₦airaland Forum

sagieramos:
No wonder! You've been using the lowest type of IPS screen (720p) on your infinix, not the FHD (1080p) on the Redmi phones, that's why you give AMOLED so much consideration.

My Redmi Note 8 is my first phone that doesn't come with AMOLED, from Galaxy S4 to S7 personally owned, although I've handle the Galaxy S8 to S10, but not personally owned. I guess some of the mentioned phone above would have better AMOLED display than Samsung mid-range phone considering the fact they are flagship

See! The beauty of AMOLED doesn't freak me anymore. I'm used to it. Performance and multi-tasking is my utmost priority over screen beauty, provided that the price is right. Every specs (except the screen type) in the A51, the RN9s have better, e.g the Corning gorilla glass, yet the RN9s is almost 30k cheaper

If you dont mind me, and please be sincere the perfomance you talk about which app do you use that can not perform decently on the a51, I'll like to know so I can download it and give it a shot on my sister's phone and compare it with my s10 and see the outrageous difference in performance.

RealEzee:
bud my question no hard na, a C300 or azeera?
Engine vs beauty?

Oga beauty , over engine, I dey do drag race abi I one drive go Morocco

RealEzee:
a benz C300 or a Hyundai azeera, which will you go for?

If you read carefully you'd see that I initially suggested the m31 because of it's better battery and basically its newer , but on the other hand after checking the m31 closer I realized the a51 is a lot prettier , I only said the only reason I could opt for the redmi is because of its price.

But anyways why I even they explain self

supaflex:
20k instagram followers for sale at 15k...
whatsapp me on 08034364686 for details..
it wil be deliverd to you in less than 3 hours.

I'm in if you're willing to use an escrow

Habiodunz:
You are an average phone user
Na why you dey talk like dz

Real phone users look for specs be4 buying a phone but okay

Hahahahha baba average , there's no real phone users you are either tech savvy or you are into intensive apps and those requires PC, tell me what real phones users do with their phones that average users can't do with their average phones , excluding crappy devices like the tecnos and itels or do you think there's any application that a snapdragon 765g can't handle effortlessly .

Say you wanna play games with your phone , and if you're even a real gamer you'd place more importance in a gaming rig or PC over any phone, dont bullshit yourself into the delusion that you're a real phone user , I'll rather make money by browsing and selling items on an average phone than spend my time on apps and games that can't give me money pursuing the notion that I want to maximize the use of my phone or use everything my phone has to offer , but what do I know I'm ab average phone user

Real phone users prioritize what the want in a device, I want something sleek , that can perform effortlessly without lag , and can give me the customization I seek and when go still make chicks look me like real G or soft boy , that's all I want in a phone .

Habiodunz:
You are slow asf


The 3rd best performing android phone on the world is Xiaomi K30 Pro - Flagship only bested by Oppo

An 100k Xiaomi midrange outperforms and 100k Samsung Midrange In both performance and durability

An 100k Xiaomi midrange comes with a CGG5 while Samsung Uses CGG3

Oponu oshi

You are talking to someone that ported from a Samsung to a Xiaomi phone
Not a Tecno user

I'm sure you don't even have any
You are still stuck with transsion

Bro make them get the fastest processors , highest antutu rating 95 % of persons who would go out to buy phones wouldn't even care about such things me when even know about such things, I'll always pick a phone is sleek and has parts readily available that can perform the desired task I want them to over anything with incredible specs , I one hack NASA abi interpol when i go buy 16gig ram phone or phone with 144hertz refresh rate abi touch latency, all those ones na bs , iphone with 60frames refresh rate abi wetin them they call am still sells like crazy, abeg make we leave specs for Indians and those poor wannabes, if you have good money buy a decent samsung or apple device , you can ade one plus , Huawei and Xiaomi to the mix , but emphasis should be on the first four

Kingproy:
Life is not hard, you don't just know how to manage.

