₦airaland Forum

a woman should be submissive to her husband at all times.
being submissive is not idiocy - it's just a way of letting the man know he's the boss and he makes the final say.

for any marriage to be successful, the woman must be submissive.
the moment a woman feels like the boss, the boat rocks and it would be the death of the union.

yes, men demand a woman's submissiveness before marriage.
who would marry a female tout?

Sheenyids:
Guys and ladies, really need sound advice please, Just opened this account for obvious reasons but I ve been an avid follower of the inputs SOME of you make to people in distress and I think it's useful. The situation is this,

I am a single lady, late twenties , had a intimate encounter 2 weeks ago with someone and used protection but now I ve started getting a skin rash which I only get when I am pregnant, how is it possible after using a condom which didn't burst, I am baffled. Similar thing happened years back as a student and let me just say I was practically disowned by my parents for 'bringing disgrace and shame to family' , lost that pregnancy, now I am working but not in a relationship

The koko is that I am not in a relationship now so goes back to me becoming a single mum which will complete the disowning process for me (my family are the type you havent seen, my age is just a number to them) or I find someone to accept me and baby and get married for sake of it, although am not in a relationship, someone has been pestering me to be in one with him and I don't really like him but seems beggars can't choose

(I will ignore insulting comments)

get rid of the pregnancy and move on with your life!

when you let your man to call the shots

texazzpete:
it is also the best case outcome for Boko Haram. That guy was not supposed to have survived the bombing. by killing a key suspect, they have done Boko Haram a great favour by eliminating a potential weak point in the chain.

What a foolish move.

it's a futile attempt sparing the life of a suicide bomber to extract information from him.
a man that wants to die would see any form of torture as a stroll in the park.

if he's spared, the police would come for him and release him to try again.
there must be thousands of boko haram suspects in the police cells - what information have the authorities extracted from them?

an eye for an eye.

afrodoc:
coogar i agree.
i would hv started berba n hernandez in dis match just cos i know norwich would come out to play n there will spaces best xploited by berba's vision n hernandez finishing BUT fergie in his wisdom(which though great isnt infinite) decided to go with welbeck n chicharito.
for watever reasons hernandez didnt hav a great game n we were losing d midfield battle so it made sense to bring giggs inwards take out one striker n play young on d left.u wont get any sane man arguing over who is better finisher chicharito or welbeck,chicharito is probably d best finisher in d EPL but to get to d nxt level he has to improve his game! if he wasnt a united player i wont care butr his game is too limited at d moment

i think the reason giggs was moved centrally was because he was leaving evra exposed.
all of norwich's good attacking play came from evra's side of the pitch. giggs was hardly there to put a shield in front of evra.
ashley young came into it and he was tracking back better and i was so happy for his assist today. . . . that was a peach of a cross.

afrodoc:
bros calm down
strikers r judged PRIMARILY by wt dey do in d box but dts not all there is to it.players like bergkamp,teddy,le tissier didnt work their magic only in d box.weda welbeck is a slowpoke or not i will leave dt to analysts like u but while he n chicharito were on d pitch TOGETHER he had d better game and when fergie decided dt he was going to play a lone man up front it had to b welbeck whose game is more suited to dt n who was having d better game.i am not going into d old argument of who is better welbeck or chicharito,but hernandez had a poor match until he was taken off today.
and concerning fergie,even though i think he is a great manager i know he isnt God so i have a right to ask questions

welbeck has the rooney syndrome. . . .

he overworks himself on things he shouldn't be paying attention to and when the crucial moment comes, he fluffs his chance.
hernandez doesn't do much outside the box but he's the best poacher in england. . . .if he gets 10 chances, he would score 8 or 9.
welbeck is the exact opposite of hernandez.

StarBoard:
coogar,
I agree De Gea has to acclamatise but I think his mental capacity is fragile at best.He hardly seems to recover from any mistakes he makes and is susceptible to criticism. When you think he was supposed to be a direct and even better replacement for van Der Sar, I think he hasn't adjusted quick enough.
But he is good:I have to give him that.

starboard, our defence has been shyte in the absence of vidic. we don't have the aggressive centre-half that really wants to head the ball with commitment.
smalling, evans and rio are all the same. they can only mop up - not in the mould of vida, stam, dunne, etc.

