₦airaland Forum

debosky:
I did witness the liposuction, but Ando paid for it as the final installment of Sharon's sponsorship deal.

deborah, thunder faya your mouth. . . .

TBH, Fergie messed things up badly - Evans has been a liability since the beginning of 10/11 season, so why start him in this game and leave Jones on the bench? Why not take out a striker and strengthen the midfield considering Milner, Silva and co were running rings round Utd?

i would never have started evans in such a game.
smalling - rio - jones - evra. it was too easy for balotelli to target evans. he's an easy target for united's opponents every game.

The tactics were suicidal, especially in the second half. You can do that gung-ho madness if you're playing a struggling team, but against a disciplined Citeh it was an invitation to commit murder.

good observation.
fletcher moved to right back and it was only anderson in the centre of the pitch.
toure, barry, silva, milner versus anderson and some people are still blaming the brazilian for the loss. how rich?

As for peeps blaming Evra, only 2 goals max came from his end - most of the goals came either through the middle or from the right, but I don't hear much blame for 'golden boy' Smalling who was taken to the cleaners time and time again.

no no no. all the goals came through evra's position.
i am not sure if young was protecting him enough or evra strolled out of his position as usual.
the number of times micah richards popped up on that side told me evra wasn't doing anything. . . . .dzeko's first goal, where was evra?
aguero's goal? silva's goal? balotelli's goal?

evra needs a rest.

[quote author=Mr_TA link=topic=716327.msg9408829#msg9408829 date=1319467685]Im starting to think the less Cleverley plays the better a player he has become in the eyes of some.[/quote]you underrate him because we didn't pay £50m to get him from bayern munich or porto.

his style of play is simple but effective. nothing bedazzles opponents more than one touch passing. cleverley is a master of that and that also suits anderson very well. pair anderson with fletcher/carrick(long ball specialists) and anderson is ineffective. when fletcher passes to anderson, he stays static. anderson has no one else to pass to but the forward players running the channels instead of at least one of them coming to him - only berbatov gets attracted to the ball. nani, young, rooney, welbeck and chicharito would run towards goal.

then again, cleverley's one touch passing actually beats the opponents' line. cos he passes it, and moves forward into space to receive the ball and he gives it back to anderson who must have moved forward to. it means you now have 2 players more in the opponents area to support the attack .
with carrick and fletcher, they just play the ball forward and remain in the same position thus contributing nada to the attack. with cleverley and anderson yesterday, we would have scored plenty of goals and conceded few.

StarBoard:
This coogar is pathetic.

nah - you are the one pathetic and bordering on acute lunacy.
the only people allowed to gloat here are the non-united fans - you were sitting on the fence, weren't you? if you don't place bets, how do you expect to win any stake? all along, you said you dey siddon look. when you siddon look, you cannot claim you have predicted anything so shush!

Who's ranting now?I think it's you seeing how duduspastic you have become.
You didn't tell Evans to cop a red card.But isn't he part of the side you've been hailing all season long?I told you United don't have the steel against a top squad.One red card and the team folds like an accordion.

it was 1-0 before the red card and united bossed the first half. city's goal came completely against the run of play like they did in wembley.
united were okay until the red card incident which got evans sent off. would balotelli have bullied jones, smalling or vidic like that? what was evans doing on the pitch to start with? i'll say it again - wrong team selection.

So you're blaming the red card?

what else should i blame? 1-0 before the red card, 6-1 after it.
of course, the red card was the turning point. . . . .it took fletcher to the right back position


after the red card, fletcher moved to the right back position. leaving only anderson in the middle to battle 3-4 city midfielders. fergie in his wisdom should have sacrificed a striker for phil jones immediately and keep it 4-4-1 or 4-2-3. . . .but he did not. it was anderson alone in the midfield - i wonder what fergie was playing at. i'll repeat it again - wrong tactics for damage limitation.

How come the red card wasn't a factor against Otelul?

it wasn't a factor because otelul were not leading 1-0 before the red card and otelul don't have the quality of man city.
christ - you can do better than this. in games where players are sent off, it depends on the scoreline before the sending off, the time remaining after the sending off and so on and so forth.

