ChizzyBuna: my mother was the first that went to village to clean and get our village house ready.
Meanwhile my dad excuse for not joining her was that he has some workers his trying to settle their salary before going to village for christmas
Meaning he arrived village 24th night while my mum had been in village since 21st december.
Clearly my p man use that excuse to knack...SMH Only God will judge that man!!
Now i just arrive the house in town and this man had the audacity to not even dispose the condoms 3 Beer bottles litrerd on the floor Asin i just dey regret entering his room. I no fit look that man the same again
You have found what you were looking for.
You can wisely help them both and make their sex life stronger and more spicing, so that he can stop looking elsewhere for sexual satisfaction..
Or you can blow it all up carelessly, and have your loving home chattered to pieces,, and it might affect you too in the future.
ChizzyBuna: So my parents are in village for christmas. Coming from lagos to visit for xmas I decided to visit our house in town where our family lives. Before going to meet them in village
What i found in my fathers room shocked me
Condom packets that were not prpperly thrown away.
Ky gel found open on the table For those that don't know Ky gel is lubricant for sex.
This is enough proof this man is cheating. Should i repirt him to my mum??
If they both lived in that house in town,, you cannot conclude who it was that used those things..
jazzman7711: ''I visited your country and was never in any danger, and enjoyed myself throughout my stay, even though my Nigerian friends abroad had warned me not to go there, saying I would be kidnapped by bandits, robbed, and scammed. Please stop bad-mouthing your beautiful country to the world.'' - South African lady tells Nigerians.
Richtaiwo: This news is just like an arrow straight into the damn hearts of bitter people. They will soon land with their bitterness, curse and swears.
Well, na those their bitterness and pains dey sweet me pass.
Good job by the military and may God crown their efforts with success.
I have signed the N607 billion 2025 Appropriation Bill into law!
This budget, themed "Changing Gears 2.0", marks a significant milestone in our administration's efforts to transform Anambra State into a modern, prosperous, and livable homeland. We are prioritizing our 5 pillars of development namely; Security, Law and Order; Human capital and social agenda; Environment; Governance and Value System; Infrastructure and Economic Transformation.
With a 48% increase from the 2024 budget, this appropriation bill prioritizes infrastructure, economic transformation, human capital development, and social welfare. A total of 77% (N467.5 billion) is allocated to capital expenditure, while 23% (N139.5 billion) goes to recurrent expenditure.
This budget is a testament to our administration's commitment to transparency, accountability, and people-centered leadership. I am confident that it will drive sustainable growth and development in Anambra State.
Thank you to the Anambra State House of Assembly for their diligent work in passing this appropriation bill. Together, we will continue to work tirelessly to make Anambra State a beacon of governance, prosperity, and equity.
SUGGESTIONS TOWARDS EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE HANDLING OF THE ELECTION RESULTS BY THE INEC.
These suggestions below are borne out of my mind.
Readers can contribute to it, criticize it, or even refute it..
Here we go..
I would suggest INEC develops an E-Collation System In Addition to the existing IREV-PORTAL.., and at the same time, they should increase the current functional scope of the existing IREV-PORTAL..
It is worthy to note that the IREV-PORTAL is a single Central Server. But this suggested “E-Collation System” is Supposed to be a decentralized system of many independently working servers, whose main work (in summary) is to accept and collate the various results, and then transmit the collated results to the upline-server within the same E-Collation System.
The E-Collation System is not supposed to be a single central server, but a collection of independent servers working together.
..
Therefore, I am suggesting that the INEC should develop a decentralized E-collation System where there would be a special collation-server reserved and dedicated for each of the collation centers.. Thus, all these various collation centers should have their own dedicated independent servers, [b]thus there would not be only one single central back-end server which would be serving all the Collation Centers -- where all the results are transmitted to, and collated, and stored; -- BUT RATHER,, A SYSTEM WHICH IS MADE UP OF MANY SERVERS...
Thus, during the usage of this e-collation system, the BVAS-devices at the various Polling-units would have to simultaneously (but separately) transmit the accreditation data and results (which are contained inside them) to all the relevant servers that are in its upline at all the required levels of the e-collation system..
