Benwallt's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Benwallt's Profile › Benwallt's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 (of 416 pages)
Olodo24:More reason he gave Erica series of back shots |
Erica is in for round 2 in the hands of kiddwaya, Ozo should get Nengi ikebe this time around if Dem no swear for am |
psyqs:Perhaps, it's just happening in your area. They were off here for close to two months but back bigger n Better now |
Who are those taken these drugs? |
Trust some people from the other side, Na scissors kick Dem go use send their elders crashing to the floor in pain. |
Love has not to do with dental formula arrangements . When you have lowself esteem it is your cross |
Love has not to do with dental formula arrangements |
Bacƙ n very better now. They are the best thing after jollof rice now data wise |
citizenY:My apology brother man.. |
citizenY:Are you one of the gullible ignoramus that did the casting? I don't need lens to spot the bogusness |
People that believed that Buhari is El Sudan are at it again. Show us pictures, videos and blood not white paper written in beer parlour |
Exercise in futility. The judges will do the right thing irrespective of pressure put on them by opposition and validate Nigerians mandate freely given to Bola Tinubu to steer the ship for 8years. |
Bold n beautiful |
It was a mistake
|
Would there ever be peace? Gbasgbos everywhere. |
seunmsg:You have said it all |
MadamExcellency:Are those the reason Obi went to court. He went to court to challenge the outcome of the best election but abandoned that after seeing the writings on the wall. It is unseriousness |
GreatBoss:Then, the remaining 5 and a half is for who? |
They will be comparing Messi to a Ronaldo that can't even afford a proper wedding. |
He said the money forfeit was his. Let me ask you too, why didn't the court take all the money in the account? Why did they do plus and minus? You can see Ibori trying to go for appeal because the money about to be taken from him was his money according to him. Tinubu has no case to answer. If the owner wants his money back he will approach the court himself. The role of Tinubu is that of a fiduciary |
talented321:I dey go home |
raskymonojendor:It's the very height of madness from the party and it's supporters. You won presidency and almost lose all the seats |
Is it the result of rerun between PDP and LP? |
The Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar has asked the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) to uphold the submission by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) that he won 21 states in the February 25 presidential election. Atiku Abubakar made the request in his final written address in support of his joint petition with the PDP, challenging the declaration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu as winner of the presidential election. In the final written address filed on July 20 by his lead counsel, Chief Chris Uche (SAN), Atiku Abubakar said INEC’s assertion that he won in 21 states of the Federation was neither disputed, retracted, debunked nor claimed to be an error through the proceedings of the Court so far. INEC had, in its response to Atiku Abubakar’s petition asserted that the PDP presidential candidate won 21 States of the Federation in the February 25 presidential election. The 21 states listed by INEC as having been won by Atiku and PDP are Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Borno, Delta, Ekiti, Gombe, Jigawa, Kaduna, Katsina, Kebbi, Kogi, Kwara, Nasarawa, Niger, Osun, Sokoto, Taraba, Yobe and Zamfara. The former Vice President said, since INEC, which, in its averments claimed that he won 21 states and did not rebut the assertion throughout the proceedings, the Court should proceed to uphold the declaration. The final written address reads in part, “Very importantly, the 1st Respondent (INEC) which conducted the election made an open admission in paragraph 18 of its Reply to the Petition, where it unequivocally stated thus: “The 1st Respondent further avers that in compliance with extant laws and regulations, it diligently discharged its duties when it collated the 1st Petitioner’s (Atiku) scores at the election which aggregates to 6,984,520 winning only 21 States to wit: Adamawa, Akwa Ibom. Bauchi. Bavelsa. Borno, Delta, Ekiti, Gombe, Jigawa, Kaduna, Katsina. Kebbi. Kogi. Kwara, Nasarawa, Niger, Osun, Sokoto, Taraba, Yobe and Zamfara. Indeed, as admitted by the 1st Respondent (INEC), the 1st Petitioner (Atiku) won in these 21 States. It is important to note that throughout the trial, the 1st Respondent (INEC) neither refuted nor countermanded this critical averment nor denied it. “We urge your Lordship to hold that this constitutes an admission that requires no further proof. It also constitutes an admission against interest. “The 1st Petitioner (Atiku) contested election to the office of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria under the platform of the 2nd Petitioner, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) which held on 25th February 2023, along with 17 other candidates, including the 2nd Respondent, (Tinubu) who was the candidate of the ruling party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), in whose favour the electoral body, the “Independent” National Electoral Commission (INEC) manipulated the technologies earlier put in place to ensure transparency, and wrongfully returned the said 2nd Respondent (Tinubu) as winner at about 4.00 am on is March 2023, at a time the 1st Respondent admitted that substantial percentage of the results had not been transmitted to the collation system for verification as required by law. “Under the cover of the so-called “technical glitch” excuse which the Respondent (INEC) never explained, the results were deliberately manipulated through suppression and discounting of the votes of the 1st Petitioner (Atiku) and inflation of the votes of the 2nd Respondent (Tinubu). “This deliberate bypass of the use of the prescribed verification technology was nationwide and substantially affected the outcome of the election. The said 1st Respondent (INEC) equally proceeded to declare the 2nd Respondent (Tinubu) winner when the 2nd Respondent ( Tinubu) did not meet the mandatory constitutional requirement to secure not less than a quarter of the votes cast in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. “This was in addition to the numerous infractions and corrupt practices perpetrated by the Respondents. “Notwithstanding, the 1st Respondent (INEC) unequivocally and clearly admitted in its pleadings, namely paragraph 18 at page 13 of its Reply to the Petition, which was never refuted nor retracted, that the Petitioners won 21 States of the Federation in the presidential election, which is an admission against interest. “As a result of non-use of collation by electronic transmission, the 1st Respondent (INEC) later altered the admitted result of 21 States for the 1st Petitioner to 12 States,” the final address said. Atiku Abubakar then urged the Court to uphold the assertion of INEC in the process and declare him winner of the February 25 presidential election. |
VOsimhen144:What's grocery in particular? |
The best INEC chairman ever. His ability to work under pressure and packed propaganda and slandering deserved to be studied. I pray he conducts 2027 elections |
juman:Is the challenger a Christian? |
Op, How u take hear watin he dey talk |
kelvindj98:He is not going for suffering |
There is more to this than meet the eye. That felicitator must be arrested. Whatever gas that couldn't kill a 4days old baby but killed two adults. I want to know |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 (of 416 pages)