₦airaland Forum

99cent: ^ pressing the ignore button on the olodo.

see the cop out from the number one knucklehead....

you have proven to be the lying bastärd - your claim that the brides did not feel like a cheap commodity has been destroyed. even after the evidence was presented to you, you still tried to wriggle out of it by saying the surveyer connoted the conclusion when it was obvious the sentence read "the idea" connoted that brides that are walked by their dads feel cheapened.

next time, pick on those on your intellectual level. the cheap quality of the education you had is nowhere near mine. i read information and process it - i was not trained to be spoonfed. i would be on the look-out for you from now on. roaches like you don't die quick, i am sure you would soon be caught on another thread talking about child marriage when the topic says citizen renunciation.

99cent: your sons may not even invite u to their wedding at all if they hate ur guts. it happens.
trust me, many of the women who are not letting their dad walk them down the aisle, chances are that a good percentage of them aren't even inviting their dads at all (that is if they even know their dads LOL).

if you were sired by an abusive dad, don't put everyone in your troubled childhood. i already said most feminists had a stinking childhood dotted with parental abuse. i intend to raise my kids the right way. find someone else to preach to!

the surveyer didn't ask about step-dads or brothers etc. because I do know quite a few women who do not have good relationship with their biological dads and go walked by their step father or brothers. others whose fathers have passed away too. the article says nothing about this. but then its a tabloid article so i really don't see d reason for the big deal being made out of this survey.

it's not about abusive dads, stop clawing out your own idiotic opinion. people have been using "stand-in" dads on their wedding day for aeons. the women who don't want to be walked hate the idea totally of being given away by a man.

ileobatojo: Try as you might to dodge the issue, you have utterly disgraced yourself. Just go bury your dull head in shame! Olodo!

don't join the bandwagon of the blind bartimeaus. i intend to marry you by christmas so open that your eye very well and read. nowhere in my comment did i add 16%. if your eyes have started playing tricks on you at your young age, start mixing yeast with your jollof rice.

99cent: @cooagar u must be blind because there is a post of mine right above urs!

you are blind, deaf and dumb.....

conclusion about coogar:
1. u can't do math for s.hit
2. u are carrying other men's problems on your head
3. you seem to be worried that ur daughter won't ask u to walk her down the aisle. hahaha to which I will say, be a good father and u will have no reason to worry.
I can go on but I will stop here... for now.

1) i wouldn't be where i am at today if i wasn't good at math.

2) carrying man's problems on my head? far from it. i get my kicks yanking the chain of pseudo-feminists like yourself.

3)why should i worry about my daughter not asking me to walk the aisle? i might produce sons all through? i might not even be alive when my daughter is getting married. who worries about such frivolities? you are clearly wrongly wired. your comprehension skills are nothing to write home about - you are poor in spirit!

99cent: so now you admit that it was the woman conducting the survey that "spoke" LOL

she spoke to the yet-to-be brides and she regurgitated what they told her that the idea of fathers walking the aisle with them connotes they are cheap properties. it's the idea that connotes cheap commodity not the piffle you explained minutes ago...

anyway, based on the last sentence in the article, we can also make a connotation that
1.many of the women who did not want their dad walking the aisle did not love their father. maybe these fathers were abusive and absent.
2.many women who DID want their fathers to walk the aisle were feminists (it is stated that they didn't do it for anti-feminist reasons afterall)

these are false connotations - the reason these women don't want to be given away is because it connotes them as cheap commodities. if the fathers are abusive or absent, another man can act as their dad on the day.

your idiocy is epic, christ!!!!

99 cent? you cannot comment again? cat got your tongue?? you really should have gone to specsavers instead of making yourself look like a lying bastärd with poop for brains.

i dey go sleep.....

99cent: so the women didn't make the statement afterall. i'm not blind and i'm reading the same article as you!
the article simply stated it as "one of the connotations" meaning that it wasn't the women's words. unless u don't know what means.

you are a disgrace to all XX-chromosomes carrying specie....
the woman that made the survey spoke to the women and they did not want their dads giving them away as that act connotes that the brides are cheap commodity that are being given away.

99cent: post the quote to this "statement". otherwise, u remain a lying basterd.
stop making stuff up out of your AZZ

Elki Parmar of Wedding Days.co.uk, who conducted the survey, said: ‘Some of the brides we have spoken to are doing things that they feel make their wedding more 'feminist'.

