₦airaland Forum

leunamme93: I see you lack value and pride for being called a Nigerian. Just watch out for the Nigerians that will shake this world, and Yes, i know you will be gnashing your teeth then. Dont ever think you are better than anyone here because you are just giving the privilege, you come here to rant all manner of rubbish. I don't want to insult you because you are a Nigerian, will always be and also to maintain the rules here in Nairaland. You see We Nigerians keep to rules and regulation.

Desola: No, I don't think Nigerians are worse than the Eastern Europeans, very far from it.

I was trying to highlight Britain's headache. See, to understand what is going on here, we need to understand a bit about the EU treaty signed by the UK. As much as the UK would rather have hardworking tax paying Nigerians in its Economy, it is bound to cater to EU citizens first whether they be miscreants or revenue generating. The point here is that the UK must fulfil its obligations under the EU and in order to do so, it has to check the population of its people by going for the jugular of the third word countries. If it does not cut immigration from the countries outside the EU, by the time Romania becomes part of the EU and the Romanians head for the UK, the UK would become severely overpopulated and its infrastructures would be stretched.

I'm sure you would hate to see London turn to another Lagos, wouldn't you?

Whichever way we choose to see the UK, it is still an attractive destination for foreigners for its economic viability and generous health services. Until the UK gets rid of social welfare, it would continue to b seen as a soft touch for all migrants.

alutacontinua: *spreads mat on thread*

Desola: Having an influx of economic migrants who can seldom secure an 18k per annum job isn't exactly wise business move, is it?

Moreover, the UK has too look out for its EU citizens first before worrying its head about third world countries. They have their own third world EU citizens in Romania and most East European countries to worry about.

Why waste time on those who would put head labour on their free NHS and social benefits. That's what the polish, romanians and other Eastern Europeans are there for.

r231: Yes ma
Air/Sea,and RoRo,

Desola: Ah! Coogar, you're still here. Good!

The flint: foooool....is that how an ideal country ought to be, where the poor and middle income can't survive.

eGuerrilla: Back up a bit on this one. Black folks are proportionally over-presented in prisons and mental institutions in the UK - fact.

TheBookWorm: Why live in Peckam when you can live in Houston or my hometown of New York City?

Come join a prosperous Nigerian-American community!

TheBookWorm: Is that so? I know many Nigerian-Americans living the American dream. Not living in some ghetto or on welfare like the ones in the UK.

Nigerians have much easier chance of being successful in the US, than in the UK. In some US cities, they even welcome us like in Houston.

TheBookWorm: Didn't we have this discussion before why the US is much better than the UK?

It is the truth. The US is a land of immigrants, the UK is not. Deal with it.

eGuerrilla: Indeed coogar.

The emboldened portion of your post is what I find problematic in Desola's wholesale acceptance of this discriminatory policy.

Source: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2010/05/451993.html?c=on

TheBookWorm: I do not even know why anyone would want to move to the UK when you have better places in the US where you can feel comfortable

The UK is a country that lives in its former glory. It should be happy that immigrants are trying to prop up its poor economy.

Desola: .
Vince Cable of Lib Dem? That party lost the plot a long time ago and is probably rumbling to remain relevant.

Truth be told though, that country cannot continue to be run as it is. Immigration needs to be checked at all cost.

eGuerrilla: Even Cameron is dead set against it.
Let's recall he was over in India with a begging bowl not so long ago.

Desola: Long overdue policy!
I support it!

afrodoc: U divided cech nd de gea's total minutes played by their total clean sheets to get their minutes per clean sheet at abt 228 and 229 respectively.and u claimed because de gea at 229 was higher than cech at 228 that mean de gea with d higher number was better.now do the same thing for d rest of d keepers esp the otondo ones like myhill,tremmel. And rob green

afrodoc: u r even more confused! divide myhills minutes played by his number of clean sheets to get his minutes per clean sheet.exactly d way u divided for cech and de gea .wat do u come up with? Now do the same for robert green and al habsi. It should be clear even to u by now.

afrodoc: Lol u r so disingenuous! Ur point was the higher d minutes per clean sheet d better d keeper hence de gea better than cech while my point is the lower d minutes per clean sheet d better d keeper.so from your table calculate the minutes per clean sheet of boaz myhill and robert green and compare it to that of cech and de gea

Fabville: You are the one getting it wrong. There is nothing wrong in what he has computed up there. The longer the minutes per clean sheet the better.

