₦airaland Forum

BlueDiva:
---------- Cech
Iva---Luiz---Cahill----Ashley
-----------Mikel
Essien---Ramires----Lamps
-----------Mata
-----------Drog.

hindsight is 20/20.
why didn't you complain before the game.

unlike you, i faulted chelsea's use of malouda even before the game. . .

Must we use the same formation every single game?
Study your opponents and adapt.

Napoli has killed us at the break.

chelsea used the best tactical formation possible away from home.
it's the personnel that is at fault.
luiz and cahill are not good defenders.

BlueDiva:
Always quick to spew. . .
Like AVB you have zero tactical knowledge.

i pack more intelligence than 500 bluedivas put together.

AVB with all his wisdom is losing.
Play your 4-5-1.
You don't use 3 upfront against a team like Napoli.

avb is playing 4-2-3-1.
drogba is a lone striker. . .sturridge+mata+malouda are floating behind drogba.

Nearly conceded another.
Thanks Ashley.

the goal woulda been assisted by lampard.
throwing his leg to a loose ball.

the substitutes have failed to makeany impact.
now i know why united are different when chasing a game. our wingers put quality ball in the box.

see lampard almost assisting napoli again.
this lampard is a fat useless b@stard.

ashley cole saved chelsea there.

BlueDiva:
Thankfully no room for the dud today.

you're lucky you're not a united fan.
if you write these heresies on my matchday thread, i would put soldier ants in your bra.

dayokanu:
Lampard is no longer the issue its now Drogba?

This is Napoli playing without a coach, Only God knows what woulda happened with Manzari on the bench

it doesn't make a difference with or without a manager.
when fergie was banned for 5 games, united won all their matches without him.
when he sat on the bench, he lost 4-0 to west ham @ upton park.

nateevs:
Clever people without the right tools will come last.
Ask Faraday to try drilling a hole through your gate with a screw driver.

would that be the same michael faraday.
the father of electrolyte? you want faraday to die?

bluediva does not understand tactics. . . .na only results him sabi.
the only fault today is the sleeping chelsea defenders and some of the final ball from the flanks.

chelsea need a 2nd goal though.

BlueDiva:
Mata is the only player that matters.
Good to see Essien and Lamps.

lampard would ruin the pace needed to get the 2nd goal.
abeg, lampard na overkill.

all i wanna see here is nando torres!
drogba has been uber-useless.

see juan mata dispossessing inler. . .
what a player this little man is. . . .he looks like villas-boas love child!

dayokanu:
I told you about Napolis counter attacks

Now chase 3-1 with the chance of it being 4-1 or 5-1

you would find out that chelsea have made more attempts than napoli.
but chelsea's conversion rate is horrendous.
they do the pressing, bark without biting.


david luiz and gary cahill are a bunch of jokers!

what the feck was david luiz thinking?
chelsea need the 2nd goal.

2 away goals and they would be coasting.

nateevs:
Honestly I cannot understand what the statement means.
AVB is a clever guy.

We are playing a 4-2-1-3 with Ramires and Meireles sitting and Mata in the hole and we are playing direct football.
He knows we cannot match their pace. We cannot beat them on the counter. They are way quicker.
What's the tactic, play a high defensive line and try to constrict play to their half even though we are away.
Many may not agree with that, but I do.

Press and aim to snatch the ball. Recycle possession early by finding the forwards.
It's easy to see. The only difference, they are a way better team than we are. Simple.

bluediva does not understand football. . . .and villas-boas is a retard for not playing mata in the hole since.
he's been the best player on the pitch. he's stringing things in the middle. . .making things happen.
the only fault here is the final ball of chelsea's wngers. none of them has been top drawer.

chelsea have been playing really well since napoli's 2nd goal.

BlueDiva:
Worthless manager.
No tactics, no footie knowledge.

Why did we buy that waste pipe Cahill?
Who said we should buy Meireles?
Why didn't we play Kalou instead of Malouda?

