₦airaland Forum

gwas: @chaircover, crying is definitely your hobby! Haba! wetin! Cry this cry that. Just take am easy because i hear say too much cry don dey remove person eyes o. lol.
@Topic, those girls are bloody hypocrites. My ex is a good example of this. She would cry when she's feeding you a solid cooked lies - lies wey get NAFDAC number. That girl is nothing but a big time blackmailer!

where's the girl now?

dayokanu: When he attempts to pay RVP and Fabregas the same range as Djourou and Squilacci

the top players get underpaid and the shyte players get overpaid. wenger is an economist so i can understand his methods.

Clemzy16: Girls have some kinda natural emotional immunity clause. Even without them crying you'll score them right above a male. We men are always seen as the bad guys.

because men are always more daring, more criminal-minded than women. that is getting phased out now anyways. the law is starting to admit women can be dangerous as men!

chaircover: There is emotional and there is blackmail. We are all different and some of us are actually very emotional because thats just the way we are.

I cry a lot. Always have done and I doubt that it will stop anytime soon. It doesnt mean that I am doing it to blackmail anyone.

I cry when I watch things on TV. Just Friday I watched Skyfall in the cinema and cried thrice in that movie I wont say where cos I dont want to ruin it for folks who are yet to see the movie. Who crys watching James Bond? Thank God the place was dark and no once could see me crying

I cry when I watch survivor stories, I cry when I watch births on TV, I cry when I watch Air crash investigation; all sorts. Im always wiping my eyes and pretending that there is something in my eye. I cried when I saw my daughter singing in the Christmas School play and I cry when one of our tropical fish dies sef!

If Mr CC and I have a misunderstanding and I am right, I cry. If he is wrong I cry too. I def cry when I am accused falsely or my intentions are misunderstood . . .thats just me

So for me there is no emotional blackmail behind it. Mr CC is used to it and when the tears start flowing he will go and get tissue and cuddle me. Some of us just have very active tear ducts

lmao, i have always known chaircover is a cry-baby, her heart is softer than baby wipes. cried watching "skyfall"? jeeeeeez, judi dench is old - she was always going to die anyways. better dont watch "life of pi" otherwise you would be escorted out by the wardens.

@ topic,
most women use these tears to win favours, they use tears to make their tales more believeable and blah blah blah. the moment i see crocodile tears, i begin to doubt their stories. i understand we all have varying degrees of threshold of pain but then some women are just pathetic......

dayokanu: Torres won because he played less minutes than Gomez

only torres n gomez copped 3 goals n 1 assist, so they finished ahead of dzagoev, balotelli, ronaldo and mandzukic. however, gomez spent almost 100 mins more than torres on the pitch......so torres won it by a landslide margin.

gomez, 3 goals + 1 assist in 281 mins
nando, 3 goals + 1 assist in 189 mins

abegi, torres made gomez look like a kindergarten striker......

4llerbuntu: @coogar is that Torres golden boot not the THREE goals golden boot?

the more reason his peers should have scored more, don't you think? torres got less minutes than europe's most feared strikers and he managed to outscore them. if torres had played every game, he would have definitely scored more goals, no?

was it not the one he had same number of goals with other players and was awarded it because he scored in a later stage of thectournament ?
was it that golden boot or another?

you dunno your football - he was awarded the golden boot because he managed to add one assist to his 3 goals.....something the other strikers failed to do. in spite of the fact that torres was on the bench, he beat ronaldo, rooney, gomez, benzema, van persie, muller and mandzukic to the award. torres puts the e in effective!

Andre Uweh: What do you mean?.

he meant you spoke the truth but the plebs on this forum are too daft to admit it!

dayokanu: Only that none of goals was a goal that count.
Thats why he was a benchwarmer all competition

i never knew uefa now use purfication techniques to separate goals that count and the ones that don't count. torres won the golden boot outscoring his peers by scoring all his goals from open play and someone said his goals didn't count. go n take the award from him and give it to gomez(the german whose goals counted)!!!

dayokanu: Yeah it was in the time he had 7 goals in 2yrs for his national team

so lemme get this straight - in the last 2 yrs, torres scored 7 goals for spain, won a golden boot, won euro 2012 and scored in the last 2 finals of the same competition, right? he has already done more than the whole german team in the last 16 yrs.