Again as per Anderson,just save this rubbish you've been posting.It's like saying your girlfriend can't Be Intimate if there isn't Luther Vandross playing at the background.Is Andrson paid to play only with Cleverley?If Tc is out for the season,what happens?

if tom cleverley is out for the season then play 3 central midfielders. how's that so difficult to grasp? how many teams in the world still play 4-4-2?
barca check! madrid check! bayern check! chelsea check! arsenal check! milan check! man city check! inter check! every big team has abandoned the flat 4-4-2 cos it leaves the defence vulnerable. it was a safe bet with anderson and cleverley(2 mobile midfielders) who are masters of one touch passing when they do their triangles. . . . carrick/fletcher/gibson etc are not suited to that kind of passing.

I'm tired of arguing with you,as for me there's no point calling Ibime fat when you ain't doing any better.

i am not fat, debosky can testify - he paid/witnessed my liposuction

Losing to City scandalously isnt the end of the world, but try not to go on record to say something when you know the only control of apart from anonymity behind a Toshiba laptop is absolutely nothing but your opinion.

losing to city scandalously was inevitable considering the circumstance.
we were playing at home, a goal down and a man down. united should have just given up and concede defeat but united will never do that to city.
if that was bayern, barcelona or team united actually respect, fergie would have hauled off rooney or welbeck to keep the shape.

but the pride will not let him do that against city so they kept attacking even after 3-1, they kept at it even at 4-1, 5-1, 6-1.
evra practically turned himself into a winger in the last 5 mins. he was nowhere to be found in the defence when city scored the last 3 goals.
it's a loss - an emphatic one but then maybe that would effectively put paid to project evans and project 4-4-2 with incompatible players.

if I'm pissing in the wind,your jerking off into your car's fuel tank.At least last season's side wouldnt lose to City at home.

hehe. . . . . .united lost 1-4 to liverpool at old trafford.
that team was better than the united team that started last night and the liverpool team we lost to weren't half as decent as the city side that got us tonked. selection cost us the game and the events after the red card - playing only anderson against 4 midfielders must be fergie's most spastic tactic in fergie's managerial history.

emofine:
okay my mind was itching to just clear one final thing with you . .

okay!

Beauty is appreciated and valued more on a woman. Thus when one wants to conclude which group carries the highest prevalence of beauty compared to another, women are often used in such research. His findings declare Asian women are the most "desirable" . . . so ironically no, his race did not come "last".

but he was particular about "attraction" - which is generic to both sexes.
beauty is a feminine thing. no man is beautiful

kazanawa ranked asian males the lowest and black women the lowest.
if kazanawa is asian, he's not biased.

hmm see a pattern. . .white men and asian men placing their women on the highest plane
alright, I'm spent. . .goodnight

(hmm)food for thought!
goodnight.

emofine:
Oh Coogar, if I could translate my polite laughter into sufficient vocabulary I would have taken up half this page alone

you are too sweet!
the best banter i have had in a long while here. . . . .
next time i will try to be on your side.

. . .a final laughing pill before I retire to bed, thank you and goodnight.

however I will concede that you made some good points and valid correction i.e. India/Africa comparison on my part was misleading and unfair.

don't let the bugs bite.

StarBoard:
I said Anderson was crap.
I said this side was weak in the middle.
I said a huge defeat was going to come sooner rather than later.
I was labelled a knee-jerker and a chief complainant.
If a 6-1 thumping by City doesn't get folks to review their positions,I guess folks are lost for good.
Red card or not we were poor and have been since the Chelsea game.
Awaiting the excuses by coogar.
Otelul win in midweek and everything is alright.

you need to go to spec savers with your ill-advised comments and misguided rants.
please, coogar did not choose the team that played today, neither did coogar tell evans to cop a red card.

first things first, i absolutely hate it when you make these kinda comments when i am offline. you should have at least waited to see me online before "villifying" or whatever vocab you can come up with. you have been throwing your pessimistic rants all season, when you got it wrong, no one said nada. your faulty clock got it right once and you want to "villify" coogar. . . . you are not fit to wear those shoes.

like i thought you would, anderson is crap! how's anderson crap? your last comments on this topic was you would wait until anderson gets paired with cleverley before you say anything further. but like a gaynner, you went off your handle spewing bile that anderson is crappy. we have concluded here you either pair anderson with cleverley(2 mobile midfielders) or play him in a 3-man midfield. your gaffer did none of that.

to further compound your woes, your gaffer played johnny evans(the weakest united defender) and left vidic and phil jones on the bench.
but let's blame anderson for the 2-man midfield against city's 5 with the wingers playing on the touch-line. the tactics worked perfectly and should have suited anderson, isn't it? i am happy we lost emphatically. i brought this to light last weekend at anfield when i cursed ferguson but montelik said it was a game of chess not checkers.