This also means that we would be expecting to have many final collation results -- which are dependent on the number of collation servers at the different upline levels of collation within the e-collation system to which the BVAS-MACHINES transmitted its data to.
For instance, for a Presidential Election,, we are expecting four differently collated Final Results, which should definitely be the same figures for all the four differently collated results -- if all things being equal.. For Governorship Election, we would be expecting three differently collated results, and all the final figures are supposed to be the same.
THIS WOULD ALSO SERVE AS A VERY GOOD METHOD OF REVIEWING THE RESULTS -- AND FOR CHECKS-AND-BALANCES -- AND ALSO FOR POST-ELECTION AUDIT OF THE PROCESSES.
... Thus, there is supposed to be a minimum of 9,621 independent servers in the suggested e-collation system for the Presidential Election alone (that-is 8,809 wards + 774 LGAs + 37 States and FCT + 1 National Collation Center = 9,621), and an additional 1,491 servers that would serve as the final collation servers for all those other Contested Positions.
All these servers in the e-collation system must be independent, and can only assess the data that are relevant and necessary for its operations (that-is, the down-line data from the direct lower-level down-line servers, and the data transmitted directly to it from the BVAS Devices at the polling units).
WITH SUCH A DECENTRALIZED E-COLLATION SYSTEM,, THE DATA CANNOT BE EASILY MANIPULATED -- BECAUSE THE AUTHENTIC ORIGINAL DATA WAS TRANSMITTED AND STORED IN VARIOUS UNCONNECTED BACK-END SERVERS,, AND NOT JUST ONE BIG MIGHTY CENTRAL SERVER WHICH COULD JUST BE TAMPERED WITH AT ANY TIME, AND IT WOULD AFFECT THE WHOLE RESULTS EVERYWHERE.!!
SmartyPants: Which losses? Why do you people refuse to behave like normal human beings? Obviously, the FG will pay the balance. What is so difficult to understand about how this works?
December 2023 is still just a year ago..
Which of the transport companies were reimbursed for this same sham they did last year.??
(Whenever people are talking out of experience,, please guide your vituperations.)
Alternatively,, why won't INEC develop an E-collation System where all these various collation centers have their own dedicated independent servers, thus there won't be only one single back-end server,, BUT A SYSTEM OF MANY SERVERS.??
Thus, a particular BVAS-device would have to simultaneously (but separately) transmit the data within it to all the specifically concerned servers in its upline at all the required levels of the collation system..
... Thus, there is supposed to be a minimum of 9,621 independent servers in the e-collation system of the Presidential Election alone (that-is 8,809 + 774 + 37 + 1 = 9,621), and an additional 1,491 servers that would serve as the final collation servers for those other contestable positions.
All the servers in the system must be independent, and can only assess the data that is necessary for its operations (that-is, the down-line data from the lower-level servers and the data transmitted directly from the BVAS Devices at the polling units).
WITH SUCH A DECENTRALIZED E-COLLATION SYSTEM,, THE DATA CANNOT BE EASILY MANIPULATED -- BECAUSE THE AUTHENTIC ORIGINAL DATA WAS TRANSMITTED AND STORED IN VARIOUS UNCONNECTED BACK-END SERVERS,, AND NOT JUST ONE BIGG MIGHTY SERVER WHICH COULD JUST BE TAMPERED WITH, AND IT WOULD AFFECT THE WHOLE RESULTS EVERYWHERE.!!
89green: Jesus is not God is the biggest truth of all time. I like their style, they displayed the banner for a while and then removed it, if you are wise you will understand that God is one and not 3, Jesus is not God.
That is,, if you even think that God in any way resembles anything that looked in any way like a human being.
LegendHero: If they are fanatics, why did they remove it?
If someone says “FANATICS”,, is the person referring to ONLY MUSLIMS.??
..
WHY DID YOU FEEL SO GUILTY.??
I mean, read that comment again which you responded to -- and bear “CHRISTIAN FANATICS” in mind (even though he wrote only “FANATICS” without tagging any particular religion to it)..