This is looking like the worst season in RA era.
I wish una luck.

playing mata behind drogba is a marked improvement.
you can see the magician weaving his way in the centre of the park. if only chelsea have traditional wingers. . . .things would been loads better.
i dont think malouda/sturridge crosses have found a chelsea player once.

dayokanu:
Best thing is to keep it tight Losing 2-1 is not the end of the world, You have an away goal already

Going all out can be punished by Napoli, they are very fast on the counter

and their 3 tenors can hurt you with  pace

no - chelsea should go for it.
napoli are also vulnerable at the back if they commit men to the attack.

chelsea are very weak at stamford bridge.
the last 2 times they got eliminated in the competition, they were beaten at home.

they should play counter-attacking football. . . .sit deep and catch napoli on the break.
now where's duff, robben and joe cole when you need them.

nateevs:
Ivanovic sun la enu le. If that was Bosingwa, dudes will be on the thread calling AVB names for playing him.

and chelsea started so well - with mata in the middle dictating stuff.
meirelez is useless!

that's a very good line up except for malouda and sturridge
i wish villas-boas can get proper wingers on loan. this chelsea team is 3-4 players away from being world beaters.
malouda has lost his football sense and sturridge is too selfish to make an attack fearsome.

solomon kalou should have been played instead of malouda.
mata staying behind drogba should give chelsea hope. the little man would create one or 2 through-passes for drogba and its up to drogba to make it count.
chelsea should draw this or win by a margin thinner than the skin of their teeth.

goshen360:
@ coogar,
So you can argue abortion means murder? But the word "Abortion" doesn't appear in the bible. So i can abort and say it is not a sin. Where do you see murder as abortion in the bible. You can kill without necessarily aborting as you know. I hope you can hear yourself?

try and make sense abeg.
how can you liken abortion to w@nking? abortion involves the life of another. . . . .how do you affect the life of anyone if you w@nk?
this is why it's a sin against yourself and not against anyone.

dare2think:
Lol@ cooger
I see you are still persistent in yabbing me abi. But I can't be upset coz I have nothing but love for u.

yab you?
if you read my yabs, you would take cover.
i don't have any grudge against you, dare2think.

@Men on the thread,

Do you have a hard on every morning you wake up for everyday of the week all year round?

Cooger, are you serious? I think it is you or your partner (if you are a female) that needs that check up !!!

Lol @ Hard on everyday.

i have a right to educate young minds on this forum.
try and read about n-p-t(nocturnal penile tumescence).
i reiterate, if you don't wake up with a morning wood, it is safe to conclude you are suffering from a sorta erectile dysfunction.
see your doctor before your ailment gets worse. viagra won't help you.

aletheia:
^
From the medical perspective, they don't have to mast[b]ur[/b]bate to produce se[b]m[/b]en. . .alternative modalities exist for those who may object to it.

how? draw it out of his scrotum or what?

shadrach77:
i've heard and i believe that the days of ladies playing ;hard-to-get' is gone in nigeria - a lot of ladies have lamented about how Nigerian men are unwilling to tie the knot and finding a responsible man is becoming more and more difficult. Recently i read a story about a guy who registered with a dating agency and within a short period, he had been introduced to over 8 ladies. Within weeks, he had slept with five of them. I'm amazed too at the ease at which i make friends and collect numbers of 9ja girls on facebook - it's the ladies who even make the move nowadays. The suitors are not coming and the ladies are becoming increasingly desperate and would do anything to hook a man

so guys, what's the reason for this trend? your thoughts 

it has always been like this - it's a phase of life.
at a point in your life, you would be the one doing the chasing. . . .after a while, they would be the ones chasing you.
just eat what you can and don't get trapped in their fishnets.

Joagbaje:
Coogar I just asked a question and I'm waiting for their response. What of those who do sperrm test in hospital . They have to mastubate to bring the semmen out. Is it a sin or a medical or biological thing.

masturbati[i]o[/i]n won't be a problem then to these zealots. some of them are confused.
the thoughts behind every action is the critical thing. . . .not the act itself.

a foetus endangering the life of the mother should be terminated. yes - it's abortion but it's for a just cause.
a man who has been asked to provide his s[i]e[/i]men sample can w@nk. why would it be a sin if he does?
people who also take alcohol for medicinal purposes have not sinned? they do so for a reason.

until christians bend their heads around these things, they would continue to see things in black and white plainly whereas they should acknowledge there's a gray area in every sphere of our lives.

goshen360:
My brother, stop hiding sins under bible verses. I can as well argue abort.ion is not a sin because the word itself didn't appear in the bible just as you are arguing masturba.tion is not in the bible. I can as well argue that abortion is not murder because i am not committing murder as long as the bible didn't say abortion is sinful or because i assume it only says murder. So technically or indirectly, you are saying abortion, though it doesn't occur in the bible also mean murder. Then I  think you should be honest with your sinful nature to also see masturba.tion as related under lots of bible verses that had been given to you. Deal with your sin and stop hiding it. We all have shortcomings in our life and only God can deliver us from such but we must admit and cooprate with God. I hope i make sense to you.

