benji93: It's an American media narrative that has infected many. It's usually brought to the fore when debating who makes it to the top lists. At this point, even the pettiest arguments are admitted as evidence. I mean A choked more than B so B must be better. . Very interesting angle that many of us find useful. And unfortunately for the players today the history of their chokejobs are easily accessible, even so some are still fresh in our minds .
Khanben: The nfl is not a players league, the nba is
That is what nfl players used to think, until they were convinced otherwise.
In a fair business climate, your scenario is possible. Players have the goods, and can sell to the highest bidder in a capitalist society.
Unfortunately, big business does not work this way. In the case of the NBA, the owners have huge advantages like TV rights, backroom deals and buddy networks that include lawmakers, that ensure any usurper will fail. To make a parallel league to the NBA, you need to get an equivalent amount of rich billionaires to buy in to even have a chance to succeed. It is those billionaires that will wage war with the NBA to make sure parallel league succeeds.
If you doubt this, go count how many competitors google alone has killed in the last 5 years. Set aside a couple of hours to read the list
Khanben: Nobody says they will take all, but they can definitely sustain taking the very best. Also, a $150bil investment with a a yearly return of like 5% for say the 1st 3-5yrs and rising to say 10% after that is something that the nba players as a product can generate if they start their own league, and that is easily sellable in today's financial market. Any fund manager worth their name will scramble to get some of that action.
PS: The next NBA CBA discussion will be starting by latest next year, we will all see that the players will not lose any ground when it's all said and done, because they have a very strong hand and they know how to play it.
The very best need a supporting cast. You will end up needing at least a third of the current league to form a parallel league that is viable. Good luck convincing a third of the league to stick their neck out. Cats that could not stay in the bubble for 2 weeks to win a ring, they had to get their strip club on and risk catching covid. You think they are disciplined enough for this? Nah.
Khanben: In the year of the lockout. Dirk was under contract for 4yr/80mil. The Chinese league offered him 1.5mil per month, with the knowledge that he would leave whenever the lockout ended. With the fact that basketball players from the states don't pay taxes in China, I say that is pretty equivalent, we've not even started to talk about the endorsement opportunities and how brands like Nike, Adidas pand puma would love it for the big name guys to play there even if it is for just a season.
PS: you say the owners don't need the money. I say all the players association needs to do is go to either Blackrock or one of the emirates fund and guarantee that if they get the funding for a league, every single player in the nba retires from the nba and joins said new league, if they guarantee coaches a union, coaches will absolutely follow them. In case you think it is far fetched, the PGA just saw how easy it is for players to get funding for a competing tour. Aston Martin one of the worst teams in f1, just secured over $600mil in funding for a paltry 17% stake from the same people. So please keep telling yourself the players don't have an option, if they decide to go nuclear the owners will lose, because their investment will become worthless. That is why it is in everybody's interest to work together and fix the issues that exists without one group acting as if it's an aristocracy.
They can take a few players, but they cant sustain one NBA team talk less of a dozen.
Khanben: When the skillset you have makes you 1 of 5 or so in the whole world, then you have as much leverage as you are willing to push for and that is a fact. The scarcer the skillset the more power the owner of said skillset becomes.
PS: As for the owners shutting the league down, ask them what happened the last time they tried it, during the last, lock out. In case you didn’t follow the situation, most of the big Euroleague and Chinese teams offered the big name players very good contracts to come over and play for them. that situation in essence was the beginning of the power shift in the NBA, because the big named players who drive the ratings realized that money wise they could get comparable earnings at least for a few months in Europe.
That lockout worked because players were decent, responsible and looked out for each other. Even hotheads kept their cool. Players were teaching players side hustles. This generation of players are fake internet teammates. . Look at the covid playins, with kyrie on purpose trying to come out against what the majority of players had already agreed to. When you have selfish players like Simmons, Kyrie, Harden etc, it is difficult to put up a united front. Hence the next lockout will not favor players as much.
No matter how skilled you are, unless you writing the checks, your bargaining power is limited. Having a united front will help, but I doubt that happens this time.
It really pisses me off to see how these cats hove ruined the hard work and sacrifice of the last lokcdown that led to a favorable CBA.
wait, SAS is out with a shoulder injury. On top wetin?!!! Lmao. We need Kyrie, Simmons and AD to comment on this situation. Wetin concern sportscaster with shoulder injury. Or is this a stylish contract dispute
Roland17: Special Leprechaun? As much as I have defended him on this thread, he is no longer welcome in Boston. Houston will not be a bad landing spot, you can give him the Harden treatment..
We have not recovered from one diva, you say we should start another one. God is currently buttering our bread, and we are content. No thanks.
felix00: This kinda rules out KD to Suns. Is it possible for KD to run it back with the nets?
Has any super star put in a request but end up staying? Like has it happened before..
