Bemeruca's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Bemeruca's Profile › Bemeruca's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 (of 291 pages)
Raumdeuter 🤣🤣🤣
|
Bigot
|
|
bayelsaowei:Which science, what's the damage? 6 years don reach and pass. What's the damage according to the science? Now he has moved to AI. "The potential threat of AI is more dangerous than nuclear weapons" This guy is helping China push propaganda against AI and data centers in the US |
Bayelsaowei, Your compassionate friends need more money for the homeless
|
Bayelsaowei see your man.
|
IjeBos:No drummy, that's not what I am saying. government regulates anything that hurts consumers, the environment or people. They are there to protect the people; they do it when they see issues. When an AI company is building something they believe will kill us all, but instead of stopping, they continue to build it while asking the government to stop them from killing us, that does not make sense. My point is and always has been about monopoly for the giants. They don't have to ask government to regulate, the government is already doing that. Who do you think produce the regulations the government will impose? The AI giants, because they know all the dangers which is AI will kill us all. That's not to say I am against government regulations. I am saying regulations fail, so instead of continuing and asking government to regulate, why not stop? Your speeding analogy also creates another problem for your position. People violate regulations just like your pure water lady, she violated health standards despite government regulation. So what makes you think a regulation written on paper automatically prevents an AI laboratory from doing something dangerous behind closed doors? How does government know? How does government inspect the training process? Again, NAFDAC regulates, but a woman still prepares dirty pure water. It is when it reaches the public that people will find out. By that time, some people have already consumed it. So if AI is going to kill us and the AI companies continue to head towards that way, government regulations will not stop anything, only self regulation will. |
IjeBos:You have nothing to say. Bringing a Love Machine to a common sense fight will not help you. Person they talk sense, you come they talk about pure water. You cannot argue with common sense. |
IjeBos:This is why you should stick to what you are good at and use very well (deal-thoughs). Your pure-water example actually proves my point. That water seller is breaking regulations that already exist. NAFDAC can regulate, inspect and punish, and people still find a way to sell unsafe water. So regulation clearly isn't some magic switch that stops dangerous behaviour. there's a bigger difference here. The water seller is not standing in public saying "my product could kill everybody, please regulate my whole industry" while opening three more factories to make even more of it. That's the contradiction I'm pointing out with AI, and why it is irrelevant to this hysteria. If a company genuinely believes their systems could become catastrophically dangerous, go rogue and start killing all humans like in the Terminator movie, then they already have the most powerful safety mechanism available: don't build it. Or at least hold yourself to the same restrictions you're asking government to force on everyone else. If a training run is too dangerous, don't run it. If a capability is too dangerous, don't release it. If a model needs heavy safety testing, test it before you deploy it. You don't need Congress to stop you from doing something you already believe could kill people. That's my issue with the over exaggerated claim. when all the biggest companies tell us, all three of them, at once: this technology could be catastrophic, we must keep making it more powerful, and government must regulate everyone building it. Especially when those regulations cost more for small companies and open-source developers than for the giants who can easily absorb them. One should be able to question the hysteria. The water seller is chasing naira and ignoring the law. The AI companies I'm talking about are warning us about the danger while continuing to build it themselves, and asking government to regulate the whole market around them. Those are two different things. You pointing to one Nigerian illegally selling bad water doesn't answer that contradiction. Stick to using deal-th😐ughs |
IjeBos:You are deficient in common sense. Why can't they self-regulate instead of begging the government to regulate them? Despite NAFDAC and government penalties, you still see someone making pure water out of dirt, right? So how does it concern the AI discussion? My point is, if they say AI is going to kill us, why ask the government to put a defensive mechanism on it when you can self-regulate? Why not stop building or advancing the thing if they fear it is going to kill us all? As I said, this is to monopolize the market for the big players and to absolve themselves of responsibility. Pure water has nothing to do with this. The regulations in the US will not affect China; they will continue to push. They are constantly experimenting on autonomous war machines as we speak |
A Black mother started hitting her son with a hammer. When he blocked it, she began using pepper spray on him. He ran into the house, and police found him trying to wash it off. The boy was scared and traumatized. A female Florida judge blamed the boy and said, "I don't know what would make a mother hit a child with a hammer and spray him, he is 12 years old, it is hard to manage young men, he probably said something to set her off." The judge wants the mother to learn how to care for her child rather than sit in jail. 😳😳😳😳 |
IjeBos:How is pure water related to this? Are there no regulations for dirty water? People who are making AI are begging the government to regulate it that it will kill us all. Make that make sense if you are not gullible. |
Budaatum, does this look like a jury? See why the jury system is outdated.
|
budaatum:The jury is part of the fan club, when you watch their interview you would know the juries are a joke. |
raumdeuter:Bayelsaowei says it is compassion because the mouth also said the word "FREE" |
raumdeuter:FC Wayo |
raumdeuter:They both need to fight each other and get redcard. No one should dethrone my lead. |
Calibrator:Wildcard? |
It is important that DCL blank today, wissa as well. |
Bayelsaowei see your people
|
Cococandy lies: Women don’t support abusive women when they commit heinous crimes. Case in point all other cases of domestic violence by women that have gained attention and were condemned by all and sundry. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QWk3EFasQM |
@cococandy, she's embarrassed by you. Women don't support other women doing domestic violence? Look at you supporting Lindsay Clancy and blaming her husband. Clancy admitted to the murder, her lawyers said so, yet the husband's story doesn't add up. Did he try to kill her after killing the children? Or is he using some kind of voodoo to make her claim she did it? What do you want the police to investigate? And now it's conservative men? You want to normalize killing children. How can you prove someone is not insane? It is impossible. One can fake being insane, go to one or two psychiatrists, before they kill whoever they want to kill and this case will be cited. Liberal women are advocating for the right to kill their children. https://youtube.com/shorts/uRsBwRasExY |
raumdeuter: ![]() |
Ibime:Strong, you have moved to 4th place |
Cococandy, maybe her lawyers should have stepped down and called the police to ask these questions. Pathetic. I know your opinion on this case would be the same as the TikTok feminists blaming the husband for the murder. |
cococandy:This woman, who is pro abortion and the killing of babies all the way up to the time of birth, wants to blame the husband for the killing of his kids despite all the facts. Your husband if you have one, should be worried. This is the problem with feminists. You don't care about the kids; the hatred for men is what matters to you. Your husband is probably a zoyboi, liberal, and all the woke in the world, and I doubt you like him because of your hatred for men and children. |
bayelsaowei:You are okay with DSA but you want to talk about APC. |
bayelsaowei:I don't think you understand manufacturing. I am shocked. They build ships, so? Does it have quality? Chinese people are running away from their country. |
ijebosb:Wait, I did not know you took your emotions to this thread. Why? |