Golden boot winner who was even aa benchwarmer in all games that mattered to the team? and mostly used as a time wasting sub

it begs the question - how did this bench warmer manage to outscore the starters? logic dictates a player on the bench should be peripheral, no? torres is the first bench warmer that won the golden boot of a football tournament in the history of association football!

dayokanu: Here we go again
Since January 2011 that he moved to Chelsea also coincided with the time players in Spain no longer played to his strenght and scored 7 goals in 2 yrs

was it in this period he won a golden boot in an international tournament known as euro 2012? i am not sure - dayo, please help me out.

Torres after 2010 has lost it, Infact he was always overrated to start with. I have always said and maintained it on here

golden boot winner has lost it? a player who spent less minutes on the pitch than goal machines like ibrahimovic, rooney, mario gomez, ronaldo, benzema and van persie...and still outscored them has lost it? cheiiiiii - dayo is on a roll tonight!

dayokanu: Thats why he has 7 almighty goals for Chelsea which he has started every league game for. 7 goals for a top striker who started every game for a top club!!
At least 14 strikers have scored more than Torres

blame chelsea and the idiotic managers they have had since torres joined in.

Yeah because Henry was bought for 50m, coming from the same league and Henry was a useless striker for bth club and country in the lat 2 yrs

so the price-tag suddenly makes a player develop 8 limbs, right?
where am i tonight? in the land of philistines? whose fault if roman paid £50m for torres? did he price himself £50m? if you are foolish enough to pay $500,000 for a volkswagen passat and you thought you would outrun a benz mclaren because of the price-tag then you are a bumbling oaf!

dayokanu: By all standards its a silly comment. Torres has played in the same setup and played worse teams than SOuthampton yet couldnt score. 2 days ago he played against the worst team in the league QPR and couldnt score even when one vs one

So what gives the assurance that he would have scored today?

Its like saying if I that couldn't manage 1million Naira properly but if I was given 1 million dollars I would have done better

Demba Ba delivered in West Ham, delivered in newcastle and delivered on his debut

the same torres in a blue shirt has scored against man utd, arsenal, barcelona, newcastle, etc(tougher clubs than southampton). sometimes i think you just type in a spaz mode.

dayokanu: Actually Torres scored his first Chelsea goal after 1,300 min, Demba scored his first Chelsea goal after 30mins.

Khaki no be leather, Monkey yato si Chimpanzee, Akuwarapa yato so Akuyanyan( Epilepsy is different from Death)

the analogy above is for the simpletons......too simplistic!
henry scored his first goal for arsenal after 2000 mins, macheda did after 3 mins. by dayo's standard, macheda is greater than henry! nice one.

dayokanu: You mean from your crystal Prism or as a dibia you saw that Torres that has failed for most of 2yrs would suddenly get it right today

what a daft thing to say?
torres has never scored 2 goals in a chelsea shirt before? really?

StarBoard: So the occurence of an event that had never happeend in the more than 120 years of English League football is enough to abandon any kind of defensive mentality.
Wow.
That we lost the league on goal difference could also be down to defensive carelessness.

the single most important factor is goals win games.
even at 4-4, we could have beaten everton 5-4. i remember evra missing a sitter at the death in that game. then we got beat at wigan, all we had to do was outscore wigan too, same as city. we have already buried those demons now bar everton at old trafford! this is why we are 7 points clear. it should be 13 points.

Let us keep conceding like amateurs.That way, goal difference won't even be up for consideration as well.
Fact is we won't always get the bail-out we require when our dodgy midfield/defence keep shipping in goals by the half-dozen.

if we don't concede, it still does not mean we would win. stoke have the meanest defence in the league, they are not in the top 4. only goals can guarantee 3 points, not clean sheets!