Oga with what I'm seeing someone's life is hard

RealEzee:
Personally I'll go for the note 9s,I'm particular about performance cos that will prove how the phone will respond to task from mid to heavy usage, also gives room for upgrade on existing features thru future updates from the company or personal tweaks, that SD 720g will blow the chipset on m31 and A51 away.

Can't compare a corolla on v4 engine to a benz on a v8 engine,even if you put 8 tyres on it, engine performance will always tell who's better on the long.

Screen display is where the Samsung takes it, for me it's not a deal breaker at all, will pick a benz over a Hyundai .

When doing personal tweaks I go fit upgrade the features on the note 9s but will be limited on the A51 n m31 cos of its chipset(engine).

The trade offs or corners cut on the note 9s is ok by me, they are not some specular feature I will be missing e.g amoled panel.

The note 9s ticks the box for me.

I'm happy for you I wanna say one more thing . The sole reason I could take the redmi note is the price difference , i think it's about 20 - 30k cheaper, but on the other hand it boils down to what he intends using his phone to do .

I dont know about others but I really like a beautiful screen , paired with that dark theme on an amoled , hmmmm then when the body of the phone is sleek , I swear ehn it's kinda gratifying , I did a mini survey and I showed my kid sister the m31 and she was like she's never gonna take that phone over her a51 , so you see aesthetics still count .

My sister just said the m31 be like techno

I need to clarify something ,

It's not everybody who primarily concerns their self about device performance . For instance in my house , I'm the sole person who has a game in his device and the only game I have on my phone is dream league soccer and gangstar new Orleans.

My brother uses an x my sister the a51 and they dont have games on their device including my parents .

Now other than the better processor or bigger battery I dont think there's any way the redmi note 9 is better than the a51.

Please don't go into that argument of screen , I dont think i can use a phone with LCD or ips display ever again , as much as I love the 11 and xr I can't use those phones because of their screens .

The thing is y'all always rate Xiaomi devices over other devices simply because of their value for money concept or ideology.

Forgetting they surely must cut corners in one or two places . I don't want to be drawn into the argument between which is a better device . But if you were given an option to wait for a month and half to use your device after a broken screen or to get it the very next day for a higher amount which would you go for .

This brings to mind an argument of a google pixel 4a over a Samsung s10 lite . And someone was all about the pixel having better camera as a factor why it's a better device .

I downgraded the os of my s10 plus so I could unlock it for a cheaper amount and it was only today I realized my sister's a51 takes better pictures than mine . Because I practically dont use the camera app on my phone . Its tucked in a folder I call essentials , to declutter my apps screen .

There's more to a phone than a faster processor and a bigger battery .

sagieramos:
M31 is slightly over A51 especially in the camera and battery department. Both M31 and A51 run on Exynos 9611 (10nm) processor.

Nevertheless, the Snapdragon 720g (8nm) on the Redmi note9s is ahead here as it is built on an 8nm process, as compared to the 10nm manufacturing process of the Exynos 9611. This makes the Snapdragon 720G way more efficient than the Exynos 9611. Even in the CPU department, the Snapdragon 720G pulls ahead with two Cortex-A76 performance cores clocked @ 2.3 GHz and six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores clocked @ 1.8 GHz. The Exynos 9611, on the other hand, uses the age-old four Cortex-A73 performance cores clocked @ 2.3 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked @ 1.7 GHz. In simpler terms, the Exynos 9611 CPU architecture is generations behind the 720G in RN9s.

As expected from an older processor, the 9611 just can’t come close to the number TOPs the Snapdragon 720G can perform. So hands down RN9s with the Snapdragon 720G and GPU is a much better device than Samsung’s Exynos 9611 powered M31 and A51

The RN9s is only inferior in screen type (IPS) to the AMOLED in Galaxy M31 and A51, however some people would still not choose AMOLED due to its very high cost when due for replacement. Apart from this, RN9s will swallow Galaxy M31 and A51 in every aspect, only in camera department Galaxy A51 is in tier with the RN9s, although, M31 is superior to both RN9s and M31 in camera department, but the differences is negligible, as Gcam can be use to enhance the shot quality in RN9s. Just so you know, Gcam doesn't work on Galaxy phones with esynos processor.

