Coogar's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Coogar's Profile › Coogar's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 (of 1148 pages)
mikel is a better defensive midfielder than alex song. everyone knows that. . . what people would put into it is mikel obi does not score like alex song. . . . by the same token, vincent enyeama is better than iker casillas. enyeama has scored more goals as well. i'd ask someone on the chelsea thread what he thinks. he's anti-mikel so it would be interesting to see what he feels. be right back. . . . |
diluminati:i'll put it to you that he's not. if you have any evidence against him that he's phoney please bring it out. . . . . joagbaje is as real as they come. if there's one man of God who persistently matches his words of wisdom with actions on this forum, i would mention his name again and again and again. [quote author=Natasha,, link=topic=874534.msg10242866#msg10242866 date=1329840665]LOL Coogar abeg leave me oh, LOL @ canine STYLE, like I said before sex and everything pataining to it should be left for married peeps if they choose to explore canine style in other to make the game of sex more interesting its their own toro, bottom line is they are married. please Coogar why do people self-service? can you tell me the reason behind it? what triggers self-service ? and while masturb@ting what do they want to achieve at the end of it? a bowl of rice? two cubes of sugar? please tell me [/quote]so you are saying w@nking is legal for married folks but illegal for unmarried folks? there's a reason it's not listed as a sin in the bible.it's because the ish would be too vague to be enforced. you cannot say pleasuring one's self is a sin against God. fornication/adultery involves someone else - masturbati[i]o[/i]n does not. the fact that someone thinks of beyonce whilst w@nking does not mean beyonce has had sex with the fellow. beyonce doesn't even know the fellow exists so it's a sin against one's self - not a sin against God as it was explained correctly by pastor chris. yeah what a feeling of fraustration that you can't get the real thingdon't get it twisted. . . .some people enjoy w@nking more than sex. |
debosky:that was the same berbatov whose butt-prints left indents on old trafford bench. how many games did the replacement start in 09/10? even when rooney got injured later that season in munich, berbatov wasn't trusted to lead the line and rooney was rushed back. in fact, it was michael owen that replaced tevez not berbatov. ![]() Keeping him a season longer while Nani was his understudy AND buying Valencia. In essence, two players attempted to replace his output, in addition to Rooney stepping up from helping Ronaldo to shining for himself.but no one has tied wenger's hands not to buy players. the emirates is a 60,000 capacity stadium charging the highest matchday tickets in europe. arsenal make £100m at the gates alone and that excludes food/drink. arsenal also sold big players. why did wenger fail to replace quality with quality? is there an evil spirit that prevents arsenal from spending? That he was a Wigan player does not mean he wasn't a good player.you cannot replace nasri with walcott but you can pay quacks over the average at the emirates. i heard djourou got another 3-year contract after the show of shame he keeps showing. what sorta manager is wenger? can a man be so intransigent and insensitive to the yearnings of his own fans? would you give djourou another contract after what he has shown so far at the emirates? In any case, Nasri and Cesc while present only got Arsenal to 4th and the same level in the CL. It is not surprising that the new side is struggling to maintain that level.you are a proper wenger apologist! what about spending the money made on nasri/cesc judiciously and getting able replacements to push for the title. chelsea and liverpool have been w@nk this season. this is the season arsenal could have really challenged for the title as some of their adversaries were far below average. yet again, wenger missed the opportunity. |
diluminati:stop misinforming the public. joagbaje is a good pastor who matches his words of mouth with his actions. you should emulate him instead of ptyalizing heresies. |
