BlackManta's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BlackManta's Profile › BlackManta's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 101 pages)
MSGAMBLE9:Of course, not all post-Endgame MCU movies are trash. But the truth is, the majority of them are. Let’s go through the full list of MCU films released after Endgame and break down which ones were average or just plain underperformed. Spider-Man: Far From Home A billion-dollar movie riding the momentum of Endgame. Plus, it’s Spider-Man—Marvel’s biggest and best-selling character. No surprise it was a hit. Black Widow This movie flopped so badly, Scarlett Johansson sued Disney. Yes, it came out in 2021 (a COVID year), but it’s still a flop, forgettable and below average. Shang-Chi Good movie, sure. Still a flop. Eternals The first MCU movie to go rotten on Rotten Tomatoes. Not only did it flop, it damaged the franchise. You’ll never see the Eternals again, not even as a cameo. Spider-Man: No Way Home Massive fan service with all three Spider-Men. Obviously, it was a hit. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness Released in 2022, this was the first time the MCU had back-to-back hits since Endgame. Thor: Love and Thunder Made money, but no one likes it. It underperformed, and Taika Waititi has been in director jail ever since. Black Panther: Wakanda Forever Not as good as the first. Slightly underperformed but still a win overall. Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania One of the worst comic book movies of all time. The damage this film did to the MCU will take years to fix. Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 James Gunn doesn’t miss. Solid movie. The Marvels The biggest box office bomb in MCU history. Cost over $220M and didn’t even make that back. A complete disaster. Deadpool & Wolverine Another multiverse cash grab built to pander to X-Men fans. Full of cameos and fan service—because that’s apparently the only way the MCU can make money now. No wonder they’re rushing to bring back Robert Downey Jr. for the next Avengers. Captain America: Brave New World Nothing to write home about. No redeeming qualities. Thunderbolts Not bad, not good. Just there. Another big flop. Now let’s talk about the Disney+ shows: WandaVision – Decent. The Falcon and the Winter Soldier – Mid. Loki – Decent. Hawkeye – Mid. Moon Knight – Mid. Ms. Marvel – Mid. She-Hulk: Attorney at Law – Disgusting. Secret Invasion – Makes She-Hulk look like prestige TV. Echo – Did anyone even watch this? You can defend the disastrous post-Endgame run all you want, but let’s not pretend Phase 1–3 was ever this messy. Between 2008 and 2019, Marvel released 23 movies. Only two were genuinely bad: Thor: The Dark World and Captain Marvel. Now compare that to the post-Endgame era. Be serious. |
oyaskii:If Fantastic Four fails, that's a wrap on every superhero movie that is not a guaranteed box office draw. In fact, I believe that is where we are right now. The only movies Marvel has in active development are Spiderman and Avengers. Kevin Feige will never make a movie about B-list characters ever again. |
Samistry2:Given how No Way Home ended, I think a darker serious tone is the only direction to go. I don't understand how Peter loses his aunt and best friends, ends up completely alone, and then suddenly goes back to being funny and acting like a typical teenager. I think we will get a Spiderman that is more mature like Tobey Maguire. |
Brand new day. Brand new suit. A much darker and serious film...(my answered prayers). Yeah I'm excited. This is the only Marvel movie I'm looking forward to next year, yes I know there's an Avengers movie coming but nothing about that excites me as much this.
|
August is looking good ![]()
|
All the critics that were raving about this movie deserve to be flogged. It took me two days to finish 28 years later. The only part of the movie that makes sense is when the kid and his dad went to the mainland. After that the plot got nonsensical, everything about the movie just dey vex me. A 12 year old who can barely kill zombies took his sick mother to a zombie infested land to find a doctor. At the end the journey turned out to be a complete waste of time. In addition to the weak plot, this movie is also boring. When the credits rolled I was asking myself, "is that it? What is the point of this movie?" 28 years later is a 2/10 Please avoid it. |
This is a big surprise I have never seen a comedy get so much positive buzz since Game Night 2018
|
. |
![]()
|
DO NOT WATCH THIS MOVIE AT HOME James Cameron's Avatar was made for the big screen. I remember seeing Way of Water in cinema and my god, those visuals were breathtakingly stunning. Fire and Ash could be bigger and better. Make I go lock 10k inside piggyvest because on December 19th, I will be there no matter what.
