₦airaland Forum

flexybobo:
I mean, what a wayward generation that we are, and a. wayward blind religious leaders of this generation.
if you read Bible, people of the apostles days were more intelligent, having understanding of everything.

Maamin:
First does this someone exist to you?

Not really slaughter, but Justice served in love..plus he raised him up back from the dead and gave him a name above every other name and a throne by his right hand, judging all things on earth, beneath the earth and above. Stop beating yourself up..is a win win situation for the believers.

You atheists try way too hard to disregard a none existing God.

E no exist e no exist, but u still dey antagonise and talk bad about am.

E no sweet e no sweet but you don chop the food finish.

malvisguy212:
so you know the verses was not actually talking about slaves? You guys are the one who bring leviticus 25 first, the context of leviticus 25 was actually talking about the YEAR OF JUBILEE, now my response was from the same book of leviticus and you defence was "the verse was not talking about slavery ? You are NOT qualify to interpret the bible.

JANDRENTPR:
My people perish for lack of knowledge. Why did she/he read the bible out of context? I'll be praying for him/her to receive God's mercy. Let him remember that "it's appointed for a man to die once thereafter, judgment. There is no mercy in Hell. May God be with us.

Daniel4wap:
I don't beg pple to repent.wen some1 who don't know ur father insult him on d way, and u are there presently with him. what will b ur action. watch d next 3hours

CuteBidemi:
Tis so funny hw d ao called educated young Nigerian youths misbehave on social media.

D post i about an atheist... and somepple started attacking d Muslims....

secondly, all of us need to rili knw what God really wants...GOD..LORD..Dis r d english names.Allah also means God in Arabic...

I wonder y d hatred... Believe wot u wanna believe....

Leave d atheist to abuse God. u cant fyt for HIM.God fyts for HIMSELF.. So save d machetes n d negative words.

Daniel4wap:
in d next 3hours ask God for mercy.if not will remain blind

247notire:
As a physicist who majored in astronomy I need to point out that thr has to be a God. That's the only possible explanation to the emergence of the singularity from whence the world evolved. QED.

yorubadelta:
Those were the days the laws of Moses were applicable. Jesus Christ came to replace those laws in the New Testament.

I dont understand why athiests on this forum are so heavily invested in bashing a God they claim to not believe in.

malvisguy212:
davien.
The slavery of the past few centuries was often based on skin colour. In the United States, many black people were considered slaves because of their nationality; many slave owners truly believed black people to be inferior human beings, the truth is slavery in this era was because of racism and the bible condemned racism. The Bible condemns race- based slavery in that it teaches that all men are created by God and made in His image (Genesis 1:27).

One thing for sure, the bible condemned man stealing which is what happened in Africa. Africans were rounded up by slave-hunters, who sold them to slave-traders,who brought them to the New World to work on plantations and farms. This practice is condemned by God. In fact, the penalty for such a crime in the Mosaic Law was death:

“Anyone who kidnaps another
and either sells him or still has him when he is caught must be put to
death” ( Exodus 21:16).

Now is this not what happened in Africa during the times of slavery ? Man stealing? The bible condemned it . Slave mention in liviticus was because of poverty.and law was given to guide this slaves.

plaetton:
@Tex & Deepsight,

You continue to miss the point.

Consciousness is simply the sum of interactive information.

Birds, turtles and puppies have billions of years of interactive information programmed by natural processes into their genes, their biology, thie physiology, their instincts.
So , your statements above are not good, well thought out arguments.

AI does not need to go through billion years of evolution to have the prerequisite threshold of interactive information that would make them human-like.
In fact, they do not need human emotions like love, fear, empathy, etc., because those traits were honed over the billions of years as necessities for evolutionary survival. They do not need it.

AI would not learn or social evolve in the same way that humans do, simply because they would bypass all the nuances, hickups, trials and errors of the evolution of human neural circuitry.

Unlike human babies that begin to quickly assimilate information from the moment of birth , to adulthood and most of it's life, AI's learning gradient would be almost instantaneous.
The reason for this is that AI , from the moment it is turned on, can plug itself right into the entire sum of human interactive information, and then stay constantly tuned into it.

