₦airaland Forum

Capaldi:
Now Once again do all Christians use the same book?

Yes. I spelled it out for you.

Capaldi:
You are sure the Catholic bible contains the same books as the protestant bible?

The Roman Catholic Bible you mean? It has 7 extra books which contains tenets that do not contradict the principles of the other 66 that other Christians hold binding. The "protestants" only saw them as surplus to requirements because they question the historical accounts and authorship of those books. Hardly means anything.

Capaldi:
Do all christians use one book?

Yes sir. The Bible, beyond which Christianity is not being discussed but someone's opinion about it.

Ellexy:
Hahahaha

These are the people that will call people of faith casual yet I have just been reading one level of rubbish upon another. I saw a post where he said the Christian God killed someone and tried to equate it to human beings killing someone for their God and he did not see the illogic. My position has always been if your God is real he should fight for himself. To me, is that not proof why the Christian God is real since he can kill for himself unlike some God that needs people he is more powerful than to kill for him?

Capaldi:
I am asking why the question is relevant

Because it is futile to use one "Christian's" opinion over another's when they have a "book" from which all their teachings stem from. It will only be smart to refer to the "book" they refer to as their subjective opinions mean zilch. Nothing.

Havertz10:
Catholic Church created the Bible, left for them self, they wanted the stupidity to be sacred and out of public use unless under a priest supervision, it was the real Martin Luther king that forced its translation and started the age of contrarian views of the Bible cause people had access to it and read and get the full story enough to smell bullshit

Arrant nonsense.

andrewbaba44:


Southampton can still beat Liverpool or pick a draw

Exactly. And even if they win, City were still supposed to beat Aston Villa so I don't know what they are talking about.

Havertz10:
you people are so casual about your religion that you don’t even understand it, 99% of you are there for wishful benefits and the promise of heaven

I am going to give you some respect and ask you to read what you posted again. Then, instead of wasting everyone's time go to the language in which those words stem from and show that Jehovah means God as does Allah. I don't like to play lawyer for God so I will simply treat this issue based on an intellectual or unintellectual point of view.

Jodera:
I understand where you coming from but Gerrard's talk was only after Liverpool blocked the move and Suarez was left reeling. It's just like a consolations talk after something that can not be reversed have already happened.

In Gerrard's biography (abi book), he talked about Suarez calling the board and B.Rodgers liars after not allowing him to leave. He even said after that blocked move, there was a huge gap between him and Rodgers.

All our facts are right and agreeable but the chronology is where we disagree. My underlying point was that Suarez was convinced away from leaving which is why he did not force his way out. He could have. The release clause was met.

Havertz10:
you do realize that allah translates as god, same way johavah translates as god too

Of course, this is a lie.

andrewbaba44:
I wished mahrez scored ,this is the first time he will miss a pk in the epl since 2018

Not trying to sound superstitious but I hate when we wear this Jersey.

Ellexy:
Out of the blue just like that? What is the proof?

Don't tell me it's generational cos many Arab generations existed thousands of years before Muhammad who never believed nor worshipped that God.

You have energy.

Capaldi:
Bro Muslims agree they worship the God of Abraham and trace their root to him. Even Catholic and the Vatican council agree the same. I really don't know what you are arguing about.


https://www.usccb.org/committees/ecumenical-interreligious-affairs/vatican-council-and-papal-statements-islam

You know that all Christians do not believe the same thing right?

andrewbaba44:
Them go collect ,if dem like make dem borrow trailer to block post

Allow people to express their wishes. I wonder why the argument they want to make doesn't work for Southampton who can also beat Liverpool before game day 38.

Roland17:
Naaaa. Arsenal are not chasing the top 4 at all. We have achieved our season target by qualifying for Europa league and people have gotten their contract extensions for meeting the target, everything else na jara. I don’t believe the FA is interested in what you are making inferences to. Twice this year, Arsenal have been in control of the 4th position and we blew it, this has nothing to do with the FA or refs.

This is a team of mediocrity/ weak mentality and showing signs of lethargy and indifference to finishing 4th. It is a very thin squad that is now beat down and barely able to stay up by the 90th minute of most games, consequently, they have nothing left. The PK against Spuds was questionable I admit but we played very very poorly to deserve anything from that game.

While wins against United and Chelsea were great and repositioned us, it should not overshadow the fact that the team was playing poorly and had lost consecutive games against Palace and Brighton. Post United/ Chelsea we scraped wins against the Hammers and Leeds, finishing both games parking Dangote trailers and Bokoharam tested trailers.

Our only hope is for Burnley to perform some magic with hopes that we can get all 6 points from our remaining fixtures against Newcastle and Everton. Once again, we are in control.