Kobe did. Its not that uncommon - we just didnt have social media to this extent to fan up the flames. In Kobe's case, Shaq left anyways, so it was easy to pacify Kobe. In this case, Kyrie is staying, and I think Durant wants out primarily to avoid another Kyrie season. I am not sure what could be done to pacify Durant in this case. It is hard to unload Kyrie because apparently nobody wants Kyrie, not even for a bag of chips. Maybe we can beg the celtics to take him back as special leprechaun
This man bet on himself after the Suns stopped contract negotiations last year. He believes he is a max player and is now going to get his max contract. The Suns have no option than match the Pacers offer sheet or lose Ayton for free.
Once again, big credit to Ayton!
Gotta look out for yourself. Even though I dont think he is worth max player deal. I am feeling some Roy Hibbert vibes in this whole saga
etidy: You could say the same about Duncan. No one wins without help. Not lebron, not even MJ
Hence I tried to compare them without looking at rings etc - you need a great team and great organization and few injuries to win a ship. But if we talking player vs player, thats a different ballgame.
It was definitely Kobe's doing. Shaq was a perennial underperformer vs Duncan and the Spurs. All their matchups the Lakers won was primarily because of Kobe's play. Kobe always outplayed Shaq wherever they were able to get the win. Duncan always outplayed Shaq as well in the series the Lakers lost to San Antone
1999. Shaq 23ppg Duncan 29 ppg
2001 Kobe 33-7-7 Duncan 23 ppg
2002 Kobe 26 ppg Shaq 21 ppg
2004. Kobe 26ppg Shaq. 22ppg
They were 3-2 and Kobe was the best player in all 3 series wins unquestionably. People always get caught up in Shaq's final numbers. Go and watch all their playoff series after 2000 season and see the work Kobe was doing
Lakers missing the playoffs is majorly due to Kobe missing 16 games while adding dross like Caron Butler etc.
Again another myth and urban legend. Paul Gasol in 08 averaged 13ppg in that 5 game series. He averaged fewer pts, fewer assists, fewer rebounds, fewer blocks so pray tell how did he offset Duncan? Duncan averaged 22ppg. It was Kobe's 29ppg that enabled them wipe the defending champion San Antonio Spurs with oraimo cord in 5.
Duncan played in a position that allowed him age with grace. He wasn't picking up guys 90 ft like Kobe could. Also anyone being honest will know that from 07 onwards Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili were arguably the best players on that Spurs team. At the very worst they were essentially a big 3. And in their battle with the Heatles claiming Timmy was still carrying the Spurs then is just flat out dishonest. They had like 4-5 guys averaging double digits every night
If you say Kobe can't carry a team to a ring then what did he do in 2009 and 2010? What do we call that? Kobe was the OG Spurs killa and the biggest reason Tim Duncan never repeated. Never forget it
Well lets here from the horse's mount how important Pau was:
A40: These new players are just divas and buttersoft. This is what they are calling Player empowerment? Smh. All I see is the softest era ever
Even as much of a fraud I consider Ben Simmons I don't see why he's not a good fit with the Nets. There's enough guys and shooters they are never going to need shooting from him and he can defend. It's a crying disgrace if KD is allowed to run from this team. If he wins just 1 chip with the Nets. he will win back so much respect. There's something about winning a team it's first title. It permanently alters your legacy positively. Guys like Olajuwon, Dirk, Wade and Giannis will forever live off that tax and be respected like KD never will unless he can do it with the Nets.
You forgot to add Lebron na . He won Cavaliers first title. That was Lebron's finest leadership moment imo. Team chemistry was excellent until the Kyrie debacle.
Which is why I cant understand why he would entertain reuniting with Kyrie, assuming the rumors are true. Kyrie is locker room cancer. He camoflages it by being silent and pleasant, but the results speak for itself.
Khanben: Thanks for all those who contributed to the kobe vs TD debate. I really appreciated the thought put behind each person's choice. I just want to ask another question, which criteria is best for ranking players?. Some background,I came across a podcast where everyone on it believes that Prime Draymond Green is better than Prime Blake Griffin, which was shocking to me, and they kept repeating their reason as Draymond impacts winning more than Blake. My issue with that approach is, one guy is judged on his impact as the 4th best player on a championship winning team, while the other is judged on being the 1st option on a team. I truly believe that players should be ranked on a level playing field. So really looking forward to reading your opinions
Bwahahaha , I think some of these podcasts are just trying to stir sh** up and generate online buzz. Draymond is so way overhyped, there are at least a dozen SF/PF type guys who make the same or better impact in the league. Thats why Draymond talks so musch ish. He knows, deep down, that he is just a role player riding the coat tails of a great.
Imaging the Warriors having Blake Griffin instead. LOL! Blake is his prime was stronger, nastier on offense, dirtier on defense and hustled way more - in fact I hated Blake most of his career, he would play you like you owed his mom money. Dude had a legit midrange, and could create his own offense and dunk over you and your mama . Blake's main weakness was that injury bug
Khanben: With due respect to the Admiral, he averaged 15.6pts and 10rbs for the Spurs first chip and 8pts and 7rbs for the 2nd one. So he was no longer the MVP caliber player he used to be
Yeah, I was going to say this, but, I think everybody is set on who they want lol. Those were his last years in the league, and he was a shadow if himself by then. The second ring he was averaging like 10pts or something.