[quote author=Natasha,, link=topic=874534.msg10242660#msg10242660 date=1329839236][b]lol you're right I shouldn't waste my time to reply rhymz there heart is made up and thanks to pastor chris they have all the whole reason in the world to masturb@te. and you are right, they should give a reason why masturb@tion is not a sin Rhymz you haven't answered me, does self-service give glory to God? what does one think about when one masurb@tes? a professor teaching? ![]() what triggers self-service 99% of the time? angels singing? rhymz its not the same for a man that feels bad after sleeping with his wife, only God knows why he should feel bad anyways, he is married innit? how many times have you seen men complaining they feel bad after sleeping with their wives? except of course she is not good in bed, but you see so many people having low self esteems feeling guilt and much more when they mastub@te and threads like ''how do i stop mastuirbatiing'' floods nairaland, if it was a nice thing why should more than half of the people who engage in it want to stop? how many times have you seen, or heard people say ''i want to stop sleeping with my wife, i feel bad after sleeping with her'' really oh please [/b][/quote]natasha, you are my bestest friend on the planet but stop this line of debate? you ask if w@nking glorifies God. . . .does d[i]o[/i]ggystyle glorify God too? i mean do you not think if masturbati[i]o[/i]n was a sin, the bible would have mentioned it as a sin? if the bible could prohibit Inbreeding, bestiality, homoerotica and all other forms of intimate deviance, why did it not mention masturbati[i]o[/i]n as a wrong doing? so a christian whose wife is away on a travel and then imagines poking his wife while pleasuring himself has sinned? what is the sin? it's his wife. if the wife was around, he wouldn't need to pleasure himself - he would have carried out the act 100%. so what makes sex legal with his wife and pleasuring his own body illegal? those are the core questions you should ask yourself. masturbati[i]o[/i]n is not a sin. if it is, it would have been mentioned cos i am sure people would be doing it way back. the same bible reminds us there's nothing new under the sun. self-service as a practise didn't just spring up in the 21st century. adam and eve must have done it before knowing where and how to carry out the sex act. if it was lawful then, it is lawful even now. |
debosky:tevez and ronaldo left in the same window. . . .just before the 09/10 season. what have you been drinking? Second question - how reliant was Utd on the aforementioned players? Not as reliant as Arsenal were on Cesc and Nasri in one season. Utd could confidently win games if either was absent.ronaldo and tevez? the holy trinity components. i can actually tell you tevez/ronaldo contributed more goals @ united than nasri/cesc ever did for arsenal. Did Utd’s starting line up have only 2 world class players and lose one of them? No.united lost the best player in the world in 08/09. you cannot even dispute ronaldo's importance. many people including yourself felt that was the end of man utd as far as challenging for titles in england was concerned. you celebrated ronaldo's loss than van persie's recovery from his injury that season. Third question - did Utd have ample preparation for their departure? Yes - Nani, Valencia for Ronaldo for example. Berbatov cost £30m and was bought before Tevez left. Tevez’ goal haul has more than been replaced by Berbatov, not to mention Hernandez.nani was still fluffing his lines when ronaldo left. fergie had to tweak the team. he bought valencia and programmed his head to always look for rooney and that's the tactical problem wenger is having. he still sets up arsenal like nasri and fabregas are still there, whereas the replacements are not good enough. wenger should tweak that team and make the others work only for van persie(who's the only world class player left in the team). That Utd won titles is not in dispute - the fact is that Utd had a better squad to start with and always replaced their stars, even if not directly thereby keeping their overall squad quality level high.so valencia was a suitable replacement for ronaldo or fergie should be praised for taking the dive? had valencia not worked out, wouldn't we be here stabbing fergie with a spear about his stupidity? who replaces a winger of £80m with £14m? Valencia did not replace Ronaldo’s output solely - Nani was already at the club understudying Ronaldo and obviously stepped up when he left. He wasn’t cheap either at £17m. Utd’s formation during Ronaldo’s time was optimised to get the best out of him. Once he left, the squad became more balanced and optimised to get excellent output from Rooney.nani wasn't spectacular after ronaldo left. as a matter of fact, when fergie got valencia, united fans feared nani's days were over. cos the general perception was giggs/js park would take the left side of the pitch and valencia would take the right flank. nani looked suddenly lost until he had that meeting with fergie in december 09 and everything changed. |
ANGRY ARSENAL FANS DEMAND ANSWERS ON NO-SPEND. The Arsenal Supporters’ Trust are demanding to know why Wenger did not dip into a £50m transfer kitty as they are facing a seventh season without a trophy. |
