₦airaland Forum

plaetton:
Lol.
Another half-wit and his assemblage of convoluted nonsense.

Computer scientist my foot.

dalaman:

texanomaly:
It all comes down to how we define AI and consciousness. Doesn't it?

Yungwizzzy:
I thought these guys were said to be spirits ??

That when a Christian dies he transforms to one, how come they now eat and dine in the kingdom ??

I hope this religion is not scam?

texanomaly:
Planes don't mimic birds. They use the same aerodynamic rules. They are dissimilar in almost every other way except that they both have wings. This is not a good example. Planes don't fly themselves. Even on autopilot they are programmed to do so. Who is grasping at straws now?

You seem to be under the misconception that I don't believe AI is a viable possibility. On the contrary there have been significant advances toward that end. I don't however believe Man will ever come up with an option near what actual humans are.

Oh and if all I've pointed out is so obvious, why do you feel the need to continue debating me.

AllNaijaBlogger:
There will be a cure. We have found people immune to HIV. Just a matter of finding out why and how.

texanomaly:
Emphasis on the bolded.

texanomaly:
I'll give you the bolded. btw HIV/AIDS is manageable with treatment now. There is no cure.

texanomaly:
None of this compares to human intelligence or consciousness. My point is...I'm don't believe Man will ever be able to completely engineer human emotions from A.I. If we are talking machines that can learn, we are already there.

texanomaly:
The bolded makes it still just a program

This statement brings us back to what Uyi said. It all depends on how you define consciousness.

Still programmed.

Which makes me think about the myriad of movies where "self aware" machines make choices based on logic alone, and do not take any extenuating circumstances into consideration.

I read somewhere that artificial intelligence should not be confused with consciousness in the sense of qualia. I agree with this.

Delusiongirl20:
this is the kind of argument that do makes me to dislike all these Christian apologists trying too hard to find reasons to cover up vivid argument.

AllNaijaBlogger:
Really? Is that what you believe.

I wish you could see into the future 500 years from now.


You would have the same look that my cousins from the village had when I showed them how bluetooth radio media works in my car

AllNaijaBlogger:
YES!

I have watched ALL blockbuster robot movies. Try me.


Sha...the main actor in the Ex Machina was a fool....see robot seduce my guy throway am!!

Scholar8200:
At a time when technology was very primitive (unlike today), the need for human capital was very high; productive activities were largely labour-intensive; most times, slaves were required only for economic activities (agriculture, building etc). In fact, those who were poor gave themselves out as slaves to get a benefit eg Jacob, Egyptians to Pharaoh Genesis 47:25,26 etc Hence thew law given was to guide how they were to relate with them given the reality that was obtainable then. An abrupt halt to the practise will mean that, in some cases, the slaves will be worst hit.

malvisguy212:
I know you will not be sincere, anyway, let it sealed in your heart, I've seen many people who find it difficult to even forgive themselves for the wrong they commit ,I've don many bad things in my life that I find its hard to forgive myself, but ever since I make peace with God, I've been doing great.

malvisguy212:
ok, let me not involved anyone here, will you find it easy to forgive yourself for all the evil you commit ?

Scholar8200:
[size=14pt]The ransom is for the life of the owner of the killer Ox[/size] who knew his Ox dangerous tendencies but left it to roam freely
Exodus 21:29,30
29 But if the ox had the habit of goring, and its owner was warned, and he did not take the necessary precautions, and then it killed a man or a woman, the ox must be stoned and the man must be put to death.
30 If a ransom is set for him, then he must pay the redemption for his life according to whatever amount was set for him.

But how do you 'correct' that habit for the Ox?

So, was this referring to a slave? Exodus 21:28 You still sound as though the Ox will gore only slaves!!! [quote]what else would I be talking about when the verse is about slaves

So say your justifications for putting slaves in that ordeal in the first place...

[quote]Your premise for that conclusion is faulty; where is the IF that justify your claim? Seems you don't understand that statement!

author=Scholar8200 post=36570770]
Exodus 21:29,30

29 But if the ox had the habit of goring, and its owner was warned, and he did not take the necessary precautions, and then it killed a man or a woman, the ox must be stoned and the man must be put to death.

'If' shows it is not a command

Oh good, you finally got another soon to be overworked cliche!

malvisguy212:
I cannot take away what you did to me. You are a kind person right? Meaning you agree people make mistake and you accepts their apology,but being a kind person doesn't mean I should take away their responsibility to deal with their mistakes.forget about atheism for now and reason with me.

trapQ:
if Isaac Newton the father of physics could acknowledge God and the bible, also Albert Einstein the greatest chemist could acknowledge GOD then all these atheists can go to hell

malvisguy212:
someone wrongs me and says "I'm sorry, please forgive me", to me these are two different requests. Yes of course I can accept someone's apology, but who am I to forgive them? The responsibility to deal with the
consequences of ones actions both in
the physical world as well as in the
psychological world, is not mine to take
away from someone. I cannot take
away what you did to me. It is not my
place to say to you, it's ok, I forgive
what you did, now you can go on with
your life.

Scholar8200:
Exodus 21:29,30
29 But if the ox had the habit of goring, and its owner was warned, and he did not take the necessary precautions, and then it killed a man or a woman, the ox must be stoned and the man must be put to death.
The Ox had a habit and its owner had been notified by those who witnessed/noticed it.

So the Ox got programmed to read labels before attacking!? Or is it that you did not see that it was mentioned that the Ox could wound one who was not a slave?!

'If' shows it is not a command to sell daughters as slaves.

An overworked cliche by NL atheists!