The last but not the least, RN9s will run any games throw at it without heating up, but Galaxy M31 and A51 can only struggle in some games RNs9 will run smoothly

Do you use the redmi note 9s that you're recommending.

amordi:
Please help me choose between Samsung Galaxy A51 or Samsung Galaxy M31. Honest review will be appreciated.

n

My kid sister uses the galaxy a51 si I can confidently tell you, it's a nice slim and sleek device , I can answer every question about the phone because I'm at home at the moment.

I checked the specs of the galaxy m31 and other than the bigger battery and a higher mega pixel count on the rear camera which doesn't neccesarily translate to a better battery they are pretty much similar device , personally I can't tell you which to pick , because it all depends on what you prefer , going by the specs , will you prefer a bigger battery over a front facing fingerprint scanner I swear na wetin e boil down to .

Or you can use another method and go price wise , I like slim and sleek device but the assurances a 6kmah battery gives I swear can't be prised , and since they use the same processor and pretty much the same internals , It all boils down to battery vs under display finger print scanner, and I think any Nigerian will go for the former .

Disclaimer I haven't used the m31 but I'll suggest it sha its newer and that 6kmah battery is the bomb , but I'll suggest you get a feel of both . The processor and pretty much everything inside is almost the same , my advice go for the m31 if the prices are similar.

Another thing least I forget, if its aesthetics you value more , like the punch hole over a notch , well you know what to do. I swear thr punch hole dope sha . With better pouch it can be mistaking for a higher or more premium device ( a51) it's becoming a tough choice . But at the end its still the same thing sha functionality over aesthetics.

That's why I said pick both device and have a feel of both, it would suprise you the sleekness of the a51 can sway your decision and even the 4k may battery still serves my sister a day , and that one rarely they leave social media , I dont know much about games because I've never played a graphics intensive game on any phone I've used .

supercase1:
kolisokoloko



I think any phone above 40k budget is just been an unnecessary asset judging by the present situation of Nigeria I will rather use that money to get a 30k phone and a 50k fairly used laptop
It's is a win win though
kolisokoloko
my opinion though

Speak for yourself,

Interesting so she don turn condom prefect

Joedoyle:
Oga, if Messi dribble you, all you'll do is just run along with him but if Ronaldinho dribble you, hmmm, a 4sqr metre is enough to end your entire career with numerous skills. Ronaldinho was a goal master-piece. He has the best accuracy in football-a player who can comfortably play with the goal post without missing, who can juggle without missing, whose football was for the fans and not just himself.

Ronaldinho played for fun , he was more of an entertainer than a footballer, his game was silky smooth , beautiful sometimes mesmerizing but messi is a total phenomenon a different beast .

Beverlyjean:
Messi has been I the national team for 14 yrs... over the years midfield players like di Maria, taglafico of ajax that's wanted by man u and man city, otamendi , lo Celso and de Paul will make the first team of these countries u mentioned

peak taglafico will not start for any top country in the world and you know the truth , the dimaria you made mention of though he occupies a midfield position plays more like an attacker for then a winger of sorts , I believe he's played in more games as a winger than an actual midfielder n

Rabehdo7:
Who has taken Argentina to the finals?
Argentina carried Messi to the WC final ask MARCOS ROJO. Messi did not score or assist a goal from the round16 to the final.

I'm done with this argument , like I asked y'all likened the Argentine squad to world beaters my simple question is how many of their midfielders would start for Germany, France, England, Brazil , Belgium etc.

Beverlyjean:
...temper temper.... when messi fans face the truth , they become aggressive ... u compared messi with pele saying pele played with weak defenders ... so what makes u think the defenders these days are weak , or did u play during both generations... strikers are even being protected these days compared to back then... hardly will u see players going on long injury holidays like back then... if messi played football during the Maradona / van basten de lima days ...he wud hv retired years ago due to injuries... how dare u go to the Italian league and try to dribble everyone or score lots of goals those days ...