ritchboy:thunder roast your testicles. ![]() |
wamahbaby:f@cking hell, buzugee's stalkers are here again. |
debosky:and they brought in santos, park, chamberlain, gervinho, arteta, benyaoun, metresacker, eisfeld, joel campbell and they promoted coquelin. what a way to spend £53 million. |
buzugee:there's no difference between you and a terrorist! |
buzugee:the law you are quoting have been superseded by the new testament laws. as long as a woman dresses appropriately, it does not matter whether she wears trousers or agbada. |
buzugee:don't make me laugh! |
stepo707:ohh shut up and get the hell out of here you self-righteous zealot! if there's one country who still possesses the biblical pharisees/sadducees, that country is nigeria with their self righteous and conceited laws. some churches won't allow the females to let out their hair or wear trousers - and they think it's justified. the pastors of the churches bring out ridiculous rules/regulations that are non-existent elsewhere and they think it's right. . . . |
debosky:arteta, santos, metresacker were all horrible buys. . . . Utd made £50m worth of signings as well, without losing the calibre of players that Arsenal lost (in terms of importance to the team).says who? in terms of quality, brown, van der sar, oshea, etc are not bad at all. they are all proven winners. after all, we saw how o'shea sodomized van persie @ the stadium of light on saturday. Considering that Utd won the title and reached the UCL finals last year and STILL went ahead to spend that amount, it shows you that in reality, the £53m spent by Wenger is a paltry sum considering the yawning gaps in the squad even prior to the loss of Cesc, Nasri, Clichy and Wilshere, not mentioning Comrade Eboue the fufu king.united spent that amount because 8 players in the senior squad were moved out. oshea, brown, neville, scholes, van der sar, gibson, obertan and diouf! |
mysmoothie:sincerely ask yourself this. . . .will there be sex in heaven? can you pray when you're sh@gging? why do you sh@g? why do people engage in sex? |
debosky:what don't you agree with, young blood? |
ritchboy:your comment puts the i in idiotic. . . . . most people agree united lost the ucl because their central midfield was gangbanged? which football team hasn't lost to guardiola's barca? teams like spurs, real madrid, arsenal, etc all lost to barcelona. united were just unfortunate to be in the same competition as one of the best teams in the history of football. nothing to do with united's central midfield that won the english league and reached the european final having mopped the floor with chelsea(which you perceive have a better central midfield). we all saw how arsenal was mentally detached by the same barcelona team. why didn't your superior midfield beat barcelona over 2 legs? why didn't madrid's supersonic midfield damage barca over 2 legs? united lost and it's because they have a weak midfield.you are so inscrutable, you make the bawling of a newborn sound like mozart's 5th symphony! Secondly, i don't understand what last season's achievements have to do with United strengthening their squad for THIS season. In case you missed the memo, United were already out of three competitions by January after being knocked out of the FA Cup by Liverpool, losing to lowly Crystal Palace in the League Cup, and failing to qualify from a relatively weak UCL group and are currently playing Thursday night football.all that is down to the obscene amount of injured players @ man utd. if we cut it down to the football, united have played, they have been loads better than last season when they could only win 5 games away from home. united had their best start under fergie this season then injury to key players undid them. that they are even 2 points off the top is a testament to the strength of their squad. the points accrued so far also agree with me. a cursory glance at the injury room website should tell you had united been lucky to have man city's clean bill of health, they would be at least 10 points clear on the table as we speak. Facts easily forgettable considering Arsenal/Chelsea are hogging the crisis headlines. You cannot possibly tell me Cabaye isn't an improvement over Anderson/Giggs etc.improvement on giggs that single-handedly obliterated the chelsea midfield last season that took united to their league title or the european final? if it ain't broke, don't fix it. i am very happy with anderson/giggs @ man utd. cabaye is not even 5 levels close to the perennial winners in the man utd team. it is arsenal that cannot win a pin for 7 seasons consecutively. they need an immediate revamp after 7 years of gnashing of teeth. i look at the arsenal