we are good enough to beat city - but when you leave your strongest players on the bench and play upstarts like welbeck, evans, etc then you are asking for trouble. balotelli would never have bullied jones or smalling like he did evans today. that is not coogar's fault. that is the gaffer's fault.
if the team i predicted would start on friday had started and lost, then you can put me against the wall and shoot me with a golden gun like gadaffhi.

anything short of that, you are pissing in the wind. losing 1-6 to city is not the end of the world.
it's just 3 points after matchday 9, if it irks you so bad. . . . .take off your red shirt and wear the sky-blue one.
united are better than city. wrong selection/spastic tactics cost us the game and we were well stuffed . . . . . .and i loved it.
i doubt fergie would be starting evans in a big game ever again.

when is the next game?

i missed the match for bleeps' sake, please- what's the scores?
i heard united won but they didn't take the 3 points.

can someone explain what happened?

emofine:
What was the aim and result of his research if he wasn't trying to relay an outcome?. . .Granted "message" may have been the incorrect term employed (because I really can't claim to know this man's intention even though his findings allows particular groups to be marginalized.)

emofine, it's called academic freedom.

It is certainly not "just a research". Many of these "just a research" have been done time and time again using different variables, demoting black men and/or women in the process. Thus when such analysis once again is brought to the forefront it reopens former sentiments and strengthens stereotypes. Furthermore it is further disappointing when so called educated people are behind such compilation that causes some people to get "hyper about it".

nah, it shouldn't be seen as denigrating to the black race. just read it, laugh, take what you can from it and delete the other stuffs. i mean i have been told for years that black people are better at sex than their white counterparts. i doubt the white folks found it denigrating. they just moved on with their lives.

Oh so the existence of the wowo populace can now be firmly blamed on the black woman - na wa oh . . . well according to Darwin blacks are less evolved than whites so how much of his words shall we truly sieve through before we reach unbiased territory?
Was it not the "less attractive" black women that carried you highly attractive black males in her womb. . . give your counterparts some credit, chai.

haba - stop exaggerating!
the existence of the wowo populace cannot be blamed on the black woman. however, you will find more ugly black women than their counterparts.
more is the operative word - not that the other races are saints in the art of worworness.

If black women according to Dr Satoshi Kanazawa's research are indeed the least desired by men from other races why in effect should that matter? what does matter is that black men desire their women, *sigh* or are some black men now willing to join the camp that finds their counterpart "less attractive" than other women because black women are apparently not in vogue. . .would you evaluate us differently if the research carried different results?

i love my black women. damnit. . . . .they are the salt of the earth! that dr satoshi kanazawa said black women are less attractive does not mean you will not find black women that are beautiful than most of the white chics. it's just that there are more less-attractive black women but the few ones that are fine are gorgeous. so i will just operate in and around the top 5%.

Coogar, you do not have to deliberately oppose the point I was trying to make by effectively supporting racist notions about your own people (smh).

i am impressed - i am enjoying the banter.

If malnourished and impoverished people were the main reasons why Blacks (not only Africans) apparently have the lowest level of intelligence then how comes India (that carries more poor people than the continent of Africa) is not thus ranked aside or even lower than blacks?
Intelligence is not determined by race, if you had argued that environment was a factor I could have taken your comment much more seriously.

environmental factors contribute to the peaks n troughs of the intelligence quotient. india cannot possibly have more poor people than the whole of africa. you are comparing the population of one country to one continent. jeeez, india is not china.

Oh I will confess. . . if he's "spastic research" favoured me as a black woman I would not have been bothered just in the same way I wasn't bothered when the details of his findings was first presented . . .in fact I would have still picked holes at it. Just because some research out there is likely to favour me doesn't mean I automatically embrace them without inspection and vice versa.
Likewise I also wonder if you would have taken such reaserch seriously if black men were at the bottom of the totem pole hmmm, Coogar confess oh.

i confess. . . . . .i wouldn't have been bothered because all i want to see is my face looking fresh n sexy in the mirror. once that is confirmed, other things matter not to me.

Coogar, it is people that carry out such "beauty" research that are likely to be unattractive or shall I say "less attractive" - have you seen Kanazawa?

kanazawa is an asian male. he ranked his own race the lowest.
now, is that biased?

