dalaman:


You are a liar. From wikipedia

Ichthyology (from Greek: ἰχθύς, ikhthus, "fish"; and λόγος, logos, "study", also known as fish science, is the branch of biology devoted to the study of fish. This includes bony fishes (Osteichthyes), cartilaginous fish (Chondrichthyes), and jawless fish (Agnatha).

Where can it be found that a whale has enough air to make animals survive inside it for prolong period ? We're is the study that says that a whales digestive juices only kick in when Animas have died inside the whale. In which Verde of the ible did you get that becaude there is no scientific evidence for this maybe a spiritual evidence but no scientific one is available. You have been been caught lying as usual.

randomperson:

Oh someone definitely lied. So a great fish was descriptive?! U no try at all... A great fish is not a whale. The bible was wrong .. Holy spirit couldn't inspire the writer to say the actual name of the animal?? .. Or the holy spirit told u it's descriptive? Why didn't the bible even use 'like'?
Thanks for pointing this out...

randomperson:

Oh someone definitely lied. So a great fish was descriptive?! U no try at all... A great fish is not a whale. The bible was wrong .. Holy spirit couldn't inspire the writer to say the actual name of the animal?? .. Or the holy spirit told u it's descriptive? Why didn't the bible even use 'like'?
Thanks for pointing this out...

dalaman:


You are a liar you me the nonsene you wrote up. Prove to me that you didn't make it up.

dalaman:


It is a lie. You just made it up. I actually checked it that was when I realized you lied. Show me where you got the lies you spwed up there.

dalaman:


I just noticed you just concocted some lies. Al what you said previously is not true. The study that show a that whales have enough air to keep living things inside them for a long time can be found where? What about the one that says their digestive juices only kick in when the things inside them are dead. Where is that study that says this.

dalaman:


You are lying. Where is the study that supports all the lies you spew here?

randomperson:

Wow!! Never noticed this . the actual story said fish and Jesus came and said whale. So, was Jesus lying or or was the original writer lying?

dalaman:


Jonah was swallowed by a fish according to the bible. No whale was mentioned there. A whale is NOT a fish.

dalaman:


The bible does not say whale. The bible says fish. Even if it is a whale. You'll have to tell me.if you were there when he survived inside the whale for 3 days and explain to me how a person can survive inside a whale for 3 days. We will take you to the ocean, allow a whale to swallow yu and see if you will survive for 3 days.

dalaman:


Recorded history or recorded mythology. After all if we are to go by your recorded history brouhaha then we can also say that Mohammed divided the moon into two halves and people in other parts of the world saw it.

felixomor:


At least its recorded history.

Show us your own recorded history of how men taught themselves how to marry.

Show us the recorded history of how man invented God.

dalaman:


Where you there when a fish swallowed Johah? But you believe it happened abi? I can also play your games so don't even go there.

KingEbukasBlog:


I have explained to you before what it means to be created in God's image . I'm not sure why the argument is being rehashed .

KingEbukasBlog:


Your preference of creation story -allegorical or literal- is not a prerequisite for eternal life , salvation is . Christianity does not lay any emphasis on how the creation story should be seen . Its a personal choice .

dalaman:


Go and study the history of marriage and how it evolved. The caveman didn't know anything like marriage. Men thought themselves and created most things. Language, writing, culture, laws, religion etc men created and thought themselves all these things.

randomperson:

It's a friggin' analogy... There are documented reports about the Bermuda triangle, just like there is of God. Prove that all those don't exist. U can't... Why?? Because u don't prove negative. Not even in a court of law

dalaman:


I only talk of things that are known. Scientifically a first man is impossible. It has nothing to do with evolution. We can use DNA to trace the first man if there is any such thing. But there is nothing like that. That knowledge is actually what drove some christians to begin the theistic evolution movement.

dalaman:


Obviously you are more interested in attacking a straw man. Sex exist in nature marriage does not. Men thought themselves how to marry women. I was just trying to show that sex exist in nature but marriage does not just forgot to add the marriage part.

Read up on human anthropology and learn.

The people that invented the God idea had to indoctrinate others. Just as when the whites conquered your lands and systematically made your ancestors to stop worshipping the Gods they were worshipping which was their own creation and accept their version of God and accept their religion. Even though your ancestors did not invent the God idea they had to indoctrinate your parents and your parents had to also indoctrinate you and you in turn will have to indoctrinate your Kids to accept a God idea that wasn't yours but that of the white man.

jonbellion:
no they are not
But there have been documented occurrences of them all
So with your earlier comment they must exist

LiberaDeus:


You theists have never debunked the death, disease and suffering argument.

You have never debunked it, you just run away when the heat is much and later come back to claim that you won the argument.

randomperson:

Which data are talking about!? Because there is a manuscript means it must exist??
Okay, lemme give another analogy that might be more apt... Prove there are no aliens... Because there are reports of alien sightings... So prove they don't exist

jonbellion:
actually you can say the same for the people they believe in
-UFOS
-BIGFOOT
-The loch ness monster
-the krakken
-the Bermuda triangle
At least there has benn documented appearances of these

felixomor:


You just equated sex to marriage.
Am I surprised?
For your level, No i am not.

Animals have sex, they dont get married.

Besides u just made a claim on human anthropology, with no evidence again.
And if u say there was nothing like first man on earth.

And with the same mouth, u said humans "started worshipping"
The same mouth that said man had to be indoctrinated.

Somethings are obviously wrong.

jonbellion:
he didn't say evolution
The population bottleneck has never been as low as two people
Does this have to be as a product of evolution

randomperson:

It actually is... By that analogy, he's showing the folly of asking for PROOF OF THE ABSENCE of God.

dalaman:


First man on earth? Scientifically speaking there is nothing like that. Human anthropology has shown us that humans started worshipping natural agents of nature like the sun, the moon, mountains, rivers etc before they started worshipping spirits and later to invisible beings.

If there is anything like the first man then he invented what ever concept of God he worshipped and others after him kept inventing their own various God/Gods concept.

Sex is natural it exist in nature. If you place 20 years old a man that has never seen a woman in his life beside a Nked woman he'll get an erection. If the woman touches him he will respond. He will not have to be tought to have an erection. It will be automatic.

If all the people in the world are to be presented with the bible on their 20th birthday and told that it is the word of God for example many will just laugh and very few will accept it.

dalaman:


How can you start a debate by shutting out the point of your opponent?

Is God good?