midfield and it's softer than the core of trebor. who do we have there? ramsey? song? arteta? an ordinary apprentice called tom cleverley took them to the cleaners in the 8-2 debacle and arsenal's season hasn't been the same since then. More of the same. . . OK, they're "doing fine", couldn't they have done "finer" with a better squad?how finer can they do? you have tottenham who didn't even make the top four last season in the top three and you are telling me they have not improved? even a blind bartimeaus knows tottenham have stepped it up. giovanni and bentley are squad players. they have bale, lennon, van der vaart and even modric who can play on the flank. they have adebayor on loan and saha who are causing mayhem in the attack. they don't have the kind of money arsenal command from the gates but they have done better than arsenal under harry redknapp. tottenham keep progressing, arsenal keep regressing. your show of shame would be obvious when they put wenger out of his misery on sunday. Selective amnesia. I doubt there's any team that improves/regresses "every" season unless you're only seeing what you want to see. Spurs finished fourth two seasons ago and fifth last season, that's improvement according to Coogar. Save your premature ejaculations for the end of the season when we'll actually know where they ended up.look at this troglodyte. so arsenal have not regressed since 2005? a team that used to compete with man utd for the titles and suddenly stopped winning hasn't regressed? yes, spurs finished 4th 2 seasons ago but that was down to man city's fortunes. . . .with the kind of money city spent last season, spurs had to be the scape goat dropping out. . . . .but now they are back in it and arsenal(once a great club that every one admired) are now struggling to get into the top four. you have to be a blind bat not to think arsenal have regressed so badly. it's gotten so bad wenger thinks staying in the top four is winning a trophy. by wenger's idiotic logic, arsenal have won a trophy in the last 7 seasons. how deluded can this man get? i heard some supporters held a meeting last night to discuss wenger. his bubble has burst, i really hope tottenham paste him on sunday so we can get rid of this useless recidivist once and for all. ![]() |
armyofone:armyoften, where is the pic you promised? |
freecocoa:please speak for yourself. don't lump me into your group of serial w@nkers. |
ritchboy:yes it is that easy when there's £53m to spend. Nuccahs are asking why Wenger didn't sign Tom, Nick and Kim or sell Bert, Ernie and Barney. Ninjas obviously don't understand the dynamics of the transfer market to be making such daft statements. . . This ain't a movie dog!arsene wenger is a knuckle-head. nothing compares to his stupidity, intransigence and lunacy. OK, why didn't Fergie sign Cabaye last summer? After all many United fans will tell you they have the worst central midfield in the top six.that worst central midfield won the league and played in the final of the champions league. many managers would kill for that same central midfield. had wenger's troops achieved the same results last season, would we be here discussing your gaffer's lunatic tendencies? ritchboy, do you reason with the corn on your toes? Why didn't Spurs sell Bentley, Giovanni etc and replace them with Ben Arfa or Siphiwe Tshabalala?spurs are doing just fine too. they have the best central midfield in the league. parker + sandro + modric = quality. there's a marked improvement of the spurs of this season and that of last season. they keep improving every season unlike arsenal who keep regressing. stop mixing apples and oranges. |
dare2think:unfortunately, that is the issue with men. . . . .that an act itself is not sinful does not mean humans will not abuse it. food is a gift from God but people still abuse food and get obese and become a general nuisance to the public. alcohol is not a sin but people drink to the point of misbehaving and it gives alcohol a bad name. that is the same issue with having sex with one's self. . . . .a man who w@nks at the thoughts of a sister-in-law has done the act with impure thoughts. the act is not the sin, his thoughts are the sin. a man who drinks to stupor has abused himself with the drink. the drink is not the sin, his greed is. |
slimshay:you are hopelessly deluded if you think shawcross is not better than metresacker who is a bumbling oaf! then you have the ever reliable robert huth who gives you 100% commitment and is ready to die for the shirt with peanuts as wages. i have seen teams in this very league on shoe-string budgets and they still deliver good performance week in week out. i would have done better with £53m than what arsene wenger assembled in the summer. was money the factor when arsenal were bundled out of the cup final against obafemi martins' birmingham fc. what was birmingham's total worth compared to arsenal on the night? how come arsenal still failed to win that game within 90 mins? |
