Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,152,469 members, 7,816,108 topics. Date: Friday, 03 May 2024 at 05:02 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Damogul's Profile / Damogul's Posts
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 65 pages)
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:40pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: Dalaman save your fingers and use it to show us proof. Stop typing irrelevant things to the OP. Show us your proof simple. 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:37pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
Is there any atheist who can bell the cat and provide us tangle empirically proven proof that God is non existent? That is what this thread is about. Its not about Red Herrings or Goal post shifting or Fallacies in all its forms. Simply Proof. 2 Likes 2 Shares |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:32pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
akintom: You do not believe God exists. Show us your empirical data backing this up if you have one. Or show us something irrefutable especially since science is still unable to disprove God. Show us how you arrived at your own conclusion and stop asking others questions when the OP is about proof. 2 Likes 2 Shares |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:29pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: i have asked you to show me tangible proof to your claim of God being a man made idea by proving to me that you are probably 10000 yrs old and were there when the first man made God idea began and how lack of experiences or head knowledge brought this about. I also asked you to show me proof that you have interviewed all the god proponents worldwide to arrive at your conclusion. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:27pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
randomperson: You see? This is why we say proof is subjective as no proof would ever suffice for an atheist in self denial. You determine what you want as proof and when its given you switch to something else. Pathetic really. |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:25pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: Dalaman stop being coy. Where is your proof to your own claim? Felixomor ignore him till he provides his proof. |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:23pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
jonbellion: Totally! Something you are yet to get to. |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:22pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
ScepticalPyrrho: Do you have any evidence to provide to back up your claim or not? If you do not then my convo with you ends now. Thank you |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:21pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
PDBonline: They seem not to get that part and would rather derail than provide |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:20pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
randomperson: Did you read the OP with understanding or you just want to argue blindly as you love doing? |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:19pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
LiberaDeus: Did you say hide? Hide like you atheists are doing here n NL? I am no hypocrite. Jesus was not a hypocrite either. Do wrong and get bashed simple. I can love you tomorrow but in that moment you will get bashed. My ministry is doing great as its been running for a few years now so its not a dream. God is not all about miracles as miracles are not life. His word is life. If you so much desire miracles then submit YOURSELF for one. |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:11pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
LiberaDeus: So much stupid in one post If yu say atheists are blind should their focus not be for them to see so they can know what the theists know rather than for them to say in their blindness that God does not exist? Can a blind man be drinking water and still declare that water is nonexistent because he has not seen it? Can a fish be in water and claim land dry land does not exist because it has not walked on it or even seen it? Life is all about personal experiences. If an atheist needs proof then they should submit THEMSELVES for a personal experience. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:10pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
ScepticalPyrrho: Is the OP an assumption? The OP was specific! The question was not directed to me so stop being silly. FYI i am 200% sure of my walk with God. I am not into a "RELIGION" i am into a RELATIONSHIP with God...something you dunderheads cannot seem to understand. 3 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:03pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
randomperson: Wrong! In this case you are the prosecution. That is what this thread is about. You say God does not exist so the defendant says you should show us how you arrived at this conclusion. What part of the OP did you not understand? 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 3:00pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
ScepticalPyrrho: If you had any intellect then you would not make any claim if you have not travelled back in time and int the future to see all and know all and spoken with all yet stand so cocksure that what you claim is what it is and should be declared in every ones face and not expect to be asked to show one how you arrived at this alleged fact. Can you accuse me of murder and not be able to provide evidence? Can you say my mathematical calculation is wrong without showing me the right one? Will you just walk up to a teacher and say hey sir you are explaining it wrong and not expect the teacher to ask you for the right explanation? Will you just say it and walk away refusing to answer any question? You need to go back and find out what intellect means. Intellect is meant to be proven. Its practical.... so how have you shown yours is practical? 2 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:53pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: Oga was man communicating with whales or dolphins before? Did they think it possible before? If you wish to communicate with another then you speak their language. Man has been able to deduce through frequency what a whale or dolphin is trying to say when they make certain sounds and have recorded these sounds and use them to communicate with these sea creatures. Are you saying man cannot extract the chemicals in bacteria and use it to control their behavioral patterns via communication? Are you admitting that science is LIMITED? 2 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:50pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: Its obvious you have no proof and are just dodging bullets everywhere. Do you know how complex chemical communication is? Even something as simple as testosterone interpretation or estrogene is way too complex to even understand and here you say bacteria is primitive. Show us your proof to your claim and stop dodging. 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:47pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