abortion is murder. it's the termination of the life of a foetus.
how isn't that murder?

can you tell me what is remotely close to w@nking that was mentioned in the bible?
it's actually a bigger sin to twist the bible to suit selfish wet dreams than to w@nk.

dare2think:
Simple biology? is it simple enough for you to benefit us with some details?

every man wakes up with a wood every morning - false statement, but then again one can only speak for themselves.


would you rather have him fornicate or r@pe an unsuspecting babe walking across the street? No, Id rather he w@ank his brains out.

now if someone with little threshold decides to act on his Situation and w@nks in the bathroom, has that man sinned? I dont know, and I really dont care. I have not attributed 'sin' to anything in my discussion on this thread.

waking up with a hardon every morning is a false statement? really?
you better go check yourself for impotency if you are not as hard as rock every morning. it means something is chemically wrong with your phallus.

My argument, just to be clear, is that a thought must precede every action, including w@nking. I assume that its the contents of those thoughts that should be scrutinised. And only the w@anker would know what he thinks of. That a person can W@nk without thinking is something I cant understand. But quite rightly, I can only speak of myself, but nobody has been able to say how one can w@nk at 'nothingness'.

thoughts don't have to precede every action. speak for yourself.
yes, i agree the thoughts behind the act is the critical issue not the act itself.
a man that w@nks so his Fluid can be properly tested has sinned? i am sure some of you zealots would argue Fluid test is ungodly and does not glorify God in heaven.

dare2think:
lol, another jab again. Cooger, wetin I do you.

what activates wet dreams that marked a teenager's I dony know, you tell me.

So, you mean one can just start w@nking without a preceding thought or 'catalyst'?

care to explain?

it's simple biology.
every man wakes up with a wood every morning - is that because my mind is perverse or because of my hormones?
now if someone with little threshold decides to act on his boner and w@nks in the bathroom, has that man sinned?

would you rather have him fornicate or r@pe an unsuspecting babe walking across the street?

debosky:
They lost ONE player and had a stronger squad than Arsenal even with the loss of Ronaldo. That is the problem - the inherent weakness of the squad Arsenal has had since the invincibles were disbanded.

should we blame natural hazard for that? tsunami tied wenger's hands behind him and prevented him from buying?

Berbatov had 3 seasons of 20+ hoals in the EPL - which of those Arsenal players had the same pedigree. In case your math is weak, 30.75m is over two times 15m for Arshavin.

that berbatov was bought for £30.75,m does not make him possess 8 limbs he can score with. he's the same as arshavin(2 legs and a football brain).
torres and andy caroll combined cost £85m. demba ba who was brought in for £0 has outscored the two of them put together.

How could Ramsey understudy Cesc with a broken leg? Even if he kept the players you mentioned, the squad with Cesc was still weak.

i agree but he could have sold cesc, buy a talented midfielder and change the way arsenal play.
arsenal's problem stems from playing like they still have cesc/nasri whereas they don't have that level of quality again.

He has done as well as last season at this stage, minus the CC final. That is all that has been achieved - some level of replacement but no improvement.

what about the fa cup loss at old trafford when fergie lined up 8 defenders to beat up a very strong arsenal team.
it was rafael and fabio as wingers on the night and you cannot argue arsenal did not have a better starting team that night.

Because of an inherently weaker squad than its main rivals caused by chronic underinvestment after the invincibles left. To be clear, Arsenal could have won a minor trophy if the club's focus had been to do that, but Arsenal has focused primarily on winning the big prizes and have come up short.

what is a minor trophy? what is the big prizes?
even when arsenal had the invincibles, they never won in europe - not in their history. . . .
which leaves one other title(the league title). na that one you dey call big prizes?

goshen360:
Let those who says masturba.tion is NOT sin simply because it is not specified in word as sin in the bible kindly answer these question below:

Does the word "Abortion" appear in the bible and what makes it a sin?
Does the "sex-trading" or "Prostitut.ion" appear in the bible and what makes it a sin?
Does the word "Indecency" appear in the bible and what makes it sin?

Let them asnwer the above questions and they should be able to prove to us masturba.tion is not a sin because the word, "masturba.tion" doesn't occur or it's not specified in the bible.