'That could be reflected by deciding not be given away, the idea being that one of the connotations of this tradition is that the woman is property to be given away'.

congratulations for telling the whole world the money invested in your formal education should have been used to purchase quality condoms to prevent your conception.

now, who's the lying bastärd that is also an unintelligible charlatan? your attention span needs spiritual deliverance.

ileobatojo: 99 cent, you are so on point and I love you!
Coogar OMG! Really? 76+16+14? Really? ? ? ? ?

see this village bicycle, where did you see 16%?

99cent: hahaha dummy. no where in d article does it state that all the 10% who didn't wear white also didn't let their dad walk the aisle with them. that's just something u made up out of your yansh.

you are thick-headed!!!

I don't blame u though. u couldn't think of any other reason why a woman would not wear white (divorced, non-conformist etc) or refuse to walk with their dad (abusive, dead, absent etc). just as you couldn't think of any reason why a woman would prefer her own name (profession, ease of pronunciation etc). Feminism is not a one size fit all. it's all about women having the ability to make their own choices for whatever reason. women aren't children.

you are a consummate simpleton.....
the women who don't want their dads giving them away clearly stated it made them feel like a property. the ones who didn't want white wedding alluded it to the fact that the grooms don't wear any colour code that signifies their own purity and the explanation of keeping the maiden name was also stated in the article......they were all for feminist reasons...

I will leave u with a picture of a woman in alternative wedding dress who is being walked by her father. I hope u don't have a heart attack from seeing it. hahahaha
https://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md6qe64zLt1ri31gpo1_500.jpg

the picture is irrelevant if it's not the picture of one of the 200 women in the survey. you must really have poop for brains to claw out a picture from the ozone layer to buttress your point. the main focus here are the 200 women in the article!

try again.....

99cent: out of 100%
10% wanted red
24% wanted apples

therefore the 10% who wanted red ALSO must have wanted apples based on coogar-math. hahahah dumb dumb dumb.

if 24% want apples and 10% want red, it means the 10% want red apples and the other 14% would have any colour of apples.

99cent: out of 100%
24% do not want to walk with their fathers
10% do not want white dress

therefore, according to you, the 10% must have come out of the 24%.
hahaha I agree. only the dumbest student in primary 4 could have come up with this kind of dumb illlogic!!

the 24% encompass all the alterations in the traditional wedding. all of them want the maiden name and no dad walking the aisle with them. 10% of the 24% want no white wedding.

the other 76% are keeping to the old tradition!!!

99cent: can you show me the quote in the article that u found this breakdown of the 24% who didn't want their dads?
again, stop making stuff out of your azz

u r looking dumber and dumber by the minute.

you are a fool - you can either be a feminist or not a feminist. you cannot sit on the fence. the distinction is clear. 76% still want the old tradition of the wedding. 24% want some of the ideas altered!!

99cent: just be a good father.
no woman in her right mind will let an abusive or absent father walk her down the aisle whether or not she is a feminist.

like i said, don't preach to me, we are not in the church.

I re-read the article and didn't see anywhere where it suggests this (that ALL women who didn't want to wear white also didn't want their fathers to walk them down the aisle). can u plz show us data?
quit making stuff up/ adding ur own jara to the article.

where were you when your mates were doing set theory in school? you were probably a perpetual truant. this is simple mathematics.

100% - class size

76% - traditional marriage(no compromise)

10% - no white wedding, no dad walking the aisle
14% - white wedding, no dad walking the aisle

remember, the article said almost a quarter....which means it's a bit less than 25%, not 25%. how difficult can it be? if you cannot make your own deductions from simple data, please kill yourself.

99cent: Let me give u a simple advice, if you ever become a father (to a male or female) be a good father. The chances of your daughter inviting you to their wedding or letting u walk down the aisle with her is more correlated to whether or not you were a good father than to whether or not she is a feminist.

you don't need the eulogy or sermon, we are not in a church.

I will leave you with the QUOTE in the article to digest.
'For example the bride will often want her father to ‘give’ her away, not because of anti-feminist reasons but because she loves her father and wants to display that love on her wedding day.

goodluck

but feminists who have loving fathers still abhor the idea because it is not what their principle teaches. the idea of their dads giving them away cheapens them like a commodity. so whether they had good dads or deadbeat dads, they still wouldn't allow their dads to walk the aisle with them.