As per Welbeck going to Ukraine,he can forget it.Not with displays that aren't any better than quadriplegic/paraplegics.
That missed header made my landlord faint,I swear.Who still mis-times jumps in this day and age?

welbeck will go to euros. he has scored in too many high profile games to merit his invitation.
and again, who has he got as rivals? caroll? sturridge? heskey? bent? none of them is good enough.
rooney is the only england striker better than welbeck. others are in the same level or lower.

As per England,I can only imagine what farce England would descend into if Harry is given the job, from what I saw at the Emirates today.His coaching was shambolic.You have Modric,Bale,Van Der Vart amongst others yet you succumbed so easily to the slightest bit of Arsenal pressure.Tell me what he'll do with more technically-inferior players. . .

harry left it too open. spurs should have gone for the 4-2-3-1 that has served them well.
but the game against newcastle where they hammered the toons 5-0 with saha and adebayor got them bugging and they tried to do that @ the emirates.
to be fair to them, they counter-attacked very well in the first half but spurs have always had fragile mental strength.

3-0 against man utd, united won 5-3.
2-0 against man utd, united won 5-2
2-0 against arsenal, arsenal won 5-2.

that said, i think the defending in the[b] big games[/b] this season have been shambolic.

StarBoard:
Expect Welbeck to start vs Spurs a week from today.
Senile Fergie will piss away whatever chances we have of retaining the title by constantly fielding the dullard.We have last season's joint-top scorer growing logs from his arse on the bench yet this slowpoke called Welbeck keeps starting games.
And my,I gotta say this.Why didn't DeGea perform like this all season?
I'm not changing my view on him though. . .

de gea's problem is acclimatizing to the physical premier league.
once he gets used to catching the ball in a crowded box, he would be world class. his mistakes have been magnified because of vidic's absence too.
with vidic on the pitch, 90% of the balls pumped into the box would be cleared by vida. . . .

as for welbeck, the missed header was criminal.
i nearly wept! his forehead is three times bigger than the ball and yet he completely missed the header.
the difference between him and hernandez is their composure. hernandez does not flinch when aiming for the net. welbeck either overhits or underhits the ball.

welbeck could have made himself a hero today by scoring a hatrick.

the chances he had weren't half-chances. . . .they were one v one with the goalie/net and he squandered them.
the free header was the worst. how can you miss an empty net from 5 yards? his timing for the header was poor, the execution was pathetic.
no football sense too - he does not know when to shoot, when to chip or when to hold because his intended shot was going to be blocked.

abeg, enough negatives. . . . .he's too immature to be leading our attack.
fergie would continue to play him though. fergie musta bet welbeck would go to the euros in the summer and his continuous appearance for us means he would get on the plane to ukraine. apart from that, he's not better than berbatov or owen or even bebe.

afrodoc:
my point exactly! welbeck had d better game of d 2 before chicharito was taken off.added to dis is d fact dt welbeck is a better bet for d lone striker role,i see y fergie took off hernandez.however welbeck had better improve his finshing n learn how to take such chances or else he will b shown d way out.at d same time chicharito has to learn to improve his own game too i.e ball control,holdup play,passing n dribbling/running wit d ball.

stop analysing football like this.
welbeck did not have a better game than hernandez before the mexican was taken off. . . .it is actually what a striker does when he's given the chance that matters. and it matters a lot. when chicharito was on the pitch, how many chances did we create for him? none - nil.

when chicharito left, welbeck had 3 golden chances to kill the game. he missed them all.
using the wrong execution in each of the chances in the dying minutes. we could have won 5-0 today if the 2nd goal had come quicker to silence the canaries.
welbeck is a liability. i don't care how much link-up play he does.

montelik:
Welbeck missed 2 chances. One badly missed free header and a deft goal bound chip cleared. But besides one tame shot in d 1st half what did Chica do for over an hour.

the game opened up when chicharito was removed and there's no way chicharito wouldn't have scored the chances welbeck missed.
chicharito would have buried that header, he wouldn't have attempted to chip ruddy for the one the defender cleared off the line and chicharito would have certainly buried the one v one with the goalkeeper.

let's face it - welbeck is not clinical.

mukina has found her tongue. . . .

it's your time to gloat.
fill your boots, gooners!

danny welbeck is a liability.
but for the undying spirit, he would have made us piss off 2 points today again.
how many chances does he need to put them away? and to think fergie removed hernandez and kept welbeck on the pitch was atrocious.

debosky:
At this time when squad members are dropping like flies it looks phoolish to loan anyone who is fit. If he loaned out Diaby or Almunia I wouldn't mind. If he was thinking about loaning out Arshavin, he should've brought someone else in in January.