Oh and it's people that adhere to such analysis that might not even consider themselves attractive until some skewed scientist concludes from "spastic research" that they are indeed attractive then such people thus carry those results as the gospel and suddenly believe they're gorgeous because some scientist's research said so.

i knew about this before kanazawa's research. i just didn't have the resources to conduct a thorough research and prove to the world i have discovered something no one else ever did.

*clears throat* Well it's rather appropriate that you mention Whoopi Goldberg because she serves to counter some of the OP's suggestion - that he hardly sees black women and white men together (in the media or otherwise) well . . . .here's a fine example (presented by coogar) to rebut those remarks. . .

one tree doesn't make a forest.
obviously, there will be few exceptions to every rule. the op said he hardly sees black women and white men. . . . he did not say he's never seen black women with white men together.

Whoopi may not be considered more attractive than Genevieve (well at least in yours and my opinion) but she's had her fair share of oyinbo meat

because no black man would consider her - her only other choice is the white meat.
happy white-meat licking.

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9395804#msg9395804 date=1319293160]iPhone 4 has been around for more than a year now but mine can do stuffs your iPhone 4s can't do. So if I need Siri I can wait or just buy factory unlocked iPhone 4s when it's available here.[/quote]so why waste ample time looking and worrying over jailbreaking if you can get a newly iphone 4s?
i can see you are confused!

See the bottom line is I will always be ahead of you. If not for jailbreak, iOS 5 will not be what it is today. Now I'm done with you. I noticed you are always looking for someone to fight. Bro, I'm too over that.

you are not ahead of your freckled nose, and you think you are ahead of me?
tell me about siri if you are ahead of me.

ronkebp:
I could not help but laugh my a***** out, OMG!!!!! i dey read new things everyday for NL.

nice!

emofine:
Well I stand corrected then, at least now I feel vindicated in the knowledge that some Asian man's research concluded that black women aren't unattractive but less attractive on the whole.
Least attractive of all races equals what exactly?. . .the ugliest (let's not use euphemisms to cushion his account) in the bunch so it doesn't dilute whatever message he was trying to relay.

he wasn't trying to relay any message. it was just a research but people got hyper about it.

But thank goodness his research ranked Black men the highest in terms of desirability and Asian men the lowest to eliminate all doubt of bias whatsoever and for some black men to tell black women that the list is impartial thus no need to object - the sad irony is that some of these men will likely produce daughters which this man's research considers "less attractive"

you are very correct. some of these men will likely produce daughters that are less attractive provided the genes of the other partner(the black woman) is dominant. at least, according to darwin's theory - this is very possible.

Coogar, so those who have also "researched" and claimed that Black people have the smallest brain and lowest IQ are not at all trying to say blacks are dumb but that blacks are the dumbest instead - how most certainly noble of them to render such a qualitative statement.

smallest brain and lowest iq is quite possible!
considering the number of impoverished people in africa with malnourished brain development. it's quite possible.

There is no fact when it comes to beauty, maybe most popular/likely choice is how people measure beauty because it is also a "fact" that some find Genevieve to be more beautiful than Halle.
facts and opinions are two different concepts.

of course, some people will find genevieve more beautiful than halle. . . . .but if you line up all the men in the world to choose. . . .more men would prefer halle berry to genevieve. it does not make genevieve ugly - she's just less attractive in the grand scheme of things. we could both score As in an exam but with you getting 2 more marks than i did. it does not mean i failed, i only get less marks than you did.

"race card"? the man was trying to measure beauty/desirability of each race correlating to genders so when one of the variables in this "spastic research" is "race" I thus wonder how that subject could be made redundant when one decides to dissect the motive behind such pseudo experiment.

if his findings favoured you as a black woman, i doubt you would be this bothered.
emofine, confess!

. . .and lastly I don't need a research to inform me that Black men are indeed the most attractive males of all "races" when my personal thoughts are governed by such notion yet I understand my views doesn't necessarily correlate with that of my neighbours because beauty is ultimately subjective.

if anyone tells you beauty is ultimately subjective then such person is not beautiful!
there's no thin line between beauty and ugliness. we can have a bit of ambiguity deciding who is more beautiful when judging 2 pretty women - but nobody in this world would choose whoopi goldberg ahead of genevieve nnaji - not even a blind man!

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9395254#msg9395254 date=1319287046]Ok my iPhone 4 ga no Siri. Are you ok now?[/quote]no shyte!
you mean your super-computer iphone that has been jailbroken 50 years ago with over 1 billion apps has no siri?
check again, i am sure it has siri. you just dunno how to operate it.

by the time your hackers get around siri, i would have forgotten i even have it.
so much for silly jailbreaks.

