₦airaland Forum

verminnel:
Goaaaal

meobizy:
AI advert. The world has gotten lazy. “Nowhere to hide,” I hear. As the seasons pass, housemates are able to clock all the cameras in the house and act to their benefit. The show has matured and the audience is bored. A five year hiatus can bring life into it. There is nothing which will happen in this new season which we haven’t seen in two and a half decades.

AbosedeFalade:
.......🥱

AbosedeFalade:
The statement said "it neither handled nor determined any case relating to the registration or deregistration of the party or any other political party in Nigeria." If this is true, then there is a bigger problem that awaits NDC. This by implication means that Senator Dickson forged a court judgement that forced INEC to register NDC as a political party.

Segxydube:
And what is special about england? Argentina will never play beautiful football but they give u results.

That's how u play cup competitions.

LordReed:
The guy is astoundingly clueless.

QuinQ:
I must make it a point to always remember that people like you exist. People capable of misunderstanding anything unless it is totally spelled out in detail.

Don't you wonder how other people on this thread understand exactly what I meant except you? I don't understand how people like you think.
What is the purpose of the thread if it had been determined at birth that the child was not the man's biological child? What then have we been discussing? Why are we discussing banning teenage DNA tests if it had already been determined at birth that the child did not belong to the man??
People like you eh!

aswani:
It's an online forum oga, if you don't want the view or opinion you put down challenged or debated, maybe you should keep them to yourself.

I haven't said you are not entitled to your opinion, I have clearly stated why I disagree with them.

Happy to move on.

FortCavazosKnox:
Anyone that doesn’t know this is a dull head and shouldn’t be watching football. Park the bus doesn’t work against Argentina

aswani:
You realise England scored a breakaway goal and at no time had Argentina on the ropes. Ehag pressure could they have put with Harry Lane not having a shot at goal.

When they put Rashford and Toney in later on, what happened? Did the game change in any way?

Please don't ever compare Spain with England when it comes to football, not even as a joke. Players IQ and skill is on a very different plane.

Watch what Spain will do to Argentina on Sunday.

Tuchel didn't goof, the players he has are simply not capable of playing and succeeding against the very best.

They can go toe to toe against teams ftom the second rung of the international ladder and below, which they showed on previous rounds and might have deluded the rest of us to think they are better than they actually are.

QuinQ:
You know, I find this really amazing. I will try my best to always remember people like you exist.
HOW DOES THE GUY KNOW THE CHILD IS NOT HIS WITHOUT DNA TEST??!!!

Besides, did you read any of my subsequent posts? How many times did I subsequently make it clear that this thread is NOT about adultery, parternity fraud, or mother's accountability. I made it clear the thread is about the govt recognizing that once a man accepts a child and bonds with the child for several years, THAT IS HIS CHILD! And there ought be a law encouraging him to focus on raising that precious child to maturity rather than spending time and 100's of thousands on DNA tests. The thread is about the govt making laws encouraging him to do just that instead of spending scarce resources pursuing unwarranted DNA fishing expeditions!

aswani:
The team wasn't crippled, he put players on to solidify the defence. Instead, his team decided to play like headless chickens.

Look at the first goal, no closing down, poor positioning for a free shot from outside the box. The guy that scored had had a few shots beforehand to get his bearings. Same guy stands alone waiting for the ball again outside the box while England players wait inside.

If you notice the guys first touch was poor and pushed the ball 5 yards away for him to admittedly catch sweetly. Is Tuchel meant to come and mark him?

Compare that to Argentina who always let Guehi have the ball in space, knowing he can't do any damage to them, while they focus on canceling Rice and Bellingham.

Second goal, easy cross to be dealt with by a serious team. A headed goal scored by a striker under 6 feet with no one anywhere near him. Free header o, what's the coach to do in that case, teach people to contest headers.

Argentina also hit the bar twice and Pickford made really good saves too. Is it a coaches job to tell players how to defend?

aswani:
Maybe Argentina are that good as they have done it before.

Tuchel can only play with the hand he has been dealt. Do you think Argentina can do that to France, Spain, Morocco or even Brazil, impossible?

My point is England had players on that pitch who, if truly as good as they (think they) are should have seen that game to safety on the pitch.

At what point exactly where Argentina not in control of that game, I can't think. A lucky breakaway goal that meant Argentina had to come out and damn the consequences, they did and England folded at the first sign of trouble.

Even at 2-1 down, with Tony and Rashford on, , you couldn't see England do anything, you couldn't see them putting sustained pressure on Argentina to equakise.

Argentina were holding on against Cape Verde, whose performance in that game now needs to be seen in a different light. Against England, they were strolling.

It's not a Tuchel issue, it's an England player issue.

QuinQ:
What this teaches me.is that you have to be VERY, VERY, VERY CAREFUL how you WRITE anything, because some people are not able to fill in the gaps you assume they'll fill in.

My dear, I thought it was obvious what I meant was "We don't know, but even if it turns out he indeed wasn't the father, it is NOT sperm that makes you someone's father!"

It is not the first time I've been taught this lesson but I always forget and also in writing you're rushing and at same time.trying to be as brief as possible but you forget that unless you spell EVERYTHING out clearly, there are people like you who will misunderstand.

But again, what I still don’t understand is, how will.we know it was not his child without DNA test? Is there anywhere it is implied a DNA test took place? So, I still don't know how you could have.misunderstood!

aswani:
Nothing special about a team 1-nil down playing against 11 players, in what is meant to be the third best team in the world full of star players, and impossng themselves so much that the game doesn't even go to extra time.

If you had watched that match without knowing who Messi was in the Argentina team, you would think he was McAllister. He, like Yamal on Tuesday, just did the basics with a flash of skill here and there.

I actually think England are a poor team with poor players, at least no better than Egypt who Argentina did much the same thing too.

So called star players like Kane and Bellingham that don't turn up when their team really needs them. When your goalie id the best player in a losing effort, you know you have problems.

Segxydube:
On a platter? 🤣🤣

Waa he supposed to attack under such attacking pressure by argentina? Keep playing

QuinQ:
Wow, you really do have comprehension issues

Please HOW exactly does the first post force a man to take care of a child that is not his??

How does anyone know the child is not his withour DNA??

QuinQ:
I HONESTLY don’t know what you're talking about. I suspect you are misreading what I wrote.
Please post the statements you're referring to and I will patiently explain everything to you

QuinQQ:
Simple resson: if you've had a child since infancy, he is your child and you're his father and you're 'obligated' to take care of that child till age of maturity. That's how Nature intended it.
It is NOT sperm that makes you someone's father!

QuinQQ:
It is entirely up to the man to decide if he'd accept the child. But once he accepts the child and bonds with the child and have a settled family, he can't come out years later to start screaming DNA.
The state's concern is to discourage such uwarranted DNA fishing expeditions and have the man save his money and focuse on raising a child that knows him as his only father, a child that is almost cerrainly his biological child!

QuinQ:
Am I missing something here? Of course those are my words and they align with everything I've said. We don't know werher there have been infidelity or not, all we know is that he accepted this child and has raised him since infancy.
Our position is that he can't suddenly screaming DNA years later The suggestion is that the state step in with laws to help him do what he ought normally do - which is save his money and focus on raising his precious child!

Poske95:
Excuse
Why did we choose Tinubu go be the next question coming back home

QuinQ:
But this is NOT about fraud or mother's accountability. This is about the state recognizing that once a man accepts a child and bonds with the child for several years, THAT IS HIS CHILD! And there ought be a law encouraging him to focus on raising that precious child to maturity rather than spending time and 100's of thousands on a DNA test!