revealed the discovery of African skulls at Olmec sites in Tlatilco, Cerro de las Mesas and Monte Alban. Some people insist that Africans couldn’t have made it to the New World first simply because they didn’t have the skill and resources to sail across the Atlantic. As it turns out, that’s completely false. Historians have discovered evidence that suggests Africans are masters at building ships and that it was actually a part of their tradition. Shipbuilding and sailing are over 20,000 years old in the Sahara, and cave wall paintings of ancient ships were displayed in National Geographic magazine years ago. With those shipbuilding skills and the navigation skills that were noted by other historians of the time, the myth that Africans wouldn’t have been able to sail to the New World becomes officially debunked. As Dr. Julian Whitewright, a maritime archaeologist at the University of Southampton, explained, the voyage from Africa on ancient ships was “quite a plausible undertaking, based on the capabilities of the vessel of the period and historical material stating it took place.” |
baby124:Unism Let’s employ unism in order to achieve our collective aspirations. Let’s become that perfect union that the world will come to adore. Get rid, scepticism in favour of optimism. We are engineered to become great and successful. Trust me. With these concept of perfect union makes it clear that their is no limit to what we can achieve. unism is known as the ultimate union; it’s important to note that is probably non existing in the humble dictionary, although some might include such kind of terms. |
Africans have a history of a pro-long and sustained presence in ancient Europe and other parts of the world. In antiquity, it’s fair to say, that would suggest West African communities being present in the region as part of the larger family of Africans. In that scenario, Greece would in actual fact be considered a Yoruba Colony; an African Colony |
druxlazu:I know, ancient Africans invented “art” as a profession, aren’t they brilliant? Leo Frobenius is a breath of fresh ideas, an exceptional intellectual. Sumerian art is strikingly similar to African art, could it be that they actually are? Everyone already knows that African artists are always a major influence on art. Its indeed a part of African history that Africans are the ones whom found Greece. Here is a video describing extracts from Martin Bernal’s the “Black Athena”. [flash=250,250] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVQa2XXM6Zk[/flash] Professor Martin Gardiner Bernal (also wrote the book Cadmean Letters, devoted to the origins of the Greek alphabet.. |
Rossikk:I agree with your analysis here. Thanks here also. Your post combined with contributors analysis may as well be stating the obvious. Since ancient black Africans are said to have found Greece, is it not possible that West Africans are amongst these founding communities? All of the proof suggest that ancient Africans leave traces of a long and sustained presence elsewhere in the world. KM.T was created out of African unism, different ethnicities coming together to form a super-satellite-state so that they may find it easier to best rule over their world. unism is known as the ultimate union |
Anthony Joshua-Andy Ruiz Jr rematch confirmed for November or December “Anthony Joshua will get the chance to win back his IBF, WBA and WBO heavyweight titles in a rematch with Andy Ruiz Jr later this year. Joshua’s promoter, Eddie Hearn, announced the contracted rematch clause was triggered on Tuesday and the second fight will take place in November or December, with a venue still to be confirmed.” https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/jun/04/anthony-joshua-andy-ruiz-jr-rematch-boxing |
Amujale:You are peddling a defeated argument. Try again. Or better still, just accept the mere fact that African historians are correct with our determinations with regards to history. |
morpheus24:You continue to sound unintelligent. Dr Hendrik Clarke is an historian. And what is it that I refer to here? Is it not history? And you are completely wrong about Dr Clarke, as he is probably amongst the first African historians to identify the fact that Africans are present in the Americas before the arrival of Columbus. Dr Hendrik Clarke is the person to coin the ‘Establishment’s bias views on African history as Eurocentric. Have you read any of his books? Listened to any of his lectures? Study his works? What are you on about? Dr Hendrik Clarke isnt merely an historian, with extraordinary success in his chosen fields of academics, especially World History, for me, Dr Clarke is arguably one of the greatest intellectuals of our time. You continue to justify my conclusion on your type, by making these unqualified remarks when everyone knows that you know not what you talk about here. What is your argument? Who are your sources? And what are the names of the authors that back these Eurocentric views? |
According to “Dontae Boxing”, “AJ himself told him that their team turned down a re-match in the contract because they thought they wouldn’t really need it” Although, after fight, the promoter Eddie Hearn was heard announcing the rematch supposedly to be scheduled sometime around be November - December later in the year. Let’s wait to hear from the people at the upper echelons in boxing i.e Al Hamon, Bob Arum, Don King e.t.c. They could break it down better.. It seems to me that the re-match is bound to happen due to the fact that AJ is a big pull and I find it hard to believe that they didn’t squeeze in a nice and lovely to AJ rematch clause somewhere within the contract. Team Ruiz will be looking to make a mini fortune on their first title defence. Although it’s become clear that Andy Ruiz could choose to go for his mandatories, yet, AJ would always be the better choice, in as much as it makes better sense to get the rematch out off the way rather than prolong the inevitable. Horus:[flash=250,250] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGQ38krZbUo[/flash] |
... |
BuddhaPalm:You sir, you know your martial arts. Yes looks can be deceiving as either “Butterbean” or “Manny Yarbrough” both mixed martial art specialist will have us know.