Funkymallam:
@cooger. U did not only argue wit a woman, u r now attacking everybody. B4 u attack me, i bet u will, pls try to b more polite nxt time.
@op. It all depends on d man, i lyk dem slim n dark wit d right additions.

i have got zero tolerance for ninnys and people with no mental faculty.
i won't attack you - you have got immunity.

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9393554#msg9393554 date=1319266805]I no argue o. I dey lecture am ni. I've seen most of his posts he no sabi n he no go gree say him no sabi[/quote]my toenail packs more phone intelligence than your whole being so don't even go there.
simple question you nor gree answer - has your prisonbreak fone got siri? yes or no!!!

Captain Cids:
As i wz reading through the comments i saw two mad bulls fighting!coogar and slimch1c una dey craze?why must u showcase your idiocy here,wat a catastrophy!this is wat i call d wrong philosophy, decayed mentality,decaying identity and yet u guys re entity of this glorious network, u have both been given a chance to do something worthwhile yet u guys end up destroying your chance of doing dat and the one who gave u dat chance, u guys should horse-whipped and burnt!wat a disgrace to our country!MR poster forgive ma behaviour but sometimes fools should be corrected, i don't like slim ladies nor do i lyk fat ladies,average one's is where i rest ma case, am done!!!

you are the particular spermatozoon your mother should have taken with her glass of guinness stout instead of allowing it to travel the other way.
you are a tool of epic proportions you homoerotic simpleton!
go fück yourself!

emofine:
I don't understand why people will adhere to clearly biased research which claims black woman are unattractive? First of all beauty is subjective so cannot be measured by science and why would some allow themselves to be dictated to by an Asian man of all people whether them or their counterparts are indeed desirable or not?

Please let's just be wise because if we were to adhere to all these racial research apparently black people have less IQ or a smaller brain . . . why do many of these research usually reflect negatively on black people? People just want to justify their stereotypes. It's not everything in the name of science that must be swallowed without questioning.

this is where you guys got it wrong.
his research did not say black women are unattractive - his research found out black women are less attractive.
the fact that genevieve is less attractive than halle berry does not make genevieve unattractive or ugly.

it's just that more men would chase after halle than genevieve.
unattractive and less attractive are 2 different issues.
but trust black people to read it upside down and flash the race card.

StarBoard:
Coogar,
Don't make me laugh.I'm currently embroiled inthe Baba Suwe controversy and that's enough comedy for one go.

you are a comedian!

Just because Roma won the Scudetto eons ago,they are suddenly "European Elite"?
Must you make these bogus claims just to justify your more bogus statements?I thought you needed to have a track-record of success(e.g consistently appearing in the latter stages of the Champions League,at the very least) to be considered "elite" in Europe.
If this is where your "guruism" has taken you,I want no parts of it.

a.s. roma are part of the elite - consistently appearing in the latter stages of the champions league will not remove roma's history.

As for Zlatan,you need to concentrate.How does his multiple league wins make him a Euro asset given that he has rarely set Europe alight in the Champions League?I said he was a consummate Euro failure,not a domestic champ.

his multiple league wins guarantees the teams he plays for an automatic ticket to european football.
concentrate - zlatan's multiple league wins is an automatic slot to play in elite europe.

He has played for a good number of European Sides across the continent and never managed to make it to a cup final in Europe.
It is safe to bet that Milan will not get too far this season because Zlatan is I'm their squad.

same as van nistelrooy and many players of that ilk. super duper players who never played in the champions league final.
roy keane never played in a champions league final - does that make keane shyte? vieira? etc?
abeg, enough of your baba suwe arguments!

And as for inter 2009.That squad was rubbish.how many goals did they score in that season's chamPions League in 8 games?They were in easily the weakest group that season but couldn't even top it,managing to qualify on the final day.

what has the number of goals gotta do with a team being weak or strong?

You talk of winning the Serie A at a canter forgetting that Roma were there closest rivals and traditional powers Juventus and Milan were at their weakest for a long time around this period.

what made them weak?
juventus and milan suddenly got weaker than inter or inter were good value for their money? which is which?
milan and juventus were cheating in those years you thought they were good. they were found out, they were found guilty and were docked points.
if they were good enough - why bribe?

