₦airaland Forum

IjeBos:
Yeah.
You said you were in the US on this day as well.

Yeah, that means i am not in the US. lol i posted photos of me in Boston and you have refused to touch it

Remain pained and stay envious

descarado:

I leave that to you guys.

he is killing himself where i reside
I am in the United States. Washington

he is so toxic that he has the photo of my daughter stored in his phone. she is almost 11 years old now

Android17:
And just like that, the illegality of the war is not being discussed. A lot of time and effort have gone into discussing Signal and Classified claptrap. Your media is still dictating your talking points.

Remember the same media that have never told you the truth in real time?

Trump is fighting an uncongressed war against a sovereign nation on behalf of another sovereign nation and the uniparty are happy with it. That's what any critical thinker would have been puzzled by.

I don't understand you o.

Angelfrost:
You see Nigerians and Indians ehn... Tread with serious caution around them abroad.

Not Nigerians entirely. Igbo and yoruba guys are the problem

Na aproko put her for this condition. I am sure she is not talking about the lust she has for him.

Na she carry her hand they contact car dealers for someone wey Wan buy car.

ObaIgwe1:
A slight admittance like the bold and admittance that Signal should not have been used for such an high level discussion and sensitive information sharing would have been far better than the merry-go-round Trump and his officials are doing.

But the excuse of 'witch-hunting' and "no classified information was shared on Signal"

Imagine if that information had gotten to Houthis 5 mins before the attack, with Houthis having the capacity to shut down those jets, the causalities would have been on the US sides.

The admittance was there from the get go.
Signal should not have been used? Why not? Why is it in their phones? They did not download it themselves. During the chat they talked about the high-inbox (high-side) that's where top-secret information or stuff are talked about.

The big scandal here was how the hell did they add that idiot, not weda they were sharing the time their F/A 18 take off.

Notice how it was Hegseth they are calling for to resign even if he is not the one responsible for the mistake.

Before he was confirmed they brought a woman to accuse him of rape, an actual lie.

ObaIgwe1:
What a shame! This is the president of the most powerful nation on earth. I wonder what will be going on in the minds of other world leaders hearing Trump respond like this.

As terrible as Tinubu is, I will be dammed to see him defending such a mess like this.

Trump said it's a wintchunt ... I could hardly bear bemeruca and basilico saying this... But Trump... smh

They tried to use a woman who raped Hegseth to stall his confirmation it failed now they are hoping this will get him out. They did a good job.

basilico:
Judge orders change to passports to include the gender pronouns such as
he/him/his
she/her/hers
they/them/theirs
ze/zir/zirs
ey/em/eirs
fae/faer/faers
xe/xem/xirs
ve/ver/vers
it/its
ne/nem/ners

Passports wil be bukier to accommodate all genders

Trump should give them the middle finger

This is rude 🤣🤣🤣😂
Why don't you go back to your country. Some will say they only target non whites

BREAKING: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene tells a British reporter to “go back to your country.” pic.twitter.com/pnbb3NqwXK

— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) March 26, 2025

raumdeuter:
NPR and PBS were questioned today

Some interesting takes from Katherine Maher

It really is amazing watching people like Katherine Maher hear things she’s said and posted, and be so stunned at how absurd and ridiculous they sound that they deny saying what they’ve already said
pic.twitter.com/nP2IKv3VtN

— Ian Miller (@ianmSC) March 26, 2025

Rep. Brandon Gill brings up all of Katherine Maher's old tweets claiming that "America is addicted to white supremacy" and supporting looting, reparations, and BLM.

This woman is the blonde version of Robin DiAngelo. pic.twitter.com/w5BRyMJlHd

— Christopher Rufo (@christopherrufo) March 26, 2025

They are not supposed to be operating

Rep. Timmons: "You have 87 registered Democrats, not a single Republican in your editor board."

