She didn't say anything that has to do with our argument.. You can't join NATO if you are having internal crisis.. some part of Ukraine have been rebelling against the Ukrainian gov for years now That's why NATO couldn't accept Ukraine.. After all Estonia, Lithuania were all former members of the Soviet union and are also neighbors to Russia but were accepted by NATO and Russia couldn't do anything
[quote author=Walkee post=110884744]lol. USA have more population than China? You expect Russia to come out and take credit? US intelligence found out that it was Russia, everyone knew it was Russia. Ukraine have lots of Soviet Union facilities that USA were trying to take over. USA were also funding biological weapons facilities in Ukraine. These are the main reasons Ukraine was targeted. Also, around 35% of Ukrainian population are ethnic Russians and they want to join Russia. Here's a video of US secretary of states admitting to USA having bio labs in Ukraine after they denied it as propaganda initially
U.S. Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland says Washington is working with Ukraine to prevent biological research facilities from falling into Russian hands. She just confirmed every conspiracy theory about the existence of those labs. pic.twitter.com/ynkd7hW6iK
is a developing country.. go and make your research.. Any Soviet union facility still in the hands of Ukraine is now theirs and they have the right to do whatever they want with it,it shouldn't concern Russia... That 35% that wants to join Russia should go to Russia and join them, no one is stopping them..
Russia is just using silly reasons to justify their attack on Ukraine... Why didn't Russia attack other former Soviet union members that are now in NATO?
Walkee: no, USA have not left before Taliban took control. Taliban were winning in almost all the major fronts and were pressing towards the capital in a very rapid pace. USA were still in Afghanistan when Taliban took over. The US marines that were in the Kabul explosion were they from Nigeria or what
They started gaining control because the U.S were already pulling out, have you forgotten it was during trump regime they started moving out their equipments from Afghanistan? You and I know that if they really wanted to continue staying they would have for as long as possible, it will only cost them more money and men.
Walkee: Nigerians also flock to China, UK, Russia etc Nigeria is third world country that's an established fact. There is no developed country in the world where you will meet as many homeless citizens as USA. It's USA who have historically run away from direct confrontation with Russia. There was news in 2020 on Putin placing prices on USA soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, what did USA do? In early 2021 Russia launched a cyber attack against USA and overfloated their pipelines which led to the first energy crisis under Biden, what did USA do? When Russia fighter jets entered Syria and started bombing the rebel areas, USA ran away because they said they didn't want to face Russia which would lead to a major war.
That's because there is no developed country with as much population as U.S.. the U.S receives the highest number of immigrants from all over the world..so of course,there are bound to be homeless people.. Russia never came out openly to claim attacks on the U.S pipeline so you don't have any proof they were involved.. Romania, Lithuania, Estonia, poland are all close to Russia why didn't he attack them if he isn't scared of NATO? Or at least wait for Ukraine to join NATO before invading them?
Walkee: North Vietnam were armed by USSR. China is close to Vietnam and also have more population than Russia so it is normal they have more men on ground. UK also supported USA but nobody is talking about that. During that cold war it was USSR vs USA. Taliban defeated USA and chase away the government USA backed and funded. How else were they supposed to defeat them?
Taliban chased away the government immediately U.S left, why did they not do it during the 20years U.S troops were there? Like I said earlier the Afghanistan's were in support of the Taliban's hence why they didn't even put up any form of resistance immediately U.S left, even if U.S troops spend 100years in Afghanistan the day they decide to leave the same thing would still have happened.. I hope you know their primary aim of going to Afghanistan was to hunt down Osama bin laden of which they achieved? So how did they lose?
Walkee: they have the best weapons on Hollywood and social media. They have never won any war with their "best weapons in the world ". USA are like that yahoo boy who spends 7m in night club by buying Hennesy and Azul for for dj and hypemen and then come home to brag about how he spends 9m monthly on only food and drink. The only thing usa have is media and information technology. Their economy is a joke. Most of their people live on debt. There are more homeless people in USA than Nigeria. They print money and share for their citizens because they know their dollars won't collapse since dollars is used to sell drugs, illegal arms, crude oil etc. That was the main reason they killed Gaddafi because he wanted to bring a new central currency that will be used by Africans to trade oil which would have been the end of dollar and subsequently the fugazi US economy.
"There are more homeless people in U.S than Nigeria " yet Nigerians flock into their embassy in thousands begging for visa,this must be the biggest joke of the century
They have never won any war? tell your darling Russia to go and fire a shot at American soil.. Or even lay hands on any NATO country, let's see what happens
Walkee: so you don't know Russia funded Afganistan that beat USA? During Vietnam war China was a meme. USSR armed and funded North Vietnam, of course China helped too mostly due to proximity UK also helped USA. We're talking about the major players. In Ukraine, USA backed the government while Russia backed the rebels. Russia won. In Syria, USA backed the rebels while Russia backed Assad, Russia won. In Afghanistan USA backed the government while Russia backed Taliban, Russia won.
You don't know what you are saying.. China funded north Vietnam more than Russia did, they sent in more than 200000+ men while Russia sent in just 4000+ , so how was Russia the major player? And Taliban did not defeat the U.S.. U.S got tired and left, were you expecting Dem to stay in Afghanistan forever? Most Afghanistan's are sympathetic to the Taliban's so it was just a waste of time and funds, this is the same thing that will happen to Russia if they try to force in a president to rule Ukraine, Ukrainians are not interested in working with Russia so it is just a waste of time..