|
Rossikk:Totally agree with you here, the only obvious sport that India has an edge is field hockey. Athletics, no way, Football, no way , boxing hahaha they get KO’d or lose on the judges scorecard as per normal. Nigerian sports men/women give a good account of themselves during international competitions. If not for bias and other factors like greed and lack of full concentration, they should be medaling in many of the major sporting events out there: especially football. |
Hey guys, word has it that AJ’s team didn’t secure their rematch in the contract clause. Oh my gold, what a stupid thing to does. Kindly check whether these facts hold up though. Dontae (a close friend of AJ and a boxing pundit) says and I quote “AJ and his team turned down a re-match in the contract because they thought they wouldn’t need it” I don’t know what you guys think of that news, maybe it’s fake news,but if not, then, that to me was a very naive move on their part. Although, after fight, the promoter Eddie Hearn announced the rematch will be Nov - December later in the year. It seems to me team Ruiz now holds all the aces. |
Hey guys, word has it that AJ’s team didn’t secure their rematch in the contract clause. Oh my gold, what a stupid thing to does. Kindly check whether these facts hold up though. Dontae (a close friend of AJ and a boxing pundit) says and I quote “AJ and his team turned down a re-match in the contract because they thought they wouldn’t need it” I don’t know what you guys think of that news, maybe it’s fake news,but if not, then, that to me was a very naive move on their part. Although, after fight, the promoter Eddie Hearn was seen announcing the rematch will be Nov - December later in the year. It seems Ruiz now holds all the aces. |
allisso:Not really, it’s been the talk in local pubs and sports leisure centres everywhere, ever since. Even though I do not subscribe to such notion, to me AJ under estimated Ruiz and paid dearly. He should have come into the bout with the same hunger and mindset he had against Vladimir. I blame his team for not employing the correct tactics against a doughy Mexican-American boxer. AJ should have slept on the heavy bags more and his tactics should have been boxing at a distance not the slug fest that eventually got him into trouble. In a way the fight was quite similar the Vladimir one, the major difference being that time he picked himself off the canvas and came back steaming to pick up the win. Whereas in this occasion all the credit goes to Andy Ruiz for constantly staying on top of the former champ and scoring an unexpected win in my opinion. |
Proverb: Owo omode ko to pepe, ti agbalagba ko wo keregbe, atiwipe ogbon ologbon kii je ki a pe agba ni omugo. meaning: youngsters don't possess a high reach, just as the elder’s hands are too spacious as to be able to enter into a tiny gourd, furthermore, someone else’s wisdom (or a foreign knowledge) does not warrant one to call an elderly foolish. |
Favmil101:Plus, team AJ was deemed the ‘A side’ the reason he and his team called all the shots before any glove was laced. I’m not here to argue for or against whether it was fixed simply because I wasn’t present in their meetings nor their dressing rooms. The “A side” always get the lion’s share lose or win. What happens when both teams are claiming to be the ‘A side’? Well, nothing happens, no agreement, no boxing match. When Floyd Mayweather Jnr out boxed Manny Pacquiao, Floyd was the ‘A side’, gets to pick the winnings and the re-match clause. The same applies to AJ as per getting the most cash and re-match is in the bag already. Even in the re-match it’s highly probable that team AJ concocted the writing of the clause so as to retain ‘A side’ status in order to receive the lions share yet again. It’s important to note that a draw in the re-match would definitely dispossess AJ of such status, not to talk about another numeric tally on the second column of his astonishing boxing record. |
Favourobyno27:In modern day boxing, there’s something they call the ‘A team’. As the defending champion, AJ team was deemed the ‘A team’ the reason he and his team called all the shots pre-boxing bout. It’s common in today’s boxing. It is the main reason that us boxing fans aren’t treated with the dream matchups us all deserve. i.e AJ vs Wilder, AJ vs Tyson Fury, Terrence Crawford vs Keith Thurman, Terrence Crawford vs Errol Spence JNR, Keith Thurman vs Errol Spence JNR e.t.c The “A team” always get the lion’s share win or lose. What happens when both teams are claiming to be the ‘A side’? Well, nothing happens, no agreement, no boxing match. When Floyd Mayweather Jnr out boxed Manny Pacquiao, Floyd was the ‘A side’, gets to pick the winnings and the re-match clause, the same applies to AJ as per getting the most cash and re-match is in the bag already. |
Floyd Mayweather Jnr The Best Ever to lace a pair of gloves. Boxing IQ: 100% Defensive: 100% Offensive: 0 - 100% Ring Craft: 100% Record: 49-0 (+2 wins against mixed martial arts opponents) unofficial record 51-0 [flash=250,250] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XkymjlJOBI[/flash] |
luluman:Not really, it’s a huge advantage being ripped with a 6pack; Floyd Mayweather Jnr (TBE) a prime example on how it works, definitely assist you against vicious touches to the unprotected parts of the body. I think AJ’s game plan failed on the night of the bout, although, cannot wait for the re-match later in the year. |
luluman:Exactly, most seem to have overlooked his decent record of 32-1 including 21 KO’s before the bout. His only ever loss is to Joseph Parker on an split decision. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 (of 151 pages)