Whether you like it or not,the additions of Milito Eto'o and Sneijder were key to transforming Inter to Euro champs from perennial chumps.Or why did Mourinho go for them if he didn't have it in mind to win in Europe?If his side in 2009 were that strong,he wouldn't have needed to fortify his side that much,or so common logic tells me.

why did man utd fortify their squad after 07/08 season by getting berbatov? why did barcelona pay for zlatan after winning it in 08/09?
was it because the previous winning sides weren't good enough?
once again - baba suwe arguments surface! if baba suwe goes to prison, you will likely replace him.

You may have a point on JMs sides not being weak but that 2009 side has to be the worst side he has handled.I could be wrong but his Porto side in Europe were a tad fortunate and probably the most undeserving champions of the ECL era.but they won so I won't take anything away from them.

there's no weak mourinho side. all his teams tend to play beyond their abilities, they tend to punch above their weights because of the siege mentality and controversies jose mourinho creates. they were just unlucky to have met man utd in that round of 16. that inter team would have beaten any other english side(arsenal, chelsea, etc). matter of fact, only barcelona and man utd were good enough to beat that inter team then,

it seems you guys forgot how many thought jose would beat ferguson again that season.

Tumababa2:
Interesting. Me wey post am no see am again.
U can also attach pictures on Nairaland right from safari on your iphone(only if u jailbreak).

i think i now know why people are hooked on it like drugs.
they want to be free. using the same old device to do a lot of things and blah blah.
i see. . . .

but it still won't sell to me.
i am not capable of using any phone no matter how pimped more than 18 months. i get tired of it and get a new one.
my 3gs is lying fallow at home now with several apps and music/video files on it. jailbreaking it 100 times still won't make it attractive to me. the feel of a new phone in ma jeans pocket is the appeal!

so tumababa, more power to your elbow!

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9392980#msg9392980 date=1319246536]Talk is cheap. You hardly even know me. Sebi E be like say you say u get iPhone 4s ask Siri about Suntemi, she go tell you  [/quote]answer the question now.
does your prisonbreak iphone4 possess siri(artificial intelligence) - it's a yes or no answer.

Clap for yourself. 'Big grammar Boy' See no time I wan sleep. U wey no no wetin Jailbreak is reversible means, U want make I dey follow you speak grammar. Learn and perfect small small english first. See you bye.

jailbreak is very reversible. i can tutor you step by step how to unjailbreak
however, when you do it. the hacks at apple still know it's been tampered with and you won't get a replacement.
i know a lot of people who were turned back when they hoped they could get new devices for their damaged phones.

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=786371.msg9392922#msg9392922 date=1319245355] Coogar, see ya life?[/quote]keep wearing your foolishness like a badge of honour.
you have not yet confirmed your iphone 4 with iOS 1000 has got siri - find out for me in 48 hrs.
serial w@nker!!

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9392935#msg9392935 date=1319245735]You don't even know what Jailbreak is reversible means. You are showing your foolishness all over the place, even here https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-786371.192.html , I try to teach you but you wouldn't just learn. See I don tire I wan sleep. See you tomorrow[/quote]shut it, you homoerotic nincompoop!

sleekch1c:
@coogar,
Glad I got U̶̲̥̅̊ squirting all over the place.now as U̶̲̥̅̊ rage and bark like a mad dog,I will like to get some sleep.oh as for d agege bread,damn I tried dat stuff once and it was so good.I wish they cld make it in ph too.yum yum.goodnyt puckerface!
And b4 I forget,try ŋ☺† to m.asturbate over M̶̲̅γ̲̣̣̥  pix 'cos dat wld really hurt me feelings.

i am sick and tired of this back and forth rants so i'd better leave a final note. . . .

my first observation is you have the intelligence of an unborn foetus. legally, i'm pretty sure it'd be possible to still get you aborted.
your existence has to be a disgrace to humankind. it'd be a mercy killing. showing mercy to everyone else in the world. everytime anyone, who isn't an equally rëtarded excuse for a lifeform, is unfortunate enough to read any of your posts that person immediately becomes a less intelligent and angrier human being.

sleekchic, you are a sort of online life-sucking, soul-draining, leech-like virus, who i'm sure cannot possibly be a real, living, breathing organism beyond the computer screen, but rather a vicious invention developed to slowly infect and infuriate human beings from one forum section to the other. the only comfort i take is that perhaps you can be succesfully quarantined on nairaland and you won't spread to the rest of the internet. however, i fear that you're probably already responsible for every single moronic youtube comment, forum troll, spam e-mail, fraudulent advert and bestiality website to have ever existed.

you can go now - sin no more!