Andre Uweh: From neutrality, am sure Torres would have scored today had he played.

just be patient.....
when ba hits his drought, the charlatans would bring up another excuse. see them speaking like torres has never scored a brace for chelsea. this is myopia at its best. ba scores a brace on his debut and he's the next best thing since sliced-bread.

StarBoard: I beg to disagree.
Like RuuDie pointed out, the first 4-nil win over Wigan had Scholes and Giggs togetehr so that isn't an issue.
We just saw Giggs pass the ball better than most players in their prime for a vital equaliser.

so because we managed to beat wigan(bottom club) at old trafford now means giggs/scholes are the truth, the light and the way? even a broken clock would be correct twice in 24 hrs. lets weigh our wins vs our losses in the matches they have featured and maybe you would see the light. the wigan game is a bad example to bring up.....i cannot remember any season we have not beaten wigan at old trafford - they have only scored once at old trafford since their promotion - they are that bad!

Our defence is wack because our midfield doesn't shield them from incessant attacks.
Newcastle came to OT shorn of their best players and still scored thrice.
Teams aren't scared to take it to us because they know they will have open season in front of our goal.

several factors can be blamed for that....
fergie's idiotic tinkering has done us more harm than good. with the right personnel, the only game we genuinely deserved to lose was against everton. the losses against spurs and norwich(we should have won). the draw against swansea(we should have won too).

It's no surprise we concede so many these days.
The state of the EPL is such that United can get away with winning that many games despite a dodgy middle through the help of our attack.

maybe the instruction is to score more goals and avoid the travesty of last season. i think we have now scored 50 goals in the league. some 14 goals more than city! in fergie's wisdom, goals win games.......outscore your opponents and the issue of goals difference would not even come up!

StarBoard: False.
Why couldn't they bail us out vs Norwich, Spurs and Everton in the Premier League?

because fergie started with a shyte team and even ruined the substitution by having 2 ageless fools in the team. the similarity in those losses? giggscholes in the line-up! what a coincidence.

I hope you don't expect me to answer that question.
Because I hope you don't believe it's all good in that department.

our midfield has done fairly well. the defence has cocked it more than the midfield in my opinion. united have won 17 games in 21 premier league games. only mourinho's killersquad of 2004/5 have the same record. you underestimate this team!

StarBoard: Maybe, but there are games that you need one. Like today's.
West Ham were comfortable in the middle of the park.
Please scratch Fletcher off that list.Dude is past it. Carrick? Hardly an enforcer in my view.

carrick's ability to intercept is the best in europe bar busquets! with him on the pitch today, he would have managed to intercept at least one of the joe cole's assists. fletcher is good value for money as a water-carrier.

so far in Europe we've srtuggled with minor opposition even if we went ahead to win.
Carrick played in those games.
I'm still waiting for the miracle of transformation.If we're still talking fitness issues midway into the season, then heaven help us.

in europe? the same europe where we won the first 4 games and dumbed down the last 2 games to give the wounded some game time?

RuuDie: I can say the same for you with respect to Scholes, Giggs and Valencia. . .I don't argue that Valencia has played well this season, never had! But he is there, available and puts in a decent shift - even if he does nothing offensively, you can at least count on him defensively. Thats why he is in there and thats why he'll get picked over and over again!
By the way, if your supposed "maverick" didn't spend so much time whinging for wage he has barely earned, would we have to put up with a shyttie Valencia!?

which shift does valencia put in? it must be a shyte shower of shift!
maverick copped hamstring(his first ever in his football career) - very odd and it had to be managed carefully! it's not about his transfer or whatever boardroom politics going on. he's back in training now and hopefully, he should get a run out in the next league game.