I agree that a serious club will not extend Arteta's contract as he has no hope of winning the league with the current managers in it. I also quite agree that Arsenal see qualifying for Europa as a success. But I don't think it is conspiratorial to also mention that the FA are therefore trying to help the more desperate team perhaps because they don't want Conte to leave the league. Funny enough, Mark Clattenburg agreed that the PK against yall the other day was dodgy. He said there would be 10 PKs per game if that is called and I have to say I agreed with him fully.

Sanchez fouled Barnes shortly before that sequence that led to the unnatural position, and Kane got that chance that he missed as a result of that same sequence. Nobody goes back to review the handball to give THFC another advantage from that sequence. It is unfair.

Your grievances against your club are warranted though. Maybe na because Arteta was an assistant manager in City that I have a soft spot for him but I kind of always want Arsenal to win whenever City is not involved.

Arsenal fans should be worried. It seems like the FA want Tottenham in that 4th spot. I cannot understand the recent decisions they have going for them. From the PK against y'all to the one today.

Jodera:
Nahhh... While I agree Gerard spoke to him against joining arsenal, Suarez was still adamant to join us. It was that infamous £1 that arsenal added that spoilt everything and even changed Suarez mind from joining us and not Gerard convincing him otherwise.

This is not true. In fact, John Henry later confessed that Wenger was right. The reason Wenger added £1 was because you don't "negotiate" a release clause. Liverpool had to make Suarez sign a new contract that season which is why he left for 75M when Barca came calling. The extra 1 pound was inconsequential as Arsenal had already met the release clause. Suarez even said it was Gerard that convinced him not to leave by saying "no disrespect to Arsenal but I think a club like Real Madrid or Barcelona should be where you head to if you leave Liverpool".

Jodera:
But Suarez wanted to leave Liverpool for arsenal na

Yes but then Gerard convinced him to stay stating that Suarez should be going to RM or Barcelona and not Arsenal. Suarez listened which was why even if Wenger had met the release clause, the player did not leave.

afrodoc2:
If you know this then what was the point of that table you posted if not to insinuate that City's investments were not heavier than that of other clubs?

That all big clubs spend money not just City which is what scousers always imply.

afrodoc2:
Who knows. But it seems to me that you are insinuating that they would have to outspend their rivals heavily to catch up which in essence is what City did, and which is a tacit admission on your part that the table you posted is spurious.

City outspent their rivals HEAVILY to get to their position. Newcastle would have to do the same, and i don't have any problem at all with either of them. Arab money is authentic money.

I am insinuating that huge investments over multiple years is what is needed to make up for the lacuna created between traditionally smaller clubs and their bigger counterparts. United, by the way, have spent more than City since Ferguson left and United is still a bigger club than City.

The revenue is always cooked. Even if there are FFP rules in place. Even if everybody investigated and found nothing. They even know more than Monsieur Wenger. lol

Certainly it is arab oil money. Not the sale of Lucas Nmecha, Leroy Sané, Angelino, winning the EPL (3 times), TV deal, sponsorship, ticket and merchandise sale. But their darling club is using Coutinho money to buy everyone even if Barcelona still owed them part of the Coutinho money.

afrodoc2:
But in 5 years less City has spent double Arsenal and spent 300m more than Liverpool and Man Utd. Only Chelsea is on City's level in spending but City did it in 5 less years.

Imagine spending years in Championship and League One and still outspending perennial EPL clubs like United, Liverpool, Arsenal to the tune of between 300m-700m pounds?

E no shock you?

There are other ways to support your argument but that table you put up there no enter.

How much will Newcastle need to spend to compete with City and Liverpool?

afrodoc2:
The fact that City spent 5 seasons in that period in the lower divisions but are still up there in money spent tells its own story.

I am not of the opinion that City are ruining football but that stat there is very misleading. City has spent 5 less seasons in the EPL and they have spent nearly double what Arsenal has spent and 300m more than moneybags like United and Liverpool.

The point there is that all big clubs spend money. It is not Coutinho money that brought Konate and Luis Diaz. Some scousers don't know that so someone has to educate them.

Oil club, state owned. This is when Burnley and Norwich were in need of a manager who wanted to try.

The league titles are so local the better manager won it once and it was enough for people to give him coach of the year. Some jokes write themselves.

Typical scouser will troll a manager that has won 2 of the trophies they listed above. . 2 each by the way.

If I was not intelligent I would have been a scouser. One manager has 2 UCL titles and 3 soon to be 4 EPL titles. Do am if e easy.

1 red card in 3 years. Of course that is down to great coaching and resource management. Not like Mané has not punched players or Fabinho and Milner have not kicked players enough to get sent off.

The UEFA CL is so important that the best teams always win it unlike the league. Remember 2012 when Chelsea was the best team and won it? Remember 2005 when Carlo Ancelotti choked a 3-0 lead? Yea, me too.

Remember folks, the FA Cup and Carabao cups are useless until another team not named City win it. Some managers can be manager of the year for 99 points but the one with 100 points is a fraud. The one with 4 EPL titles in 5 seasons is a fraud because City are ruining football.

City ruining football since 1992.