NPR CEO: "Well, I would agree with you that that number is a concern."pic.twitter.com/dVYWGreRR6

— Thomas Sowell Quotes (@ThomasSowell) March 26, 2025

US may be lining up to strike Iran as the US sent at least 3 spirits close to Iran

IjeBos:
[size=8pt][/size]

I see you got your talking points. Just to add some facts to your bullshit.
1.) Attack plans are more dangerous than War Plans.
What is wild that you don't seem to understand leaking attack/operation plans is worse than leaking War plans.
Attack plans are imminent, meaning the leak can lead to soldiers dying. War plans can be changed or amended if they are leaked.

Another nonsense from you, making me wonder if you know how yo use your head or not.
First off, war plans aren’t just some dusty binder of what if scenarios. They’re the backbone of any military strategy, long-term blueprints that dictate how a country positions:
its forces, allocates resources, and responds to threats. If those leak, you’re not just tweaking a few dates or rerouting kekenapep here and there. You’re handing the enemy a roadmap to your entire defense posture. Reason that for a bit if you can use your head: a leaked war plan could expose critical vulnerabilities. That’s not changeable overnight; it’s a slow-motion disaster.

Attack plans, yeah, they’re more immediate. If someone leaks tomorrow’s airstrike coordinates, people could die tomorrow. That’s bad, no question. But the damage is often more contained to specific units or specific missions. You cancel the op, you adapt, you move on. War plans? A leak there screws over not just the soldiers in one fight, but potentially everyone for years. So, i'd call bullshit your your excuses

And let’s be real: militaries aren’t dumb. Attack plans have contingencies Plan B, Plan C because leaks happen. War plans? You don’t get a do-over on your national strategy. I’m not saying attack-plan leaks are fine; I’m saying war-plan leaks could be a bigger gut punch in the long run. so why all of a sudden are you cooking up this nonsense? Must you make excuses?

IjeBos:
2.) This was even beyond Top Secret.
In fact, I'm sure the release would be highly limited to those who have to know like the principles on that chat.
Here is what is supposed to be classified and the classification levels:

Sec. 1.4. Classification Categories. Information shall not be considered for classification unless its unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause identifiable or describable damage to the national security in accordance with section 1.2 of this order, and it pertains to one or more of the following.

you see the word considered.

IjeBos:
Lol. Bemeruca is not in the US.
He'll claim he's here illegally or he's here on a work Visa and that he's some big boy where his company bought him Range Rover to get him to come to the US. Then when he gets called out, he'll say he's just trolling.

The day he said he "landed" in the US, he was posting pictures here celebrating his "first night in the US". Those pictures turned out to be pictures of Canada. He didn't know the difference. Lol.

He's a Yahoo Boy probably running Romance scams so he has to pretend he is in the US.

I'd be in Las Vegas very soon. A party is on there. time may be in the past, future, or now. who knows.

cococandy:
Right. And that would be Hegseth the DUI hire who was chosen for loyalty rather than merit?



I wish you had the ability to understand what you’re saying. If a service member can’t do this because it helps the enemy, is there any room for your logic to expand to recognizing that it’s highly incompetent for the leadership of the military to do it? I’ll leave you to digest that.

Funny that you can’t let logic guide your thinking yet you want to project being emotional onto others. Everyone so far has told you you’re letting your support for this administration to cloud your judgement and you can’t for the life of you recognize that that’s what it actually means to be emotional.

Not that emotions are bad but when you can’t use your brain as needed because you’re hung up on defending the indefensible, that’s what it means to be negatively emotional. You need to do better. Be open to learning. And stop projecting.

Also you’re not in the position to tell me anything about the military.

Alright, let’s break this down like a real conversation, person to person.

First off, you’re throwing out Hegseth’s DUI like it’s a knockout punch . Okay na but nobody’s saying it’s a gold star on his resume. But if we’re talking loyalty versus merit, let’s not pretend that’s some new scandal in politics. Administrations pick people they trust all the time; it’s not always about meritocracy but his resume is not empty. You can hate that, but it’s not unique to this case. So, is Hegseth a mess things up because of a DUI (changed guy), or is he still capable of leading? That’s the real question—not just slapping a label on him and calling it a day.