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9392904#msg9392904 date=1319244883]See what I'm saying. You don't know anything. Bro, Jailbreak is reversible.[/quote]you are a r[i]e[/i]tard!
take your reversed jailbroken fone to apple store and they will spit in your face.

If my[b] iPhone 4 [/b]can do what your iPhone 4s can't do then I'm above you which means we are not in the same class. U grab that?

your iphone 4 does not have siri. so it cannot do what mine can do.
get a book and learn.

Now that's the problem I have with you. Are you Tuma? Let him speak for himself.

irrelevant - leave 3rd party out of this.

Let's be logical here. What do you know about an operating system you've never modify in your entire life? It is like me saying I know iOS more that Comex and Geohot. I don confuse U again I'm sure you don't know who they are. Guy, think like a gadget freak you claimed to be.

hehehehe
i won't stoop so low and do a dickwaving contest with you. i am far far above that.
but let this be known. your intelligence about gadgets is not even up to half the cube-root of mine.

i will stop right here!

toba:
yes but im about to be taken

by who? candyness??

Idowuogbo:
Eeemmh oga lower your voice to strengthen your argument. Time is natures way of putting certain tings bck to place ,so far we right on target meaning hes alive again.Thank u very much

toba doesn't have time.
be quick - don't make him fly off his handle.

sleekch1c:
@coogar
Oh shut up and stop showing yellow teeth.if i wasn't pretty ♈ did U̶̲̥̅̊ think dat it was an actress?Ɣε̲̣̣̣̥§,I will call your mother a million times if dat is wat it takes to make U̶̲̥̅̊ stop mouthing off abt big women wen U̶̲̥̅̊ look like mr.ibu.anuofia!

so all actresses are pretty? can you see how shallow your mind can be?
you are not calling my mother - you are mopping the toilet floor with your own mother - she will be proud of you dragging her face in shyte.
pasty cuntbucket!

sleekch1c:
@coogar,
Only a man who has ₪o regards for his own mother wnt call women a sack of shyte.I mentioned your mother to get M̶̲̅γ̲̣̣̥  point home.
Ps- ppl say a̶̲̥̅♏ very pretty, l0l,if M̶̲̅γ̲̣̣̥  face got U̶̲̥̅̊ dis heated,wait till U̶̲̥̅̊ see M̶̲̅γ̲̣̣̥  bod.l0l

this is the irritating thing about nigerians.
why do you attack personalities and not the issue? i expect someone with half-a-brain to at least tackle what i said instead of mouthing mother this, mother that. so you think you have gotten your point home by mouthing someone's mother?

you are lucky today is one of my happiest days. on another day, i would do you wrong like a dentist fixing your appendix.
your face got me cold, not hot. like i have said - not my type!
and if your face is meh - you can forget the body(it's of no use to me).

sleekch1c:
@coogar
I feel your pain dear.I knw d best U̶̲̥̅̊ have seen in women is your anorexic sister,

you are an epileptic beast of burden.
if only you know how much women of substance spend to keep fit in gyms all over the world - you are still carrying your bloated face full of agege-bread particles dey do yanga. i nor pity you.

I took dat pix myself in M̶̲̅γ̲̣̣̥ room at sch and a̶̲̥̅♏ flattered dat U̶̲̥̅̊ think dat its so good dat it can't be me.if U̶̲̥̅̊ say it an actress,pray wats her name?

stop deceiving yourself. . . .
its not so good it can't be you. i just think the person in your profile cannot possibly have a disgusting shitty attitude like you do.
you happen to be an open sore on the arse of womanhood.

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9392842#msg9392842 date=1319243714]If you don't know? Ask, Friend, Jailbreak is not illegal. It is legalized in the US.[/quote]really? so supposing your fone gets damaged now, can you get a new device as replacement for your jailbroken phone?
i laugh in otigba street. you are clueless.

It adds class and cool cash go and ask boys at Computer Village in Ikeja. You will be surprise.

class in jailbreaking.
you probably dunno the meaning of class.

Why not allow him to speak for himself?

we chat on imessage a lot
he's laughing at your foolishness - take it from me.