LiberaDeus: You know i speak the truth. You know this thread is specific but you just want to be naughty. |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:47pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
randomperson: So if i accuse you of murder and a witness comes and says you were not involved would he not be asked to state his reasons for trying to declare you innocent? 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:44pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: Do you know how ridiculous you sound? You speak with so much certainty without any research or proof to back that up with. Have you tried communicating with bacteria using their method of communication and failed before? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16212498 Bacteria communicate with one another using chemical signal molecules. As in higher organisms, the information supplied by these molecules is critical for synchronizing the activities of large groups of cells. In bacteria, chemical communication involves producing, releasing, detecting, and responding to small hormone-like molecules termed autoinducers . This process, termed quorum sensing, allows bacteria to monitor the environment for other bacteria and to alter behavior on a population-wide scale in response to changes in the number and/or species present in a community. Most quorum-sensing-controlled processes are unproductive when undertaken by an individual bacterium acting alone but become beneficial when carried out simultaneously by a large number of cells. Thus, quorum sensing confuses the distinction between prokaryotes and eukaryotes because it enables bacteria to act as multicellular organisms. This review focuses on the architectures of bacterial chemical communication networks; how chemical information is integrated, processed, and transduced to control gene expression; how intra- and interspecies cell-cell communication is accomplished; and the intriguing possibility of prokaryote-eukaryote cross-communication. Do you call what i highlighted primitive? 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:39pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
LiberaDeus: Since you know this thread is not about the bolded why are you trying to derail it? When that thread is opened then you can grace it. Until then stop derailing this one. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:37pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
Deicide: Keep deceiving yourself. You have been caught read handed. Deicide, eyehategod, blackbolt, ninjaX, fsms, pastafarians. |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:36pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: I have already shown you how you idea of bacteria being primitive is wrong. Are ants primitive? Is communication via a complex method as using chemicals and having chemical receptors primitive? Must all communication be in words to be modern? Back to the topic. Can yu show us your tangible proof to your claim that gods are man made ideas in every tribe, clan, community, hamlet, state, nation. 2 Likes |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:32pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
Blackbolt: kids |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:30pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: Goalpost shifting Research about whale and dolphin communication began as late as in the 2000s but concrete understanding was established in 2006 or so. Before then as far back as the 1900s till when research began nobody could communicate or even thought it was possible to achieve. Google is your friend. Bacteria can communicate and they communicate same way ants communicate by excreting chemicals so ye such chemicals can be extracted and used to trigger communication when applied from man to bacteria. Do i need to school you? 2 Likes |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:26pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
Dalaman can bacteria still not communicate and is it still primitive? |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:25pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
Deicide: Small boy who thinks himself smart. NinjaX and Blackbolt well done. Keep logging out and back in with different monikers |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:24pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: Oga look up ad see your bacteria that cannot communicate which you called primitive 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:21pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: When did man begin learning how to communicate with whales or dolphins. Do you even know science? Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Bacteria communicate with one another using chemical signal molecules. As in higher organisms, the information supplied by these molecules is critical for synchronizing the activities of large groups of cells. Yet you say bacteria cannot communicate because it has no brain right? 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:16pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: I have given you your answer and the one with the clear cut work is actually you. 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:14pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: How did you arrive at the claim i highlighted? Have you exhausted all attempts to communicate with a bacteria? Have you even made any attempt before? When you make certain claims be very careful. Same way they said man cannot communicate with whales or dolphins but today we are able to do that. So what attempt have you made to communicate with a bacterium to prove that they lack the ability to communicate? 1 Like |
Religion / Re: Why Do Atheists Shift The Burden Of Proof? by damogul: 2:12pm On Dec 17, 2016 |
dalaman: What came first. man or nature? How did nature get here? If you are an advocate for evolution then you can make this assertion but you are not. You believe in Creation but not the religious creation. So how then is man needed as an input to the existence of God? If you were not there and have not carried out one single personal research or interview of anyone at at any age then you are not an authority to say for a fact that God does not exist or is a man made idea. All you have are claims based on assumptions. 2 Likes |
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (of 65 pages)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 70 |