|
We're getting not just one but two more Navi clans in Fire and Ash
|
BlackManta:Sky Navi, water Navi and fire Navi Bro took inspiration from The Last Airbender |
On December 19th James Cameron is serving visuals https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb_fFj_0rq8?si=TV2Y5y4T58_OGyO0 |
abduleez1:Why is China rejecting CBMs? Venom 3 earned $90m+ over there last year and now Supes and F4, far better movies, can't even sniff $20m+ Is this CBM fatigue or something else? |
Xavier5:#Gunneddown |
![]()
|
I'm glad we're finally getting a good F4 adaptation but man, bar is really low. The fourth time is the charm...
|
December 19th Will you be there?
|
joseph1832:Worse |
Degrezhaa:Nope. I wrote it after. My mistake. |
abduleez1:If Gunn is casting based on acting prowess, then there's no better actress that fits WW than Elizabeth Debicki. She's 6"3 tall. She's an accomplished TV drama actress, won a golden globe and Emmy for portrayal of Princess Diana in The Crown, a very iconic role. Only two years older than David, so not too old and not too young either. Only downside is her physique. She's really slim. Some would even call her skinny but that can be fixed with dieting and exercise. She's worked with Gunn before on GOTG vol 2 and 3. Gunn is known to use the same actors across different films.
|
joseph1832:Sorry bro |
bentenny:SPOILER WARNING Did we watch the same movie ![]() Superman only lost to one person in the whole movie. Ultraman, his cl**e, who was being controlled by Lex, the genius billionaire who studied Superman and the way he fights and even developed his own counter moves to defeat him. The movie even states at the beginning that Superman is the most powerful metahuman in the world and he has never lost a battle in over 3 years...until Ultraman. Bro beat Ultraman and the Engineer, beat all of the Lex's goons in a few seconds. Escaped a pocket dimension with kryptonite poison in his body and saved many people when the city was falling apart. So tell me again which movie did you watch ![]() |
MacDaddy01:Lagos too cost Viva Cinema charges 7000 with popcorn and drink @Enugu That's the cheapest option right now. |
Baddestguyp:I like Henry Cavill Superman but Snyder was too focused on making him look cool as fvck all the time. There's a scene in Batman v Superman where a courtroom full of people exploded and Superman just stood there aura farming. https://youtube.com/shorts/szbyQ0UaigY?si=euvqvqvMExFixg-4 |
Tboy2050:Is it good? |
BlackManta:Did I mention that the score was really good. It's no Hans Zimmer but it's better than I expected. Also Krypto was great in this movie. Almost every character gets a moment to shine.
|
SUPERMAN: MY HONEST REVIEW I saw Superman yesterday and thought it was a good movie. Action-packed, emotional, with solid characters and great visuals. It’s a solid movie overall, but not a perfect one. It has its strengths and weaknesses—but at the end of the day, the pros outweigh the cons. --- THE PROS Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor A fantastic villain. He brought so much energy to this movie. He played Lex in a way that radiates envy, hatred, and disdain for Superman. He’s menacing and genuinely scary. This version of Lex Luthor is a stone-cold killer—a real hater. His entire purpose is to take down Superman. I love that the movie doesn’t try to make us feel sympathy for Lex or justify why he’s evil. In this movie, Lex is evil because that’s just who he is. Full stop. No tragic backstory or emotional trigger. Being evil is simply in his nature. He spends the entire movie rage-baiting Superman, and until the third act, he has the upper hand. This is by far the best Lex Luthor I’ve ever seen—strong, brilliant, and terrifying. The movie shows that even though Superman is powerful, Lex can humble him with his intelligence. There’s a great line where Lex gloats and says, “Brain beats brawn.” It hits hard. The way Lex was written and used made me like the character even more. Nicholas Hoult is perfectly cast—he’s the best actor in this movie. He absolutely killed it. No complaints. --- David Corenswet as Superman Charming and charismatic. David is a phenomenal Superman. This is not a dark or brooding version—this Superman wants to be Superman. David radiates the hope and optimism the character is known for. He’s heroic and also very human. Before seeing this movie, I heard someone say Zack Snyder made SUPERman and James Gunn made superMAN. David Corenswet brings so much energy to the role that it makes that statement true. He completely owns it. I’m glad his Superman doesn’t carry the gloom and stoicism that Henry Cavill’s