Messis la Liga protection will end once he joins another league and he knows this... flying tackles will await him and if he expects free kicks, he will watch the red wave play on... messi needs highly gifted technical players in a team to thrive ...ronaldo dont need that...

Ur example of pele playing for Malawi is flawed cos messi is not in the category of weah, shevchenko and giggs and had weak national team despite being world class players... messi plays for one of the most reputable teams in football... only Germany, Italy and brazil have bettered Argentinas world cup victories ... Argentina has produced world class players compared to Portugal

A better name any current argentina midfielder or defender that can start for France, England , Brazil or Argentina.

Beverlyjean:
U are still showcasing ur ignorance.... so in ur mind, zidane sabotaged the final against italy so that henry wudnt b a WC winner ... so u dont even know that henry was France top scorer at the 98 WC... besides zidane won the golden ball at that 06 WC ...he was better than henry and wud hv been the first man to win 4 balon dor if not for what happened that day...

Messi definitely dont owe anyone anything but when his fans comes out to claim the greatest , that's when we gonna hv a problem... just imagine if Ronaldo was still in man u and had beaten Shearer's goal record and had won multiple league titles but had not win anything for Portugal and stopped appearing in the CL final after Scholes and Giggs retired but still claims only league titles and top scorer in the EPL but a messi joins liverpool from barca after winning la Liga titles and CL title ...comes to liverpool and set new goal records with an average of one goal per game, win bk to bk to bk CL titles with liverpool, with 6 yr straight top scorer at the CL , wins copa america with Argentina that had previously never won an international trophy... wins EPL titles with liverpool and balon dors with liverpool and then joins Juventus, turns top scorer wins league titles and ronaldo fans will say ronaldo is the greatest and is better that pele and maradona ...wudnt they sound as crazy??

If he wanna spend his whole career at barca there is no problem with that ... xavi , iniesta , totti , maldini , giggs , Scholes, gert muller, Gerrard, di stefano , cruyff all did it but non claims to b the greatest of all time....

Oga at no point did I say this thread was meant for the greatest player .

Secondly you used the fact that zidane won the world cup and henry didn't whilst having better stats as a yardstick to beat him .

Beverlyjean:
Its certain that messi fans are not intelligent... an intelligent person would rather use zidane as an example...did giroud lead france to WC victory?? U guys are really dumb and dumber oooo... truly, those that support messi think like kids and not logical at alllll... it's not bad to stay in a club all ur career , players do that ...but claiming greatest in history is whr we have a problem... u cant b claiming greatest when ur achievements is limited to one club... compare messi with cruyff and di Stefano or even puskas... cruyff was highest goal scorer for ajax at a time and won 3 CL titles with them and also led Holland to their first final which they lost, di stefano won all types of titles with real Madrid and was highest goal scorer in la Liga history at some point and greatest la Liga player at a time but nothing for argentina... puskas led Hungary to their first WC final , highest goal scorer in the history of Hungarian football and has the second best goals per game ratio after Ronaldo in la Liga... these players dont claim greatest players of all time cos they literally played for one club all their lives( apart from puskas) and won nothing for their national teams ... those considered greatest of all time won for both club and country ... pele, Maradona, CR7 , zidane, ronaldinho , gert muller, Franz beckenbauer , van basten

Oga clearly you have a problem with your reasoning faculty if you can't make a point without resorting to names calling I can see the clear evidence of your own dumbness .

You argue without reason , did anybody say the thread was meant for who is greatest or following your smelly analogy now , if pele was to come from, Rwanda and wasn't able to successfully motivate the mediocre cretins playing around him to any national trophy you'd still say he wasn't or can't be called a world beater or one of the greatest , e clear say something they wrong with the way you think .

