₦airaland Forum

oyetpel:
Built up muscle stifles arm and hand movement, although being too fat also does the same thing because the fats will also reduce fast movement of the arm and hand.

jany49:
Omode gbon, agba gbon, lafi da ile ife

morpheus24:
...

morpheus24:
...

Amujale:
Try again.

The links you post are speculative at the best and outright gibberish at the very least.

Again I ask to to tell us your argument backed up with sources and their authors.

morpheus24:
https://www.thoughtco.com/out-of-africa-hypothesis-172030

morpheus24:
https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/evolution/africa-cradle-humanity1.htm

morpheus24:
Morphues contention 1; Africans left the continent at least 100,000 to 150,000 yeas ago following possibly two paths. DNA evidence points to the population dispersals by tracking back mitochrondial DNA back to Africa with the oldest link residing in the Khoi people of Southern Africa L0


https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/evolution/africa-cradle-humanity1.htm

https://www.thoughtco.com/out-of-africa-hypothesis-172030

morpheus24:
If you didn't click on any of the links I posted

morpheus24:
It is evident that you cannot rebut any argument

mysticwarrior:
Isn't it time you guys end this your prolonged war?
Everybody has left this tread for you guys, pls it is time for truce.

morpheus24:
That's like saying if a Yoruba man claims that his version of Okro soup is the best tasting in the entire world and an Igbo man eats it and says no then the Igbo man is utterly and completely false in his assertion.

morpheus24:
YouTube videos all day.
What is the proof you have provided, YouTube videos

morpheus24:
Point to any measurable phenomena that can be quoted to true absolute terms however 99.99999999% fact is a good enough measure for anything.


[s]All disciplines are put together to reconstruct history however there are certain disciplines that are "MORE ACCURATE" that others. Anthropology can hypothesize that a certain people lived in a certain area at a given period of time. Carbon dating/archealogy determines more definitively an estimate of the time frame they lived there. Genetic evidence gives a better definitive answer of who actually lived there. [/s]

Amujale:
Tell us what your arguments are, quote your sources and their authors..

Amujale:
All black people are easily associated with Africa. In antiquity, all black people are African and are the only humans present in the world at the time.

The oldest human fossil is found in Africa, the oldest complete human fossils found outside Africa are that of a black Africans.

It’s simple logic that evades Eurocentrics.

“All Nigerian people are intelligent.

Olu is a Nigerian.

Therefore, to everyone else other than Eurocentric and their sympathisers, applying simple logic Olu is an intelligent person.”

Exploring the analysis of reputable African historians, academics and scholars, one is bound to reach similar conclusions.

Eurocentric’s view on African history is wrong, I can fully assure everyone reading these text that African historians are accurate in their determinations of our own history.

Amujale:
In the early 2000’s i wrote a whole thesis on DNA studies and how it can be used to “con” the general public. Years later, numerous sites pop out of the wood work, you only need to check the situation with sites similar to “ancestry.com”, these are mere guess works, nothing scientific about their methods.

Amujale:
All black people are easily associated with Africa. In antiquity, all black people are African and are the only humans present in the world at the time.

The oldest human fossil is found in Africa, the oldest complete human fossils found outside Africa are that of a black Africans.

It’s simple logic that evades Eurocentrics.

“All Nigerian people are intelligent.

Olu is a Nigerian.

Therefore, to everyone else other than Eurocentric and their sympathisers, applying simple logic Olu is an intelligent person.”

Exploring the analysis of reputable African historians, academics and scholars, one is bound to reach similar conclusions.

Eurocentric’s view on African history is wrong, I can fully assure everyone reading these text that African historians are accurate in their determinations of our own history.

Amujale:
In the early 2000’s i wrote a whole thesis on DNA studies and how it can be used to “con” the general public. Years later, numerous sites pop out of the wood work, you only need to check the situation with sites similar to “ancestry.com”, these are mere guess works, nothing scientific about their methods.

Amujale:
Tell us what your arguments are, quote your sources and their authors..

Amujale:
That isn’t uncommon, since the Nile Valley ,West Asian and Europe civilisations have been in direct communication since around 800 B.C.E.

Moreover, DNA isn’t meant as the “be all and end all”. Eurocentric’s and other non
-African scientist use it to further their delusions, similar to the ones that you peddle.

The only academics that use DNA testing to further the African narrative are African academics and pro-African scholars and academics.

In the early 2000’s i wrote a whole thesis on DNA studies and how it can be used to “con” the general public. Years later, numerous sites pop out of the wood work, you only need to check the situation with sites similar to “ancestry.com”, these are mere guess works, nothing scientific about their methods.

morpheus24:
He is not a scientist O

He makes no commentary of genetics o!

morpheus24:
[s]Please answer my other question O!, this running around ithe subject is exposing you as a nuisance.

Cheikh Anta Diops's contribution to this matter as you psoted is within the field of Anthropology i.e. the study of the origins of man.

He is not a scientist O

He makes no commentary of genetics o!


If you are looking for a black scientist that comments on these matters Keita who is an expat is who you should refer to .
[/s]

Amujale:
If you don’t understand my research then STFU instead of making yourself look the more stupid.

All your analysis of the above academics are completely and utterly wrong.

It isn’t hard to research.

But as all brain washed Eurocentric’s, they cannot research on African historians because your brain has been fried.

Maybe if you make the effort to read and study his works instead of peddling Eurocentric views that are false and vile.

morpheus24:
"ancestors" of all people presently populating the entire world today "originate" in Africa.

[s]This is different from saying Caribs came from Africa if you want to use simple deductive reasoning. [/s]

morpheus24:
He argued that most of the Egyptian Pharoahs were black African and Melanin tests on some of the mummified Pharoahs proved this

morpheus24:
After Diops time, further genetic testing was done on many pharaonic mummies and they cluster with Africans on a PN2 clad, meaning they did have African ancestry with E3b1b being the most consistent Ydna haplogroup consistent North Africans, Ethiopians, Somali and Nile valley peoples but also had many West Asian DNA ancestry as well