Now, since I have stated before that consciousness is simply a product of interactive information, AI would be more alive to the moment than humans , without the nuances of culture, history, religion and genetic dispositions.

osile2012:
A king set a rule, that anyone in his kingdom who violates will die. A servant violated and was sentenced . While the servant is awaiting the execution date, he deceives the kings son to violate.In other for the king to ensure he does not break his word, he takes on the body of his son and is executed. Pays the prices and returns to his throne, keeps the blood he shed as human as an evidence that his sons(childrens ) debt has been paid. Now the kings children are free but the servant will still be executed at the appointed time .

God2man:
It is an overfloged topic on naira land. They have been defeated. They refused to accept the truth. They know that there is God. They do not want to know that they know. They do not want to believe that they know.
God gave them up to a reprobate mind to say foolish things and behave in an irrational manner.


The fool has said in his heart that there is no God.

Says the Bible.
God2man.

Redlyn:
See this guy snaking around

The question is not whether or not god has laws about how to manage slaves.
The question is why does god not condemn Slavery.

"slavery was initiated by the slave" chai

DeepSight:
^^^ Turtles that are born from eggs and abandoned in the sand walk straight to the sea once hatched.

Birds will fly with magnetic traction towards the places in the earth that provide their food according to the season, even new birds.

All of this wonderful grandeur you dare to compare to the infantile technology of mankind.

I COMMAND YOU: SHUT UP: AND PAY RESPECT TO THE GOD THAT WE ARE MADE FROM.

DeepSight:
Jesus Christ! I have to quit on you here if you dont answer the following question correctly.

WHY do you call such a pup defective?

Think deeply o.

If you do not get this question right, I will have to save my time and not further engage you until I see something better from you.

Regards bro!

DeepSight:
Of course! to some wonderful atheistic scientists the very breath of life itself is a pathetic random meaningless happenstance!
Ain't that pathetic?

STFU and revere GOD.

DeepSight:
Nope. That's not what I mean.

Have you ever watched a dog give birth to its pup and see how instantly the pup makes towards the breast that it (should) not know is there and grabs to it for life?

Mind you, this pup cannot even see at the time, its eyes are firmly closed and it is a stranger in the world, knowing NOTHING.

Is that situational learning?

Ol boy.

Think harder.

DeepSight:
. . . . . and nor world dogs. Nor would cats. Nor would birds. Nor would turtles. Nor would anything with the breath of life that moves and creeps upon the earth!

Ah - - - The breath of life! Another point!

Would the best AI have the breath of life?

Lol.

Both points in this post may be lost on you though.

But in your dreams at night, summon them.

DeepSight:
. . . . . . . And if humans were anything comparable to the bold, humans would certainly not need to go through life-school at all!

Lol.

But did you get that?

I doubt it.

malvisguy212:
the king James translated "thou shall not kill" but the original Hebrew translated it you shall not kill" as an atheist , you are not qualify to know what this text mean even some believers may not.

like English, Hebrew, the language in which most of the Old Testament was written, uses different words for intentional vs. unintentional killing. The verse translated "Thou shalt not kill" in the KJV translation, is translated "You shall not murder"in MODERN translations -because these translations represents the REAL meaning of the Hebrew text. The Bible in Basic English translates the phrase, "Do not put anyone to death without cause."
The Hebrew word used here is ratsach,
which nearly always refers to intentionally killing without cause (unless indicated otherwise by CONTEXT). Hebrew law recognized accidental killing as not punishable. In fact, specific cities were designated as "cities of refuge," so that an unintentional killer could flee to escape retribution. The Hebrew word for "kill" in this instance is not ratsach,
but nakah, which can refer to either
premeditated or unintentional killing,
depending upon CONTEXT. Other Hebrew words also can refer to killing.

The punishment for murder was the death sentence. However, to be convicted,there needed to be at least two eyewitnesses. The Bible also
prescribes that people have a right to
defend themselves against attack and
use deadly force if necessary.

Now the question is,IS GOD KILLING JUSTIFY ?
To answer the question whether God
breaks His own commandments, we
need to determine if God committed
murder (i.e., killed people without cause)
The Bible is quite clear that God has
killed people directly (the most
prominent example being the flood) and indirectly (ordered peoples to be killed). If God ordered or participated in the killing of innocent people, then He would be guilty of murder.

So do your research and bring evidence were God kill without a caused.

DeepSight:
You are much more st.upid and unschooled than I ever expected.
How old are you?

DeepSight:
The bold sorts you out. Human-like. Not Human.

These silly questions about asking robots questions are actually unimaginably silly - for the simple reason that any robot can be programmed to give the desired answer of any experiment.

Do you people actually ever look beyond your noses?