Anyways, poor Arshavin won't be blamed for any rooster ups if things get worse for us this season. As far as he's concerned, his last act this season was to provide the assist that took us into 4th place.

As for a massive shake up, we had a pretty massive one in the summer - without the requisite inward flow of quality. Same as this Arshavin loan - no one came in to replace him. I'll believe it when I see it.

your prediction tomorrow?
who would stand tallest? van persie? adebayor or saha?

diggz:
Kai! See madt man o! Dem suppose put U Mugu Coogar for Uselu walahi. Funny enuff,u remind me of a wrestler called ruddy piper. Bros are U in anyway related to him?

afrodoc:
coogar don kolo 
now he is telling us that Muhammad Ali didnt win a gold medal in d olympics cos he was called cassius clay then,try saying that when u r on d hot seat on Who Wants To Be A Millionaire 

2 phaggots waving their phalli at each other. . . . .

debosky:
You still don't get it do you? This fanshare has clouded your reasoning completely. It has nothing to do with share ownership - the performances on the pitch and the poor quality squad we have is testament to the problem we are suffering from.

arshavin on loan back to zenit st petersburg for the rest of the season.
at this rate, walcott would go back to southampton and aaron ramsey would be shipped back to cardiff city.
i smell a massive shake-up @ the emirates.

crossman9:
coogar
ok Mr this man is playing a bigger joke on the people what he teaches this is a little crud yes and he is no pastor he is making money out of the Gospel this is a business and not a place of salvation, I am sorry your offend but there all valid points and more he is just married on paper it is like the Truman show in a spiritual format

I was part of their band of goons for a time it’s all about money not Jesus that is why I told people this is no joking matter mast.ru.b.at.ion is against Gods word

no wonder. . .
dissatisfied employee that seeks vengeance by all means.
i would be ashamed if i were you.

pendo89:
jeez!! you expect me to fight another woman in public?? dd u see that ugly pic on that other thread?  . What about the mere thought that smbody could be taking video to upload on youtube for the world to see ur thongs,bras and  !! 
what about leaving the scene or hiding behind the guy and letting him take the blows on my behalf?

i refuse to be a human shield for any woman.  

I believe,that is the time for him to prove his manhood!! lets see who is spineless since its not supposed to be my fight but his!!

prove my manhood by attacking another woman?
pendo, you make me laugh.

Have you noticed that whenevr girls fight nobody emerges winner?? they only scratch and mess up each other's make up,wigs and clothes.
So what is the use if there is no crown?

defending yourself against a lunatic makes you a winner.
it assures me you can handle yourself when i am away from home.

honsule:
i have 2 different 7.1.0 os but still stucked @ re-connecting to JVM

i have had this same problem before and i was stuck @ this same junction.
all i remembered doing was uninstalling my desktop manager, reinstalled a new one and i did it all over again with a better internet connection speed.
it went past jvm and i scaled through.

honsule:
the only os that manage to display the hourglass is this:7.0.0.296 But still stucked @ re-connecting to JVM

step it up to 7.1.0.XXXX

[quote author=dan_dollar link=topic=877363.msg10267848#msg10267848 date=1330116161]please,what new features does this Os 7.1 give the bb 9810? Haven't upgraded yet.want to be sure I'm not falling into a ditch.[/quote]the battery life is unbelievable. . . . .
it has a mobile hotspot and some other stuff yet to be discovered!

debosky:
Let the hostilities resume!

Why isn't there any analysis on this thread yet?

managers have lost ideas. . . .

pendo89:
see that? why oh oh why should a woman defend herself physically while the man watches? If shes slapped guess what? her demins wake up but I would love to see the guy's reaction. If he doesn't blink that is it. I step in peace and for good.
A man must defend his helpless woman,but if she decides to do it herself then let her not expect the man to intervene cz shes already embarrassed herself and caused a scene. Maybe that's why men take off!!

Passerbys should not be treated to fights. Getting slapped by a strange woman in the presence of you guy and failure by him to react spells doom.

the other chic is his woman too? why would he take sides?
so you would just let a guttersnipe put blows on your face without fighting back?
how spineless can you be?

pendo89:
I thought about this while reading the other thread where 2 women are fighting over some guy.At first I thought the guy was but on second thoughts I said nope, why should you degrade yourself fighting another woman over him?? isnt he a loser who doesn't love and respect you?