Robinson was never a showman, so most folk are surprised to hear he dropped a 70pt game once. But by the time Duncan got drafted to become the face of the Spurs, Robinson was an old man. Just like Olajuwon.
A40: I would have picked Duncan just for consistency and stability till I dug into their playoff series clashes. Kobe used to absolutely destroy them. I can't in good conscience put Duncan over Kobe after seeing how much Kobe used to torch Duncan and the Spurs.
Kobe averaged 28 a game on Duncan. And dethroned him and his team 3x. There's a reason Timmy never repeated. Kobe
You do have a point there. Kobe Lakers whopped Duncan Spurs the first 2 WC finals and had a 3-1 advantage in all their first 4 matchups.
But was that Kobe's doing? I think not. Remember Kobe had Shaq at his most dominant! In fact the year Shaq left to Miami, Lakers didnt even make the playoffs! So it wasnt so much Kobe's brilliance as much as having a superior supporting cast. In fact Shaq was responsible for dousing Duncan's fire, not Kobe.
After the Kobe/Shaq era, the next time Spurs would meet Lakers in the playoffs, Kobe again had a Pau Gasol to help offset Duncan. Finally, as both Duncan and Kobe's careers came to an end, Duncan's consistency helped them get to the finals versus the deadly Heat back-to-back, and they won another ring.
Duncan can carry a team to a ring. Kobe can will a team to win games. Big difference.
Khanben: Quick question Kobe vs Duncan who was better?
Duncan, and its not close. If Duncan hogged the ball half as much as Kobe did, he would have 50 20 10 every night. He could score with his back to the basket on anyone. Or kiss it off the glass, an unblockable money shot
What has Kawhi done in the last 3 years? Perhaps you are right that I am too harsh on Durant. I think Nash sucked as a coach, and could not run plays to free up Durant. So yeah, Durant should bounce back in the right environment.
benji93: He's box office. That's enough goods to sell.
as in cardboard box All the handles in the world and he cannot score over one determined defender. So what is the use of all the dribbling. Na streetball we come watch?
aliondo: Mehn,just been following posts about my gee, K.D. Sentiment will not allow me post coz he's my favorite but gotta admit he effd up so bad. But I want to put more of the blame(for Brooklyn failure) on Kyrie. I think he deserves it more. Kyrie will be a good fit for the Lakers tho but just wondering which will be the best team for K.D?Maybe we can discuss that here
You dey scarce for here brah. The moment KD listened to Kyrie, that was the beginning of the end. I dont think Kyrie fits anywhere to be honest, and I am not sold on his skills. Kyrie has always been a streaky shooter, will win you some games, and lose a lot more. People need to shine their eye on this cat.
As for KD, I would like to see him on the Bulls team - I think that crew fits his personality and playing style very well. Even if they dont win a ring, I think he would be happy there.
Android17: I dislike KD now but that man is a superstar. Come on. More so than even Jokic, Giannis and Embiid.
And tell us you did not watch Steph last season. Sucks on defense? lol
Post injury KD has some weak spots. Specifically he could not handle double teams. I suspect athletically he has declined a bit, but it was not noticeable until he had to read the defense of a very good team and still impose his will. Hence the struggles vs the well coached Celtics. I suspect that is why he also changed his shooting mechanics a bit. His shot always had a high arc, but it was even higher last season.
If the opposing team's superstar has the ball with 2s to go, Steph is not going to defend them. They will pick Klay before Steph even. The other 4 superstars I mention can be trusted for that last second defensive stand.
Khanben: With Shaq saying there are currently only 4 superstars in the nba, let me just come out and ask, what is the criteria that makes a player a nba superstar? cause it seems to be all-over the place
I say 5: Lebron, Jokic, Giannis, Embiid, Steph
Its more than just skill. Your skill has to be capable of shining even with a double or triple team. Which means you have a very good basketball mind. You can read defenses and still execute your game plan. Which also means you are by nature a disciplined and driven person. And you can take over games on the offense as well as defense. Interestingly, my list is all mobile bigs, except Steph. Steph sucks on defense, but his offense more than makes up for it.
Also note that being a superstar does not equal ring - you need a complete team and disciplined organization for that. Any of these superstars would have won a ring with the Warriors cast. None of these superstars can win a ring with say for example Orlando
Khanben: Actually that part I understand, Kyrie has shown he cannot be counted upon to stay on the court for any extended period of time. In Hindsight KD probably knows it was a mistake to team up with him and has decided to the detriment of the Nets to cut bait, rather than continue their partnership.
The fact that Kyrie tried to opt out, and leave KD is what crossed the line in KD's mind. You brought me here to Brooklyn, and now you try to bail out. So even though Kyrie eventually stayed, the damage has been done.
Warriors have been complete @55holes since their win. It is good to see other NBA drama to wash away the stench of the sore winners
KNIGHTBlaed: Have you guys seen the movie "Rise", about the Adetokumbo family and their rise to fame. A very interesting movie this one, so Giannis is more Nigerian then he is Greek fa. Lovely movie, you guys should see it. Na almost naija movie sha..
I loved it. I need to stop doing some of the things his pops did I also didnt know he was yoruba/igbo, I was always wondering what the ugo stood for