I'm a jjc right in the gadget world? I agree but I will teach you things you don't know about iOS. I think I'm loving this

you know nada.
i will school you so much you will regret the night you were born!

sleekch1c:
@oguguo,Ɣε̲̣̣̣̥§ dats me.thanks dearie.

that's not you.
you lifted that pic from the net - that chic in your profile is an igbo actress.

sleekch1c:
^^^hahahaha,I laugh in ibo.listen oh U̶̲̥̅̊ nitwit,I a̶̲̥̅♏ ŋ☺† obese in any form,maybe I have to upload a full pix but ♈ wld I want to convince U̶̲̥̅̊?I believe dat every woman is beautiful in her own way and U̶̲̥̅̊ have ₪o damn right to call anyone a sack of shyte because if U̶̲̥̅̊ do,it shows U̶̲̥̅̊ mother is one.go hug a transformer,those women U̶̲̥̅̊ call shyte re getting hitched everyday and men like U̶̲̥̅̊ will die unhappy.keep spewing poo frm dat poo hole U̶̲̥̅̊ call mouth.insult any body type in a woman both slim or fat and U̶̲̥̅̊ have urself an enemy.bumbling !

it shows the kind of shitty upbringing you must have had talking about mothers.
do you have one? cos if you do - you won't be mouthing on mothers like you do.
all you children birthed as a result of cheap drunk [i]s[/i]hag never cease to amaze me.

i don't need to see your full pix to be convinced!
you can shove your pics up your rectum - i am not interested in your types.
haggard hawk!

sleekch1c:
and fyi,U̶̲̥̅̊ dnt eat oxygen olodo.I think U̶̲̥̅̊ meant carbohydrate which is a compound of carbon,hydrogen and oxygen.it will do U̶̲̥̅̊ a lot of good to leave those hungry girls U̶̲̥̅̊ re chasing and face your studies.and if U̶̲̥̅̊ re a graduate,a̶̲̥̅♏ sorry for d person who paid your sch fees.

look at this dingbat!
i meant the oxygen you consume when you breathe with your fat nostrils.
where are these products of accidental conception crawling out from all of a sudden?

Idowuogbo:
Dont bother,Toba &ID are synching @ d moment 

then you are doing a pretty bad job
toba is still hurt.

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9392790#msg9392790 date=1319242532]I'm not asking you to jailbreak. I just want to you see that I have the iOS 5 you talking about, it's not special to me. So that means I am very free even than you. You are one of those guyz Steve Jobs don brainwash that jailbreak is bad You asked what I gain from jailbreak, ok I will tell you little so that you can easily grab the idea. Jailbreak is all about getting you out of Steve Job and co's bondage. See, we that jailbreak have been using most of the 200 + features Apple claims to have in iOS 5 even when we were on iOS 4, so it's like we are always a year ahead of you. Sometimes I wonder how Steve Jobs himself copes without jailbreaking his phone when he was alive. I'm sure he jailbreaks then too because most of the so called 200+ features were copied from cydia.

Ask likes of Tuma, Gbtye and other more about jailbreak, They will be able to explain more in your own language so that you can understand. Even Nairaland's Steve Jobs; Texazzpete jailbreaks. Guy I no sabi talk too much I don tire. Maybe I should allow you use my iPhone for a week. You wouldn't touch yours again.[/quote]yea yea, you jailbreakers all have siri.
nonsense and ingridients. . . . . .i dunno why you people think everyone has to go the illegal route to feel funky.
if it makes you happy. . . . .goodluck to you. don't then use the word brainwash for people who don't go your route. i don't jailbreak, i don't want to jailbreak. i am happy and fully contented with what i have got.

possessing ios 100 when others are still on 5 adds what amount to your bank account?

[quote author=sun_temi link=topic=774977.msg9392792#msg9392792 date=1319242629]I'm sure Tuma was laughing at your ignorance. Make I laugh too. [/quote]he's probably laughing at your foolishness.
you are a j-j-c in the gadget world. go and stay at the back of the queue!

toba:
No i was no mugu, neither I'm i an albino or a sofo. lets just say poo happens and it happened in my case, hence lessons learnt which is, 'never date amateurs or inexperienced toddlers'.

don't let it bother you, son!
you win some, you lose some. that's life.

actually, i can recommend some decent chic on here.
are you ready?

sleekch1c:
^^oh shut up with the excuse.the guy is obviously a juvenile.pls let us comment like smart ppl.

your great grandma is the juvenile.
just because you have a disgusting eating habit that has turned you into a human elephant does not make you desirable.
go and cure your obesity and stop consuming oxygen meant for 10 people.

what a simpleton!
was i even talking to you? speak to me only when you are spoken to. . . .
you recto-cranially inverted peasant!