₦airaland Forum

tolutweety:
Wen ll u be ready for the kick?

Good morning dear

tolutweety:

How long have u bn doing this??

Dint notice u are a fighter o..

Omari88:
No, you don't need to go through moves 1, 2, and 3. A straight kick to the groin is just enough. The first 3 moves just close the distance for a knee to the groin. Doesn't have to be a knee (even though that's more effective).

deuce7:
Straight to 4? Hehehe. I don't think you can achieve that without 1,2 and 3.

chidiezeh:
Lolx albino ko

tolutweety:

Last tym i chked,
I was your lover not your cook

MrCork:
...r u light skin?

tolutweety:
*drags her back*
Prove me wrong
Why did you call me?

tolutweety:
Yes swts,
I m @ur call..


I eavesdropped u need my help 'bossomwise'?

cc davide470

stinggy:
Ok coco, I apologize to you and your fellow 'tinys'
Never meant to hurt your feelings

davide470:
Errm.. about the Egusi, ask tolutweety..

Non-Egusi matters, I should be helpful in that regard.

davide470:
Help out with the bosoms or egusi?

davide470:
Ohk. Think about your Egusi soup

davide470:


What do you think?

davide470:

stinggy:
Hmmm, let's discuss it so you can get help biko.

But really, you don't mean to say you are 'small' sha

dguyindcorner:
very childish post.

stinggy:
Bae don't telme yours is close to lemon too

stinggy:
Big boobsies any day please. Stop consoling all these small-bweasted ladies

Wallie:
Agreed. But has it ever occurred to you that this might just be the cries of soldiers thinking of fighting a casualty free war? Since you're the expert, how about you summarize what their EXACT complaints were and what was deemed inadequate? Are things as black or white as you portray them to be?


Here's what they were complaining about...



http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-03-26-body-armor_x.htm

Here's a counter to their complaints...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interceptor_body_armor

And here's the result of the newly issued body armor



http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htinf/articles/20060328.aspx

AZeD1:
OK ma'am
Thanks.

mollytinrox:
I like that u said that is just you. Different strokes, I guess. Before I met the lovely man I married, I'd been in two long-term relationships. I knew them oh so well. First was (may still be) a psychopath who was a possessive freak. The other was a liar who, despite claiming he loved me and my son, had any available chic.


My husband was ready and open, so was I. All it took was our willingness to make things work. Like everything else in life, marriage is a risk.

Short Story:
My husband (then fiance) and I attended marriage counselling for 3 months. In our opening class, we were 47 couples, and during the introduction we were asked to state the duration of our relationships. See landlords dem. 6, 7, 8, 9 years. Out of fear, I said one year, but we'd only dated for 3/4 months.
Believe me, when we had the class wrap party, only 16 couples were remaining, and it was the long-term people that had either broken up due to irreconcilable issues (the class was that intense and effective) or stopped coming because they didn't want to go ahead.

Moral lesson: not how far(long) but how well.

AZeD1:
Please update it.

Pleaseeeeeeeee

AZeD1:
Pweety please!!!!

AZeD1:
Madam don't do this.. Go and please finish that story.

Na beg I dey beg.

AZeD1:
Well to me it does. I can ask about 3 million questions from your last update.

Enjoy your weekend.

AZeD1:
Thanks for the update.


You do know your updates raises many questions?