You can give any justification for your argument , the thread was meant to ask a simply question, why does messi have to leave barcelona , you can't give a satisfactory answer so you spend the rest of your time and energy arguing on baseless things like national honor. So if a player wins only national honors without club honors what then , or a player that's fortunate to be in the right place at the right time , like them varane what then . You're probably gonna bring influence , so who them influenced or motivated France to win the last world cup .

Debating with your type is pointless because you only rile up others to justify the petty and baseless points you're trying to profer . I wish you best of luck sha , anyone you award your lifetime balloon d'or na your cross , since you be your personal fifa

Beverlyjean:
The mumu omitted Maradona taking Argentina to back to back finals....that's to show u these biased minions

Now let me address certain things . You've digressed this argument or debate to irrelevant facets.

1 for a start going by your analogy you're basically saying Jordan Henderson is a better player than Steven Gerrard because he motivated liverpool to win an epl , we both know they have UCL trophy.

2 I never said maradona didn't take them to finals , I simply said messi hasn't taken them to more .

3 you brought the issus of comparing the stats of zidane and Henry which rational person will compare the goals of a midfielder to that of an attacker especially someone as prolific as Henry. And if you have your facts right I think there's an argument that it was zidane who sabotaged Henry's chance to win a world cup irrespective of the circumstances , but your type probably didn't watch the match y'all rely on them say , goal.com or stats . If zidane has led France to win the finals you'd crowned him the hero , but because of his emotions that he couldn't put in check you're using it to blame henry who gave the game his all .

4 the talk about winning trophies , I always ask myself , why is it that most times the winners of certain trophies dont get awarded the mvps. Look at modric , van dijk, griezmann ( laliga best player ) . We all see conspiracies in everything but the simple truth is we mistakenly think we know better than people who spend their entire life in soccer , they breathe eat and live the game . Do you think you know about football more than Wenger mind you zidane came from his country and some other Brazilians who has picked messi as the best player , though that's not thr point .

5 my argument is simple , messi owes no one anything , and he doesn't need to leave Barcelona to prove a smelly point to someone who is not paying his bills. If I tell you to live your house and go to Sambisa for peace keeping your reply would probably " who you " or " who your help " . And you'd be right because you owe me nothing.

6 messi is exceptional , I dont wanna talk about luck or are you gonna say ronaldo inspired Portugal to win the euros from the stands , following his theatrics and antics , are you aware there was a point he was giving conflicting suggestions to the players with the coach and the coach had to shove him away codedly .

7. Maradona is a phenomenon
Pele is amazing
Messi is incredible
Ronaldo is equally great .

Everybody has a unique preference but dont come using some weak , illogical and completely unreasonable reasons to justify why your pick is better than the other .

Initially it was ronaldo then pele now its maradona , pretty soon its gonna be mbappe . If you wanna argue watch all four players, then tell me the goals pele was scoring at random , tell me if he could do it against the likes of them van dijk, Jimenez, Ramos, miranda or those his funny shots if he could score them against , allison and Oblak consistently. That dude was amazing but he was a specialist in exhibition matches against regular Joe's.

Maradona is great , I've seen highlights of him and his skills where mesmerizing . But mu personal preference will always remain messi because he does things you dont expect. Imagine comparing an attacker's playmaking stats to one of the best in the world at present de bruyne . Hmmm make i rest. Before it was laliga was too weak , there's always something y'all use to undermine his success.

obonujoker:
Barca fans like to degrade other players to raise theirs

Apparently you have your facts screwed or somehow mixed up , maybe the term mumu is alright with y'all. I dont need to degrade anyone to make a point.

otipoju:
For sure ,your Papa get mental problem. And if we check well e be like sey crase dey worry your mama join sef.

And if you are not a bloody thief, you wont be advertising a used car as brand new. Mad dog.

As the guy no answer you again sheybe you calm down , I can bet you with anything I have say you aren't interested in buying this car , I'm not gonna say you dont have the resources , because that will be a stretch . Read the insults your hurled on someone's parents , hmmmm God dey sha , I realized na people when no value their parents they always they quick to bring parents up for simple issues .