Shaking my head and waiting for answers

abortion is the unlawful killing of a child - it's murder(no brainer)
there were whores in the bible. jesus actually saved one(no brainer)
indecency = immorality(no brainer).

how come there's nothing remotely related to masturbati[i]o[/i]n in the bible?

dare2think:
Really, so self-service can come from 'nothingness'!!!
Something must have activated that need to self-service in the first place. Thoughts?

I dont feel its wrong to self-service at the thought of your wife/husband, impossible not to have thoughts to mastubate. C'mon now people, I assume we are all adults here.

Can you just wake up and start self-servicing!! Urge transforms to thoughts. or vice-versa

Ps Jo ,virgins can self-service at the thoughts of the opposite sex. Ask teenagers in puberty! (dont tell me you are that naive)

it doesn't need to be activated by any thought.
what activates wet dreams that marked a teenager's puberty? come on. people are different and people have different thresholds of emotions.
that you need to think of your sexy neighbour to w@nk does not mean everyone is programmed that way.

dare2think:
-sighs-

Let me steal a saying from someone.

If you feel, as a religious person, that you can w@nk in heaven, then by all means please follow your conviction.

The matter is very subjective. Wonder why the bible sometimes dont do specifics, all this commotion would be unnecessary.

Happy wa@nking CE people!!!

stop this obtuse reasoning.
the bible clearly tells us there's no marriage and sex in heaven but we still practise it on earth with smiles on our faces.
leave heavenly things to when we get there.

[quote author=Natasha,, link=topic=874534.msg10243127#msg10243127 date=1329842826]
lol coogar you are making things worse, why didn't you answer mu questions, why do peole self-service? what do they intend to achieve while self-servicing?  
Now a lot of people think cos you do it with your self only its not a sin but it seems you have forgotten it is the Temple of God  God dwells in our Body its not your play thing. So how is it a sin to oneself and not God since our body is His temple please explain   Lastly you were talking about thinking of beyonce and so on read Matthew 5:28 I hope you get what I'm trying to say from it   and don't you dare tell me it talks about adultery  

Rhymz your comparison does not tally you can't compare eating food which is beneficail for growth to  masturb@ting which is a substitute for sex   also read 1 Corinthians 10:31  [/quote]i am not making things worse. . . . .one of the things i have learnt lately is that human beings operating at varying thresholds.
you as a woman might go without sex for 30 years. . . .it doesn't mean the next man who cannot go without it for 3 hours is perverse.

now you asked, why do people w@nk? well - they do it to release some form of tension. . . .
it's much more cleaner as it leaves no one with emotional trauma, no one can get pregnant and there's no likelihood of having any infection. . .

one's body is a temple of God but that is besides the point. . . . my question to you is simple.
if a married man w@nks because his wife is away on travels or the wife is physically disabled to perform a sex act, has that man committed any sin?
throughout his lewd act, his mind was focused on his own wife which means his thoughts are pure. . . .has this man committed any sin?
i need answers.

so you are saying beyonce has sinned because a man from obscurity had wet dreams about her? what the heck are you talking about?
it is the man who has sinned - it does not involve whoever formed his thoughts.
that is my point! a man who had sex himself sinned against himself not his neighbour.

[quote author=Natasha,, link=topic=874534.msg10243053#msg10243053 date=1329842020]  Galatians 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest and they are fornication, uncleanness, loose conduct, idolatry . . . drunken bouts, revelries AND THINGS LIKE THESE As to these things I'm forewarning you, . . .'' so if drinking doesn't concern God why should He talk about it, why does he want us to keep it on check not to get drunk?    [/quote]because drinking itself is no sin but drunkeness involves greed and greediness is a sin.
drinks don't kill people if taken with a considerable measure. but humans always abuse substances.
i am a bit concerned masturbati[i]o[/i]n was not mentioned amongst the immoral stuff listed in this passage from galatians.

Joagbaje:
Exodus 20:16
16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

All these Just because I said the gadget you use to be DOING  IT YOURSELF is a Bad habit.     . Sorry Oo. Continue doing it o.

oga sir, you don't even need to say a word.
people would say all sorts to discredit their neighbours without any shred of evidence or fact. . .and they expect people of their ilk to believe what they say.
she said you're a fake pastor but that opinion was plucked from the stratosphere. because she believes so must mean it's the truth.

talk about delusion of grandeur!

Ibime:
According to that ex-Middlesbrough dude on PressPass, "its the players who back AVB who have been failing Chelsea in recent weeks". "Perhaps its time to hand shirt back to those he's beefing with cos they can do a better job".

ibime the charlatan, who would you sign between mikel obi and alex song as a defensive midfielder and why?