dare2think:but how is that enforceable? i think that would be too vague to enforce. we cannot prohibit w@nking based on impure thoughts. it would be equivalent to prohibiting all forms of advertisement as it can provoke impure thoughts of material greed. there's a reason masturbati[i]o[/i]n was never mentioned in the bible. it's because it's perfectly legal. if masturbat[i]i[/i]ng would prevent a man from going out there to r@pe, fornicate or commit adultery then by all means, let him jerk off. |
dare2think:how is this relevant to the topic of discussion. are you saying a man who masturbat[b]e[/b]s with the fantasies of his own legally married wife has committed a sin? how is imagining marital sex with one's wife while the wife is away from home a sin? if the bible does not prohibit it, why do people think it's immoral? incest is prohibited in the bible, homoerotica is prohibited, bestiality is prohibited - so why wasn't masturbati[i]o[/i]n prohibited? |
goshen360:so what has this gotta do with your body being the temple of the holy spirit? so if a woman w@nks with the fantasies of her husband while the husband is away from home for months then the woman has committed a sin? the bible did not mention masturbati[i]o[/i]n as a sin in any of the books so who are you to say it's a sin? |
ritchboy:epl is not shyte. . . . .wenger was winning league titles before now. he won 2 titles in 3 seasons at a point in his career and now he's struggling to stay in the top four. of course, arsenal have regressed as a club if staying in the top four is now the priority instead of going out there to win titles. ritchboy:he spent £53m and made £70m in sales. i believe he could still have made astute signings with that £53m instead of the quacks he bought in the last minute of the transfer window. debosky:who is alex song compared to cheik tiote? are you a troglodyte? you are comparing their level at newcastle to a team like arsenal where the general performance is high and thus everyone in the team gets carried forward. the question should be how would gervinho, arteta and song perform in newcastle with less technical players in the squad? the answer i am sure is not what you would want to answer. alex song is shyte. . . . .i was arguing on a thread the other day about alex song vs mikel obi. it is fair to say mikel is 50 times better than him. he's more brawns than brains. his statistics is disgusting in the things he should be doing as a defensive midfielder. that per metresacker and koscielny get exposed week in week out is because alex song as a screen is useless. Is Friedel better than Sczezney or just benefiting from a settled defence playing in front of him game after game?friedel is 1000 times better than szczesny unless you are a billy goat. Of that lot the only ones that merit discussion are Demba Ba and maybe Parker. The others are shyte.demba ba was a free transfer, he's better than chamakh, park and bendtner all put together. if arsenal have ba as a weapon on the bench. . . .most of the games you have drawn or lost would have been salvaged. parker was acquired for peanuts and he's better than anyone in the arsenal midfield as we speak. arsenal have no full-back of good quality. gibbs, santos, sagna have all become also rans. ryan taylor was another free transfer for newcastle - i am sure he would have done a better job than metresacker. . . . .you must be an irredeemable tool if you think shawcross and robert huth are not better than any arsenal defender as we speak. they are no sicknotes too. . . . .they play in almost every game. |
goshen360:the act itself is not a sin against God. it could be a sin against your own body. God has nothing to do with it. pastor chris is very correct based on that. it only becomes a sin against God if you allow it to dominate you and stop you from worshipping God. the act itself is what you do with yourself. you don't have to involve anyone with it. |
ritchboy:stoke fc have not relegated - why should arsenal relegate? arsenal don't play more beautiful football than swansea fc whose budget is thinner than a shoe-string and yet swansea ain't in relegation. this issue of money has been overplayed - it's starting to disgust me. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 (of 1148 pages)
like I said before sex and everything pataining to it should be left for married peeps if they choose to explore canine style in other to make the game of sex more interesting its their own toro, bottom line is they are married.