Now, your logic about service members and leadership. You’re saying if a soldier can’t do something because it’d help the enemy, then leadership shouldn’t either. I get the angle consistency matters. But there’s a difference between a grunt in the field and the brass at the top. A service member leaking intel is direct aid to the enemy; a leader with a messy personal record isn’t the same thing unless you’ve got evidence he’s actively sabotaging the mission.
Competence isn’t just about avoiding screw-ups it’s about results. If Hegseth can deliver, the DUI’s a footnote. If he can’t, then yeah, it’s a problem. Where’s your proof he’s incompetent, not just a guy you don’t like?

descarado:
OK. So they give them fake identity.
Exactly what happened during 2015 when illegals flooded northern Nigeria to vote for buhari and thus what we have now.
That is totally wrong. Thanks for the explanation.

But what happens to legal immigrants. So they will not vote be that?

Their main focus is legal migrants, but let's say you cross the border illegally like me and apply for asylum, they will now change your illegal status to legal status pending your asylum approval. This can overwhelm the system, keeping illegals in the country and allowing them to vote even if they have no path to getting a legal status

cococandy:
Mind you there’s information they ran by the CIA and were told not to release. probably because it’s still relevant. What’s revealed is already had enough but it’s funny you think you’re the one to tell us what’s classified and what’s not.

The People who know what is classified and what is not TOLD US NO CLASSIFIED INFO WAS SHARED. they also can declassify documents or information.

cococandy:
I’m sick of going back and forth with people like you who see things that are this obvious and try to wiggle your way into a lengthy bad faith debate because you are allergic to accepting when you are wrong.

You always get sick when someone is not in agreement with you. This is why there is nationwide vandalism on Tesla cars. if i call you emotional, you will get angry, so calm down, please. Don't be sick

cococandy:
I can tell you authoritatively that a service member who reveals this kind of information especially before the launch of the attack would be currently be locked up. And that’s not hearsay. I know this for a fact.

A service member is not allowed to help the enemy, Classified or not

raumdeuter:
How is mandating any govt issued ID before voting a controversial thing that the Democrats are so against it?

Democrats are always about cheating.

cococandy:
And we know for a fact that your side is not testing the waters as far as voter suppression. You’re full on suppressing any votes you think won’t go your way. Removing legal voters from the registers. Harassing people who don’t look like they “belong” in those areas.
Gerrymandering districts to give less voting power to “certain communities”.

This would be embarrassing for you as an immigrant if you actually knew what you were talking about. But I know you don’t know so you think you are saying something.

How are they trying to suppress votes? How are they removing legal voters from the register? you are just making up crap. How are they harassing people?
I don't think asking for ID when you want to cast your vote is suppression of vote.

happney65:
BREAKING: The Atlantic reveals war plans shared on Signal chat after the government has repeatedly said that it included no classified information.

News.

But her emails..

Atlantic quietly update their story to attack plan

cococandy:
You don’t think the precise sequence and time of an attack is classified information? So If the information got out and into the wrong hands before the attack it wouldn’t have changed anything?

Nateev said you’re a bot. At this rate I believe him.

That's not a precise sequence of time. It tells when the planes launch from the carrier, but there is no precise location of where they are striking. If the information got out into the wrong hands, where would they position their air defence? When Israel attacked Iran, Iran knew the time but had no Idea where. The Houthis have already shot down at least 10 of American drones, they know the Americans are always at their airspace.

The time a jet launches from a carrier thats it.
Where are the GPS coordinates?
Target name or location?
Or anything actionable?

Only that they are talking about future events but from what you see. What will you consider or identify as classified information?
the time the plane took off?