Whom would you label the failure or disgrace here? man or fighting women?

Chima!! no fights!you'v been warned in advance! 

none of them is a failure.
to put the issue down to fighting over some guy is too simplistic - most times, the women involved are just looking out for themselves.

look at this scenario. . . .
you are on a date with this guy that never told you he's got another woman. the other woman showed up and delivered 4 hot slaps on your face . . .
you then decide to defend yourself and challenge the other woman.

a passerby sees 2 women scrapping it out and his conclusion is. . . .they are fighting over a man.
is that the conclusion? are you fighting over a man or you are just defending yourself from a lunatic?
answers on a postcard, please!

my best moment in the game. . . .
berbatov's curly pass to hernandez.

https://i.minus.com/ibsBSG4ryMLf6b.gif

[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=859170.msg10267125#msg10267125 date=1330109327]
huh?

you mean coogar is the guy in the romance section photos who is currently jetting off to germany with his "significant other"?
wonders will never cease!![/quote]you wish!

crossman9:
did you like the comady i put there or is it dull and boring

it's disgraceful.
attacking a pastor the way you have been doing says something about the background you crawled out from.
your attempt to be funny is pitiful.

montelik:
^^ Isn't that how Baba went gun-ho attacking against City after going down to 10 men and trailing 3-0, till we ended up enduring humiliation at home in d Manchester derby. Some times it backfires spectacularly, but it works most times in euphoric fashion.

i would have beaten city if i was the manager on the day. . . .

it was obvious welbeck was having brain-farts on the day. fergie should have removed welbeck for phil jones.
one of nani/young for valencia and set up the formation as 4-2-3

smalling - rio - jones - evra
------anderson---fletcher-----
valencia----rooney----nani/young.

when defending, it becomes 4-4-1, when attacking, it's 4-2-3.
in the 80th minute, remove evra for hernandez and go 3-4-2 if we are still chasing.

fergie in his wisdom simply moved fletcher to right back and left the midfield too open.
city could have sailed the titanic in our midfield without any challenge and left us playing 4-1-4.

fletcher---rio---smalling---evra
--------------anderson-------------
nani----rooney---welbeck--young

dayokanu:
I dont know o.

One time some years back I was moving into an apartment and she came. I made a mistake to offer to drive her there.

She went to IKEA and spent good 4-5 hours there!!!!.  

You know those Ikea where they already set up the rooms living room, bedroom  etc She was going through everyone. After 4hrs we almost got into a fight when the sales girl told us that maybe we should check another setup and I yelled NO. She was like isnt she doing it for me, Isnt it my aparment bla bla, I was like If its left to me I would buy one 3seater sofa on craiglist, one TV stand and shikena.

After IKEA she now said Home depot or Walmart I just told her to let me go home and she can take the car keys and do the rest

4-5 hrs @ ikea?
i would have dropped dead! ikea is the most boring place ever.

women just love prancing about. i am yet to meet a time-conscious woman.
they don't even care that people that met them in the store are leaving n driving away. . .whilst they are still deciding what and what not to buy.

[quote author=soft-touch link=topic=877363.msg10265854#msg10265854 date=1330098308]@Coogar:
The hurrible battery life of 9900/9930 was solved by Leaked OS 7.1.0.267 update, you need to give a try.

My battery drain per hour is stable at 3.2%/hrs unlike 9.7%/hrs on stock OS 7.0[/quote]i am on 7.1.0.258(on bb 9810).

[quote author=c.fours link=topic=859170.msg10261621#msg10261621 date=1330054350]even our own mr. coogar named himself after his benefactor.
you can learn one or two things from him.[/quote]are you jealous of my glamour life?

chamotex:
I wont be surprised.
In recent years, Fergie has played Giggs at Left Back, Evra at Right Back, Rooney as Defensive Midfielder, Rafael as CM
Wait! Na so craze dey start o
Next it will be Mike Phelan as Attacking Midfielder

it's a price we have to pay for having such a successful manager.
after 12 league titles, 4 european cups, etc - who can question fergie's wisdom.
if a manager can win the league title on the back of a miserable 5 away victories then fergie is immune to criticism.

this is how he would wobble n fumble to another league title having played phelan as a winger and sir bobby charlton as a striker.

armyofone:
lol, online shopping for food eh. Welcome to Peapod.
do you use Peapod?

sainsburys
waitrose
tesco