version had. He genuinely sees himself not as an alien, but as part of the human race. He treats Metropolis like home and carries his duties like a good-natured boy scout. James Gunn captures Superman’s humility and humanity. He’s not treated like a god but like a normal, everyday hero. --- Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane A very strong and beautiful female character. What I like most about this Lois Lane is that she’s not a damsel in distress. She actually helps Superman take down Lex Luthor. She’s intelligent, charming, and has amazing chemistry with David. That chemistry is one of the most important things in a Superman movie, and it works perfectly here. Lois isn’t just a background character—she plays just as major a role as Superman. She’s well-written, courageous, and gets things done. Even among people with superpowers, she still stands out and contributes in meaningful ways. --- THE JUSTICE GANG I originally thought they were only in the movie to show that this world has other superheroes. I didn’t expect them to do anything important. But by the end, I liked them way more than I expected. Mr. Terrific was my favorite. He’s basically the Batman of the group—no superpowers, but super smart and tech-savvy. Guy Gardner blew my expectations. I didn’t expect much from him, but he brought great humor to the movie. His scenes were the funniest. Nathan Fillion was born to play this role. Hawkgirl was my least favorite. She didn’t really stand out, except for one scene where she killed someone by dropping them from the sky. Overall, though, the Justice Gang were an essential part of the movie. --- THE VISUALS Top notch. Not mind-blowing like Man of Steel or Snyder’s DC movies, but still really good. I’d say the visuals are on par with Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, and in some scenes, even better. The CGI is 99% great. The bright, colorful cinematography fits the tone of this movie perfectly. --- ACTION-PACKED Superman is an action sci-fi movie, and the action is really good—especially in the third act. There’s a scene where Superman lasers all of Lex’s henchmen while spinning at high speed. It’s in the trailer, but seeing it on the big screen blew my mind. The action isn’t like Man of Steel, where cities are leveled and civilian casualties are everywhere. David’s Superman is much more careful—he protects civilians and tries to limit the damage around him. Mr. Terrific also has an incredible action scene that I enjoyed a lot. James Gunn knows how to do action. If you’ve seen his other movies, you’ll know what to expect—and he delivers. --- CHEMISTRY BETWEEN CLARK AND LOIS One of the most important things in a Superman movie is the chemistry between Clark and Lois. Without it, the whole thing feels flat. Thankfully, James Gunn nailed this. The two leads aren’t just great in their roles—they have real, believable chemistry. It makes a huge difference. --- THE CONS PACING The pacing is a bit off—especially in the first half. There’s a lot going on: heavy world-building, tons of new characters, and lots of exposition. It can be overwhelming if you're not used to comic book movies. The first hour moves too fast. The story needed more time to breathe. But once the movie hits the second hour, the pacing improves and everything starts to flow better. --- NOT ENOUGH KENTS I thought Pa Kent and Ma Kent were underused. There’s a heartfelt scene where Pa Kent talks to Clark, and it was arguably the best part of the movie—but it was too short. I wish we spent more time with them. Their scenes were beautiful and emotional, and they deserved more screen time. --- RUNTIME TOO SHORT The movie is 130 minutes long, and honestly, I think that’s too short. It feels like James Gunn trimmed it for the sake of making it more rewatchable. But if the movie had 15 more minutes, that pacing issue I mentioned earlier probably wouldn’t exist. It’s a very entertaining movie, but it left me wanting more. --- I can’t wait to see the next DCU project. James Gunn is building something special here, and I think it has serious potential. --- FINAL RATING: 8/10
|
MacDaddy01:Someone said the president of Boravia looked a bit like Benjamin Netanyahu and now I can't stop thinking about it. |
This Hollywood summer period is great for Nigerian cinemas. I went to see Superman today and everywhere was packed. The movie was a delightful experience. My theater was lively. People were laughing and cheering. James Gunn made a highly entertaining family movie. A complete crowd pleaser. This is a movie that everyone will enjoy even non-cbm fans. I'll post a full review later. |