99cent: I glanced at ur post (didn't read it) and didn't see any quotations from the article so I do not feel obliged to read it.
don't make claims about an article that can't back up with quotes from that same article. it makes you a liar.

you are a disgrace to formal education..... the reason you were sent to a tertiary institution is to have the ability to pick up any data or information and process it to answer various questions. your failure to do that or waiting to be spoonfed tells me you are a waste of money.

the article did not divide 200 (which is already pretty small) females into feeminist vs antifeminist. It only implied that since many of them were open to non-traditional weddings that meant that "feminist wedding" (whatever that means) was on the rise. This is an article in a tabloid magazine mind u...so the fact that u needed to make up ur own lies to add jara to it makes u look pathetic.

200 is a small sample size so the division should be easy. my math quickly told me 76% still believe in the old tradition and 24% want some of the old ideas altered to suit their feminism.

76% + 24% = 100%
of the 24%, 10% want to take it further by wearing anything other than white as they do not like the white dress that signifies their virginity(sëx history). this is simple logic that even the dumbest of student in primary 4 would have grasped.

shame on you!!!

99cent: What a liar.

don't call people liars when you have a challenge comprehending simple sentences. you need to work on your short attention span!

You must be reading a different article than the one posted by the OP then.Because in the article here that I read,they interviewed 200 women and they all had different ideas that vereed away from the traditional idea of marriage.

i thought you said they interviewed 200 feminists....now it's 200 women?

25% wanted to keep their maiden name
10% wanted to wear a different color than white
76% wanted their father to walk them down the aisle

and adding this together gave you 100%? you must be an F student in qualitative analysis class. the 10% who wanted to wear a different colour apart from white were also in the 25% that want to keep their maiden name.

the 76% are the sane thinking women who want no part of feminism attitude and still believe in the tenets of the traditional marriage.

and this is the commentary on the last point:
For example the bride will often want her father to ‘give’ her away, not because of anti-feminist reasons but because she loves her father and wants to display that love on her wedding day.

which buttresses my point - no feminist would veer into antifeminist reason of allowing her father to give her away. the 76% are the normal secure women that have nothing to do with feminism.

If u saw something different, let me know and use direct quotes from the article to back ur claims.

you have shown countless times that you have a poor grasp of the language so showing you anything would be a futile attempt. we crossed paths on the senator yerima thread several days ago and you insisted the section of the constitution being amended was child marriage when it clearly stated it was about citizen acquisition/renunciation.

99cent: WRONG. I am a feminist and want my dad to walk the aisle with me. Read the article and it clearly states that an overwhelming majority of those feminist women who don't want traditional wedding still want their dad to walk the aisle with them.

they interviewed 200 women(not 200 feminists) - the feminists amongst them did not like the idea of their dads walking the aisle with them, they did not like the idea of the engagement ring and they would keep their maiden names(their father's name)

If my husband's last name is short enough, i'll hyphenate. If his name is very nice and I like it better than my own, i'll keep his name. if he has an ugly last name, i'll keep mine.

if you keep your last name(which belongs to your dad by the way), is that not patriarchal - what you feminists actually fight against?

99cent: I don't want a big dramatic wedding either. Something small and personal is what I prefer. Guess I am a feminist!

you are not a feminist because of a small wedding....you are a feminist if you want to keep your maiden name, you are a feminist if you don't want your dad to walk the aisle with you or some other deluded made-up stuff that mocks the marriage tradition.

adaobi123: Argos it is.....

B&Q!!!

adaobi123: How is everyone coping with the heat at night ? I can't sleep.

get the mobile a/c unit!

quarashi: What a pity.Giving up already? You this dissolute slowpoke.

that's what she is known for - rant for few minutes and do a cop out. she's a loser of epic proportions. when she pröstitutes herself to the lowest bidder on the least intellectual sections of nairaland and her army of mentally-indigent trolls stalk her, she intetionally accuses the intelligentsias of the forum as the culprits to score cheap brownie points...

i don't know what can make me consider a heifer like her - she looks like the inflated blimp of segun arinze

Shollypopz: As I've always done to old a*ss coogar, IGNORED!
You were already dying for the attention anyway

dying for the attention of a butch? if i manage to assemble the most powerful super-telescope ever made, i still won't be able to locate my interest in anything you stand for....you should wear a T-shirt that says "NL made me"

alutacontinua: I trust her...she get liver to take care of herself, you might even be the one I should watch out for, for the sake of ileoba

more like liver to make noise for 2-3 minutes and then disappear into thin air like the fart of a leprous old woman. shollypopz is the boil on the arsë of humanity.

stillwater: I see you coogar. You boys keep getting mad!
Next week I bet my women would release something else to shatter your cores again and again.

your women have lost the essence of womanhood! what remains for them now is to attach artificial pënis to their mound of venus to fight equality.....

alutacontinua: Where on planet Nairaland have I been? Sholly and coogar? this is gonna be a bomb!
*following from bumper to bumper*

try and buy a cheap coffin for her as you follow her bumper to bumper....