StarBoard: We don't have an enforcer in our squad.
The closest to that description is Anderson, presently on the doctor's table.
I've been campaigning for a signing of that nature since forever, but RvP's goal scoring glut has pulled the wool over some peeps eyes to the point that most folks came to the conclusion that we didn't need any more additions to the midfield.

when everyone is fit, we don't need any enforcer. anderson, fletcher, carrick are reliable enforcers on their days. cleverley, kagawa, giggscholes and powell are creative enough. there are wingers too(nani, young and the shyte ecuadorian). the problem is the fitness not necessarily the personnel!

I make bold to say that our middle will be our undoing this season.
We could win the Premier League (far from a guarantee), but we will get found out in Europe and on nights like these.

carrick would bail us out in europe and united wouldn't be this cavalier in the knock out stage in europe. we weren't this open against city or arsenal......we are more suited to playing big teams than giant-killers like west ham or norwich.

RuuDie: I agree with the bolded. . .but the second is a no-no. If you blame Scholes for the first, not pressing Joe Cole - who were the two guys closing down the second cross!? Why didn't they stop that cross from coming in too. How very convenient!!!

different circumstance.....
the second goal was from a west ham corner. they had 2 players against 1 united marker. as the ball got floated in, scholes did not track collins' runs and vidic was marking carlton cole and collins at the same time(similar to the first goal as the cross came in). an enforcer should be there but scholes/kagawa/cleverley are not cut for such duties.

mbulela: Valencia is doing a very good job of helping Nani bargain for an improved contract. Valencia's case seems almost irredeemable. I will not be surprised to seem him leave in the summer.
Buttner is not better than Fabio, he is just fitter. We need a direct competition for Evra.
For all his hard work, Welbeck needs to be more incisive and direct as a striker.
Kagawa is still a work in progress. Rooney is out for another 2 weeks, he needs to step up.
Vidic did not do well enough.
Was that pass from Evans to RVP?

giggs!

RuuDie: You must have been watching it on Ghana's National Tv. . .even they wouldn't have seen it so - welbeck did well - *spits on Coogar's face*!

we all know you have a natural hatred for welbeck so this is a witchhunt. however, for the best player in the club last season to have deteriorated to the shower of shyte valencia is currently displaying is mind-boggling. he has lost everything - no pace, he's clumsy in possession and he's too one dimensional. he has been figured out. he can't shoot for shyte and this is not a one-off incident. valencia has been shyte all season.

StarBoard: According to both of you, our midfied was fine.
SO please Ruudie, answer me.
How long are we going to keep relying on RvP for late heroics?
It surely can't be everyday. . .

considering the personnel fergie started, they didn't fare too badly. i would rather blame fergie's timid selection of having kagawa, scholes and cleverley in the starting line up, there's no real enforcer here, they are too similar cos they all love going forward!

RuuDie: How apt. . .I bet if it was Ando, Cleverly or worse, Nani that played such a pass you would edit out RvP's goal, magnify the gif to fit the dimensions of National Stadium, Surulere score-board and never let us hear or see anything else till the season ends.

cleverley scored a beauty today - i have not drooled over it.

Age aside, Giggs is by and large, the best winger we have in our ranks and we will continue to turn back to him for help in situations such as this until whenever the likes of "maverick" find their A-game from wherever it is he kept it!

except that giggs didn't even play as a winger tonight. welbeck moved to the left, giggs n cleverley stayed in the centre and valencia kept stinking the whole joint on the right. giggs is finished, abeg!

RuuDie: @ Coogar,
if giggs was shyttie (because he missed one chance) and Valencia, shyttier (for also fouling up one time in fifteen minutes). . .please, what about Danny Welbeck!!?

welbeck did well - he hustled the hammers out of possession several times. apart from his selfish play of shooting straight at jussi instead of squaring the ball for chicharito to score, welbeck didn't really put any foot wrong.

valencia fouled up once? did you watch the same game? jeez! i cannot remember anything valencia did correctly. the only time he managed to beat his marker, he sent the ball out of play with the most useless cross ever. abeg, valencia is finished - dead and buried! thank feck, nani is back.......valencia needs competiton or......retirement!

dayokanu: ^^ Thats what is called STRIKER. many DUDs would probably miss the control and lose the chance

the key to that goal is the first touch.....
i am sure berbatov, rooney, torres, drogba(chest) and suarez would have finished like van persie too.