Mr reflect on your life , choices and actions .

4xplore:
Not true. When they were both at their prime in La-Liga, the English Prem. League was still the most watched in the world. That is not going to change anytime soon.

Most watched and best is not the same o . It's like
Saying most popular equates to best

obonujoker:
Even maradona that dribbled 6 players is still 2nd to Pele.... Even Pele that carried Argentina to win a WC is still 2nd to Pele...

You need to read up and Pele and make your suggestion again... We didnt watch Pele play,but his exploits linger for generations.

Pele
Maradona

Still above many statpadders

FYI.. Pele scored 70 freekicks... Assists weren't counted in his time.... You are asking if Pele could beat 5 player to score a goal...lol.. if Van Nistelrooy could do it, will it be too hard for Pele??

How can you argue and base your argument on the opinion of others , I thought you were an oldie but e clear say you're just another dude who reads football without actually watching the match . I really dont have much to say , I've seen highlights of pele and I believe neymar go even match am on a normal day , abi neymar never almost break his Brazilian goal scoring records .

And what was the opposition your pele faced , dock workers, lumber men and regular Joe's

obonujoker:
Giroud is not in the goat discussion... So it holds no water..

To be the numero Uno, you must be a champion in all sphere of the sport...

This is why Pele is still number 1

So who's a champion in all sphere of the sport , guy footballers are humans , and it takes a perfect human being to be a champion in all sphere of the sport . And I was not saying messing was the number one .

So pele is your number one , I really dont have much to say to you , your type prefer to rely on squawka and other stats oriented sites than to actually watch a game .

Was pele the best set piece taker ?
Was pele more skillful
How many assists did pele give
Could he beat 5 players to score a goal .

Pele is all about his goals , messi is far better as an All rounder than your pele.

obonujoker:
WC bigger than all Messi trophies...

In Argentina history, Maradona is bigger than Messi

Going by your analogy that makes giroud a better player than messi na , or you'll say a more accomplished player because his world cup trumps all of messi's trophies .

Boss unless it's an LG g8 or v40 I doubt there's any phone without a camera bump that can rival an iphones face unlock

obonujoker:
You can not win only at one club, and call yourself greatest of all time

Did pele play outside Brazilian league

obonujoker:
Do you know what Maradona did with Napoli and Argentina??

Has he done what messi has done and moreover how many cup finals did Maradona take argentina to

Look at your Maradona,

Argentina
1x World Champion (1986)
Napoli
1x UEFA-Cup (1989)
2x Italian Champion (1987, 1990)
1x Italian Cup (1987)
1x Italian Super Cup (1991)
FC Barcelona
1x Spanish Cup (1983)
1x Spanish League Cup (1982)
1x Spanish Super Cup (1983)
Boca Juniors
1x Argentinean Champion (1981)

Honours

5x South American Footballer of the Year (1979, '86, '89, '90, '92)
3x Top scorer Argentine League (1979, 1980, 1981)
1x Top scorer Italian League (1988)


mind you he went to four world cup o , the only difference is he won the final and messi didn't, other than that, what else of note did he achieve?

I dare not bring messi trophies and individual honors

Thebwoy:
Best ever single lens camera on an Android phone.

It's a google pixel phone

ojaysam25:
A typical messi fan, often revert to use of vulgar words when being slapped with the truth..
He is a great player but we all know he wouldn't be able to replicate such football in any other team.....
Those messhit asslickers please stop wailing on my mention...we all know i spoke the blunt truth..

Who is we , who cares about your smelly assumptions abi na you they assist am when he they carry Argentina go finals back to back . Una spirit of entitlement is absurd, persons when them no recognize for their compound go they criticize someone when they do his best in his own way . Final question " WHO YOU " ? That will make messi take up a so called no sensical challenge for. You one pay am abi you don see reasonable person when leave a sweet job for us say he one con take up a challenge for a sub par job for Nigeria. Una they reason like say na panel beater they work on una sense.