₦airaland Forum

MrMontella:
please leave him...
I don notice say na troll he be

Real one sef.

felixomor:
Of course, because everyone knows u dont read.

Lol.
Go and read it.

Prove it.

felixomor:
Ewwww.
Go and read it, u will find it.

Your own isn't more than baa baaa meh meh meh. Go and read baa baaa meh meh meh.

felixomor:
I didnt assume bro.
I know.
Yes

Prove it.

felixomor:
Quiet.
The bible already talks about arabia centuries before koran was dreamt of.
U have come again with silly assumptions

Where does the bible mention Mecca or Medina? Arabia is not Saudi Arabia.

randomperson:
As in... Some times I just wonder how the guy reaches his own conclusions. Ridiculous is an understatement

He's a baaa baaa baaa sheep that never stops giving.

felixomor:
Hehehehe.
U have not see anything.
Is it not funny that u guys hate to be asked questions?
Just look at you.

You call jerusalem real but the book u first heard it from is now fake.
U call Egyptians real, but the book u first heard it from is now fake...
U call babylon real, yet the book where u first saw it is now fake.

Continue your selective reasoning.
When u r done, answer my question..

U never see anything.

The way you reason is ridiculous . The first book you ever heard about Mecca is the Koran. But you do not accept the Koran as real do you? The first book you ever heard about Madina is the Koran but to you the Koran is fake.
The Odyssey mentions a lot of the ancient Greek cities and how the people lived their lives. Does that mean that the Greek Gods mentioned in the Oddesy are real?

felixomor:
How do you know Jerusalem is real?
How do u know its not a coincidence?

You keep asking questions, but when they ask you, you start crying like a sheep. Baa Baa baaa, meh meh meh, I can't answer because baaa baaa baaa, meh meh meh.

KingEbukasBlog:
And the law for rape protects the woman not demean her - this has been discussed ad nauseum .

Raping a lady and marrying her protects her how?

randomperson:
Please where is the archeological evidence that supports the resurrection and divinity of Jesus

That one na fiction.

felixomor:
Na lie....
U don goof

Whatever.

DoctorAlien:
Open the link.

Just paste it here.

Where is the archaeological evidence that supports the exodus?

felixomor:
"Peter's daughters"

My God o....
LooooooooLz
You dont even know how to tell lies again?
Where was that?

U just demonstrated u have never opened bible before.
Lol

4everGod should hear this.

Philip I meant to say. You know very well it's an error. I addressed that earlier correctly

KingEbukasBlog:
I can't believe you expect me to repeat all that was said here https://www.nairaland.com/3553021/conclusion-atheism-illogical-atheist-delusion

Well , whatever makes you happy as an atheist

Nothing was answered there. You didn't answer the question. You kept running away from it because you know it exposes all the nonsense you've been saying. The sharia law was given to mankind by God himself. Is it objective? Your deliberate failure to answer it shows that you clearly know that what you are saying is RUBBISH.

4kings:
Pathetic...
Please read what you wrote again...

I tire oo.

KingEbukasBlog:
Sir I thought we are done with this argument .

Objective moral values and duties are what they are regardless of how they are performed .

You know where to discuss this https://www.nairaland.com/3553021/conclusion-atheism-illogical-atheist-delusion/

We are not. If objective moral values exist that means the sharia is Objective. Yes or no? Why don't you want to answer it? Dishonesty? Is the sharia law objective. Pls answer it.

KingEbukasBlog:
Then you agree that objective morals and duties exist , right ?

Is the sharia law objective. God we are told brought it down. Is it objective?

felixomor:
because u didnt read it

Non of them had any leadership position in the church. It's not written any where in the new testament . That was his you said sad Peter's daughters taught in the church when the bible only said they had the ability to prophesy. Making things up is what you do.

felixomor:
If u read it,
U will see them

Go and read it

Non of them had any leadership position anywhere in the NT. It's not written anywhere.

felixomor:
Good.
Did u also read he part where he said a woman can save a man?
Did u read where he encouraged the women church leaders?
Did you?

Which women church leaders. Tell me their leadership position in the church.

felixomor:
Philips daughters were also in the early churches and so many other women who taught in church.

So stop showing this generalized ignorance of the bible.
It didnt apply to all women.

Again, i say, go read it.

No where does it say that Philip's daughters taught in any church.

And the next day we that were of Paul’s company departed, and came unto Caesarea: and we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist; which was one of the seven; and abode with him. And the same man had four daughters, virgins, which did prophesy” (Acts 21:8-9)


His daughters did prohecy. It wasn't stated that they did it inside the church. Prophecy is not teaching. Two very different things.

It's obvious that women used to teach inside the churches and Paul gave injunctions for it to stop to, because he said it during the curse of his evangelism and he said Jesus told him all what he was teaching.

felixomor:
because I know so

Why are the christians that abide by Paul's injunction not to allow women preach in their churches wrong? Abi you don't know what one?

felixomor:
U didnt read it.

Because you said so?

This guy was killed and dumped there. Electricuted corpses don't look like that. They look burnt.

felixomor:
Cop out on someone who doesnt read bible?

I laugh as usual....

I read the passage exactly the way other christians read it. You've failed to tell me why Christians that read it like me are wrong. Many christians abide by that injunction from Paul. Why are they wrong?

felixomor:
Ur answer is above.

Copout as usual.

felixomor:
2 Corinthians 3:6 Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life.

Which spirit is it telling christians to abide by the teachings of Paul telling women not to preach and teach men in church?

felixomor:
Ans. The Holy Spirit

So which of the holy spirit speaks to those that allow women to preach in church and those that don't? Both lay claim to the holy spirit. Or is the holy spirit sending different messages?

felixomor:
I can adress a letter to u and fold an instruction for another person in the body.
U must read everything to discern.
And that u have refused to do.

What criteria do you use to discern which part is for everybody and which part is not? Many christians believe Paul's letters are for all christians. Why are they wrong?

What is there mere commissioner doing there?

felixomor:
Ur topic has changed i hope u know?

You are the one saying it has changed. It hasn't. All of Pauls letters were addressed to a particular people. If we're are to go by your context explanation, then christians are supposed to leave all the injunctions since all were addressed to a particular people.

Why are the christians that abide to Paul's injunctions on women wrong?