This hinges on the sloppy execution rather than the careless violation of classified material. Jeffrey Goldberg, a fake news journalist, in the chat was a colossal OPSEC misstep. not because he’s a security threat in any sense, but because he’s an outsider with no need-to-know. His presence sparked this controversy, public leak when he reported it in The Atlantic. Signal, while not inherently wrong for unclassified talks, amplified the error. It’s a platform designed for privacy, not accountability, OPSEC demands rigorous access control and situational awareness, both of which collapsed when Goldberg entered the chat room

like I said before, Sensitive information that is not classified information was there, and that is what OPSEC is about. OPSEC matters even when the info isn’t stamped Top Secret

IjeBos:
Looks like Goldberg called their bluff.
Also looked like they perjured themselves under oath.
These Trumpers are the dumbest set of people.

Holy Shit!!!!
If these aren't classified, these people are fuxing incompetantly nutz.

Here Are the Attack Plans That Trump’s Advisers Shared on Signal
The administration has downplayed the importance of the text messages inadvertently sent to The Atlantic’s editor in chief.
https://archive.is/vnPIk#selection-739.0-749.19

cococandy:
Bemeruca you wanted the truth so badly. Here you go

Pete Hegseth
TEAM UPDATE:
TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is
FAVORABLE. Just CONFIRMED w/
CENTCOM we are a GO for mission
launch.
1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike
package)
1345: "Trigger Based" F-18 1st Strike
Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his
Known Location so SHOULD BE ON
TIME) — also, Strike Drones Launch
(MQ-9s)
1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike
package)
1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS
WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL
DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier
"Trigger Based" targets)
1536: F-18 2nd Strike Starts — also, first
sea-based Tomahawks launched.

What part of this is a piece of classified information?

I like how The Atlantic went from WAR PLANS to ATTACK PLANS
"terrorist at his know location" thats so classified ijebos

cococandy:
If you read the first response I posted, it was already stated. BTW city council and school boards is like your HOA. You can be a member of those groups and even be elected to lead to them as a non-citizen (depending on the state). So voting there is not the election fraud issue you guys make it out to be. You’re not embarrassed to be using city council and school board as examples of voter fraud when the LAW in those states allow them to? Therefore they’re not committing any fraud?

As far voting in federal elections, again the incidences are so rare (usually born out of ignorance on the offenders part) that you can count how many there are. And this is out of hundred of millions of voters. So let’s make it this huge bludgeoning issue and removed legal voters while we’re at it.

Do you know how many legal voters are unfairly removed from the voting registry by these people who are trying to purge “illegal” voters? Some who have legally voted in the past being removed for simply not voting frequently.

Any alarmist racially motivated attack is where they’ll find you expending all your energy and being the mouth piece of republican weirdos. I dare you to go and vote illegally since you believe it’s that easy.

They are testing the waters. School PTA meetings oga, their children are there but there is a reason the NY judge struck that shit down. That is where they want to start.

It's so rare, right, but the effort to check for election integrity is fought by the left. You need ID to buy alcohol, but you don't need one to vote.

cococandy:
MAGA has really done a number on you. There’s nothing you say that is not a regurgitation of unverified maga talking points. Since you yourself are ineligible to vote (that’s if you’re even in the USA) have you tried to go to voting booth and tried for yourself to see how easy it is to vote as a non-citizen?

I know I couldn’t legally register to vote until I got my citizenship. You guys just swallow whatever lies and run with it. They create propaganda around non or rare issues and tell you it’s happening at such a scale as have never been seen before. And because you love lies, you don’t even pause to verify.

Why would anyone risk jail or possible deportation/ban from ever entering the country again just to vote? If that makes sense to you then I don’t know what to tell you.
The guy that’s getting y’all riled up says he knows intuitively but can’t prove it. Ain’t that convenient.🙄

Some Democrats in places like NYC and San Francisco have pushed to let non-citizens vote in local elections without needing ID checks, saying it’s only fair for folks who pay taxes and live there. Like, NYC tried this in 2021 and got shot down by a judge i NY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvn9kQRlzlA

We have seen examples of non-citizens voting in the Presidential election. That is why democrats were fighting seriously against Voter ID. the Purge of noncitizens from voter rolls, and how the dems tried to block the purge etc.

budaatum:
If he shouldn't have, why did those who should have it give it to him?

