jonnysessy: Today's market is just too dull. We are almost at the end of the month and also almost at the last day of the Q3, yet there was no significant changes in the market. I was expecting reshuffling of portfolios and end of month window dressing. But, can't see any of these. Maybe, by tomorrow the market will live up to expectation.
Hedgefunds: This is wrong. kindly use chatgpt.. Only WHT TAX IS DEDUCTED AT SOURCE WHICH IS NOT NEW. No source deduction . You file Annually . Even USA don't deduct at source .
Please o, in that post you quoted, where did he talk about deductions?
He only talked about FIRS being copied na.
I think we shouldn't create arguments when they aren't warranted.
yeah, but you don't use the "maximum income tax" in this sort of analysis. You use the average. The amount involved needs to be higher than 50m before you even use 25% at all, and even then the effective tax rate still isn't 25%
emmanuelewumi: Why getting loans from Renmoney and Oxygen X, when you can get cheaper loans from United Capital and Orange One Finance
3.5% interest per month is crazy
It's cos those ones just give based on credit report and bank account cash flow. No security required at all. Simple and fast.
United capital wanted me to move to their brokers, but paying 1% brokerage fees would even cost me more. Like extra 0.5% on N300m monthly trades is extra 1.5m in brokerage fees.
Anyways, the whole loan situation was due to a heavy real estate project that drained my liquidity, I have cut them way down now since my liquidity has improved significantly.
But if I see a 5% monthly offer, I'll certainly still take it. Cos I need to hit 0.2% of all retail trades soon 😁😁😁.
We've actually talked about this loan vs tax situation in the past.
The maths is straight forward: the cost of the loan needs to be lower than the potential tax rate for it to make sense. The lower cost is the attraction.
In advanced economies, loans are priced below 5% while taxes are often above 20% so there's a 15+% positive spread in favour of debt.
In Nigeria, prime lending is above 30%, when you add 1% management fees and other sundry fees, it could be nearing 32%
I have personally paid 156% annualized this year with Oxygen X, and I still even pay over 80% with Renmoney (long story)
So prime lending at 32% , average effective tax rate at about 22% implies a 10% negative spread against loans. So taking loans is worse here!
That's just the simple maths.
Except they've changed the meaning of "greater than", "less than" 😁😁😁
mikeapollo: He said Lafarge has been repatriating money from Nigeria to France for over 60 years. So telll me how that was possible if Lafarge came into Nigeria 25 years ago. It is better he says Lafarge has been repatriating money since they came into Nigeria 25 years ago, not 60years. That is my point
sterlingD: Has your stockbroker settled or onboarded you unto NASD ?l no understand the English wey my stockbroker dey talk.l have some small units of the stock.
I'm referring to TOTAL. you seem to be talking about a different stock. Maybe MRS? I don't have MRS.
mikeapollo: All what you typed above are irrelevant to the matter in contention.
I referred to your comment that Lafarge was mostly repatriating money to France in over 60 years that they had been in Nigeria instead of investing in Nigeria. And my point is, you cannot say they have been in Nigeria for 60 years because Lafarge only acquired WAPCO in 2001, which is just about 25 years ago, and they could only repatriate money from Nigeria to France after that acquisition. There was no French (Lafarge) ownership in WAPCO in 1959-2000 so they could not have repatriated money to France during that time.
His core point wasn't to establish when lafarge started repatriating money. That was not the substance of his argument.
His point is that Lafarge(as well as some other foreign companies) preferred to repatriate profit rather to build capacity here like the locals did.