RuuDie: Before we kickstart the marathon, let me be clear with one thing...are you blaming the midfield for those goals we conceeded!!?

the first goal was scholesy's first - he should be closing down joe cole. the second goal was scholes' fault too. he literally stood off collins. any pressure put on collins would have distracted him from heading accurately into our net.

RuuDie: This is it. . .naybody that dares to insult Baba Giggs again on this thread will be BANNED!

conveniently forgetting he could have equalised much earlier when he had a free header from 6 yards and sent the ball over the bar. that's the ish about giggs, he does 99 things wrong and gets one thing right that leads to a goal. in my opinion, he's still shyte but i agree valencia is shittier these days.

what a first touch from robin van persie.....

https://i.minus.com/ibl46Qsjt18OXx.gif

i dunno why, i love goals like this. it's reminiscent of the goal drogba scored against valencia some years ago. joe cole picked the ball from the edge of chelsea's box, spotted drogba and floated one of the best passes ever with the outside of his boot, the pass dissected valencia's defence into drogba's path.....i was jumping like a child when drogba rammed the ball into the net.

nateevs: Heheheh. Ba is already poised to make Torres look really expensive.

na wash!
eden hazard did more in his first 2 games until he fizzled out. this is the easiest match demba ba would play for chelsea......the league games would prove his mettle in the coming weeks.

4llerbuntu: ERM OK so you all think a 31 yr old coming out a 1yr plus injury is a good buy for 13-17 million?

david villa is world class....if you can play henry upfront, why not villa? how old is di natale?

pls who plays upfront at barca now? if this young 31yr old "lethal" striker could still play football, u don't think he would get in the side at barca? no be tello and Pedro dey play upfront?

pedro, messi, alexi sanchez, etc

smh. talk about wastepipe managers and director fools.
demba ba was available for 7 mill. no acclimatization, lower wage. but its this one that is the target?

demba ba is a risk........he has not passed his medicals in 4 yrs - he's got a bum knee.

I didnt even want demba ba but that's a way better target compared with this one. mcheew. let me just keep quiet before this degenerates

if villa comes to arsenal with 100% fitness, he would score 20 league goals before the end of the season.

[quote author=tpia@]the "boringness" of this forum is second to none.

do most nlers have lives at all, or nl is their life.[/quote]https://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_llxhlzgMvN1qii6tmo1_250.gif

[quote author=tpia@]Gosh, the quality, or the lack thereof, of the posts and discussions on this site, are simply mind boggling.

Is it an educational deficiency, or just plain d.aftness?[/quote]you have made more brainless topics than this one - remove the log in your cornea before attempting to take out the speck in the eyes of others.

if i were wenger, i would sell chamakh to afford david villa. arshavin can also be moved so is ramsey.

dayokanu: Whether na condition of by design, Arsenal played several games with a lone striker. Thats the FACT

This was a CL game vs Man utd in 2008. Bendtner and RvP on the bench Only Adebayor started

http://espnfc.com/us/en/report/266496/report.html?soccernet=true&cc=5901

Another league match at home vs Chelsea only RVP started Adebayor and bendtner benched abi Adebayor sef na crock?

http://espnfc.com/us/en/report/244503/report.html?soccernet=true&cc=5901

dayo has managed to create his own argument as usual!
your claim was different initially - you said arsenal had ditched 4-4-2 by 2006/7. i counter-claimed arsenal still played 4-4-2 in some games up until 2011. i have shown you examples of arsenal playing 4-4-2 in the seasons you claimed they had ditched the formation. so what exactly is your point?

ileobatojo: Please say it isn't so! If not Calloti/Blazay/Jelita, who else can I live vicariously through?!

you can live with anyone, you are a witchdoctor!