And why shouldn't they be prosecuted for so doing?

He cannot verify if he was in a chat with the VP and other high-ranking officials. He can claim he did not know, and what was shared he cannot verify, so as a journalist, he published it. There is no way a case can be made against him except the case is rigged.

my problem is, he should release the so-called classified information to save his image. They have said they did not discuss or share any classified information on the chat.

He has nothing, and as usual, he is lying.

Let's remember that the journalist who did the most to convince Americans of the vital lie that Saddam Hussein had an alliance with Al-Qaeda and therefore led 70% of Americans to believe the lie that Saddam Hussein participated in the planning of the 9/11 attacks was named Jeffrey Goldberg... of The Atlantic

He did that in two articles that even won journalism awards. He was put on NPR and every Sunday show to spread this lie... Jeffrey Goldberg did more to spread the false conspiracy theory that led to the Iraq War.

He also became ground zero for every Russia Gate fraud, and of course, Jeffrey Goldberg is not expelled from the mainstream media.

He's not writing at Substack. He's the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic.

He was rewarded with that position as a result of the lying he did on behalf of the U.S. security state... Journalists who spread CIA conspiracy theories get promoted, and journalists who question the CIA get destroyed. -

Nobody trusts The Atlantic, and this is back-firing in their face. only one way to prove they are telling the truth now.

descarado:
Must you be a citizen to vote in America?
They should rather look for ways to curb election manipulation and rigging not disenfranchised some legitimate people.


Or did I read a diff meaning?

I am not afraid to call out trump if he misfires.

That is how it should be instead of being a blind supporter. Never seeing anything wrong with whoever you support do even if it is staring in your face naked is not having a mind of your own termed zoombism.

You must be a citizen to vote. Democrats are trying to make illegal immigrants and noncitizens to vote, which is why they opened the border wide open so they could get potential voters.

Intolerant idiots

How do they on the left get so bitter like this?

Crowds protest hamas in gaza calling them terrorists.

IjeBos:
What is the probability that the 1 signal chat they had where they are discussing sensitive/classified info they happened to add a reporter?

I can guarantee that this isn't the first time that they have had these classified/sensitive discussions using Signal.

Slowly walking back.
If it's not the first time we would have known and they'd be aware of their previous mistakes.

They messed up by adding that idiot but that's it. If he had classified info it would have been out. Sensitive yes, classified no.

This is why i thought this might be a deliberate leak

budaatum:
I don't think this is correct.

He did not "inadvertently stumble". He was invited to a group in which it was shared with him, and he has every right to read it. Besides, he's already posted some if it, which he could not have done if he hadn't seen or never read it.

Nevertheless, I can't see what crime he has commited, but I don't trust maga not to want to prosecute him. They'd fail to find him guilty though, in my opinion, and would just be making more of a mockery of themselves if they expect him, a journalist, to cover his eyes and not see what he was sent.

Sometimes, you make sense. Oya nateevs, I have been saying this. he has the right to read it and publish it since people who are in charge of the information said it is not a classified information. Let him put this to bed so i can take my L in peace

nateevs:
You are just a bot. You have no capacity for shame.

But he said a lot of bullshit and conspiracy. his arguments are likely to be viewed as wrong and laughable because they are based on unsubstantiated claims, broad generalizations, subjective interpretations, and a severe case of TDS, rather than factual evidence or logical reasoning.

GloriousGbola:
but you have to ask yourself who else has compromised the phones of all these jokers? this is unlikely to be the only group

what this journalist did was actually a stealth act of patriotism because if he is in the group, anyone can be in any of the groups. these guys are not vetted, they are amateurs, they were picked for their ability to kiss trumps arse.

right now for all we know multiple plans are already in the hands of America's adversaries

by reporting this, this man has let everyone know there is a compromised system.

unfortunately, since this is maga, and since soldiers that get killed are losers and suckers and it is wimps that get captured there may be no course correction

your imagination at play. too much of a movie.