Walkee: that's a lie. Russia have more nukes than USA. Russia have better supersonic missiles than USA. USA spending 600bn on their defence doesn't make it any superior. They send a very large percentage of that budget to Israel, they also spend a lot of the money defending NATO countries which was what Trump was complaining about. Russia have the natural resources they need so don't spend money importing raw materials for their products which makes it cost efficient for them. All the armed conflicts that have involved Russia and Usa since after second World War, Russia have won all. Vietnam, Afganistan, Syria and Ukraine 2014. USA know Russia that's why they are doing all they can to avoid direct conflict with them. In fact when Russian fighter jets entered Syria, USA backed down
Don't say what you don't know.. china played a major role even more than Russia in the Vietnam war, Russia lost woefully in Afghanistan so I don't know why you are mentioning that, and also why are you mentioning Ukraine? Did U.S send troops to help Ukraine fight?
United States have the best air force in the world.. United States have the best Navy in the world.. The united states have the best defense system in the world..
The united States have a good economy to sustain war, in a normal conventional war without nukes Russia doesn't have a strong enough economy to sustain a long war, or you think war is just about weapons? Lol
Great0ne1: Instead of all this sanctions, which doesn't seem to detter Russia, they should just accept Ukraine into nato and stop this killing once and for all. I actually hate the idea of killing people and young children loosing there dad's, but on the other hand, i just don't want America and UK to have there way. They have dragged the innocent Ukrainian citizens into a needless war, with the help of there puppet president, and they will not send millitary help or accept there citizens as refugee in there country. We can all see how much they love Ukrainians
They can't accept Ukraine because Ukraine doesn't meet the requirements required to join NATO.. Ukraine is fully aware of this, and the Ukrainians voted for zelensky as their president so what do you mean by "puppet president" ? The former president was legally impeached so I don't know how that is the U.S business.. Did the U.S cm to impeach him? Or they brought in people to come and vote for zelensky? And also what do you mean by they dragged them into the war, is it by force to dine with Russia? The Ukrainians are fully in support of their president so I don't know what you mean by that, Russia is only being a bully,they should let the Ukrainians be!
Because Ukraine is not a member of NATO.. Why didn't Russia invade Lithuania, Estonia, Romanian? They're all very close to Russia and also a former member of Soviet union just like Ukraine. and are a member of NATO that's why Putin won't attempt to try shit with them And mind you when it comes to nuclear war there is nothing like a winner,all parties involved will lose hence why NATO will not go into war with Russia because of Ukraine who is not a member...
Walkee: search am by yourself naa. Russia mostly focus almost all their attention on rockets, missiles and jets. They don't really care that much about tanks. Russia have thermobaric bomb that will suck all the oxygen out of the air and cause your lung, heart and liver to explode on their own even if you are hiding under rock. That was what they used to decimate the rebels USA funded in Syria. That's also why Ukraine don't want to let civilians to escape because once civilians flee Russia will start using those weapons
Unnecessary hype, there is nothing the Russians have as weapons that U.S doesn't have x2, the fact is they don't come out every now and then to brag about what weapons they have in their arsenal like Russia and china..
A country that spends over 600b$ every year on their military vs Russia that spends just 60b$.. U.S and Russia are not on the same level, you all should stop deceiving yourself
But Russia has more(6257 against 6065) that's what he's telling you all @ bolded, listen to yourself, did you really believe that.
So Russia will fold its arm while Nato ready it Nuclear forces and then still fold its arms while Nato deployed them....like Putin said before this Ukrainian crisis "you'll not even have the chance to blink, talk more of article 5". It's mutually assured destruction for a reason so wake up to reality and stop fantasizing.
BTW....if Nato has the nukes to mess up Russia, then Russia has the nukes to mess up NATO 3× over
Also, nukes are carried by the best bombers, subs and are deployed in secret or heavily guarded silos and both nations has the best bombers, subs and secret or heavily guarded silos within their countries not forgetting to mention missile defence (US: Patriots, THAAD. RUSSIA: S-300,S-400,S-500)
So yes over 85% of nukes deployed during nuclear war will hit its targets
Next time do a small research on Google, na small data e go take
Of course! In a nuclear war between NATO and Russia there will be "MAD" but Russia Will be wiped out at the end of the day while most NATO countries will still be there even Putin knows this himself, we shouldn't even be having this argument,one country cannot win against 28
The only reason NATO will not go into any war with Russia is because they value the lives of their citizens, unlike Putin who is ready to sacrifice the whole Russia for some stupid unnecessary reason
Great0ne1: Including US. Try and prove that wrong.
Not true.. NATO has about 6000+ nukes.. Russia has about 6000+ nukes too So basically they have about the same number of nukes, and mind you they don't even need that amount to wipe out Russia.. Russia won't even survive a war with America alone not to talk of the whole NATO
IgOga: Russia has more nuclear weapons than all NATO countries combined.....Russia also has the most powerful thermobaric weapons....nuclear effect without the radiation....and with the Chinese and Russian hypersonic weapons....it will be difficult for radars to detect them
Russia has more nuclear weapons than all NATO countries combined? Where did you read such from?
Looks like cystic acne.. Use nixoderm the one in a thin container not the tube own... Thats what i used when i had mine few weeks ago, and also you better act fast else it will keep spreading
27Pushing30: If squid game was a top notch series then besides the “red light - green light game” in episode 1 there will be other things worth doing memes over in a 9 episode series .
It’s just hype and that’s the fact.
But it’s made bastard money which is a good stat!
I don't understand.. you are looking for memes from squid game? Who told you it's a comedy series?