If a goalkeeper jeeps a clean sheet for 120 mins and another keeps for 130 mins. Which is better? It is obviuos that it is the one that keeps it for 130 mins.

afrodoc: u r d one getting it way wrong.pls study d stats table given.it is not minutes of clean sheet but minutes per clean sheet. There is a difference.it is not how many minutes of clean sheet d keeper has that is meant here but How many minutes a keeper has to keep before he gets one clean sheet.that's y u see cech,de gea nd joe hart having some of d lowest in the entire league(it takes dem less minutes to get a clean sheet than d other keepers) .I explained very clearly in an earlier post.the keepers that kept just 1 or 2 clean sheets have way higher numbers than cech,de gea or even hart (check myhill,robles etc.

afrodoc: Looooool u have moved to a new stat now (one that appears to favour ur side of d debate).lmao. Well I wasn't arguing wit u on who is better.just wanted to point out d error in d conclusion u made from d 1st stat. D stat on minutes per clean sheet says cech is better. D stat on clean sheets as percentage of matches says de gea is better.

afrodoc: Cmon u know dt was just an example ,I believe u understand wt I am driving at. Ok let's say d keeper X has 30 clean sheets in 3000mins making the average 100 mins per clean sheet would u rate de gea ahead of dt keeper based on those stats? Analyse ur stats carefully nd understand them.d stats u highlighted show dt in terms of clean sheets cech is better than de gea

afrodoc: . Err coogar u actually didn't interprete that stat d right way.wat it explains is how many minutes it takes to get a clean sheet I.e MINUTES PER CLEAN SHEET so d lower d figure the better(meaning cech is better in dis stat).to explain u see rob elliot wit 1 clean sheet in 834mins and myhill wit 1 clean sheet in 720mins meanind their numbers according to ur equation are 834 and 720 respectively! Dt shud make it obvious that d lower d figure d better d stat for d keeper.for example keeper X with 50 clean sheets in 3000mins will end up with a figure of 60

uche16: Why are using a nebulizer for another persons asthma, thank God you discovered you are not from the east, don't worry when I make a movie on awolowo,I would surely use saheed balogun.

nitlad: At least I still have an iota of it, however infinitesimal - compared to you with no traces of it whatsoever.

Exception don dey dey now abi? What was then your aim of bringing incomplete stats forward, presenting same as though it was the long lost Hadith recently excavated from Medina? To hoodwink Manure simps that De Gea is better than all of Yashin, Zoff and Schmeichel combined? You are a joker.

Which one make we believe between 2 and 4 nah? Even you yourself are as confused as your möronic statisticians....

This proves nothing other than lend more credence to FourFourTwo's and Opta's submission that Cech was the League's best last season!

denzel2009: Ok will do!

Btw, based on your philandering tendecies, I got you this London girl. She Kwam 1's daughter.I have her vital statistics!

https://cdn.jaguda.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/K1HoneyB-e1351188847943.jpg

tellwisdom: Damn it ...very stingy people. All their money calls and spending rate isn't even more than 5 pounds as far i can see here..Una dey spend money for other things apart from food??

denzel2009: Why am I a pleb? I have actually seen a modernised one in Burj Khalifa. It's gold plated.

elampiro: If the defence is too far backward from the attack, that will leave too much to be chased? Don't you think so? Pique, Mascherano, and co don't seat with the goalkeeper. You can't even outpace them. Neyman is the first man I saw running past them with ease.

denzel2009: Denzel!! I use water from Age( the plastic kettle-like muslims use to do ablution)

denzel2009: No dey mind these posh people jare. No be to clean shiit?

montelik: Well said. All this destroyer talk is exaggerated and unnecesary. We can always convert Jones if we are desperate. What we need is a central midfielder with energy and mobility, not some cement mixer masquearding as central midfielder or a buzz-saw flying into challenges. Solid central midfielders with good energy levels, mobility with and without possession and good use of the football.