Shollypopz: ^^The same recycled old lines, you run out of something new sapiens??....Respect your old age and shut the hell up!

you are a tool.....
the only human being who never gets old. i would transform your road to success into a path of destruction. the people that sired you would be sorry by the time i finished dealing with you. another heifer from a palm-kernel background feeling funky.....

armyofone: I said town crier and not some gulterish dorty.
careful don't let me call ile for you o .

ile has been tamed! i even took her to qatar where they made her put a veil on her head!!!

Shollypopz: ^^What is thas one saying?? Shut the fvck up abeg!! You should be jubilating ur name even graced my post sapiens

you are a product of a same sex marriage...
who are you? from what planet did you crawl out from? do i belong to the posse of deluded misfits you smoke pubic hair with? a whöre starved of attention showing the symptoms of postpartum depression!

armyofone: strolling in with my pina colanda. Sipping and looking around for Pataki and cougar.

your appetite is huge. only you? two men??

Shollypopz: Lol, it's a matter of time mumu. "Fowl yansh go open"

...you are either bejahisky, coogar, or some stalker. I'm used to people following my sh1t around NL like flies.

Upgrade your style, create a thread in my name

are you battling hypoglycemia? what's my name doing in your insanity? who and who following you? you better keep my name off your fat lips......you don't want stuff to pop off tonight? what's my business with yours?

[quote author=Sisi_Kill]How's there equality if one person is being told they can't do something solely because they are of a certain gender? Some of you Feminists slayer unabashedly admit this happens....certain companies are do not have a conducive environment for women to work (accommodation, transportation etc). Which begs the question. ...what is the argument for?![/quote]because there are men & women are not the same on terms of physical strength. would you expect a woman to work in a cement factory, doing heavy lifting or be at the frontline of the antiriot police squad. even in america(pioneers of women's rights activists), women don't lead their assault teams...

Guess it really doesn't matter that both sides are saying the same thing, the fact that the other side has a buncha women in t, then it must be shut down. Perfect example of equality, yes?

let's not digress too much, what started the thread was women saying they would shun engagement rings, keep their maiden names and refuse to let their fathers give them away as such practises are traditional.

Don't know why some ladies are wasting their time look for proof when all one need do is read this thread. Y'all Anti- feminist kick boxers never face your fellow men who make the same points these women are making but are oh so ready to flex ya muscles to shut a woman down.
Funny lots.

go bring any man - old, young, short, tall, slim, obese, black, white, albino, etc and i would challenge his feminist views. feminism is so 1960. there was something to be fought for then, they won the battle already. anything more is just stretching the borders of lunacy!

yellowpawpaw: Pls o,let me ask,r u ladies on heat?

what a question....

[quote author=Omo_Alata]Jew? from where to where?[/quote]from ibadan to jerusalem to bethlehem....

[quote author=Omo_Alata]I have expressed myself very well in this thread. so let's leave that one[/quote]ok....just so you know, i am still at sea with the whole appetite stuff. you speak in parables, are you a jew/rabbi?

[quote author=Omo_Alata]I can't disclose, but use your imagination[/quote]freedom of speech! say what you mean, mean what you say. as an omo-alata, you should have all the hutzpah to express yourself

[quote author=Omo_Alata]i am not a voluptuous woman but I am confident and extremely comfortable with my sexuality[/quote]#coughs coughs#

[quote author=Omo_Alata]You know men with money get wild appetite[/quote]appetite? what sorta appetite?

[quote author=Omo_Alata]7.3% pere, na wa for u lol[/quote]the company's assets = $3.6 billion.

[quote author=Omo_Alata]I will never quit pepper selling, too lucrative. I love diamond ring, but I believe, you cannot afford me[/quote]see this chic, i have 7.3% shares @ tiffany's. if it's ice you like, i would illuminate your life. how do you want it cut? emerald cut or what??

biolabee: In the spirit of banter, all omo alatas I know are full bodied and always have to slap off prying hands and ogles from randy dudes

How has your own experience been

this one sells pepper on eBay. visa, mastercard, discovery or amex. no cash/cheque.